journal article·2024-10

Production of multilayer graphene using molten Sn–Ni alloy as catalyst in a bubble column

Yangdong He, Shaomu Wen, Wei Yang, Changcang Qiao, Ming Xie, Li Chen, Xinqi Yang, Yongliang Tang

Carbon Letters· Volume 34· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Advancements in Battery Materials · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV et al (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–669. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
2. Orlita M, Faugeras C, Plochocka P, Neugebauer P, Martinez G, Maude DK et al (2008) Approaching the dirac point in high-mobility multilayer epitaxial graphene. Phys Rev Lett 101:267601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.26760110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.267601 ↗
3. Castro Neto AH, Guinea F, Peres NMR, Novoselov KS, Geim AK (2009) The electronic properties of graphene. Rev Mod Phys 81:109–162. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
4. Di C-A, Wei D, Yu G, Liu Y, Guo Y, Zhu D (2008) Patterned graphene as source/drain electrodes for bottom-contact organic field-effect transistors. Adv Mater 20:3289–3293. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20080015010.1002/adma.200800150 ↗
5. Zhu Y, Murali S, Cai W, Li X, Suk JW, Potts JR et al (2010) Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater 22:3906–3924. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20100106810.1002/adma.201001068 ↗
6. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321:385–388. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
7. Geim AK, Novoselov KS (2009) The rise of graphene. In: Rodgers P (Eds) Nanoscience and technology: a collection of reviews from nature journals. Macmillan Publishers Ltd, UK, pp 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814287005_000210.1142/9789814287005_0002 ↗
8. Coscia U, Palomba M, Ambrosone G, Barucca G, Cabibbo M, Mengucci P et al (2017) A new micromechanical approach for the preparation of graphene nanoplatelets deposited on polyethylene. Nanotechnology 28:194001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aa673d10.1088/1361-6528/aa673d ↗
9. Chen J, Duan M, Chen G (2012) Continuous mechanical exfoliation of graphene sheets via three-roll mill. J Mater Chem 22:19625. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm33740a10.1039/c2jm33740a ↗
10. Sinclair RC, Suter JL, Coveney PV (2019) Micromechanical exfoliation of graphene on the atomistic scale. Phys Chem Chem Phys 21:5716–5722. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp07796g10.1039/c8cp07796g ↗
11. Hummers WS, Offeman RE (2002) Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 80:1339–1339. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01539a01710.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
12. Pei S, Cheng H-M (2012) The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 50:3210–3228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.01010.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.010 ↗
13. Chen Z, Qi Y, Chen X, Zhang Y, Liu Z (2019) Direct CVD growth of graphene on traditional glass: methods and mechanisms. Adv Mater 31:e1803639. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180363910.1002/adma.201803639 ↗
14. Xin H, Zhao Q, Chen D, Li W (2018) Roll-to-roll mechanical peeling for dry transfer of chemical vapor deposition graphene. J Micro Nano-Manuf 6:031004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404044910.1115/1.4040449 ↗
15. Sutter PW, Flege JI, Sutter EA (2008) Epitaxial graphene on ruthenium. Nat Mater 7:406–411. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat216610.1038/nmat2166 ↗
16. Subrahmanyam KS, Panchakarla LS, Govindaraj A, Rao CNR (2009) Simple method of preparing graphene flakes by an arc-discharge method. J Phys Chem C 113:4257–4259. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp900791y10.1021/jp900791y ↗
17. Lin L, Peng H, Liu Z (2019) Synthesis challenges for graphene industry. Nat Mater 18:520–524. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0341-410.1038/s41563-019-0341-4 ↗
18. Geißler T, Abánades A, Heinzel A, Mehravaran K, Müller G, Rathnam RK et al (2016) Hydrogen production via methane pyrolysis in a liquid metal bubble column reactor with a packed bed. Chem Eng J 299:192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.06610.1016/j.cej.2016.04.066 ↗
