A method to characterize ink performance by line resistance measurement through modeling for direct pen writing
Source abstract
Abstract
The rational evaluation of carbon-based conductive ink performance is critical to both industrial production and applications. Herein, a model to evaluate writing performance of conductive ink by line resistance was proposed by investigating possible relations among different parameters and establishing relevant model to estimate ink writing performance. Bulk conductive inks were prepared and characterized to provide samples for model. To improve the precision of model, the impact of external factors including writing speed and angle was studied. Nonlinear regression and back propagation artificial neural network were employed to estimate line resistance, and cross check validation was conducted to prove robustness and precision of model. Most importantly, the investigation will open up a new path for the exploration of other carbon-based handwritten electronic devices.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Hu X, Dinu CZ (2020) A bio-pen for direct writing of single molecules on user-functionalized surfaces. Nanoscale Adv 2:156–165. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9na00379g10.1039/c9na00379g ↗
2. Kee S, Zhang P, Travas-Sejdic J (2020) Direct writing of 3D conjugated polymer micro/nanostructures for organic electronics and bioelectronics. Polym Chem 11:4530–4541. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0py00719f10.1039/d0py00719f ↗
3. Nuntawong N, Limwichean S, Horprathum M, Patthanasettakul V, Ketkong A, Thamaphat K, Petchruangrong P, Jankong S, Kasikijwiwat P, Chindaudom P, Eiamchai P (2020) Improved discrimination of pen inks on document by surface-enhanced Raman substrate fabricated by magnetron sputtering. Optik 201:163499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.16349910.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163499 ↗
4. Tang S, Guo Z, Shao J, Yu X-F, Xie H-H, Li Y, Li P, Zhang L, Fu RKY, Wang H, Chu PK (2016) Drawing-fabrication of multifarious nanoplasmonic platform on PLLA paper for optimized SERS performance. J Raman Spectrosc 47:687–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.488910.1002/jrs.4889 ↗
5. Zhao CF, Wang J, Zhang ZQ, Sun Z, Maimaitimin Z (2022) Silver-based conductive ink on paper electrodes based on micro-pen writing for electroanalytical applications. ChemElectroChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.20220094810.1002/celc.202200948 ↗
6. Xu LY, Yang GY, Jing HY, Wei J, Han YD (2014) Ag-graphene hybrid conductive ink for writing electronics. Nanotechnology 25:055201. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/25/5/05520110.1088/0957-4484/25/5/055201 ↗
7. Yang M, Chen Y, Wang H, Zou Y, Wu P, Zou J, Jiang J (2022) Solvothermal preparation of CeO2 nanoparticles–graphene nanocomposites as an electrochemical sensor for sensitive detecting pentachlorophenol. Carbon Lett 32:1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-022-00353-710.1007/s42823-022-00353-7 ↗
8. Pagkali V, Stavra E, Soulis D, Economou A (2021) Development of a high-throughput low-cost approach for fabricating fully drawn paper-based analytical devices using commercial writing tools. Chemosensors 9:178. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors907017810.3390/chemosensors9070178 ↗
9. Liao Y, Tian Y, Ma X, Zhao M, Qian J, Wang X (2020) Flexible electronics directly written with an ultrastable ballpoint pen based on a graphene nanosheets/MWCNTs/carbon black nanocomposite. ACS Appl Electron Mater 2:4072–4079. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.0c0086610.1021/acsaelm.0c00866 ↗
10. Johnston L, Yang J, Han J, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Tang J (2022) Intermetallic wetting enabled high resolution liquid metal patterning for 3D and flexible electronics. J Mater Chem C 10:921–931. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1tc04877e10.1039/d1tc04877e ↗
11. Chen TH, Yeh YC, Liao YC (2018) Healable and foldable carbon nanotube/wax conductive composite. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:24217–24223. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b0831010.1021/acsami.8b08310 ↗
12. Hu M, Cai X, Guo Q, Bian B, Zhang T, Yang J (2016) Direct pen writing of adhesive particle-free ultrahigh silver salt-loaded composite ink for stretchable circuits. ACS Nano 10:396–404. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b0508210.1021/acsnano.5b05082 ↗
13. Russo A, Ahn BY, Adams JJ, Duoss EB, Bernhard JT, Lewis JA (2011) Pen-on-paper flexible electronics. Adv Mater 23:3426–3430. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20110132810.1002/adma.201101328 ↗
14. Huang S, Zhao C, Pan W, Cui Y, Wu H (2015) Direct writing of half-meter long CNT based fiber for flexible electronics. Nano Lett 15:1609–1614. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl504150a10.1021/nl504150a ↗
