journal article·2023-05

Dual-templating-derived porous carbons for low-pressure CO2 capture

Gazi A. K. M. Rafiqul Bari, Hui-Ju Kang, Tae-Gyu Lee, Hyun Jin Hwang, Byeong-Hyeon An, Hye-Won Seo, Chang Hyun Ko, Won Hi Hong, Young-Si Jun

Carbon Letters· Volume 33· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Porous carbons are considered promising for CO2 capture due to their high-pressure capture performance, high chemical/thermal stability, and low humidity sensitivity. But, their low-pressure capture performance, selectivity toward CO2 over N2, and adsorption kinetics need further improvement for practical applications. Herein, we report a novel dual-templating strategy based on molten salts (LiBr/KBr) and hydrogen-bonded triazine molecules (melamine–cyanuric acid complex, MCA) to prepare high-performance porous carbon adsorbents for low-pressure CO2. The comprehensive investigations of pore structure, microstructure, and chemical structure, as well as their correlation with CO2 capture performance, reveal that the dual template plays the role of porogen for multi-hierarchical porous structure based on supermicro-/micro-/meso-/macro-pores and reactant for high N/O insertion into the carbon framework. Furthermore, they exert a synergistic but independent effect on the carbonization procedure of glucose, avoiding the counter-balance between porous structure and hetero-atom insertion. This enables the preferred formation of pyrrolic N/carboxylic acid functional groups and super-micropores of ~ 0.8 nm, while retaining the micro-/meso-/macro-pores (> 1 nm) more than 60% of the total pore volume. As a result, the dual-templated porous carbon adsorbent (MG-Br-600) simultaneously achieves a high CO2 capture capacity of 3.95 mmol g−1 at 850 Torr and 0 °C, a CO2/N2 (15:85) selectivity factor of 31 at 0 °C, and a high intra-particle diffusivity of 0.23 mmol g−1 min−0.5 without performance degradation over repeated use. With the molecular scale structure tunability and the large-scale production capability, the dual-templating strategy will offer versatile tools for designing high-performance carbon-based adsorbents for CO2 capture.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Brady D, Chris M, Amid pandemic, U.N. cancels global climate conference, The Washington post, climate and environment, 01 April 2020. Environmnent https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2020/04/01/un-climate-coronavirus-cop26/. Accessed 11 Nov 2022
2. Pedraza J, Zimmermann A, Tobon J, Schomäcker R, Rojas N (2021) On the road to net zero-emission cement: integrated assessment of mineral carbonation of cement kiln dust. Chem Eng J 408:127346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12734610.1016/j.cej.2020.127346 ↗
3. Janakiram S, Santinelli F, Costi R, Lindbråthen A, Nardelli GM, Milkowski K, Ansaloni L, Deng L (2021) Field trial of hollow fiber modules of hybrid facilitated transport membranes for flue gas CO2 capture in cement industry. Chem Eng J 413:127405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12740510.1016/j.cej.2020.127405 ↗
4. Rochelle GT (2009) Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science 325(5948):1652. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.117673110.1126/science.1176731 ↗
5. Singh A, Sharma Y, Wupardrasta Y, Desai K (2016) Selection of amine combination for CO2 capture in a packed bed scrubber. Resour Eff Technol 2:S165–S170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reffit.2016.11.01410.1016/j.reffit.2016.11.014 ↗
6. Luis P (2016) Use of monoethanolamine (MEA) for CO2 capture in a global scenario: consequences and alternatives. Desalination 380:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.00410.1016/j.desal.2015.08.004 ↗
7. Mazari SA, Ali BS, Jan BM, Saeed IM (2014) Degradation study of piperazine, its blends and structural analogs for CO2 capture: a review. Int J Greenh Gas Control 31:214–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.10.00310.1016/j.ijggc.2014.10.003 ↗
