Utilization of carbon dioxide onto activated carbon fibers for surface modification
Source abstract
Abstract
Increasing demand for fossil fuels is associated with massive atmospheric CO2 levels. Considering that numerous studies have been published with CO2 capturing techniques, utilizing techniques are yet in early stage with financial or technical issues. As a part of chemical conversion in CO2 utilization, this paper investigated the performance of a CO2 and H2O mixture (CHM) onto activated carbon fibers (ACF) for surface modification. CHM-treated ACF samples were prepared at a pressure of 20 bar with 100 °C of water vapor and 750 μL of CO2 for 1 h through the gas-phase, and labeled as C-ACF850. For the control sample, N-ACF850 was also prepared by the impregnation of nitric acid. Physiochemical analyses revealed that the overall characteristics of C-ACF850 lay between ACF850 and N-ACF850. C-ACF850 experienced minimized surface area decrement (21.92% better than N-ACF850), but increased surface functional groups (50.47% better than ACF850). C-ACF850 also showed preferable adsorption efficiency on selected metals, in which case both physical and chemical properties of adsorbent affect the overall adsorption efficiency. In this regard, a novel applicability of CHM may present an appealing alternative to traditionally used strong acids.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis · Polymer Foaming and Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Peter SC (2018) Reduction of CO2 to chemicals and fuels: a solution to global warming and energy crisis. ACS Energy Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0087810.1021/acsenergylett.8b00878 ↗
2. Tokarska KB, Gillett NP, Arora VK, Lee WG, Zickfeld K (2018) The influence of non-CO2 forcings on cumulative carbon emissions budgets. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaafdd10.1088/1748-9326/aaafdd ↗
3. Cox PM, Huntingford C, Williamson MS (2018) Emergent constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity from global temperature variability. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature2545010.1038/nature25450 ↗
4. Shafer WD, Jacobs G, Graham UM, Hamdeh HH, Davis BH (2019) Increased CO2 hydrogenation to liquid products using promoted iron catalysts. J Catal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2018.11.00110.1016/j.jcat.2018.11.001 ↗
5. Olajire AA (2018) Recent progress on the nanoparticles-assisted greenhouse carbon dioxide conversion processes. J CO2 Util. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.02.01210.1016/j.jcou.2018.02.012 ↗
6. Kar S, Goeppert A, Galvan V, Chowdhury R, Olah J, Prakash GS (2018) A carbon-neutral CO2 capture, conversion, and utilization cycle with low-temperature regeneration of sodium hydroxide. J Am Chem Soc. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b0932510.1021/jacs.8b09325 ↗
7. Mohsin HM, Johari K, Shariff AM (2018) Virgin coconut oil (VCO) and potassium glycinate (PG) mixture as absorbent for carbon dioxide capture. Fuel. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.01010.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.010 ↗
8. Meylan FD, Moreau V, Erkman S (2015) CO2 utilization in the perspective of industrial ecology, an overview. J CO2 Util. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2015.05.00310.1016/j.jcou.2015.05.003 ↗
9. Burhan M, Jain SK (2012) Tools for search, analysis and management of patent portfolios. DESIDOC J Libr Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.32.3.237610.14429/djlit.32.3.2376 ↗
10. Botomé ML, Poletto P, Junges J, Perondi D, Dettmer A, Godinho M (2017) Preparation and characterization of a metal-rich activated carbon from CCA-treated wood for CO2 capture. Chem Eng J 321:614–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.00410.1016/j.cej.2017.04.004 ↗
11. Díez N, Álvarez P, Granda M, Blanco C, Santamaría R, Menéndez R (2015) CO2 adsorption capacity and kinetics in nitrogen-enriched activated carbon fibers prepared by different methods. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.12610.1016/j.cej.2015.06.126 ↗
12. Shim JW, Park SJ, Ryu SK (2001) Effect of modification with HNO3 and NaOH on metal adsorption by pitch-based activated carbon fibers. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00290-610.1016/S0008-6223(00)00290-6 ↗
13. Mochida I, Korai Y, Shirahama M, Kawano S, Hada T, Seo Y, Yasutake A (2000) Removal of SOx and NOx over activated carbon fibers. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00179-710.1016/S0008-6223(99)00179-7 ↗
14. Kang KC, Kim SS, Choi JW, Kwon SH (2008) Sorption of Cu2 + and Cd2 + onto acid-and base-pretreated granular activated carbon and activated carbon fiber samples. J Ind Eng Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2007.08.00710.1016/j.jiec.2007.08.007 ↗
15. Harned HS, Davis R Jr (1943) The ionization constant of carbonic acid in water and the solubility of carbon dioxide in water and aqueous salt solutions from 0 to 50. J Am Chem Soc. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01250a05910.1021/ja01250a059 ↗
16. Shedlovsky T, MacInnes DA (1935) The first ionization constant of carbonic acid, 0 to 38, from conductance measurements. J Am Chem Soc. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01312a06410.1021/ja01312a064 ↗
