Self-supporting laser-induced graphene-based electrodes for efficient OER and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural oxidation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. Barreto L, Makihira A, Riahi K (2003) The hydrogen economy in the 21st century: a sustainable development scenario. Int J Hydrog Energy 28:267–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3199(02)00074-510.1016/s0360-3199(02)00074-5 ↗
2. Marbán G, Valdés-Solís T (2007) Towards the hydrogen economy? Int J Hydrog Energy 32:1625–1637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.12.01710.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.12.017 ↗
3. Yu Z, Duan Y, Feng X et al (2021) Clean and affordable hydrogen fuel from alkaline water splitting: past, recent progress, and future prospects. Adv Mater 33:2007100. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200710010.1002/adma.202007100 ↗
4. Schalenbach M, Tjarks G, Carmo M et al (2016) Acidic or alkaline? Towards a new perspective on the efficiency of water electrolysis. J Electrochem Soc 163:F3197–F3208. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0271611jes10.1149/2.0271611jes ↗
5. Jamesh M-I, Harb M (2021) Tuning the electronic structure of the earth-abundant electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) to achieve efficient alkaline water splitting – a review. J Energy Chem 56:299–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.08.00110.1016/j.jechem.2020.08.001 ↗
6. Hou J, Wu Y, Zhang B et al (2019) Rational design of nanoarray architectures for electrocatalytic water splitting. Adv Funct Mater 29:1808367. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20180836710.1002/adfm.201808367 ↗
7. Chen X, Zeng G, Gao T et al (2017) In situ formation of high performance Ni-phytate on Ni-foam for efficient electrochemical water oxidation. Electrochem Commun 74:42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2016.09.01010.1016/j.elecom.2016.09.010 ↗
8. Ma TY, Dai S, Jaroniec M, Qiao SZ (2014) Metal-organic framework derived hybrid Co3 O4 -carbon porous nanowire arrays as reversible oxygen evolution electrodes. J Am Chem Soc 136:13925–13931. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja508255310.1021/ja5082553 ↗
9. Lu X, Zhao C (2015) Electrodeposition of hierarchically structured three-dimensional nickel–iron electrodes for efficient oxygen evolution at high current densities. Nat Commun 6:6616. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms761610.1038/ncomms7616 ↗
10. Liu Y, Liang X, Gu L et al (2018) Corrosion engineering towards efficient oxygen evolution electrodes with stable catalytic activity for over 6000 hours. Nat Commun 9:2609. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05019-510.1038/s41467-018-05019-5 ↗
11. Zhou W, Wu X-J, Cao X et al (2013) Ni3S2 nanorods/Ni foam composite electrode with low overpotential for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Energy Environ Sci 6:2921. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee41572d10.1039/c3ee41572d ↗
12. Chen P, Xu K, Fang Z et al (2015) Metallic Co4 N porous nanowire arrays activated by surface oxidation as electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. Angew Chem 127:14923–14927. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.20150648010.1002/ange.201506480 ↗
13. Zheng W, Liu M, Lee LYS (2020) Best practices in using foam-type electrodes for electrocatalytic performance benchmark. ACS Energy Lett 5:3260–3264. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0195810.1021/acsenergylett.0c01958 ↗
14. Ji L, Meduri P, Agubra V et al (2016) Graphene-based nanocomposites for energy storage. Adv Energy Mater 6:1502159. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20150215910.1002/aenm.201502159 ↗
15. Chen W, Li S, Chen C, Yan L (2011) Self-assembly and embedding of nanoparticles by in situ reduced graphene for preparation of a 3D graphene/nanoparticle aerogel. Adv Mater 23:5679–5683. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20110283810.1002/adma.201102838 ↗
16. Chen K, Shi L, Zhang Y, Liu Z (2018) Scalable chemical-vapour-deposition growth of three-dimensional graphene materials towards energy-related applications. Chem Soc Rev 47:3018–3036. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CS00852J10.1039/C7CS00852J ↗
17. Lin J, Peng Z, Liu Y et al (2014) Laser-induced porous graphene films from commercial polymers. Nat Commun 5:5714. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms671410.1038/ncomms6714 ↗
18. Ye R, James DK, Tour JM (2018) Laser-induced graphene. Acc Chem Res 51:1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0008410.1021/acs.accounts.8b00084 ↗
19. Zhang Q, Zhang F, Liu X et al (2023) Doping of laser-induced graphene and its applications. Adv Mater Technol 8:2300244. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.20230024410.1002/admt.202300244 ↗
20. Jo SG, Ramkumar R, Lee JW (2024) Recent advances in laser-induced graphene-based materials for energy storage and conversion. Chemsuschem 17:e202301146. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20230114610.1002/cssc.202301146 ↗
