Glucose-derived hard carbon/carbon nanotube neural network architectures for enhanced sodium ion storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Heuberger CF, Mac Dowell N (2018) Real-world challenges with a rapid transition to 100% renewable power systems. Joule 2:367–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.02.00210.1016/j.joule.2018.02.002 ↗
2. Han XT, Li NN, Xiong PX et al (2022) Rhenium induced electronic structure modulation of Ni3S2/N-doped graphene for efficient trifunctional electrocatalysis. Compos B Eng 234:109670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10967010.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109670 ↗
3. Yan NF, Cui HM, Shi JS et al (2023) Recent progress of W18O49 nanowires for energy conversion and storage. Tungsten 5:371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42864-023-00202-810.1007/s42864-023-00202-8 ↗
4. Quilty CD, Wu DR, Li WZ et al (2023) Electron and ion transport in lithium and lithium-ion battery negative and positive composite electrodes. Chem Rev 123:1327–1363. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0021410.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00214 ↗
5. Kothandam G, Singh G, Guan XW et al (2023) Recent advances in carbon-based electrodes for energy storage and conversion. Adv Sci 10:2301045. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20230104510.1002/advs.202301045 ↗
6. Qian H, Liu Y, Chen HX et al (2023) Emerging bismuth-based materials: from fundamentals to electrochemical energy storage applications. Energy Storage Mater 58:232–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2023.03.02310.1016/j.ensm.2023.03.023 ↗
7. Che YH, Hu XS, Lin XK et al (2023) Health prognostics for lithium-ion batteries: mechanisms, methods, and prospects. Energy Environ Sci 16:338–371. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE03019E10.1039/D2EE03019E ↗
8. Zhan RM, Wang XC, Chen ZH et al (2021) Promises and challenges of the practical implementation of prelithiation in lithium-ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater 11:2101565. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20210156510.1002/aenm.202101565 ↗
9. Abraham KM (2020) How comparable are sodium-ion batteries to lithium-ion counterparts? ACS Energy Lett 5:3544–3547. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0218110.1021/acsenergylett.0c02181 ↗
10. Slater MD, Kim D, Lee E et al (2013) Sodium-ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater 23:947–958. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20120069110.1002/adfm.201200691 ↗
11. Hwang JY, Myung ST, Sun YK (2017) Sodium-ion batteries: present and future. Chem Soc Rev 46:3529–3614. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00776G10.1039/C6CS00776G ↗
12. Zhang ZB, Wang RZ, Zeng JQ et al (2021) Size effects in sodium ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater 31:2106047. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20210604710.1002/adfm.202106047 ↗
13. Shi L, Sun YD, Liu W et al (2023) Tailoring the microstructure and solid electrolyte interface of hard carbon to realize high-initial-coulombic-efficiency and high-rate sodium storage. Electrochim Acta 459:142557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2023.14255710.1016/j.electacta.2023.142557 ↗
14. Gao XD, Zhang XY, Liu XY et al (2023) Recent advances for high-entropy based layered cathodes for sodium ion batteries. Small Methods 7:2300152. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.20230015210.1002/smtd.202300152 ↗
15. Song XX, Li XF, Shan H et al (2024) V–O–C bonding of heterointerface boosting kinetics of free-standing Na5V12O32 cathode for ultralong lifespan sodium-ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater 34:2303211. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20230321110.1002/adfm.202303211 ↗
16. Wu HY, Zhang XE, Wu QH et al (2020) Confined growth of 2D MoS2 nanosheets in N-doped pearl necklace-like structured carbon nanofibers with boosted lithium and sodium storage performance. Chem Commun 56:141–144. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CC07291H10.1039/C9CC07291H ↗
17. Han XT, Li NN, Baik JS et al (2023) Sulfur mismatch substitution in layered double hydroxides as efficient oxygen electrocatalysts for flexible zinc-air batteries. Adv Funct Mater 33:202212233. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20221223310.1002/adfm.202212233 ↗
18. Gao YM, Liu Y, Feng KJ et al (2024) Emerging WS2/WSe2@graphene nanocomposites: synthesis and electrochemical energy storage applications. Rare Met 43:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-023-02424-810.1007/s12598-023-02424-8 ↗