17. Tavanai H, Jalili R, Morshed M (2009) Effects of fiber diameter and CO2 activation temperature on the pore characteristics of polyacrylonitrile based activated carbon nanofibers. Surf Interface Anal. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.310410.1002/sia.3104 ↗
18. Manocha SM (2003) Porous carbons. Sadhana. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0271714210.1007/BF02717142 ↗
19. Pines D, Ditkovich J, Mukra T, Miller Y, Kiefer PM, Daschakraborty S, Pines E (2016) How acidic is carbonic acid? J Phys Chem B. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b1242810.1021/acs.jpcb.5b12428 ↗
20. Galib M, Hanna G (2014) Molecular dynamics simulations predict an accelerated dissociation of H 2 CO 3 at the air–water interface. Phys Chem Chem Phys. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP03302G10.1039/C4CP03302G ↗
21. Sakakura T, Choi JC, Yasuda H (2007) Transformation of carbon dioxide. Chem Rev. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068357u10.1021/cr068357u ↗
22. Rayner CM (2007) The potential of carbon dioxide in synthetic organic chemistry. Org Proc Res Dev. https://doi.org/10.1021/op060165d10.1021/op060165d ↗
23. Galib M, Hanna G (2014) Molecular dynamics simulations predict an accelerated dissociation of H 2 CO 3 at the air–water interface. Phys Chem Chem Phys. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP03302G10.1039/C4CP03302G ↗
24. Liu P, Harder E, Berne BJ (2005) Hydrogen-bond dynamics in the air—water interface. J Phy Chem B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp046807l10.1021/jp046807l ↗
25. Wang H, Zeuschner J, Eremets M, Troyan I, Willams J (2016) Stable solid and aqueous H2CO3 from CO2 and H2O at high pressure and high temperature. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1990210.1038/srep19902 ↗
26. Hunter SE, Savage PE (2003) Acid-catalyzed reactions in carbon dioxide-enriched high-temperature liquid water. Ind Eng Chem Res. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie020565z10.1021/ie020565z ↗
27. Yang S, Li L, Xiao T, Zheng D, Zhang Y (2016) Role of surface chemistry in modified ACF (activated carbon fiber)-catalyzed peroxymonosulfate oxidation. Appl Surf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.16310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.163 ↗
28. Gokce Y, Aktas Z (2014) Nitric acid modification of activated carbon produced from waste tea and adsorption of methylene blue and phenol. Appl Surf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.21410.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.214 ↗
29. Boehm HP (2002) Surface oxides on carbon and their analysis: a critical assessment. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00165-810.1016/S0008-6223(01)00165-8 ↗
30. Boehm HP (1994) Some aspects of the surface chemistry of carbon blacks and other carbons. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)90031-010.1016/0008-6223(94)90031-0 ↗
31. Park MS, Ko Y, Jung MJ, Lee YS (2015) Stabilization of pitch-based carbon fibers accompanying electron beam irradiation and their mechanical properties. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2015.16.2.12110.5714/CL.2015.16.2.121 ↗
32. Ryu SK, Park BJ, Park SJ (1999) XPS analysis of carbon fiber surfaces—anodized and interfacial effects in fiber–epoxy composites. J Colloid Interface Sci. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1999.624010.1006/jcis.1999.6240 ↗
33. Park SJ, Jang YS, Shim JW, Ryu SK (2003) Studies on pore structures and surface functional groups of pitch-based activated carbon fibers. J Colloid Interface Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00081-410.1016/S0021-9797(02)00081-4 ↗
34. Zhang Y, Sun B, Deng S, Wang Y, Peng H, Li Y, Zhang X (2010) Methyl orange degradation by pulsed discharge in the presence of activated carbon fibers. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.02.02310.1016/j.cej.2010.02.023 ↗
35. Huang Y, Zhao G (2016) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon fibers from liquefied wood by KOH activation. Holzforschung. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2015-005110.1515/hf-2015-0051 ↗
36. Mo D, Ye D (2009) Surface study of composite photocatalyst based on plasma modified activated carbon fibers with TiO2. Surf Coat Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.10.00710.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.10.007 ↗
37. Chen S, Liu J, Zeng H (2005) Structure and antibacterial activity of silver-supporting activated carbon fibers. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-3149-310.1007/s10853-005-3149-3 ↗
38. Huang ZH, Kang F, Zheng YP, Yang JB, Liang KM (2002) Adsorption of trace polar methy-ethyl-ketone and non-polar benzene vapors on viscose rayon-based activated carbon fibers. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00292-510.1016/S0008-6223(01)00292-5 ↗
39. Chen S, Xu R, Huang H, Yi F, Zhou X, Zeng H (2007) Reduction–adsorption behavior of platinum ions on activated carbon fibers. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1748-x10.1007/s10853-007-1748-x ↗