Optimized fabrication and enhanced performance of low-porosity carbon anodes for aluminum electrolysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang P, Cao J, Zhang YJ, Sun Q (2021) Controllable preparation of cubic zeolite a and application of langmuir model in carbon dioxide adsorption. Nanomaterials 11:3375. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1112337510.3390/nano11123375 ↗
2. Guan W, Guo W, Chen F, Han X, Wang H, Sun W, Zhao Q, Jia D, Wei X, Zhu Q (2024) Multi-span greenhouse energy saving by external insulation: system design and implementation. Agriculture 14:281. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture1402028110.3390/agriculture14020281 ↗
3. Pang Y, Li H, Tang P, Chen C (2023) Irrigation scheduling of pressurized irrigation networks for minimizing energy consumption. Irrig Drainage 72:268–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.277110.1002/ird.2771 ↗
4. Rao CJ, Huang QF, Chen L, Goh M, Hu Z (2023) Forecasting the carbon emissions in Hubei Province under the background of carbon neutrality: a novel STIRPAT extended model with ridge regression and scenario analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:57460–57480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26599-w10.1007/s11356-023-26599-w ↗
5. Liang Z (2021) Selecting the proper material for a grain loss sensor based on DEM simulation and structure optimization to improve monitoring ability. Precis Agric 22:1120–1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-020-09772-w10.1007/s11119-020-09772-w ↗
6. Wang X, Pan Y, Wang X, Guo Y, Ni C, Wu J, Hao C (2022) High performance hybrid supercapacitors assembled with multi-cavity nickel cobalt sulfide hollow microspheres as cathode and porous typha-derived carbon as anode. Industr Crops Products 189:115863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11586310.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115863 ↗
7. Kansoun Z, Chaouki H, Picard D, Lauzon-Gauthier J, Alamdari H, Fafard M (2022) Strain rate and stress amplitude effects on the mechanical behavior of carbon paste used in the hall-heroult process and subjected to cyclic loadings. Materials 15:1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1503126310.3390/ma15031263 ↗
8. Wang YM, Wang XX, Bilal M (2022) Recovery of carbon and cryolite from spent carbon anode slag of electrolytic aluminum by flotation based on the evaluation of selectivity index. Front Chem 10:1025990. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.102599010.3389/fchem.2022.1025990 ↗
9. Lebedev AA, Davydov SY, Eliseyev IA, Roenkov AD, Avdeev O, Lebedev SP, Makarov Y, Puzyk M, Klotchenko S, Usikov AS (2021) Graphene on SiC substrate as biosensor: theoretical background, preparation, and characterization. Materials 14:590. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1403059010.3390/ma14030590 ↗
10. Gao BL, Niu HK, Guan YC, Wang ZW, Liu JJ, Taylor MP, Chen JJJ (2022) Visualization of anode effect in aluminum electrolysis. J Electrochem Soc 169:013505. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac4bf510.1149/1945-7111/ac4bf5 ↗
11. Sun KN, Li J, Zhang HL, Li TS, Li JQ (2021) First-principles study on the mechanism of greenhouse gas generation in aluminum electrolysis. Metals 11:1118. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1107111810.3390/met11071118 ↗
12. Rajendrachari S, Basavegowda N, Adimule VM, Avar B, Somu P, Kumar RMS, Baek KH (2022) Assessing the food quality using carbon nanomaterial based electrodes by voltammetric techniques. Biosensors 12:1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios1212117310.3390/bios12121173 ↗
13. Kierzek K, Gryglewicz G (2020) Activated carbons and their evaluation in electric double layer capacitors. Molecules 25:4255. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2518425510.3390/molecules25184255 ↗
14. Chen B, Chaouki H, Picard D, Lauzon-Gauthier J, Alamdari H, Fafard M (2021) Physical property evolution of the anode mixture during the baking process. Materials 14:923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1404092310.3390/ma14040923 ↗
15. Wang J, Manning DA, Werner D (2024) The limited potential of soil and vegetation in urban greenspace for nature‐based offsetting of institutional carbon emissions. Soil Use Manage 40:e13081. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.1308110.1111/sum.13081 ↗
16. Khan I, Tariq M, Alabbosh KF, Rehman A, Jalal A, Khan AA, Farooq M, Li G, Iqbal B, Ahmad N (2024) Soil microplastics: Impacts on greenhouse gasses emissions, carbon cycling, microbial diversity, and soil characteristics. Appl Soil Ecol 197:105343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.10534310.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105343 ↗
17. Wang X, Zheng Z, Jia W, Tai K, Xu Y, He Y (2024) Response mechanism and evolution trend of carbon effect in the farmland ecosystem of the middle and lower reaches of the yangtze river. Agronomy 14:2354. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy1410235410.3390/agronomy14102354 ↗
