Carbon nanotubes and montmorillonite reinforced carbon foam composites containing hollow microspheres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Cellular and Composite Structures · Flame retardant materials and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Liu HG, Wu SQ, Tian N, Yan FX, You CY, Yang T (2020) Carbon foams: 3D porous carbon materials holding immense potential. J Mater Chem A 8(45):23699–23723. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta08749a10.1039/d0ta08749a ↗
2. Wu SQ, Chen DM, Zhao GD, Cheng Y, Sun BQ, Yan XJ, Han WB, Chen GQ, Zhang XH (2022) Controllable synthesis of a robust sucrose-derived bio-carbon foam with 3D hierarchical porous structure for thermal insulation, flame retardancy and oil absorption. Chem Eng J 434:134514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.13451410.1016/j.cej.2022.134514 ↗
3. Zhao B, Bai PW, Yuan MY, Yan ZK, Fan BB, Zhang R, Che RC (2022) Recyclable magnetic carbon foams possessing voltage-controllable electromagnetic shielding and oil/water separation. Carbon 197:570–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.06.01010.1016/j.carbon.2022.06.010 ↗
4. Li QL, Chen L, Ding JJ, Zhang JJ, Li XH, Zheng K, Zhang X, Tian XY (2016) Open-cell phenolic carbon foam and electromagnetic interference shielding properties. Carbon 104:90–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.05510.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.055 ↗
5. Zimmermann MVG, Perondi D, Lazzari LK, Godinho M, Zattera AJ (2020) Carbon foam production by biomass pyrolysis. J Porous Mat 27:1119–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-020-00888-y10.1007/s10934-020-00888-y ↗
6. Li WQ, Liu HF, Zhang HB, Xu H (2020) Effect of Ti content on microstructure and performance of carbon foam derived from mesophase pitch. J Porous Mat 27:989–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-020-00876-210.1007/s10934-020-00876-2 ↗
7. Song SA, Lee YM, Kim YS, Kim SS (2017) Mechanical and thermal properties of carbon foam derived from phenolic foam reinforced with composite particles. Compos Struct 173:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.001 ↗
8. Stahlfeld KW, Belmont EL (2021) Carbon foam production from lignocellulosic biomass via high pressure pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrol 156:105115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.10511510.1016/j.jaap.2021.105115 ↗
9. Li H, Li TH, Deng WB, Kong SY (2022) Preparation and adsorption properties of graphene-modified, pitch-based carbon foam composites. Polymers-Basel 14(20):4455. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1420445510.3390/polym14204455 ↗
10. Zeng Y, Luo X, Yu KJ, Qian K (2019) EMI shielding performance of phenolic-based carbon foam modified with GO/SiO2 hybrid nanomaterials. Chem Phys Lett 715:166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2018.11.04010.1016/j.cplett.2018.11.040 ↗
11. Yu KJ, Zeng Y, Wang GL, Luo X, Li TT, Zhao JC, Qian K, Park CB (2019) r GO/Fe3O4 hybrid induced ultra-efficient EMI shielding performance of phenolic-based carbon foam. Rsc Adv 9(36):20643–20651. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra04244j10.1039/c9ra04244j ↗
12. Liu HG, Li TH, Huang TT, Zhao X (2015) Effect of multi-walled carbon nanotube additive on the microstructure and properties of pitch-derived carbon foams. J Mater Sci 50:7583–7590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9314-410.1007/s10853-015-9314-4 ↗
13. Khan M, Li TH, Zhao TK, Ali Z, Malik A, Khan A, Khan I, Ulah A, Jiao SS, Idrees M, Xiong CY (2017) Effect of multi walled carbon nanotubes and diamond nanoparticles on the structure and properties of carbon foams. Diam Relat Mater 79:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2017.09.00810.1016/j.diamond.2017.09.008 ↗
14. Wang YM, Liu YL, Lin QL, Dong SH, Xiong L (2017) Preparation and properties of montmorillonite/carbon foam nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci 140:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.01.03010.1016/j.clay.2017.01.030 ↗
15. Yadav K, Bagal R, Parmar S, Patro TU, Abhyankar AC (2021) In situ coating of needle-like NiCo2O4 magnetic nanoparticles on lightweight reticulated vitreous carbon foam toward achieving improved electromagnetic wave absorption. Ind Eng Chem Res 60(39):14225–14238. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0263610.1021/acs.iecr.1c02636 ↗
16. Liu HG, Wu SQ, You CY, Tian N, Li Y, Chopra N (2022) Fe3O4 nanoparticles decorated flexible carbon foam for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. Ceram Int 48(13):19452–19459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.24610.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.246 ↗
17. Li JW, Ding YQ, Yu N, Gao Q, Fan X, Wei X, Zhang GC, Ma ZL, He XH (2020) Lightweight and stiff carbon foams derived from rigid thermosetting polyimide foam with superior electromagnetic interference shielding performance. Carbon 158:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.11.07510.1016/j.carbon.2019.11.075 ↗