15. Rahim MA, Centurion F, Han J, Abbasi R, Mayyas M, Sun J, Christoe MJ, Esrafilzadeh D, Allioux FM, Ghasemian MB, Yang J, Tang J, Daeneke T, Mettu S, Zhang J, Uddin MH, Jalili R, Kalantar-Zadeh K (2020) Polyphenol-induced adhesive liquid metal inks for substrate-independent direct pen writing. Adv Func Mater 31:2007336. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20200733610.1002/adfm.202007336 ↗
16. Zou J, Wu J, Wang Y, Deng F, Jiang J, Zhang Y, Liu S, Li N, Zhang H, Yu J, Zhai T, Alshareef HN (2022) Additive-mediated intercalation and surface modification of MXenes. Chem Soc Rev 51:2972–2990. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs01487g10.1039/d0cs01487g ↗
17. Li F, Anjarsari Y, Wang J, Azzahiidah R, Jiang J, Zou J, Xiang K, Ma H, Arramel A (2022) Modulation of the lattice structure of 2D carbon-based materials for improving photo/electric properties. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-022-00380-410.1007/s42823-022-00380-4 ↗
18. Jiang J, Xiong Z, Wang H, Liao G, Bai S, Zou J, Wu P, Zhang P, Li X (2022) Sulfur-doped g-C3N4/g-C3N4 isotype step-scheme heterojunction for photocatalytic H2 evolution. J Mater Sci Technol 118:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.12.01810.1016/j.jmst.2021.12.018 ↗
19. Bai S, Yang M, Jiang J, He X, Zou J, Xiong Z, Liao G, Liu S (2021) Recent advances of MXenes as electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. npj 2D Mater Appl. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-021-00259-410.1038/s41699-021-00259-4 ↗
20. Jiang J, Li N, Zou J, Zhou X, Eda G, Zhang Q, Zhang H, Li LJ, Zhai T, Wee ATS (2019) Synergistic additive-mediated CVD growth and chemical modification of 2D materials. Chem Soc Rev 48:4639–4654. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cs00348g10.1039/c9cs00348g ↗
21. Zou J, Wu S, Liu Y, Sun Y, Cao Y, Hsu J-P, Shen Wee AT, Jiang J (2018) An ultra-sensitive electrochemical sensor based on 2D g-C3N4/CuO nanocomposites for dopamine detection. Carbon 130:652–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.00810.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.008 ↗
22. Jiang J, Ou-yang L, Zhu L, Zheng A, Zou J, Yi X, Tang H (2014) Dependence of electronic structure of g-C 3 N 4 on the layer number of its nanosheets: a study by Raman spectroscopy coupled with first-principles calculations. Carbon 80:213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.08.05910.1016/j.carbon.2014.08.059 ↗
23. Prestowitz LCO, Emery JD, Huang J (2021) Polysketch pen: drawing from materials chemistry to create interactive art and sensors using a polyaniline ink. J Chem Educ 98:2055–2061. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c0133010.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01330 ↗
24. Liu S, Li J, Shi X, Gao E, Xu Z, Tang H, Tong K, Pei Q, Liang J, Chen Y (2017) Rollerball-pen-drawing technology for extremely foldable paper-based electronics. Adv Electron Mater 3:1700098. https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.20170009810.1002/aelm.201700098 ↗
25. Jason NN, Shen W, Cheng W (2015) Copper nanowires as conductive ink for low-cost draw-on electronics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:16760–16766. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0452210.1021/acsami.5b04522 ↗
26. Poulin A, Aeby X, Siqueira G, Nystrom G (2021) Versatile carbon-loaded shellac ink for disposable printed electronics. Sci Rep 11:23784. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03075-410.1038/s41598-021-03075-4 ↗
27. Mathew EE, Manoj B (2022) Disorders in graphene: types, effects and control techniques-a review. Carbon Lett 32:431–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-021-00289-410.1007/s42823-021-00289-4 ↗
28. Deng FX, Jiang JZ, Sires I (2022) State-of-the-art review and bibliometric analysis on electro-Fenton process. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-022-00420-z10.1007/s42823-022-00420-z ↗
29. Wang J, Qin Q, Li F, Anjarsari Y, Sun W, Azzahiidah R, Zou J, Xiang K, Ma H, Jiang J, Arramel A (2022) Recent advances of MXenes Mo2C-based materials for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-022-00401-210.1007/s42823-022-00401-2 ↗
30. Xiang X, Zhu Y, Gao CQ, Du H, Guo CW (2022) Study on the structure of reduced graphene oxide prepared by different reduction methods. Carbon Lett 32:557–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-021-00287-610.1007/s42823-021-00287-6 ↗
31. Verma SK, Das AK, Gantait S, Panwar Y, Kumar V, Brestic M (2022) Green synthesis of carbon-based nanomaterials and their applications in various sectors: a topical review. Carbon Lett 32:365–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-021-00294-710.1007/s42823-021-00294-7 ↗
