journal article·2024-04

Comparison of lithium iron phosphate blended with different carbon sources for lithium battery electrodes

Yiming Zhang

Carbon Letters· Volume 34· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

In response to the growing demand for high-performance lithium-ion batteries, this study investigates the crucial role of different carbon sources in enhancing the electrochemical performance of lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) cathode materials. Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) suffers from drawbacks, such as low electronic conductivity and low lithium-ion diffusion coefficient, which hinder its industrial development. Carbon is a common surface coating material for LiFePO4, and the source, coating method, coating amount, and incorporation method of carbon have a significant impact on the performance of LiFePO4 materials. In this work, iron phosphate was used as the iron and phosphorus source, and lithium carbonate was used as the lithium source. Glucose, phenolic resin, ascorbic acid, and starch were employed as carbon sources. Ethanol was utilized as a dispersing agent, and ball milling was employed to obtain the LiFePO4 precursor. Carbon-coated LiFePO4 cathode materials were synthesized using the carbothermal reduction method, and the effects of different carbon sources on the structure and electrochemical performance of LiFePO4 materials were systematically investigated. The results showed that, compared to other carbon sources, LiFePO4 prepared with glucose as the carbon source not only had a higher discharge specific capacity but also better rate cycle performance. Within a voltage range of 2.5–4.2 V, the initial discharge specific capacities at 0.1, 0.5, and 1 C rates were 154.6, 145.6, and 137.6 mAh/g, respectively. After 20 cycles at a 1 C rate, the capacity retention rate was 98.7%, demonstrating excellent electrochemical performance.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Qu J, Liu F, Ma Y, Fan J (2019) A neural-network-based method for RUL prediction and SOH monitoring of lithium-ion battery. IEEE Access 7:87178–8719110.1109/ACCESS.2019.2925468 ↗
2. Manthiram A (2020) A reflection on lithium-ion battery cathode chemistry. Nat Commun 11:155010.1038/s41467-020-15355-0 ↗
3. Xie J, Lu Y-C (2020) A retrospective on lithium-ion batteries. Nat Commun 11:249910.1038/s41467-020-16259-9 ↗
4. Weiss M, Ruess R, Kasnatscheew J, Levartovsky Y, Levy NR, Minnmann P, Stolz L, Waldmann T, Wohlfahrt-Mehrens M, Aurbach D (2021) Fast charging of lithium-ion batteries: a review of materials aspects. Adv Energy Mater 11:210112610.1002/aenm.202101126 ↗
5. Zhang X, Li Z, Luo L, Fan Y, Du Z (2022) A review on thermal management of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. Energy 238:12165210.1016/j.energy.2021.121652 ↗
6. Wu F, Maier J, Yu Y (2020) Guidelines and trends for next-generation rechargeable lithium and lithium-ion batteries. Chem Soc Rev 49:1569–161410.1039/C7CS00863E ↗
7. Zhang L, Li X, Yang M, Chen W (2021) High-safety separators for lithium-ion batteries and sodium-ion batteries: advances and perspective. Energy Storage Mater 41:522–54510.1016/j.ensm.2021.06.033 ↗
8. Abraham K (2020) How comparable are sodium-ion batteries to lithium-ion counterparts? ACS Energy Lett 5:3544–354710.1021/acsenergylett.0c02181 ↗
9. Kim T, Song W, Son D-Y, Ono LK, Qi Y (2019) Lithium-ion batteries: outlook on present, future, and hybridized technologies. J Mater Chem A 7:2942–296410.1039/C8TA10513H ↗
10. Duffner F, Kronemeyer N, Tübke J, Leker J, Winter M, Schmuch R (2021) Post-lithium-ion battery cell production and its compatibility with lithium-ion cell production infrastructure. Nat Energy 6:123–13410.1038/s41560-020-00748-8 ↗
11. Fu L, Zhang X, Ding S, Chen F, Lv Y, Zhang H, Zhao S (2022) Recent developments in the electrochemical determination of sulfonamides. Curr Pharm Anal 18:4–13. https://doi.org/10.2174/157341291799920100619522910.2174/1573412917999201006195229 ↗
12. Grey CP, Hall DS (2020) Prospects for lithium-ion batteries and beyond—a 2030 vision. Nat Commun 11:627910.1038/s41467-020-19991-4 ↗
13. Zhan R, Wang X, Chen Z, Seh ZW, Wang L, Sun Y (2021) Promises and challenges of the practical implementation of prelithiation in lithium-ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater 11:210156510.1002/aenm.202101565 ↗
14. Huang C-Y, Kuo T-R, Yougbaré S, Lin L-Y (2022) Design of LiFePO4 and porous carbon composites with excellent High-Rate charging performance for Lithium-Ion secondary battery. J Colloid Interface Sci 607:1457–146510.1016/j.jcis.2021.09.118 ↗
15. Wang Y, Wang X, Jiang A, Liu G, Yu W, Dong X, Wang J (2019) A versatile nitrogen-doped carbon coating strategy to improve the electrochemical performance of LiFePO4 cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. J Alloys Compd 810:15188910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151889 ↗
16. Wang X, Feng Z, Hou X, Liu L, He M, He X, Huang J, Wen Z (2020) Fluorine doped carbon coating of LiFePO4 as a cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. Chem Eng J 379:12237110.1016/j.cej.2019.122371 ↗
