Optimizing business strategies for carbon energy management in buildings: a machine learning approach in economics and management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energy Efficiency and Management · Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Energy Load and Power Forecasting
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (84)
Show source-provided references
1. Dunn S (2002) Down to business on climate change: an overview of corporate strategies. Greener Manag Int 39:27–4110.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.au.00005 ↗
2. Kolk A, Pinkse J (2004) Market strategies for climate change. Eur Manag J 22(3):304–31410.1016/j.emj.2004.04.011 ↗
3. Shariati M et al (2020) The effect of RBS connection on energy absorption in tall buildings with braced tube frame system. Steel Compos Struct Int J 34(3):393–407
4. Shah SNR et al (2015) Steel rack connections: identification of most influential factors and a comparison of stiffness design methods. PloS One 10(10):e013942210.1371/journal.pone.0139422 ↗
5. Advisors SV (2005) Carbon disclosure project 2005. Third report of the Carbon Disclosure Project. Innovest Strategic Value Advisors and the Carbon Disclosure Project
6. Tang S et al (2023) A glassy carbon electrode modified with a composite consisting of electrodeposited chitosan and carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes for simultaneous voltammetric determination of dopamine, serotonin and melatonin. Carbon Lett 33(7):2129–213910.1007/s42823-023-00556-6 ↗
7. Jalali A et al (2012) Seismic performance of structures with pre-bent strips as a damper. Int J Phys Sci 7(26):4061–4072
8. Shariati M et al (2012) Fatigue energy dissipation and failure analysis of channel shear connector embedded in the lightweight aggregate concrete in composite bridge girders. In: Fifth international conference on engineering failure analysis, pp 1–4
9. Shariati M et al (2020) Performance of composite frame consisting of steel beams and concrete filled tubes under fire loading. Steel Compos Struct Int J 36(5):587–602
10. Okereke C (2007) An exploration of motivations, drivers and barriers to carbon management: the UK FTSE 100. Eur Manag J 25(6):475–48610.1016/j.emj.2007.08.002 ↗
11. Emergent I (2005) Ans Kolk & Jonatan Pinkse
12. Shariati M et al (2020) Evaluation of seismic performance factors for tension-only braced frames. Steel Compos Struct 35(4):599–609
13. Shariati M et al (2020) Evaluating the impacts of using piles and geosynthetics in reducing the settlement of fine-grained soils under static load. Geomech Eng 20(2):87–101
14. Naghipour M et al (2020) Effect of progressive shear punch of a foundation on a reinforced concrete building behavior. Steel Compos Struct Int J 35(2):279–294
15. Soliman SM et al (2015) Experimental and theoretical spectroscopic studies, HOMO–LUMO, NBO analyses and thione–thiol tautomerism of a new hybrid of 1, 3, 4-oxadiazole-thione with quinazolin-4-one. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 145:270–27910.1016/j.saa.2015.01.061 ↗
16. Levy DL, Kolk A (2002) Strategic responses to global climate change: Conflicting pressures on multinationals in the oil industry. Bus Polit 4(3):275–30010.2202/1469-3569.1042 ↗
17. Xia C et al (2023) Spotlighting the boosted energy storage capacity of CoFe2O4/Graphene nanoribbons: a promising positive electrode material for high-energy-density asymmetric supercapacitor. Energy 270:12691410.1016/j.energy.2023.126914 ↗
18. Razavian L et al (2020) Experimental study of the behavior of composite timber columns confined with hollow rectangular steel sections under compression. Struct Eng Mech Int J 74(1):145–156
19. Davoodnabi SM et al (2021) Analyzing shear strength of steel-concrete composite beam with angle connectors at elevated temperature using finite element method. Steel Compos Struct Int J 40(6):853–868
20. Shariati M et al (2022) A novel hybrid extreme learning machine–grey wolf optimizer (ELM-GWO) model to predict compressive strength of concrete with partial replacements for cement. Eng Comput 38:757–77910.1007/s00366-020-01081-0 ↗
21. Levy DL, Newell P (2000) Oceans apart? Business responses to global environmental issues in Europe and the United States. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 42(9):8–2110.1080/00139150009605761 ↗
