Polar mesoporous carbon as a sulfur host for Li–S battery cathodes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Chemical Synthesis and Characterization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Yan B, Li X, Xiao W, Hu J, Zhang L, Yang X (2020) Design, synthesis, and application of metal sulfides for Li-S batteries: progress and prospects. J Mater Chem A 8:17848–17882. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA06220K10.1039/D0TA06220K ↗
2. Waqas M, Niu Y, Tang M, Pang Y, Ali S, Dong Y, Lv W, He W (2024) A decade of development in cathode-facing surface modified separators for high-performance Li-S batteries. Energy Storage Mater 72:103682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2024.10368210.1016/j.ensm.2024.103682 ↗
3. Nakamura N, Ahn S, Momma T, Osaka T (2023) Future potential for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Power Sources 558:232566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23256610.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232566 ↗
4. Pu J, Wang T, Tan Y, Fan S, Xue P (2023) Effect of heterostructure-modified separator in lithium-sulfur batteries. Small 19:2303266. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20230326610.1002/smll.202303266 ↗
5. Chen Y, Wang T, Tian H, Su D, Zhang Q, Wang G (2021) Advances in lithium–sulfur batteries: From academic research to commercial viability. Adv Mater 33:2003666. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200366610.1002/adma.202003666 ↗
6. Liu J, Zhou Y, Yan T, Gao X-P (2024) Perspectives of high-performance Li-S battery electrolytes. Adv Funct Mater 34:2309625. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20230962510.1002/adfm.202309625 ↗
7. Chavan VD, Patil PD, Patil CS, Patil SR, Katkar PK, Sheikh ZA, Ustad RE, Kim H, Kadam KD, Patil HS, Aziz J, Elahi E, Ahmad M, Rabeel M, Ghafoor F, Nasir S, Sajjad L, Shinde S, Dongale TD, Kim DK (2024) Advanced functional materials and their coordinated composites for next-generation Li–S batteries: a brief review. J Energy Storage 88:111572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.11157210.1016/j.est.2024.111572 ↗
8. Jan W, Khan AD, Iftikhar FJ, Ali G (2023) Recent advancements and challenges in deploying lithium sulfur batteries as economical energy storage devices. J Energy Storage 72:108559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.10855910.1016/j.est.2023.108559 ↗
9. Zhao M, Li B-Q, Zhang X-Q, Huang J-Q, Zhang Q (2020) A perspective toward practical lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Cent Sci 6:1095–1104. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c0044910.1021/acscentsci.0c00449 ↗
10. Kumar R, Liu J, Hwang J-Y, Sun Y-K (2018) Recent research trends in Li-S batteries. J Mater Chem A 6:11582–11605. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta01483c10.1039/c8ta01483c ↗
11. Ji X, Lee KT, Nazar LF (2009) A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat Mater 8:500–506. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat246010.1038/nmat2460 ↗
12. Fu A, Wang C, Pei F, Cui J, Fang X, Zheng N (2019) Recent advances in hollow porous carbon materials for lithium-sulfur batteries. Small 15:1804786. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20180478610.1002/smll.201804786 ↗
13. Zhang Y, Gao Z, Song N, He J, Li X (2018) Graphene and its derivatives in lithium-sulfur batteries. Mater Today Energy 9:319–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2018.06.00110.1016/j.mtener.2018.06.001 ↗
14. Ye H, Yin Y-X, Xin S, Guo Y-G (2013) Tuning the porous structure of carbon hosts for loading sulfur toward long lifespan cathode materials for Li-S batteries. J Mater Chem A 1:6602–6608. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta10735c10.1039/c3ta10735c ↗
15. Sun L, Li M, Jiang Y, Kong W, Jiang K, Wang J, Fan S (2014) Sulfur nanocrystals confined in carbon nanotube network as a binder-free electrode for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Lett 14:4044–4049. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl501486n10.1021/nl501486n ↗
16. Ji L, Sun Z-H, Li F, Cheng H-M (2016) Carbon materials for Li–S batteries: Functional evolution and performance improvement. Energy Storage Mater 2:76–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2015.09.00710.1016/j.ensm.2015.09.007 ↗
17. Peng H-J, Zhang G, Chen X, Zhang Z-W, Xu W-T, Huang J-Q, Zhang Q (2016) Enhanced electrochemical kinetics on conductive polar mediators for lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 55:12990–12995. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20160567610.1002/anie.201605676 ↗