18. Duan J, Cao P, Shu T, Zhou B, Xue L, Yang L (2023) Effects of cellulosic carbon addition on nitrogen removal from simulated dry land drainage, and its environmental effects. Agronomy 13:3044. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy1312304410.3390/agronomy13123044 ↗
19. Xie PT, Li HY, He B, Dang F, Lin J, Fan RH, Hou CX, Liu H, Zhang JX, Ma Y, Guo ZH (2018) Bio-gel derived nickel/carbon nanocomposites with enhanced microwave absorption. J Mater Chem C 6:8812–8822. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8tc02127a10.1039/c8tc02127a ↗
20. Li H-T, Chen S-Q, Bui AT, Xu B, Dhital S (2021) Natural ‘capsule’in food plants: Cell wall porosity controls starch digestion and fermentation. Food Hydrocoll 117:106657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.10665710.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106657 ↗
21. Sun TM, Dong LM, Wang C, Guo WL, Wang L, Liang TX (2013) Effect of porosity on the electrical resistivity of carbon materials. New Carbon Mater 28:349–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.10.04710.1016/j.carbon.2013.10.047 ↗
22. Putri E, Brooks G, Snook G, Eick I (2017) Anode characterisation and gas diffusion behaviour in aluminium smelting. In: 1st international process metallurgy conference, IPMC 2016 1805:040001. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.497442210.1063/1.4974422 ↗
23. Hou WY, Li M, Liu L, Li HS (2024) A new approach for improving the quality of the carbon anode for aluminum electrolysis—an impregnation-baking process. Alexandria Eng J 96:195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.04.00410.1016/j.aej.2024.04.004 ↗
24. Ren YJ, Sun Z, Quan GG (2014) Effect of aluminium powder additives upon CO2 reactivity of electrolytic aluminium carbon anode with calcined anthracite. In: 3rd international conference on materials science and engineering (ICMSE 2014), Jiujiang, Peoples Republic of China, pp 44–50. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.852.4410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.852.44 ↗
25. Li ZY, Zhang NB, Wen LY (2017) Effect of titanium additives on carbon anode reactivity. Russ J Non-Ferrous Metals 58:218–224. https://doi.org/10.3103/s106782121703011710.3103/s1067821217030117 ↗
26. Brandvik T, Aarhaug TA, Gaertner H, Ratvik AP, Grande T (2019) In situ monitoring of pit gas composition during baking of anodes for aluminum electrolysis. Metall Mater Trans B 50:950–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-018-1500-810.1007/s11663-018-1500-8 ↗
27. Chen X, Mu K, Kitts DD (2019) Characterization of phytochemical mixtures with inflammatory modulation potential from coffee leaves processed by green and black tea processing methods. Food Chem 271:248–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.09710.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.097 ↗
28. Qiu W-Y, Cai W-D, Wang M, Yan J-K (2019) Effect of ultrasonic intensity on the conformational changes in citrus pectin under ultrasonic processing. Food Chem 297:125021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.12502110.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125021 ↗
29. Chevarin F, Ishak R, Ziegler D, Fafard M, Alamdari H (2017) Evolution of anode porosity under air oxidation: the unveiling of the active pore size. Metals 7:101. https://doi.org/10.3390/met703010110.3390/met7030101 ↗
30. Putri E, Brooks G, Snook GA, Eick I, Lossius LP (2019) Diffusion and flow of CO2 in carbon anode for aluminium smelting. Metall Mater Trans B 50:846–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-018-1497-z10.1007/s11663-018-1497-z ↗
31. Tajik AR, Shamim T, Ghoniem AF, Abu Al-Rub RK (2021) The impact of critical operational parameters on the performance of the aluminum anode baking furnace. J Energy Resour Technol 143:062103. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404856210.1115/1.4048562 ↗
32. Lee SH, Kim JH, Kim WS, Roh JS (2022) The effect of the heating rate during carbonization on the porosity, strength, and electrical resistivity of graphite blocks using phenolic resin as a binder. Materials 15:3259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1509325910.3390/ma15093259 ↗
33. Chao Y, Pang J, Bai Y, Wu P, Luo J, He J, Jin Y, Li X, Xiong J, Li H (2020) Graphene-like BN@ SiO2 nanocomposites as efficient sorbents for solid-phase extraction of Rhodamine B and Rhodamine 6G from food samples. Food Chem 320:126666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.12666610.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126666 ↗
34. Chen Y-C, Ou S-F (2020) Effects of reinforcement ratios and sintering temperatures on the mechanical properties of titanium nitride/nickel composites. Materials 13:4473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1320447310.3390/ma13204473 ↗