21. Tang C, Zhang R, Lu W et al (2017) Energy-saving electrolytic hydrogen generation: Ni2 P nanoarray as a high-performance non-noble-metal electrocatalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed 56:842–846. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20160889910.1002/anie.201608899 ↗
22. Yu Z-Y, Lang C-C, Gao M-R et al (2018) Ni–Mo–O nanorod-derived composite catalysts for efficient alkaline water-to-hydrogen conversion via urea electrolysis. Energy Environ Sci 11:1890–1897. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE00521D10.1039/C8EE00521D ↗
23. You B, Liu X, Jiang N, Sun Y (2016) A general strategy for decoupled hydrogen production from water splitting by integrating oxidative biomass valorization. J Am Chem Soc 138:13639–13646. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b0712710.1021/jacs.6b07127 ↗
24. You B, Sun Y (2018) Innovative strategies for electrocatalytic water splitting. Acc Chem Res 51:1571–1580. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0000210.1021/acs.accounts.8b00002 ↗
25. Huang Y, Chong X, Liu C et al (2018) Boosting hydrogen production by anodic oxidation of primary amines over a NiSe nanorod electrode. Angew Chem Int Ed 57:13163–13166. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20180771710.1002/anie.201807717 ↗
26. Pal P, Saravanamurugan S (2019) Recent advances in the development of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural oxidation with base (nonprecious)-metal-containing catalysts. Chemsuschem 12:145–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20180174410.1002/cssc.201801744 ↗
27. Chen L, Liu Y (2025) Advances and prospects of selective electrocatalytic upgrading of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural to furan-2,5-dicarboxylic acid. Chem Rec 25:e202400238. https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.20240023810.1002/tcr.202400238 ↗
28. Bozell JJ, Petersen GR (2010) Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates—the US Department of Energy’s “Top 10” revisited. Green Chem 12:539. https://doi.org/10.1039/b922014c10.1039/b922014c ↗
29. Eerhart AJJE, Faaij APC, Patel MK (2012) Replacing fossil based PET with biobased PEF; process analysis, energy and GHG balance. Energy Environ Sci 5:6407. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee02480b10.1039/c2ee02480b ↗
30. Yang Y, Mu T (2021) Electrochemical oxidation of biomass derived 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF): pathway, mechanism, catalysts and coupling reactions. Green Chem 23:4228–4254. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC00914A10.1039/D1GC00914A ↗
31. Gong M, Dai H (2015) A mini review of NiFe-based materials as highly active oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts. Nano Res 8:23–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-014-0591-z10.1007/s12274-014-0591-z ↗
32. Friebel D, Louie MW, Bajdich M et al (2015) Identification of highly active Fe sites in (Ni,Fe)OOH for electrocatalytic water splitting. J Am Chem Soc 137:1305–1313. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja511559d10.1021/ja511559d ↗
33. Qin M, Chen J, Qi M et al (2024) Constructing heteronuclear bridging atoms toward bifunctional electrocatalysis. ACS Catal 14:8414–8426. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.4c0170510.1021/acscatal.4c01705 ↗
34. Fu S, Song J, Zhu C et al (2018) Ultrafine and highly disordered Ni2Fe1 nanofoams enabled highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline electrolyte. Nano Energy 44:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.01010.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.010 ↗
35. Sahoo RC, Paniya S, Singh R et al (2024) Heterostructured Ni2 Co layered double hydroxide/reduced graphene oxide nanosheets for H2 production assisted by benzylamine oxidation. ACS Appl Nano Mater 7:26457–26467. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c0416510.1021/acsanm.4c04165 ↗
36. Cao L, Zhu S, Pan B et al (2020) Stable and durable laser-induced graphene patterns embedded in polymer substrates. Carbon 163:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.03.01510.1016/j.carbon.2020.03.015 ↗
37. Zhao W, Jiang Y, Yu W et al (2022) Wettability controlled surface for energy conversion. Small 18:2202906. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20220290610.1002/smll.202202906 ↗
38. Zhao W, Yu W, Jiang Y et al (2022) Patterning of thermosetting resins via laser engraving towards efficient thermal management. Nano Energy 100:107477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10747710.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107477 ↗
39. Yu W, Peng Y, Cao L et al (2021) Free-standing laser-induced graphene films for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 183:600–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.07.05510.1016/j.carbon.2021.07.055 ↗
40. Han X, Ye R, Chyan Y et al (2018) Laser-induced graphene from wood impregnated with metal salts and use in electrocatalysis. ACS Appl Nano Mater 1:5053–5061. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b0116310.1021/acsanm.8b01163 ↗