8. Zhang Z, Cano ZP, Luo D, Dou H, Yu A, Chen Z (2019) Rational design of tailored porous carbon-based materials for CO2 capture. J Mater Chem A 7(37):20985–21003. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA07297G10.1039/C9TA07297G ↗
9. Yang J, Yue L, Hu X, Wang L, Zhao Y, Lin Y, Sun Y, DaCosta H, Guo L (2017) Efficient CO2 capture by porous carbons derived from coconut shell. Energy Fuels 31(4):4287–4293. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b0063310.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00633 ↗
10. Sanz-Pérez ES, Murdock CR, Didas SA, Jones CW (2016) Direct capture of CO2 from ambient air. Chem Rev 116(19):11840–11876. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0017310.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00173 ↗
11. Shi S, Ochedi FO, Cui S, Liu Y (2020) Removal of CO2 from flue gas using seaweed porous carbons prepared by urea doping and KOH activation. Energy Fuels 34(12):16411–16422. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c0320010.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03200 ↗
12. Barzagli F, Mani F, Peruzzini M (2016) A comparative study of the CO2 absorption in some solvent-free alkanolamines and in aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA). Environ Sci Technol 50(13):7239–7246. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b0015010.1021/acs.est.6b00150 ↗
13. Singh G, Lee J, Karakoti A, Bahadur R, Yi J, Zhao D, AlBahily K, Vinu A (2020) Emerging trends in porous materials for CO2 capture and conversion. Chem Soc Rev 49(13):4360–4404. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS00075B10.1039/D0CS00075B ↗
14. To JWF, He J, Mei J, Haghpanah R, Chen Z, Kurosawa T, Chen S, Bae W-G, Pan L, Tok JBH, Wilcox J, Bao Z (2016) Hierarchical N-doped carbon as CO2 adsorbent with high CO2 selectivity from rationally designed polypyrrole precursor. J Am Chem Soc 138(3):1001–1009. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b1195510.1021/jacs.5b11955 ↗
15. Chang B, Shi W, Yin H, Zhang S, Yang B (2019) Poplar catkin-derived self-templated synthesis of N-doped hierarchical porous carbon microtubes for effective CO2 capture. Chem Eng J 358:1507–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.14210.1016/j.cej.2018.10.142 ↗
16. Zeng Y, Zou R, Zhao Y (2016) Covalent organic frameworks for CO2 capture. Adv Mater 28(15):2855–2873. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150500410.1002/adma.201505004 ↗
17. Rehman A, Heo Y-J, Nazir G, Park S-J (2021) Solvent-free, one-pot synthesis of nitrogen-tailored alkali-activated microporous carbons with an efficient CO2 adsorption. Carbon 172:71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.09.08810.1016/j.carbon.2020.09.088 ↗
18. Gong J, Lin H, Antonietti M, Yuan J (2016) Nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanosheets derived from poly(ionic liquids: hierarchical pore structures for efficient CO2 capture and dye removal. J Mater Chem A 4(19):7313–7321. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA01945E10.1039/C6TA01945E ↗
19. Wu D, Liu J, Yang Y, Zheng Y (2020) Nitrogen/oxygen co-doped porous carbon derived from biomass for low-pressure CO2 capture. Ind Eng Chem Res 59(31):14055–14063. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0000610.1021/acs.iecr.0c00006 ↗
20. Wu D, Yang Y, Liu J, Zheng Y (2020) Plasma-modified N/O-doped porous carbon for CO2 capture: an experimental and theoretical study. Energy Fuels 34(5):6077–6084. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c0041510.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00415 ↗
21. Ashourirad B, Arab P, Islamoglu T, Cychosz KA, Thommes M, El-Kaderi HM (2016) A cost-effective synthesis of heteroatom-doped porous carbons as efficient CO2 sorbents. J Mater Chem A 4(38):14693–14702. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA06251B10.1039/C6TA06251B ↗
22. Kang H-J, Huh YS, Im WB, Jun Y-S (2019) Molecular cooperative assembly-mediated synthesis of ultra-high-performance hard carbon anodes for dual-carbon sodium hybrid capacitors. ACS Nano 13(10):11935–11946. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b0602710.1021/acsnano.9b06027 ↗