18. Chen XK, Yu WC, Ma L, Zhou SS, Liu XX (2021) Mechanical properties and thermal characteristics of different-density phenolic foams. J Therm Anal Calorim 144:393–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10361-210.1007/s10973-020-10361-2 ↗
19. Issaoui H, de Hoyos-Martinez PL, Pellerin V, Dourges MA, Deleuze H, Bourbigo S, Bouhtoury FCE (2021) Effect of catalysts and curing temperature on the properties of biosourced phenolic foams. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9(18):6209–6223. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0823410.1021/acssuschemeng.0c08234 ↗
20. Cheng JY, Li ZK, Yan HL, Lei ZP, Yan JC, Ren SB, Wang ZC, Kang SG, Shui HF (2023) Preparation and characterization of low-temperature coal tar toughened phenolic foams. J Fuel Chem Technol 51(6):748–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5813(23)60072-010.1016/S1872-5813(23)60072-0 ↗
21. Kawamoto AM, Pardini LC, Diniz MF, Lourenço VL, Takahashi MFK (2010) Synthesis of a boron modified phenolic resin. J Aerosp Technol Man 2:169–182. https://doi.org/10.5028/jatm.2010.0202761010.5028/jatm.2010.02027610 ↗
22. Wang SB, Luo RY, Ni YF (2010) Preparation and characterization of resin-derived carbon foams reinforced by hollow ceramic microspheres. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 527(15):3392–3395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.05910.1016/j.msea.2010.02.059 ↗
23. Wang JF, Khan M, Hussain A, Khan I, Nawaz A, Ragab AH, Sayqal A, Lei TF, Zada A (2023) Carbon foam composites containing carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide as additives for enhanced mechanical, thermal, electrical and catalytic properties. J Mater Res Technol 24:608–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.05610.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.056 ↗
24. Guo X, Chen XH, Liu P, Zhou HL, Fu SL, Li W, Liu XK, Ma FC, Wu ZP (2021) Preparation and mechanical properties of copper matrix composites reinforced by carbon nanotubes and Al2O3. Adv Eng Mater 23(6):2001490. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20200149010.1002/adem.202001490 ↗
25. Sheinerman AG (2022) Mechanical properties of metal matrix composites with graphene and carbon nanotubes. Phys Met Metallogr+ 123(1):57–84. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X2201012410.1134/S0031918X22010124 ↗
26. Gao FF, Tian W, Wang Z, Wang F (2020) Effect of diameter of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on mechanical properties and microstructure of the cement-based materials. Constr Build Mater 260:120452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12045210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120452 ↗
27. Wang L, Zhao W, Zhao JW, Qiao W, Zhu GC, Xia ZP, Liu Y (2021) Super-high fraction of organic montmorillonite filled polyamide 6 composite foam: Morphologies, thermal and mechanical properties. Polym Advan Technol 32(2):544–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.510810.1002/pat.5108 ↗
28. Al-Jumaili SK, Alkaron WA, Atshan MY (2023) Mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of low-density polyethylene nanocomposites reinforced with montmorillonite: Fabrication and characterizations. Cogent Eng 10(1):2204550. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.220455010.1080/23311916.2023.2204550 ↗
29. Gou P, Ye L, Li CL, Zhao XW (2023) Formation of conductive network in urea-formaldehyde/carbon nanotube composite foams for electromagnetic shielding. Polym Int 72(8):711–719. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.652810.1002/pi.6528 ↗
30. Song JW, Xu KJ, He J, Ye HJ, Xu LX (2023) Three-dimensional graphene/carbon nanotube electromagnetic shielding composite material based on melamine resin foam template. Polym Composite 44(5):2836–2845. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2728410.1002/pc.27284 ↗
31. Chithra A, Wilson P, Vijayan S, Rajeev R, Prabhakaran K (2020) Carbon foams with low thermal conductivity and high EMI shielding effectiveness from sawdust. Ind Crop Prod 145:112076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.11207610.1016/j.indcrop.2019.112076 ↗
32. Tang RB, Xu P, Dong JW, Gui HG, Zhang T, Ding YS, Murugadoss V, Naik N, Pan D, Huang MN, Guo ZH (2022) Carbon foams derived from emulsion-templated porous polymeric composites for electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 188:492–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.12.02610.1016/j.carbon.2021.12.026 ↗
33. Jin WW, Wang WK, Mazumdar S, Xu GZ, Zhang QQ (2023) Carbon foams with Fe-organic network-derived Fe3O4 for efficient electromagnetic shielding. Mater Chem Phys 304:127797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.12779710.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127797 ↗
34. Wang YZ, Song SP, Xu GZ, Wu SY, Zhong XY, Bai JF (2023) Study on preparation and electromagnetic shielding properties of GNs/NaCl/SCF composite carbon foam. Diam Relat Mater 139:110391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2023.11039110.1016/j.diamond.2023.110391 ↗
