Advanced modeling of conductivity in graphene–polymer nanocomposites: insights into interface and tunneling characteristics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Fu X, Lin J, Liang Z, Yao R, Wu W, Fang Z et al (2023) Graphene oxide as a promising nanofiller for polymer composite. Surf Interfaces 37:10274710.1016/j.surfin.2023.102747 ↗
2. Zare Y, Rhee KY, Park S-J (2023) Progressing of a power model for electrical conductivity of graphene-based composites. Sci Rep 13(1):159610.1038/s41598-023-28232-9 ↗
3. de la Roche J, López-Cifuentes I, Jaramillo-Botero A (2023) Influence of lasing parameters on the morphology and electrical resistance of polyimide-based laser-induced graphene (LIG). Carbon Lett 33(2):587–59510.1007/s42823-022-00447-2 ↗
4. Yang M, Wang L, Lu H, Dong Q, Li H, Liu S (2023) Graphene and graphene-like carbon nanomaterials-based electrochemical biosensors for phytohormone detection. Carbon Lett 33(5):1343–135810.1007/s42823-022-00419-6 ↗
5. Tang S, Liu Z, Xiang X (2022) Graphene oxide composite hydrogels for wearable devices. Carbon Lett 32(6):1395–141010.1007/s42823-022-00402-1 ↗
6. Ismail Z (2022) Laser writing of graphene on cellulose paper and analogous material for green and sustainable electronic: a concise review. Carbon Lett 32(5):1227–124510.1007/s42823-022-00365-3 ↗
7. Danial WH, Abdul MZ (2022) Recent advances on the enhanced thermal conductivity of graphene nanoplatelets composites: a short review. Carbon Lett 32(6):1411–142410.1007/s42823-022-00371-5 ↗
8. Mohammadpour-Haratbar A, Zare Y, Rhee KY (2022) Electrochemical biosensors based on polymer nanocomposites for detecting breast cancer: recent progress and future prospects. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 309:10279510.1016/j.cis.2022.102795 ↗
9. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2022) An innovative model for conductivity of graphene-based system by networked nano-sheets, interphase and tunneling zone. Sci Rep 12(1):1–910.1038/s41598-022-19479-9 ↗
10. Lapčík L, Sepetcioğlu H, Murtaja Y, Lapčíková B, Vašina M, Ovsík M et al (2023) Study of mechanical properties of epoxy/graphene and epoxy/halloysite nanocomposites. Nanotechnol Rev 12(1):2022052010.1515/ntrev-2022-0520 ↗
11. Vatani M, Zare Y, Gharib N, Rhee KY, Park S-J (2023) Simulating of effective conductivity for grapheme–polymer nanocomposites. Sci Rep 13(1):590710.1038/s41598-023-32991-w ↗
12. Zare Y, Kim T-H, Gharib N, Chang Y-W (2023) Effect of contact number among graphene nanosheets on the conductivities of tunnels and polymer composites. Sci Rep 13(1):950610.1038/s41598-023-36669-1 ↗
13. Shahdan D, Chen RS, Ahmad S (2021) Optimization of graphene nanoplatelets dispersion and nano-filler loading in bio-based polymer nanocomposites based on tensile and thermogravimetry analysis. J Market Res 15:1284–1299
14. Chee W, Lim H, Huang N, Harrison I (2015) Nanocomposites of graphene/polymers: a review. RSC Adv 5(83):68014–6805110.1039/C5RA07989F ↗
15. Rafiee R, Eskandariyun A (2020) Predicting Young’s modulus of agglomerated graphene/polymer using multi-scale modeling. Compos Struct 245:11232410.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112324 ↗
16. Zare Y, Daraei A, Vatani M, Aghasafari P (2014) An analysis of interfacial adhesion in nanocomposites from recycled polymers. Comput Mater Sci 81:612–61610.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.041 ↗
17. Rostami M, Mohseni M, Ranjbar Z (2012) An attempt to quantitatively predict the interfacial adhesion of differently surface treated nanosilicas in a polyurethane coating matrix using tensile strength and DMTA analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes 34:24–3110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.12.005 ↗
18. Wen R, Ke K, Wang Y, Yang W, Xie BH, Yang MB (2011) Interfacial interaction of polyvinylidene fluoride/multiwalled carbon nanotubes nanocomposites: a rheological study. J Appl Polym Sci 121(5):3041–304610.1002/app.33927 ↗
19. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2018) A multistep methodology for calculation of the tensile modulus in polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites above the percolation threshold based on the modified rule of mixtures. RSC Adv 8(54):30986–3099310.1039/C8RA04992K ↗
20. Shin H, Yang S, Choi J, Chang S, Cho M (2015) Effect of interphase percolation on mechanical behavior of nanoparticle-reinforced polymer nanocomposite with filler agglomeration: a multiscale approach. Chem Phys Lett 635:80–8510.1016/j.cplett.2015.06.054 ↗
21. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2020) Significances of interphase conductivity and tunneling resistance on the conductivity of carbon nanotubes nanocomposites. Polym Compos 41(2):748–75610.1002/pc.25405 ↗
22. Li Y, Zhang H, Porwal H, Huang Z, Bilotti E, Peijs T (2017) Mechanical, electrical and thermal properties of in-situ exfoliated graphene/epoxy nanocomposites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 95:229–23610.1016/j.compositesa.2017.01.007 ↗
23. Kim H, Macosko CW (2008) Morphology and properties of polyester/exfoliated graphite nanocomposites. Macromolecules 41(9):3317–332710.1021/ma702385h ↗
24. Zare Y (2016) Effects of imperfect interfacial adhesion between polymer and nanoparticles on the tensile modulus of clay/polymer nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci 129:65–7010.1016/j.clay.2016.05.002 ↗
25. Zare Y, Gharib N, Rhee KY (2023) Influences of graphene morphology and contact distance between nanosheets on the effective conductivity of polymer nanocomposites. J Mater Res Technol 25:3588–359710.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.124 ↗
26. Downing T, Kumar R, Cross W, Kjerengtroen L, Kellar J (2000) Determining the interphase thickness and properties in polymer matrix composites using phase imaging atomic force microscopy and nanoindentation. J Adhes Sci Technol 14(14):1801–181210.1163/156856100743248 ↗
27. Gao S-L, Mäder E (2002) Characterisation of interphase nanoscale property variations in glass fibre reinforced polypropylene and epoxy resin composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 33(4):559–57610.1016/S1359-835X(01)00134-8 ↗
28. Gu Y, Li M, Wang J, Zhang Z (2010) Characterization of the interphase in carbon fiber/polymer composites using a nanoscale dynamic mechanical imaging technique. Carbon 48(11):3229–323510.1016/j.carbon.2010.05.008 ↗
29. Du F, Scogna RC, Zhou W, Brand S, Fischer JE, Winey KI (2004) Nanotube networks in polymer nanocomposites: rheology and electrical conductivity. Macromolecules 37(24):9048–905510.1021/ma049164g ↗
30. Ryvkina N, Tchmutin I, Vilčáková J, Pelíšková M, Sáha P (2005) The deformation behavior of conductivity in composites where charge carrier transport is by tunneling: theoretical modeling and experimental results. Synth Met 148(2):141–14610.1016/j.synthmet.2004.09.028 ↗
31. Ambrosetti G, Grimaldi C, Balberg I, Maeder T, Danani A, Ryser P (2010) Solution of the tunneling-percolation problem in the nanocomposite regime. Phys Rev B 81(15):15543410.1103/PhysRevB.81.155434 ↗
32. Hu N, Karube Y, Yan C, Masuda Z, Fukunaga H (2008) Tunneling effect in a polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposite strain sensor. Acta Mater 56(13):2929–293610.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.030 ↗
33. Liu Z, Peng W, Zare Y, Hui D, Rhee KY (2018) Predicting the electrical conductivity in polymer carbon nanotube nanocomposites based on the volume fractions and resistances of the nanoparticle, interphase, and tunneling regions in conductive networks. RSC Adv 8(34):19001–1901010.1039/C8RA00811F ↗
34. Li J, Kim J-K (2007) Percolation threshold of conducting polymer composites containing 3D randomly distributed graphite nanoplatelets. Compos Sci Technol 67(10):2114–212010.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.010 ↗
35. He L, Tjong SC (2013) Low percolation threshold of graphene/polymer composites prepared by solvothermal reduction of graphene oxide in the polymer solution. Nanoscale Res Lett 8(1):13210.1186/1556-276X-8-132 ↗
36. Lan Y, Liu H, Cao X, Zhao S, Dai K, Yan X et al (2016) Electrically conductive thermoplastic polyurethane/polypropylene nanocomposites with selectively distributed graphene. Polymer 97:11–1910.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.017 ↗
37. Goumri M, Lucas B, Ratier B, Baitoul M (2016) Electrical and optical properties of reduced graphene oxide and multi-walled carbon nanotubes based nanocomposites: a comparative study. Opt Mater 60:105–11310.1016/j.optmat.2016.07.010 ↗
38. Li J, Ma PC, Chow WS, To CK, Tang BZ, Kim JK (2007) Correlations between percolation threshold, dispersion state, and aspect ratio of carbon nanotubes. Adv Func Mater 17(16):3207–321510.1002/adfm.200700065 ↗
39. Zhang H-B, Zheng W-G, Yan Q, Yang Y, Wang J-W, Lu Z-H et al (2010) Electrically conductive polyethylene terephthalate/graphene nanocomposites prepared by melt compounding. Polymer 51(5):1191–119610.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.027 ↗
40. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GH, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA et al (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442(7100):282–28610.1038/nature04969 ↗