41. Feng Y, Yu X-Y, Paik U (2016) N-doped graphene layers encapsulated NiFe alloy nanoparticles derived from MOFs with superior electrochemical performance for oxygen evolution reaction. Sci Rep 6:34004. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3400410.1038/srep34004 ↗
42. Cui X, Ren P, Deng D et al (2016) Single layer graphene encapsulating non-precious metals as high-performance electrocatalysts for water oxidation. Energy Environ Sci 9:123–129. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE03316K10.1039/C5EE03316K ↗
43. Chen X, Li D, Li Y et al (2022) Short-brush NiFeOxHy films and the Pt derivative as high-performance electrode materials for efficient electrocatalytic water splitting. Appl Surf Sci 574:151636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15163610.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151636 ↗
44. Zhang M, Liu Y, Liu B et al (2020) Trimetallic NiCoFe-layered double hydroxides nanosheets efficient for oxygen evolution and highly selective oxidation of biomass-derived 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. ACS Catal 10:5179–5189. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c0000710.1021/acscatal.0c00007 ↗
45. Jin P, Zhang L, Wu Z et al (2024) Heterogeneous interface induced Co3O4-NiO catalyst for efficient electrocatalytic 5-hydroxymethylfurfural oxidation. Chem Eng J 481:148303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.14830310.1016/j.cej.2023.148303 ↗
46. Zhao Q, Yang J, Liu M et al (2018) Tuning electronic push/pull of ni-based hydroxides to enhance hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions for water splitting. ACS Catal 8:5621–5629. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b0156710.1021/acscatal.8b01567 ↗
47. Zhang J, Ren M, Li Y, Tour JM (2018) In situ synthesis of efficient water oxidation catalysts in laser-induced graphene. ACS Energy Lett 3:677–683. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0004210.1021/acsenergylett.8b00042 ↗
48. Biesinger MC, Payne BP, Grosvenor AP et al (2011) Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl Surf Sci 257:2717–2730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.05110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 ↗
49. Bo X, Hocking RK, Zhou S et al (2020) Capturing the active sites of multimetallic (oxy)hydroxides for the oxygen evolution reaction. Energy Environ Sci 13:4225–4237. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EE01609H10.1039/D0EE01609H ↗
50. Sha Y, Peng Y, Huang K et al (2022) 3D binder-free integrated electrodes prepared by phase separation and laser induction (PSLI) method for oxygen electrocatalysis and zinc-air battery. Adv Energy Mater 12:2200906. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20220090610.1002/aenm.202200906 ↗
51. Bediako DK, Lassalle-Kaiser B, Surendranath Y et al (2012) Structure-activity correlations in a nickel-borate oxygen evolution catalyst. J Am Chem Soc 134:6801–6809. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja301018q10.1021/ja301018q ↗
52. Gao M, Sheng W, Zhuang Z et al (2014) Efficient water oxidation using nanostructured α-nickel-hydroxide as an electrocatalyst. J Am Chem Soc 136:7077–7084. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja502128j10.1021/ja502128j ↗
53. Deng X, Kang X, Li M et al (2020) Coupling efficient biomass upgrading with H2 production via bifunctional Cux S@NiCo-LDH core–shell nanoarray electrocatalysts. J Mater Chem A 8:1138–1146. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA06917H10.1039/C9TA06917H ↗
54. Hui T, Liu H, Li T et al (2024) Efficient electrooxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural via phosphate intercalated hydroxides: a dual-cycle mechanism. Appl Catal B Environ Energy 355:124147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.12414710.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124147 ↗
55. Gong M, Li Y, Wang H et al (2013) An advanced Ni–Fe layered double hydroxide electrocatalyst for water oxidation. J Am Chem Soc 135:8452–8455. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja402771510.1021/ja4027715 ↗
56. Trotochaud L, Young SL, Ranney JK, Boettcher SW (2014) Nickel-iron oxyhydroxide oxygen-evolution electrocatalysts: the role of intentional and incidental iron incorporation. J Am Chem Soc 136:6744–6753. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja502379c10.1021/ja502379c ↗
57. Klaus S, Cai Y, Louie MW et al (2015) Effects of Fe electrolyte impurities on Ni(OH)2 /NiOOH structure and oxygen evolution activity. J Phys Chem C 119:7243–7254. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0010510.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00105 ↗
58. Gao T, Li X, Chen X et al (2021) Ultra-fast preparing carbon nanotube-supported trimetallic Ni, Ru, Fe heterostructures as robust bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting. Chem Eng J 424:130416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.13041610.1016/j.cej.2021.130416 ↗
59. Khan I, Baig N, Bake A et al (2023) Robust electrocatalysts decorated three-dimensional laser-induced graphene for selective alkaline OER and HER. Carbon 213:118292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2023.11829210.1016/j.carbon.2023.118292 ↗