32. Kim D, Kim KH, Lim C, Lee YS (2022) Carbon-coated SiOx anode materials via PVD and pyrolyzed fuel oil to achieve lithium-ion batteries with high cycling stability. Carbon Lett 32:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-021-00314-610.1007/s42823-021-00314-6 ↗
33. Raya I, Kzar HH, Mahmoud ZH, Ahmed AA, Ibatova AZ, Kianfar E (2022) A review of gas sensors based on carbon nanomaterial. Carbon Lett 32:339–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-021-00276-910.1007/s42823-021-00276-9 ↗
34. Kumar S, Goswami M, Singh N, Soni P, Sathish N, Kumar S (2022) Pristine graphene-ink for 3D-printed flexible solid-state supercapacitor. Carbon Lett 32:979–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-022-00331-z10.1007/s42823-022-00331-z ↗
35. Wang CN, Bai LJ, Zhao F, Bai LZ (2022) Activated carbon fibers derived from natural cattail fibers for supercapacitors. Carbon Lett 32:907–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-022-00329-710.1007/s42823-022-00329-7 ↗
36. Yang CY, Kao CL, Hung PY (2022) Preparation of activated carbon from waste cation exchange resin and its application in wastewater treatment. Carbon Lett 32:461–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-021-00275-w10.1007/s42823-021-00275-w ↗
37. Shoaib AGM, El Nemr A, El Sikaily A, Masoud MS, Ramadan MS (2022) Amidoxime modification of polyacrylonitrile/Pterocladia capillacea-derived activated carbon composite for adsorption of toxic chromium from aquatic environment. Carbon Lett 32:513–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-021-00281-y10.1007/s42823-021-00281-y ↗
38. Murjani BO, Kadu PS, Bansod M, Vaidya SS, Yadav MD (2022) Carbon nanotubes in biomedical applications: current status, promises, and challenges. Carbon Lett 32:1207–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-022-00364-410.1007/s42823-022-00364-4 ↗
39. Davaji HE, Shamoradi F, Panjepour M, Ahmadian M (2022) Preparation and characterization of carbon felt/carbon composites by chemical vapor infiltration process. Carbon Lett 32:201–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-021-00267-w10.1007/s42823-021-00267-w ↗
40. Morgan ML, Curtis DJ, Deganello D (2019) Control of morphological and electrical properties of flexographic printed electronics through tailored ink rheology. Org Electron 73:212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2019.05.02710.1016/j.orgel.2019.05.027 ↗
41. Hase A (2022) Evaluation of writing performance for different types of ballpoint pen ink by acoustic emission sensing. Lubricants 10:44. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants1003004410.3390/lubricants10030044 ↗
42. Liao Y, Zhang R, Wang H, Ye S, Zhou Y, Ma T, Zhu J, Pfefferle LD, Qian J (2019) Highly conductive carbon-based aqueous inks toward electroluminescent devices, printed capacitive sensors and flexible wearable electronics. RSC Adv 9:15184–15189. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra01721f10.1039/c9ra01721f ↗
43. Yan K, Li J, Pan L, Shi Y (2020) Inkjet printing for flexible and wearable electronics. APL Mater. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.003166910.1063/5.0031669 ↗
44. Liu Y, Ma X, Zhang H, Sun J, Qian J, Wang X (2022) Large-scale production of electrothermal films with GNSs/CNTs/CB three-dimensional structure ink by screen printing. ACS Appl Electron Mater 4:814–822. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.1c0117210.1021/acsaelm.1c01172 ↗
45. Jeong SM, Lim T, Park J, Han CY, Yang H, Ju S (2019) Pen drawing display. Nat Commun 10:4334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12395-z10.1038/s41467-019-12395-z ↗
46. Mayerhoefer TG, Mutschke H, Popp J (2016) Employing theories far beyond their limits-the case of the (Boguer-) Beer-Lambert law. ChemPhysChem 17:1948–1955. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.20160011410.1002/cphc.201600114 ↗
47. Sharma V, Kumar R (2017) Dating of ballpoint pen writing inks via spectroscopic and multiple linear regression analysis: a novel approach. Microchem J 134:104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2017.05.01410.1016/j.microc.2017.05.014 ↗
48. Fan Y, Feng B, Yang L, Zhang Y (2019) Application of artificial neural network optimization for resilient ceramic parts fabricated by direct ink writing. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 17:217–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.1339410.1111/ijac.13394 ↗
49. Yan S-R, Kalbasi R, Nguyen Q, Karimipour A (2020) Sensitivity of adhesive and cohesive intermolecular forces to the incorporation of MWCNTs into liquid paraffin: experimental study and modeling of surface tension. J Mol Liquids 310:113235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11323510.1016/j.molliq.2020.113235 ↗
50. Nair KG, Jayaseelan D, Biji P (2015) Direct-writing of circuit interconnects on cellulose paper using ultra-long, silver nanowires based conducting ink. RSC Adv 5:76092–76100. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra10837c10.1039/c5ra10837c ↗