17. Zhang H, Li J, Luo L, Zhao J, He J, Zhao X, Liu H, Qin Y, Wang F, Song J (2021) Hierarchically porous MXene decorated carbon coated LiFePO4 as cathode material for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. J Alloys Compd 876:16021010.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160210 ↗
18. Iarchuk AR, Nikitina VA, Karpushkin EA, Sergeyev VG, Antipov EV, Stevenson KJ, Abakumov AM (2019) Influence of carbon coating on intercalation kinetics and transport properties of LiFePO4. ChemElectroChem 6:5090–510010.1002/celc.201901219 ↗
19. Kim J-K, Jeong SM (2020) Physico-electrochemical properties of carbon coated LiFePO4 nanoparticles prepared by different preparation method. Appl Surf Sci 505:14463010.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144630 ↗
20. Lai A, Chu Y, Jiang J, Huang Y, Hu S, Pan Q, Zheng F, Wang J, Li J, Wang H (2022) Self-restriction to form in-situ N, P co-doped carbon-coated LiFePO4 nanocomposites for high-performance lithium ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 414:14016110.1016/j.electacta.2022.140161 ↗
21. Xi Y, Lu Y (2020) Toward uniform in situ carbon coating on nano-LiFePO4 via a solid-state reaction. Ind Eng Chem Res 59:13549–1355510.1021/acs.iecr.0c01553 ↗
22. Wang C, Yuan X, Tan H, Jian S, Ma Z, Zhao J, Wang X, Chen D, Dong Y (2021) Three-dimensional carbon-coated LiFePO4 cathode with improved Li-ion battery performance. Coatings 11:113710.3390/coatings11091137 ↗
23. Liu Z, Zhang R, Xu F, Gao Y, Zhao J (2022) Structure and electrochemical performance of LiFePO4 cathode materials modified with carbon coating and metal doping. J Solid State Electrochem 26:1655–166510.1007/s10008-022-05198-8 ↗
24. Ravet N, Chouinard Y, Magnan JF, Besner S, Gauthier M, Armand M (2001) Electroactivity of natural and synthetic triphylite. Proc 10th Int Meet Lithium Batter 97–98:503–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00727-310.1016/S0378-7753(01)00727-3 ↗
25. Zhao N, Zhi X, Wang L, Liu Y, Liang G (2015) Effect of microstructure on low temperature electrochemical properties of LiFePO4/C cathode material. J Alloys Compd 645:301–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.09710.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.097 ↗
26. Huynh LTN, Nguyen HHA, Tran TTD, Nguyen TTT, Nguyen TMA, La TH, Tran VM, Le MLP (2019) Electrode composite LiFePO4@Carbon: structure and electrochemical performances. J Nanomater 2019:2464920. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/246492010.1155/2019/2464920 ↗
27. Liu X, Zhao R, Xia Y, Li Q (2022) Improved electrochemical performance of LiFePO4/carbon cathode for lithium-ion batteries. Ionics 28:4579–458510.1007/s11581-022-04715-z ↗
28. Zhao S, Wen L, Liu J, Chen J, Bei F (2020) Mn-doped LiFePO4/C composite with excellent high-rate performance as lithium ion batteries cathode. Int J Electrochem Sci 15:8873–888210.20964/2020.09.18 ↗
29. Bai Y-X, Zhang J, Yang Y-B, Yang R, Yan Y-L, Wang J (2020) Enhance electrochemical performance of LiFePO4 cathode material by Al-doped Li7La3Zr2O12 and carbon co-coating surface modification. J Alloys Compd 843:15491510.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154915 ↗
30. Li Y, Wang L, Zhang K, Liang F, Yao Y, Kong L (2022) High performance of LiFePO4 with nitrogen and phosphorus dual-doped carbon layer for lithium-ion batteries. J Alloys Compd 890:16161710.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161617 ↗
31. Chen M, Liu F-M, Chen S-S, Zhao Y-J, Sun Y, Li C-S, Yuan Z-Y, Qian X, Wan R (2023) In situ self-catalyzed formation of carbon nanotube wrapped and amorphous nanocarbon shell coated LiFePO4 microclew for high-power lithium ion batteries. Carbon 203:661–67010.1016/j.carbon.2022.12.015 ↗
32. Gangaraju V, Shastri M, Shetty K, Marilingaiah NR, Anantharaju K, Shivaramu PD, Rangappa D (2022) In-situ preparation of silk-cocoon derived carbon and LiFePO4 nanocomposite as cathode material for Li-ion battery. Ceram Int 48:35657–3566510.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.336 ↗
33. Khan S, Raj RP, George L, Kannangara GK, Milev A, Varadaraju UV, Selvam P (2020) Surfactant-mediated and morphology-controlled nanostructured LiFePO4/carbon composite as a promising cathode material for Li-ion batteries. ChemistryOpen 9:23–3110.1002/open.201900175 ↗
34. Omidi AH, Babaei A, Ataie A (2020) Low temperature synthesis of nanostructured LiFePO4/C cathode material for lithium ion batteries. Mater Res Bull 125:11080710.1016/j.materresbull.2020.110807 ↗
35. Chen Z, Xu M, Du B, Zhu H, Xie T, Wang W (2014) Morphology control of lithium iron phosphate nanoparticles by soluble starch-assisted hydrothermal synthesis. J Power Sources 272:837–84410.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.019 ↗
36. Sun S, Yan Q, Wu M, Zhao X (2021) Carbon aerogel based materials for secondary batteries. Sustain Mater Technol 30:e00342
37. Naghib SM, Behzad F, Rahmanian M, Zare Y, Rhee KY (2020) A highly sensitive biosensor based on methacrylated graphene oxide-grafted polyaniline for ascorbic acid determination. Nanotechnol Rev 9:760–76710.1515/ntrev-2020-0061 ↗