60. Zhang J, Ren M, Wang L et al (2018) Oxidized laser-induced graphene for efficient oxygen electrocatalysis. Adv Mater 30:1707319. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170731910.1002/adma.201707319 ↗
61. Zhang J, Zhang C, Sha J et al (2017) Efficient water-splitting electrodes based on laser-induced graphene. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:26840–26847. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0672710.1021/acsami.7b06727 ↗
62. Wang N, Bo X, Zhou M (2022) Single-step and room-temperature synthesis of laser-induced Pt/VC nanocomposites as effective bifunctional electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution and oxygen evolution reactions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14:23332–23341. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c0074710.1021/acsami.2c00747 ↗
63. Ye R, Chyan Y, Zhang J et al (2017) Laser-induced graphene formation on wood. Adv Mater 29:1702211. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170221110.1002/adma.201702211 ↗
64. Yang Y, Xu D, Zhang B et al (2022) Substrate molecule adsorption energy: an activity descriptor for electrochemical oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF). Chem Eng J 433:133842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.13384210.1016/j.cej.2021.133842 ↗
65. Cheng Z, Hu J, Zhou W et al (2024) Carbon layer confined Co–Ni bimetallic oxide heterojunctions for high-efficiency electrosynthesis of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid. J Mater Chem A 12:13400–13408. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TA01159G10.1039/D4TA01159G ↗
66. Lu L, Wen C, Wang H et al (2023) Tailoring the electron structure and substrate adsorption energy of Ni hydroxide via Co doping to enhance the electrooxidation of biomass-derived chemicals. J Catal 424:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2023.05.00110.1016/j.jcat.2023.05.001 ↗
67. Zhu P, Shi M, Shen Z et al (2024) Electrocatalytic conversion of biomass-derived furan compounds: mechanisms, catalysts and perspectives. Chem Sci 15:4723–4756. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SC00546E10.1039/D4SC00546E ↗
68. Lv Y, Zhang L, Xiao Q et al (2024) Recent advances of Ni-based electrocatalyst for driving selective electrooxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural into 2,5-furandicarbox-ylic acid. Int J Hydrog Energy 72:149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.37210.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.372 ↗
69. Zhao Y, Cai M, Xian J et al (2021) Recent advances in the electrocatalytic synthesis of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid from 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural. J Mater Chem A 9:20164–20183. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA04981J10.1039/D1TA04981J ↗
70. Zhou P, Lv X, Huang H et al (2024) Construction of Ag─Co(OH)2 tandem heterogeneous electrocatalyst induced aldehyde oxidation and the co-activation of reactants for biomass effective and multi-selective upgrading. Adv Mater 36:2312402. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20231240210.1002/adma.202312402 ↗
71. Wu J, Zhai Z, Yin S, Wang S (2024) General formation of interfacial assembled hierarchical micro-nano arrays for biomass upgrading-coupled hydrogen production. Adv Funct Mater 34:2308198. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20230819810.1002/adfm.202308198 ↗
72. Chen W, Shi J, Wu Y et al (2024) Vacancy-induced catalytic mechanism for alcohol electrooxidation on nickel-based electrocatalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed 63:e202316449. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20231644910.1002/anie.202316449 ↗
73. Taitt BJ, Nam D-H, Choi K-S (2019) A comparative study of nickel, cobalt, and iron oxyhydroxide anodes for the electrochemical oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid. ACS Catal 9:660–670. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b0400310.1021/acscatal.8b04003 ↗
74. Xu P, Bao Z, Zhao Y et al (2024) Anionic regulation and heteroatom doping of Ni-based electrocatalysts to boost biomass valorization coupled with hydrogen production. Adv Energy Mater 14:2303557. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20230355710.1002/aenm.202303557 ↗
75. Mei N, Liu B, Zheng J et al (2015) A novel magnetic palladium catalyst for the mild aerobic oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural into 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid in water. Catal Sci Technol 5:3194–3202. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CY01407C10.1039/C4CY01407C ↗
76. Jia Y, Zhang L, Gao G et al (2017) A heterostructure coupling of exfoliated Ni–Fe hydroxide nanosheet and defective graphene as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. Adv Mater 29:1700017. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170001710.1002/adma.201700017 ↗
77. Li Q, Sun Z, Yin C et al (2023) Template-assisted synthesis of ultrathin graphene aerogels as bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts for water splitting and alkaline/neutral zinc-air batteries. Chem Eng J 458:141492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.14149210.1016/j.cej.2023.141492 ↗