18. Wang X, Li G, Li J, Zhang Y, Wook A, Yu A, Chen Z (2016) Structural and chemical synergistic encapsulation of polysulfides enables ultralong-life lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Environ Sci 9:2533–2538. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EE00194G10.1039/C6EE00194G ↗
19. Lee B-J, Kang T-H, Lee H-Y, Samdani JS, Jung Y, Zhang C, Yu Z, Xu G-L, Cheng L, Byun S, Lee YM, Amine K, Yu J-S (2020) Revisiting the role of conductivity and polarity of host materials for long-life lithium-sulfur battery. Adv Energy Mater 10:1903934. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20190393410.1002/aenm.201903934 ↗
20. Li Z, Guan BY, Zhang J, Lou XW (2017) A compact nanoconfined sulfur cathode for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Joule 1:576–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.06.00310.1016/j.joule.2017.06.003 ↗
21. Lei T, Chen W, Huang J, Yan C, Sun H, Wang C, Zhang W, Li Y, Xiong J (2016) Multi-functional layered WS₂ nanosheets for enhancing the performance of lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 7:1601843. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20160184310.1002/aenm.201601843 ↗
22. Fang R, Zhao S, Sun Z, Wang D-W, Amal R, Wang S, Cheng H-M, Li F (2018) Polysulfide immobilization and conversion on a conductive polar MoC@MoOx material for lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater 10:56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2017.08.00510.1016/j.ensm.2017.08.005 ↗
23. Zhao X, Liu M, Chen Y, Hou B, Zhang N, Chen B, Yang N, Chen K, Li J, An L (2015) Fabrication of layered Ti3C2 with an accordion-like structure as a potential cathode material for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:7870–7876. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA07101H10.1039/C4TA07101H ↗
24. Earp B, Dunn D, Phillips J, Agrawal R, Ansell T, Aceves P, Rosa ID, Xin W, Luhrs C (2020) Enhancement of electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube sheets through copper addition using reduction expansion synthesis. Mater Res Bull 131:110969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2020.11096910.1016/j.materresbull.2020.110969 ↗
25. Koh JY, Kim S, Park M-S, Yang HJ, Yang TH, Jung Y (2016) The role of the carbon framework in sulfur-carbon composite cathodes in Li-S batteries. Electrochim Acta 212:212–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.17110.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.171 ↗
26. Park M-S, Jeong BO, Kim TJ, Kim S, Kim KJ, Y-u JS, Jung Y, Kim Y-J (2014) Disordered mesoporous carbon as polysulfide reservoir for improved cyclic performance of lithium-sulfur batteries. Carbon 68:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.00110.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.001 ↗
27. Smith M, Scudiero L, Espinal J, McEwen J-S, Garcia-Perez M (2016) Improving the deconvolution and interpretation of XPS spectra from chars by ab initio calculations. Carbon 110:155–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.01210.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.012 ↗
28. Liu Z, Niu W, Chu H, Zhou T, Niu Z (2018) Effect of the carbonization temperature on the properties of biochar produced from the pyrolysis of crop residues. BioResources 13:3429–3446. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.2.3429-344610.15376/biores.13.2.3429-3446 ↗
29. Warren BE (1941) X-ray diffraction in random layer lattices. Phys Rev 59:693–701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.59.69310.1103/PhysRev.59.693 ↗
30. Koh JY, Park M-S, Kim EH, Kim TJ, Kim S, Kim KJ, Kim Y-J, Jung Y (2014) Electrochemical reduction mechanism of sulfur particles electrically isolated from carbon cathodes of lithium-sulfur cells. J Electrochem Soc 161:A2117–A2120. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0551414jes10.1149/2.0551414jes ↗
31. Kwon S, Song H, Çakmakçı N, Jeong Y (2021) A practical approach to design sulfur host material for lithium-sulfur batteries based on electrical conductivity and pore structure. Mater Today Commun 27:102309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10230910.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102309 ↗
32. Wu F, Li Q, Chen L, Zhang Q, Wang Z, Lu Y, Bao L, Chen S, Su Y (2019) Improving the structure stability of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 by surface perovskite-like La2Ni0.5Li0.5O4 self-assembling and subsurface La3+ doping. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:36751–36762. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b1259510.1021/acsami.9b12595 ↗