19. Farmer TC, McFarland EW, Doherty MF (2019) Membrane bubble column reactor model for the production of hydrogen by methane pyrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:14721–14731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.02310.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.023 ↗
20. Qiao C, Che J, Wang J, Wang X, Qiu S, Wu W et al (2023) Cost effective production of high quality multilayer graphene in molten Sn bubble column by using CH4 as carbon source. J Alloys Compd 930:167495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16749510.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167495 ↗
21. Tang Y, Peng P, Wang S, Liu Z, Zu X et al (2017) Continuous production of graphite nanosheets by bubbling chemical vapor deposition using molten copper. Chem Mater 29:8404–8411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0295810.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02958 ↗
22. Upham DC, Agarwal V, Khechfe A, Snodgrass ZR, Gordon MJ et al (2017) Catalytic molten metals for the direct conversion of methane to hydrogen and separable carbon. Science 358:917–921. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao502310.1126/science.aao5023 ↗
23. Kim J, Oh C, Oh H, Lee Y, Seo H et al (2023) Catalytic methane pyrolysis for simultaneous production of hydrogen and graphitic carbon using a ceramic sparger in a molten NiSn alloy. Carbon 207:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2023.02.05310.1016/j.carbon.2023.02.053 ↗
24. Galtsov-Tsientsiala MS, Dudoladov AO, Grigorenko AV, Vlaskin MS (2023) Study of soot deposits during continuous methane pyrolysis in a corundum tube. Appl Sci 13:10817. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13191081710.3390/app131910817 ↗
25. El Rouby WMA (2015) Crumpled graphene: preparation and applications. RSC Adv 5:66767–66796. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra10289h10.1039/c5ra10289h ↗
26. Zang J, Ryu S, Pugno N, Wang Q, Tu Q, Buehler MJ et al (2013) Multifunctionality and control of the crumpling and unfolding of large-area graphene. Nat Mater 12:321–325. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat354210.1038/nmat3542 ↗
27. Warren BE, Bodenstein P (1966) The shape of two-dimensional carbon black reflections. Acta Crystallogr 20:602–605. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X6600146410.1107/S0365110X66001464 ↗
28. Seehra MS, Narang V, Geddam UK, Stefaniak AB (2017) Correlation between X-ray diffraction and Raman spectra of 16 commercial graphene-based materials and their resulting classification. Carbon N Y 111:380–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.01010.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.010 ↗
29. Romero A, Lavin-Lopez MP, Sanchez-Silva L, Valverde JL, Paton-Carrero A (2018) Comparative study of different scalable routes to synthesize graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. Mater Chem Phys 203:284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.10.01310.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.10.013 ↗
30. Saleh TA (2011) The influence of treatment temperature on the acidity of MWCNT oxidized by HNO3 or a mixture of HNO3/H2SO4. Appl Surf Sci 257:7746–7751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.02010.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.020 ↗
31. Surekha G, Krishnaiah KV, Ravi N, Padma Suvarna R (2020) FTIR, Raman and XRD analysis of graphene oxide films prepared by modified Hummers method. J Phys Conf Ser 1495:012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1495/1/01201210.1088/1742-6596/1495/1/012012 ↗
32. Sudesh N, Kumar S, Das C, Bernhard GDV (2013) Effect of graphene oxide doping on superconducting properties of bulk MgB2. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26:095008. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/26/9/09500810.1088/0953-2048/26/9/095008 ↗
33. Pham VH, Cuong TV, Hur SH, Oh E, Kim EJ, Shin EW et al (2011) Chemical functionalization of graphene sheets by solvothermal reduction of a graphene oxide suspension in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone. J Mater Chem 21:3371–3377. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm02790a10.1039/c0jm02790a ↗
34. Nethravathi C, Rajamathi M (2008) Chemically modified graphene sheets produced by the solvothermal reduction of colloidal dispersions of graphite oxide. Carbon 46:1994–1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2008.08.01310.1016/j.carbon.2008.08.013 ↗