22. Kim KN et al (2024) Effects of macrostructure of carbon support in preparation of C/Six/C anode materials for lithium-ion batteries via silane decomposition. Carbon Lett10.1007/s42823-024-00756-8 ↗
23. Yazdani M et al (2021) Improving construction and demolition waste collection service in an urban area using a simheuristic approach: a case study in Sydney, Australia. J Cleaner Prod 280:12413810.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124138 ↗
24. Shariati M et al (2019) Application of a hybrid artificial neural network-particle swarm optimization (ANN-PSO) model in behavior prediction of channel shear connectors embedded in normal and high-strength concrete. Appl Sci 9(24):553410.3390/app9245534 ↗
25. Safa M et al (2016) Potential of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for evaluating the factors affecting steel-concrete composite beam’s shear strength. Steel Compos Struct Int J 21(3):679–68810.12989/scs.2016.21.3.679 ↗
26. Chiruvolu S, Rosenauer, ibid., p. 3276; Glatter O, Scherf G, Schillén K, Brown W, bid., 6046; Zhang L, Barlow RJ, Esenberg A, ibid. 28:6055 (1995). 2. Zhang L, Eisenberg A, Science 268:1728 (1995). J Am Chem Soc 118:3168 (1996)
27. Toghroli A et al (2014) Prediction of shear capacity of channel shear connectors using the ANFIS model. Steel Compos Struct 17(5):623–63910.12989/scs.2014.17.5.623 ↗
28. Shariati M et al (2020) Prediction of concrete strength in presence of furnace slag and fly ash using Hybrid ANN-GA (Artificial Neural Network-Genetic Algorithm). Smart Struct Syst Int J 25(2):183–195
29. Katebi J et al (2020) Developed comparative analysis of metaheuristic optimization algorithms for optimal active control of structures. Eng Comput 36:1539–155810.1007/s00366-019-00780-7 ↗
30. Skodvin T, Skjaerseth J (2003) Climate change and the oil industry: common problem, different strategies. Manchester University Press, England
31. Chahnasir ES et al (2018) Application of support vector machine with firefly algorithm for investigation of the factors affecting the shear strength of angle shear connectors. Smart Struct Syst 22(4):413–424
32. Mohammadhassani M et al (2013) Identification of a suitable ANN architecture in predicting strain in tie section of concrete deep beams. Struct Eng Mech Int J 46(6):853–86810.12989/sem.2013.46.6.853 ↗
33. Mohammadhassani M et al (2014) An evolutionary fuzzy modelling approach and comparison of different methods for shear strength prediction of high-strength concrete beams without stirrups. Smart Struct Syst Int J 14(5):785–80910.12989/sss.2014.14.5.785 ↗
34. Shariati M et al (2021) A novel approach to predict shear strength of tilted angle connectors using artificial intelligence techniques. Eng Comput 37:2089–210910.1007/s00366-019-00930-x ↗
35. Sedghi Y et al (2018) Application of ANFIS technique on performance of C and L shaped angle shear connectors. Smart Struct Syst 22(3):335–340
36. Toghroli A et al (2018) Potential of soft computing approach for evaluating the factors affecting the capacity of steel–concrete composite beam. J Intell Manuf 29(8):179310.1007/s10845-016-1217-y ↗
37. Safa M, Kachitvichyanukul V (2019) Moment rotation prediction of precast beam to column connections using extreme learning machine. Struct Eng Mech Int J 70(5):639–647
38. Mehrabi P et al (2019) Moment-rotation estimation of steel rack connection using extreme learning machine. Steel Compos Struct 31:427–435
39. Shariati M et al (2021) Hybridization of metaheuristic algorithms with adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system to predict load-slip behavior of angle shear connectors at elevated temperatures. Compos Struct 278:11452410.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114524 ↗
40. Chotia V et al (2024) AI-enabled green business strategy: path to carbon neutrality via environmental performance and green process innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 202:12331510.1016/j.techfore.2024.123315 ↗
41. Shariati M et al (2019) Application of Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) and Genetic Programming (GP) to design steel-concrete composite floor systems at elevated temperatures. Steel Compos Struct 33(3):319–332
42. Safa M et al (2020) Development of neuro-fuzzy and neuro-bee predictive models for prediction of the safety factor of eco-protection slopes. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 550:12404610.1016/j.physa.2019.124046 ↗