33. Ma F, Wu Y, Wei G, Qiu S, Qu J (2019) Enhanced electrochemical performance of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathode via wet-chemical coating of MgO. J Solid State Electrochem 23:2213–2224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-019-04308-310.1007/s10008-019-04308-3 ↗
34. Koh JY, Park M-S, Kim EH, Jeong BO, Kim S, Kim KJ, Kim J-G, Kim Y-J, Jung Y (2014) Understanding of electrochemical oxidation route of electrically isolated Li2S particles. J Electrochem Soc 161:A2133–A2137. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0201414jes10.1149/2.0201414jes ↗
35. Levillain E, Gaillard F, Leghie P, Demortier A, Lelieur JP (1997) On the understanding of the reduction of sulfur (S8) in dimethylformamide (DMF). J Electroanal Chem 420:167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(96)04796-110.1016/S0022-0728(96)04796-1 ↗
36. Gaillard F, Levillain E, Lelieur JP (1997) Polysulfides in dimethylformamide: Only the radical anions S3− and S4− are reducible. J Electroanal Chem 432:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(97)00192-710.1016/S0022-0728(97)00192-7 ↗
37. Levillain E, Gaillard F, Lelieur JP (1997) Polysulfides in dimethylformamide: only the redox couples Sn/Sn2− are involved. J Electroanal Chem 440:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(97)80062-910.1016/S0022-0728(97)80062-9 ↗
38. Jung Y, Kim S, Kim B-S, Han D-H, Park S-M, Kwak J (2008) Effect of organic solvents and electrode materials on electrochemical reduction of sulfur. Int J Electrochem Sci 3:566–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1452-3981(23)15544-110.1016/S1452-3981(23)15544-1 ↗
39. Pang Q, Liang X, Kwok CY, Nazar LF (2015) Review—the importance of chemical interactions between sulfur host materials and lithium polysulfides for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. J Electrochem Soc 162:A2567–A2576. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0171514jes10.1149/2.0171514jes ↗
40. Valurouthu G, Shekhirev M, Anayee M, Wang R, Matthews K, Parker T, Lord RW, Zhang D, Inman A, Downes M, Ahn CW, Kalra V, Oh I-K, Gogotsi Y (2024) Screening conductive MXenes for lithium polysulfide adsorption. Adv Funct Mater 34:2404430. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20240443010.1002/adfm.202404430 ↗
41. Xu J, An S, Song X, Cao Y, Wang N, Qiu X, Zhang Y, Chen J, Duan X, Huang J, Li W, Wang Y (2021) Towards high performance Li–S batteries via sulfonate-rich COF-modified separator. Adv Mater 33:2105178. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20210517810.1002/adma.202105178 ↗
42. Wang X, Yang L, Wang Y, Li Q, Chen C, Zhong B, Chen Y, Guo X, Wu Z, Liu Y, Liu Y, Sun Y (2022) Novel functional separator with self-assembled MnO2 layer via a simple and fast method in lithium-sulfur battery. J Colloid Interface Sci 606:666–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.06210.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.062 ↗
43. Rehman S, Tang T, Ali Z, Huang X, Hou Y (2017) Integrated design of MnO2@carbon hollow nanoboxes to synergistically encapsulate polysulfides for empowering lithium sulfur batteries. Small 13:1700087. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20170008710.1002/smll.201700087 ↗
44. Sun Z, Zhang J, Yin L, Hu G, Fang R, Cheng H-M, Li F (2017) Conductive porous vanadium nitride/graphene composite as chemical anchor of polysulfides for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nat Commun 8:14627. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1462710.1038/ncomms14627 ↗
45. Descostes M, Mercier F, Thromat N, Beaucaire C, Gautier-Soyer M (2000) Use of XPS in the determination of chemical environment and oxidation state of iron and sulfur samples: constitution of a data basis in binding energies for Fe and S reference compounds and applications to the evidence of surface species of an oxidized pyrite in a carbonate medium. Appl Surf Sci 165:288–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(00)00443-810.1016/S0169-4332(00)00443-8 ↗
46. Hood ZD, Adhikari SP, Evans SF, Wang H, Li Y, Naskar AK, Chi M, Lachgar A, Paranthaman MP (2018) Tire-derived carbon for catalytic preparation of biofuels from feedstocks containing free fatty acids. Carbon Resour Convers 1:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2018.07.00710.1016/j.crcon.2018.07.007 ↗