35. Saleh TA, Sarı A, Tuzen M (2017) Effective adsorption of antimony(III) from aqueous solutions by polyamide-graphene composite as a novel adsorbent. Chem Eng J 307:230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.07010.1016/j.cej.2016.08.070 ↗
36. Htwe YZN, Chow WS, Suda Y, Thant AA, Mariatti M (2019) Effect of electrolytes and sonication times on the formation of graphene using an electrochemical exfoliation process. Appl Surf Sci 469:951–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.02910.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.029 ↗
37. Hamra AAB, Lim HN, Chee WK, Huang NM (2016) Electro-exfoliating graphene from graphite for direct fabrication of supercapacitor. Appl Surf Sci 360:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.00610.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.006 ↗
38. Sengupta I, Chakraborty S, Talukdar M, Pal SK, Chakraborty S (2018) Thermal reduction of graphene oxide: how temperature influences purity. J Mater Res 33:4113–4122. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.33810.1557/jmr.2018.338 ↗
39. Jan R, Habib A, Akram MA, Ahmad I, Shah A, Sadiq M et al (2017) Flexible, thin films of graphene–polymer composites for EMI shielding. Mater Res Express 4:035605. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa635110.1088/2053-1591/aa6351 ↗
40. Zahid M, Nawab Y, Gulzar N, Rehan ZA, Shakir MF, Afzal A et al (2019) Fabrication of reduced graphene oxide (RGO) and nanocomposite with thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) for EMI shielding application. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 31:967–974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-02607-z10.1007/s10854-019-02607-z ↗
41. Liang J, Wang Y, Huang Y, Ma Y, Liu Z, Cai J et al (2009) Electromagnetic interference shielding of graphene/epoxy composites. Carbon 47:922–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2008.12.03810.1016/j.carbon.2008.12.038 ↗
42. Cho J, Gao L, Tian J, Cao H, Wu W, Yu Q et al (2011) Atomic-scale investigation of graphene grown on Cu foil and the effects of thermal annealing. ACS Nano 5:3607–3613. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn103338g10.1021/nn103338g ↗
43. Li X, Magnuson CW, Venugopal A, Tromp RM, Hannon JB, Vogel EM et al (2011) Large-area graphene single crystals grown by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition of methane on copper. J Am Chem Soc 133:2816–2819. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja109793s10.1021/ja109793s ↗
44. Liu N, Fu L, Dai B, Yan K, Liu X, Zhao R et al (2011) Universal segregation growth approach to wafer-size graphene from non-noble metals. Nano Lett 11:297–303. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl103962a10.1021/nl103962a ↗
45. Mattevi C, Kim H, Chhowalla M (2011) A review of chemical vapour deposition of graphene on copper. J Mater Chem 21:3324–3334. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm02126a10.1039/c0jm02126a ↗
46. Geng D, Wu B, Guo Y, Huang L, Xue Y, Chen J et al (2012) Uniform hexagonal graphene flakes and films grown on liquid copper surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:7992–7996. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.120033910910.1073/pnas.1200339109 ↗
47. Guo W, Xu C, Xu K, Deng J, Guo W, Yurgens A et al (2016) Rapid chemical vapor deposition of graphene on liquid copper. Synth Met 216:93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.09.01110.1016/j.synthmet.2015.09.011 ↗
48. Xue X, Xu Q, Wang H, Liu S, Jiang Q, Yu Z et al (2019) Gas-flow-driven aligned growth of graphene on liquid copper. Chem Mater 31:1231–1236. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0399810.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03998 ↗
49. Jankowski M, Saedi M, La Porta F, Manikas AC, Tsakonas C, Cingolani JS et al (2021) Real-time multiscale monitoring and tailoring of graphene growth on liquid copper. ACS Nano 15:9638–9648. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c1037710.1021/acsnano.0c10377 ↗
50. Hsiao S-T, Ma C-CM, Tien H-W, Liao W-H, Wang Y-S, Li S-M et al (2013) Using a non-covalent modification to prepare a high electromagnetic interference shielding performance graphene nanosheet/water-borne polyurethane composite. Carbon 60:57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.05610.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.056 ↗