35. Li WC, Feng L, Shi XL, Wang Y (2021) Mechanical and electromagnetic shielding properties of carbon foam. Adv Eng Mater 23(12):2100452. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20210045210.1002/adem.202100452 ↗
36. Patle VK, Mehta Y, Dwivedi N, Mondal DP, Srivastava AK, Kumar R (2022) Thermal insulating and fire-retardant lightweight carbon-slag composite foams towards absorption dominated electromagnetic interference shielding. Sustain Mater Techno 33:e00453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e0045310.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00453 ↗
37. Guo WW, Zhao YY, Wang X, Cai W, Wang JL, Song L, Hu Y (2020) Multifunctional epoxy composites with highly flame retardant and effective electromagnetic interference shielding performances. Compos Part B-Eng 192:107990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10799010.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107990 ↗
38. Jing H, Miao ZN, Zeng Z, Liu H, Zhou ST, Zou HW, Liang W (2021) Carbonization of graphene-doped isocyanate-based polyimide foams to achieve carbon foams with excellent electromagnetic interference shielding performance. Materials 14(24):7551. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1424755110.3390/ma14247551 ↗
39. Kumar R, Sharma A, Pandey A, Chaudhary A, Dwivedi N, Shafeeq MM, Mondal DP, Srivastava AK (2020) Lightweight carbon-red mud hybrid foam toward fire-resistant and efficient shield against electromagnetic interference. Sci Rep-uk 10(1):9913. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66929-310.1038/s41598-020-66929-3 ↗
40. Zhu S, Peng SP, Qiang Z, Ye CH, Zhu MF (2022) Cryogenic-environment resistant, highly elastic hybrid carbon foams for pressure sensing and electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 193:258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.03.02710.1016/j.carbon.2022.03.027 ↗
41. Qi FQ, Wang L, Zhang YL, Ma ZL, Qiu H, Gu JW (2021) Robust Ti3C2Tx MXene/starch derived carbon foam composites for superior EMI shielding and thermal insulation. Mater Today Phys 21:100512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2021.10051210.1016/j.mtphys.2021.100512 ↗
42. Sheng XZ, Yun SH, Wang SL, Gao YS, Zuo XP, Miao X, Shi XT, Qin JB, Ma ZL, Zhang GC (2023) Highly heat-resistant and mechanically strong co-crosslinked polyimide/bismaleimide rigid foams with superior thermal insulation and flame resistance. Mater Today Phys 36:101154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2023.10115410.1016/j.mtphys.2023.101154 ↗
43. Rostami-Tapeh-Esmaeil E, Shojaei S, Rodrigue D (2022) Mechanical and thermal properties of functionally graded polyolefin elastomer foams. Polymers-Basel 14(19):4124. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1419412410.3390/polym14194124 ↗
44. Li XX, Yan LW, Guo AR, Du HY, Hou F, Liu JC (2023) Lightweight porous silica-alumina ceramics with ultra-low thermal conductivity. Ceram Int 49(4):6479–6486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.16510.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.165 ↗
45. Li JW, Lin J, Wang YG, Chu W, Liu F, Wang B (2022) Cross-linked and rigid polyimide composite foams with prominent fire resistant, thermal insulating, and wave-transparent properties. ACS Appl Polym Mater 4(10):6994–7003. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.2c0093110.1021/acsapm.2c00931 ↗
46. Wang H, Yan R, Cheng H, Zou MM, Wang H, Zheng K (2023) Hollow glass microspheres/phenolic syntactic foams with excellent mechanical and thermal insulate performance. Front Chem 11:1216706. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.121670610.3389/fchem.2023.1216706 ↗
47. Huang CG, Cheng X, Chen BY, Wang JW, Dai Y, Situ X, Huang H (2022) Preparation of aerogel-like silica foam with the hollow-sphere-based 3D network skeleton by the cast-in situ method and ambient pressure drying. Nano Lett 22(23):9290–9296. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0276810.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02768 ↗
48. Chen YW, Zhan H, Wang JN (2021) A direct foaming approach for carbon nanotube aerogels with ultra-low thermal conductivity and high mechanical stability. Nanoscale 13(27):11878–11886. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1nr02690a10.1039/d1nr02690a ↗
49. Painuly A, George BK, Prabhakaran K (2023) SiBOC foams from methylvinylborosiloxane using urea crystals as a pore template and ethylenediamine as a gelling agent. J Aust Ceram Soc 59(4):935–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-023-00886-810.1007/s41779-023-00886-8 ↗
50. Wang L, Shi XT, Zhang JL, Zhang YL, Gu JW (2020) Lightweight and robust rGO/sugarcane derived hybrid carbon foams with outstanding EMI shielding performance. J Mater Sci Technol 52:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.03.02910.1016/j.jmst.2020.03.029 ↗