23. Dou X, Hasa I, Saurel D, Vaalma C, Wu L, Buchholz D, Bresser D, Komaba S, Passerini S (2019) Hard carbons for sodium-ion batteries: structure, analysis, sustainability, and electrochemistry. Mater Today 23:87–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.12.04010.1016/j.mattod.2018.12.040 ↗
24. Parshetti GK, Chowdhury S, Balasubramanian R (2015) Biomass derived low-cost microporous adsorbents for efficient CO2 capture. Fuel 148:246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.03210.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.032 ↗
25. Saha D, Payzant EA, Kumbhar AS, Naskar AK (2013) Sustainable mesoporous carbons as storage and controlled-delivery media for functional molecules. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(12):5868–5874. https://doi.org/10.1021/am401661f10.1021/am401661f ↗
26. Vilian ATE, Song JY, Lee YS, Hwang S-K, Kim HJ, Jun Y-S, Huh YS, Han Y-K (2018) Salt-templated three-dimensional porous carbon for electrochemical determination of gallic acid. Biosens Bioelectron 117:597–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.06.06410.1016/j.bios.2018.06.064 ↗
27. Sangster J, Pelton AD (1987) Phase diagrams and thermodynamic properties of the 70 binary alkali halide systems having common ions. J Phys Chem Ref Data 16(3):509–561. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.55580310.1063/1.555803 ↗
28. Regufe MJ, Ferreira AFP, Loureiro JM, Rodrigues A, Ribeiro AM (2020) Development of hybrid materials with activated carbon and zeolite 13X for CO2 capture from flue gases by electric swing adsorption. Ind Eng Chem Res 59(26):12197–12211. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0018410.1021/acs.iecr.0c00184 ↗
29. Kayal S, Chakraborty A (2018) Activated carbon (type Maxsorb-III) and MIL-101(Cr) metal organic framework based composite adsorbent for higher CH4 storage and CO2 capture. Chem Eng J 334:780–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.08010.1016/j.cej.2017.10.080 ↗
30. Wang R, Xi S-C, Wang D-Y, Dou M, Dong B (2021) Defluorinated porous carbon nanomaterials for CO2 capture. ACS Appl Nano Mater 4(10):10148–10154. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c0162010.1021/acsanm.1c01620 ↗
31. Jun Y-S, Lee EZ, Wang X, Hong WH, Stucky GD, Thomas A (2013) From melamine-cyanuric acid supramolecular aggregates to carbon nitride hollow spheres. Adv Funct Mater 23(29):3661–3667. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20120373210.1002/adfm.201203732 ↗
32. Culp JT, Smith MR, Bittner E, Bockrath B (2008) Hysteresis in the physisorption of CO2 and N2 in a flexible pillared layer nickel cyanide. J Am Chem Soc 130(37):12427–12434. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja802474b10.1021/ja802474b ↗
33. Rouhani M, Chau-Nan Hong F, Jeng Y-R (2018) In-situ thermal stability analysis of amorphous carbon films with different sp3 content. Carbon 130:401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.03410.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.034 ↗
34. Liu X, Giordano C, Antonietti M (2014) A facile molten-salt route to graphene synthesis. Small 10(1):193–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20130081210.1002/smll.201300812 ↗
35. Fischer A, Muller JO, Antonietti M, Thomas A (2008) Synthesis of ternary metal nitride nanoparticles using mesoporous carbon nitride as reactive template. ACS Nano 2(12):2489–2496. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn800503a10.1021/nn800503a ↗
36. Jun Y-S, Hong WH, Antonietti M, Thomas A (2009) Mesoporous, 2D hexagonal carbon nitride and titanium nitride/carbon composites. Adv Mater 21(42):4270–4274. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20080350010.1002/adma.200803500 ↗
37. Lee T-G, Kang H-J, Kim J-H, Suzuki N, Fujishima A, Choi M, Jun Y-S (2021) Eutectic iodide-based salt as a melem-to-PTI conversion stopping agent for all-in-one graphitic carbon nitride. Appl Catal B 294:120222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12022210.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120222 ↗