19. Xia QB, Li WJ, Miao ZC et al (2017) Phosphorus and phosphide nanomaterials for sodium-ion batteries. Nano Res 10:4055–4081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-017-1671-710.1007/s12274-017-1671-7 ↗
20. Chu Y, Zhang J, Zhang YB et al (2023) Reconfiguring hard carbons with emerging sodium-ion batteries: a perspective. Adv Mater 35:2212186. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20221218610.1002/adma.202212186 ↗
21. Li JB, Li ZQ, Tang SC et al (2023) Improving the sodium storage performance of carbonaceous anode: synergistic coupling of pore structure and ordered domain engineering. Carbon 203:469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.12.01410.1016/j.carbon.2022.12.014 ↗
22. Sun N, Qiu JS, Xu B (2022) Understanding of sodium storage mechanism in hard carbons: ongoing development under debate. Adv Energy Mater 12:2200715. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20220071510.1002/aenm.202200715 ↗
23. Cheng DJ, Zhou XQ, Hu HY et al (2021) Electrochemical storage mechanism of sodium in carbon materials: a study from soft carbon to hard carbon. Carbon 182:758–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.06.06610.1016/j.carbon.2021.06.066 ↗
24. Chen XY, Liu CY, Fang YJ et al (2022) Understanding of the sodium storage mechanism in hard carbon anodes. Carbon Energy 4:1133–1150. https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.19610.1002/cey2.196 ↗
25. Li JB, Ding ZB, Pan LK et al (2021) Facile self-templating synthesis of layered carbon with N, S dual doping for highly efficient sodium storage. Carbon 173:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.09210.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.092 ↗
26. Suo LY, Zhu JH, Shen XY et al (2019) Hard carbon spheres interconnected by carbon nanotubes as high-performance anodes for sodium-ion batteries. Carbon 151:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.03010.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.030 ↗
27. Xie XQ, Chen SQ, Sun B et al (2015) 3D networked tin oxide/graphene aerogel with a hierarchically porous architecture for high-rate performance sodium-ion batteries. Chemsuschem 8:2948–2955. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20150014910.1002/cssc.201500149 ↗
28. Pothaya S, Poochai C, Tammanoon N et al (2024) Bamboo-derived hard carbon/carbon nanotube composites as anode material for long-life sodium-ion batteries with high charge/discharge capacities. Rare Met 43:124–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-023-02414-w10.1007/s12598-023-02414-w ↗
29. Schönherr J, Buchheim J, Scholz P et al (2017) Oxidation of carbon nanotubes with ozone and hydroxyl radicals. Carbon 111:631–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.01310.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.013 ↗
30. Datsyuk V, Kalyva M, Papagelis K et al (2008) Chemical oxidation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 46:833–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2008.02.01210.1016/j.carbon.2008.02.012 ↗
31. Cuesta A, Dhamelincourt P, Laureyns J et al (1994) Raman microprobe studies on carbon materials. Carbon 32:1523–1532. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)90148-110.1016/0008-6223(94)90148-1 ↗
32. Kang YB, Han X, Kim S et al (2021) Structural engineering of ultrathin ReS2 on hierarchically architectured graphene for enhanced oxygen reduction. ACS Nano 15:5560–5566. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c0042010.1021/acsnano.1c00420 ↗
33. Liu YF, Ba H, Nguyen DL et al (2013) Synthesis of porous carbon nanotubes foam composites with a high accessible surface area and tunable porosity. J Mater Chem A 1:9508–9516. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA10695K10.1039/C3TA10695K ↗
34. Yang J, Yu C, Liang SX et al (2016) Bridging of ultrathin NiCo2O4 nanosheets and graphene with polyaniline: a theoretical and experimental study. Chem Mater 28:5855–5863. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0230310.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02303 ↗
35. Zhao CT, Yu C, Zhang MD et al (2017) Ultrafine MoO2-carbon microstructures enable ultralong-life power-type sodium ion storage by enhanced pseudocapacitance. Adv Energy Mater 7:1602880. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20160288010.1002/aenm.201602880 ↗
36. Takenaka N, Bouibes A, Yamada Y et al (2021) Frontiers in theoretical analysis of solid electrolyte interphase formation mechanism. Adv Mater 33:2100574. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20210057410.1002/adma.202100574 ↗
37. Li Y, Liu MQ, Feng X et al (2021) How can the electrode influence the formation of the solid electrolyte interface? ACS Energy Lett 6:3307–3320. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0135910.1021/acsenergylett.1c01359 ↗