43. Shariati M et al (2020) Identification of the most influencing parameters on the properties of corroded concrete beams using an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS). Steel Compos Struct 34(1):155
44. Tiwari S et al (2021) Freight consolidation and containerization strategy under business as usual scenario & carbon tax regulation. J Clean Prod 279:12327010.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123270 ↗
45. Shariati M et al (2024) Flexural behavior analysis of double honeycomb steel composite encased concrete beams: An integrated experimental and finite element study. Case Stud Constr Mater 20:e03299
46. Peng J et al (2022) Prediction and optimization of the flexural behavior of corroded concrete beams using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system. Structures 43:200–20810.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.043 ↗
47. Kirat Y, Prodromou T, Suardi S (2024) Unveiling the Nexus: climate change, green innovation, and the pendulum of energy consumption and carbon emissions. Energy Econ 10772710.1016/j.eneco.2024.107727 ↗
48. Petković B et al (2022) Adaptive neuro fuzzy evaluation of energy and non-energy material productivity impact on sustainable development based on circular economy and gross domestic product. Bus Strategy Environ 31(1):129–14410.1002/bse.2878 ↗
49. Wei Z et al (2021) On the optimization of building energy, material, and economic management using soft computing. Adv Concr Constr 11(6):455–468
50. Liang R et al (2022) Buildings’ internal heat gains prediction using artificial intelligence methods. Energy Build 258:11179410.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111794 ↗
51. Shi Y, Yang B (2024) Study on the impact of green digital finance on low-carbon transition of energy consumption structure under multidimensional perspective-empirical evidence from China. Energy Strategy Rev 54:10144510.1016/j.esr.2024.101445 ↗
52. Soni A et al (2023) Synergy of silica sand and waste plastics as thermoplastic composites on abrasive wear characteristics under conditions of different loads and sliding speeds. Chemosphere 323:13823310.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138233 ↗
53. Zandi Y et al (2023) Advanced integration of iot and neural networks for real-time structural health monitoring and assessment of bridges. Int J Civil Eng Advancements (IJCEA) 1(1):1–9
54. Gauch HL et al (2023) What really matters in multi-storey building design? A simultaneous sensitivity study of embodied carbon, construction cost, and operational energy. Appl Energy 333:12058510.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120585 ↗
55. Chu X et al (2017) Evaluation of CCHP system performance based on operational cost considering carbon tax. Energy Proc 142:2930–293510.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.419 ↗
56. Shi X, Xu Y, Liu C (2024) China’s environmental tax reform achieves the co-management of carbon and haze: the role of optimizing energy utilization. Atmos Pollut Res 15(8):10218010.1016/j.apr.2024.102180 ↗
57. Xia M et al (2024) Exergy, energy, economy analysis and multi-objective optimization of a comprehensive energy utilization system for LNG-powered ships based on zero-carbon emissions. Case Stud Therm Eng 53:10378310.1016/j.csite.2023.103783 ↗
58. Huynh-Van V, Tran-Thanh P (2019) Discrete sliding mode control design for piezoelectric actuator. J Adv Eng Comput 3(3):492–50210.25073/jaec.201933.254 ↗
59. Zhang J, Chen K (2024) Research on carbon asset trading strategy based on PSO-VMD and deep reinforcement learning. J Clean Prod 435:14032210.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140322 ↗
60. Thiagi TT, James S (2023) Comprehensive predictive modeling of earthquake resilience in multi-story buildings utilizing advanced machine learning techniques. Int J Civil Eng Advancements (IJCEA) 1(1):10–19
61. Shahabi E et al (2023) Innovative computational approaches to developing sustainable urban infrastructure: optimizing green roof systems for enhanced water management and environmental benefits. Int J Civil Eng Advancements (IJCEA) 1(1):20–29
62. Shariati M et al (2023) Evaluating the use of recycled glass in concrete mixtures: a comprehensive strength and durability analysis using neural networks for mix ratio optimization. Int J Civil Eng Advancements (IJCEA) 1(1):30–39