35. Kim C, Kwon W, Lee SJ, Euigyung (2022) Correlation between pitch impregnation pressure and pore sizes of graphite block. Materials 15:561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1502056110.3390/ma15020561 ↗
36. Bain G, Pruneau J, Williams J (2016) The effect of prebake anode baking temperature on potroom performance. In: Tomsett A, Johnson J (eds) Essential readings in light metals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48200-2_6110.1007/978-3-319-48200-2_61 ↗
37. Perez SP, Doval-Gandoy J, Ferro A, Silvestre F (2005) Quality improvement for anode paste used in electrolytic production of aluminium. Industr Appl Conf: 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1109/ias.2005.151835710.1109/ias.2005.1518357 ↗
38. Baastani N, Laliberté-Riverin S, Tuyizere-Flora M-A, Gauvin G, Lauzon-Gauthier J, Ollevier T, Alamdari H (2024) Effect of mixing and pressing parameters on the properties of biopitch-based lab-scale carbon anodes for use in the Hall-Héroult electrolytic cell. In: TMS annual meeting & exhibition. Springer, pp 804–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50308-5_10110.1007/978-3-031-50308-5_101 ↗
39. Wang Y-W, Peng J-P, Di Y-Z, Feng N-X (2013) Production of carbon anodes by high-temperature mould pressing. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 23:3119–3124. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(13)62842-310.1016/s1003-6326(13)62842-3 ↗
40. Amrani S, Kocaefe D, Kocaefe Y, Morais B, Blaney G (2014) Effect of heating rate on the crack formation during baking in carbon anodes used in aluminum industry. In: Grandfield J (eds) Light metals 2014. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48144-9_19610.1007/978-3-319-48144-9_196 ↗
41. Amrani S, Kocaefe D, Kocaefe Y, Bhattacharyay D, Bouazara M, Côté J (2021) Effect of carbon anode production parameters on anode cracking. SN Appl Sci 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-04133-810.1007/s42452-020-04133-8 ↗
42. Khaji K, Al Qassemi M (2016) The role of anode manufacturing processes in net carbon consumption. Metals 6:128. https://doi.org/10.3390/met606012810.3390/met6060128 ↗
43. Gwon S-U, Lee S-H, Youn U-S, Roh J-S (2024) Effect of pressure and holding time during compression molding on mechanical properties and microstructure of coke-pitch carbon blocks. Appl Sci 14:772. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1402077210.3390/app14020772 ↗
44. Sadeghi-Chahardeh A, Mollaabbasi R, Picard D, Taghavi SM, Alamdari H (2021) Discrete element method modeling for the failure analysis of dry mono-size coke aggregates. Materials 14:2174. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1409217410.3390/ma14092174 ↗
45. Xu G (2022) Hard carbons as anodes in sodium-ion batteries: sodium storage mechanism and optimization strategies. Molecules 27:6516. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2719651610.3390/molecules27196516 ↗
46. Sun Y, Meng Q, Qian M, Liu B, Gao K, Ma Y, Wen M, Zheng W (2016) Enhancement of oxidation resistance via a self-healing boron carbide coating on diamond particles. Rep 6:20198. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2019810.1038/srep20198 ↗
47. Shengli C, Zhihuan W, Xin W, Yunxing P, Xigao J (2017) Oxidative protection of carbon fibers with carborane-containing polymer. Corrosion Sci127:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2017.08.00210.1016/j.corsci.2017.08.002 ↗
48. Bao C, Zeng Q, Li F, Shi L, Wu W, Yang L, Chen Y, Liu H (2022) Effect of boron doping on the interlayer spacing of graphite. Materials 15:4203. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1512420310.3390/ma15124203 ↗
49. Bagramov RK (2022) Synthesis of borated graphites under high-pressure conditions. Nanobiotechnol Rep 17:495–499. https://doi.org/10.1134/s263516762204003610.1134/s2635167622040036 ↗
50. Peng H, Ming X, Pang K, Chen Y, Zhou J, Xu Z, Liu Y, Gao C (2022) Highly electrically conductive graphene papers via catalytic graphitization. Nano Res 15:4902–4908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-4130-z10.1007/s12274-022-4130-z ↗
51. Ngidi NPD, Ollengo MA, Nyamori VO (2020) Tuning the properties of boron-doped reduced graphene oxide by altering the boron content. New J Chem 44:16864–16876. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nj03909h10.1039/d0nj03909h ↗
52. Hückstaedt T, Erdmann J, Lehmann A, Protz R, Ganster J (2023) Boric acid as a low-temperature graphitization aid and its impact on structure and properties of cellulose-based carbon fibers. Polymers 15:4310. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1521431010.3390/polym15214310 ↗
53. Ghosh S, Nandasana M, Webster TJ, Thongmee S (2023) Agrowaste-generated biochar for the sustainable remediation of refractory pollutants. Front Chem 11:1266556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.126655610.3389/fchem.2023.1266556 ↗