63. Toghroli E et al (2023) Utilizing advanced machine learning algorithms for predicting the fatigue life of steel-reinforced concrete structures under variable load conditions. Int J Civil Eng Advancements (IJCEA) 1(1):40–48
64. Mohammad M et al (2023) Advanced computational techniques for the assessment of wind load impact on high-rise building structures. Int J Civil Eng Advancements (IJCEA) 1(1):49–57
65. Pan Y et al (2024) Deep reinforcement learning for multi-objective optimization in BIM-based green building design. Autom Constr 166:10559810.1016/j.autcon.2024.105598 ↗
66. Amaku JF, Taziwa R (2024) Sequestration of chromium by Ananas comosus extract–coated nanotubes: synthesis, characterization, optimization, thermodynamics, kinetics, and antioxidant activities. Biomass Convers Biorefin10.1007/s13399-023-05210-9 ↗
67. Toghroli A et al (2020) Analysis of extended end plate connection equipped with SMA bolts using component method. Steel Compos Struct Int J 36(2):213–228
68. Zhang Y et al (2024) Deep reinforcement learning for artificial upwelling energy management. Ocean Eng 306:11798010.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117980 ↗
69. Kumar P et al (2024) Exploring the role of activated charcoal from lignocellulosic biomass wastes for sustainable water treatment. J Energy Inst 114:10162610.1016/j.joei.2024.101626 ↗
70. Ramirez IA et al (2024) Development and evaluation of an expedited system for creation of single walled carbon nanotube platforms. Carbon Lett 34(5):1343–135410.1007/s42823-024-00691-8 ↗
71. Wang H et al (2024) Assessing the sustainability of time-dependent electric demand responsive transit service through deep reinforcement learning. Energy 296:13099910.1016/j.energy.2024.130999 ↗
72. Tao W et al (2024) Artificial intelligence-driven transformations in low-carbon energy structure: evidence from China. Energy Econ 136:10771910.1016/j.eneco.2024.107719 ↗
73. Safarkhani M et al (2024) Carbon-based nanomaterials for CRISPR/Cas delivery: a perspective on the design approach. Carbon Lett 34(1):387–39710.1007/s42823-023-00655-4 ↗
74. Xu L, Yang J (2024) Carbon pricing policies and renewable energy development: analysis based on cross-country panel data. J Environ Manag 366:12178410.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121784 ↗
75. Stanley P et al (2023) Valid inferences about soil carbon in heterogeneous landscapes. Geoderma 430:11632310.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116323 ↗
76. Forrester DI et al (2024) Sensitivity analysis of the FullCAM model: context dependency and implications for model development to predict Australia’s forest carbon stocks. Ecol Model 489:11063110.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110631 ↗
77. Ghosh B et al (2024) Spatiotemporal distribution of carbon monoxide dynamics and probabilistic health risk assessment: a comprehensive sensitivity analysis across India’s state capitals. Environ Chall 15:10089110.1016/j.envc.2024.100891 ↗
78. Liu W et al (2024) Acid rain reduced soil carbon emissions and increased the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ 923:17137010.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171370 ↗
79. Zampou E et al (2022) A design theory for energy and carbon management systems in the supply chain. J Assoc Inf Syst 23(1):329–371
80. Liou JJ (2015) Building an effective system for carbon reduction management. J Clean Prod 103:353–36110.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.053 ↗
81. Herold DM, Lee K-H (2017) Carbon management in the logistics and transportation sector: an overview and new research directions. Carbon Manag 8(1):79–9710.1080/17583004.2017.1283923 ↗
82. Hannan MA et al (2018) A review of internet of energy based building energy management systems: issues and recommendations. IEEE Access 6:38997–3901410.1109/ACCESS.2018.2852811 ↗
83. Schulze M et al (2016) Energy management in industry—a systematic review of previous findings and an integrative conceptual framework. J Clean Prod 112:3692–370810.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.060 ↗
84. May G et al (2017) Energy management in manufacturing: From literature review to a conceptual framework. J Clean Prod 167:1464–148910.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.191 ↗