38. Oschatz M, Antonietti M (2018) A search for selectivity to enable CO2 capture with porous adsorbents. Energy Environ Sci 11(1):57–70. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE02110K10.1039/C7EE02110K ↗
39. Didas SA, Choi S, Chaikittisilp W, Jones CW (2015) Amine-oxide hybrid materials for CO2 capture from ambient air. Acc Chem Res 48(10):2680–2687. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b0028410.1021/acs.accounts.5b00284 ↗
40. Wurzbacher JA, Gebald C, Piatkowski N, Steinfeld A (2012) Concurrent separation of CO2 and H2O from air by a temperature-vacuum swing adsorption/desorption cycle. Environ Sci Technol 46(16):9191–9198. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301953k10.1021/es301953k ↗
41. Ben-Mansour R, Habib MA, Bamidele OE, Basha M, Qasem NAA, Peedikakkal A, Laoui T, Ali M (2016) Carbon capture by physical adsorption: materials, experimental investigations and numerical modeling and simulations—a review. Appl Energy 161:225–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.01110.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.011 ↗
42. Lee S-Y, Park S-J (2015) A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture. J Ind Eng Chem 23:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.00110.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.001 ↗
43. Wang S, Zhang Z, Dai S, Jiang D-E (2019) Insights into CO2/N2 selectivity in porous carbons from deep learning. ACS Mater Lett 1(5):558–563. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b0037410.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00374 ↗
44. Jagiello J, Ania C, Parra JB, Cook C (2015) Dual gas analysis of microporous carbons using 2D-NLDFT heterogeneous surface model and combined adsorption data of N2 and CO2. Carbon 91:330–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.00410.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.004 ↗
45. Li B, Zhang Z, Li Y, Yao K, Zhu Y, Deng Z, Yang F, Zhou X, Li G, Wu H, Nijem N, Chabal YJ, Lai Z, Han Y, Shi Z, Feng S, Li J (2012) Enhanced binding affinity, remarkable selectivity, and high capacity of CO2 by dual functionalization of a rht-type metal-organic framework. Angew Chem Int Ed 51(6):1412–1415. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20110596610.1002/anie.201105966 ↗
46. Madden DG, Scott HS, Kumar A, Chen K-J, Sanii R, Bajpai A, Lusi M, Curtin T, Perry JJ, Zaworotko MJ (2017) Flue-gas and direct-air capture of CO2 by porous metal–organic materials. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 375(2084):20160025. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.002510.1098/rsta.2016.0025 ↗
47. Piekkari K, Ohenoja K, Isteri V, Tanskanen P, Illikainen M (2020) Immobilization of heavy metals, selenate, and sulfate from a hazardous industrial side stream by using calcium sulfoaluminate-belite cement. J Clean Prod 258:120560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12056010.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120560 ↗
48. Wang T, Wang X, Hou C, Liu J (2020) Quaternary functionalized mesoporous adsorbents for ultra-high kinetics of CO2 capture from air. Sci Rep 10(1):21429. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77477-110.1038/s41598-020-77477-1 ↗
49. Dantas S, Struckhoff KC, Thommes M, Neimark AV (2021) Pore size characterization of micro-mesoporous carbons using CO2 adsorption. Carbon 173:842–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.05910.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.059 ↗
50. Cazorla-Amorós D, Alcañiz-Monge J, Linares-Solano A (1996) Characterization of activated carbon fibers by CO2 adsorption. Langmuir 12(11):2820–2824. https://doi.org/10.1021/la960022s10.1021/la960022s ↗
51. Garrido J, Linares-Solano A, Martin-Martinez JM, Molina-Sabio M, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Torregrosa R (1987) Use of nitrogen vs. carbon dioxide in the characterization of activated carbons. Langmuir 3(1):76–81. https://doi.org/10.1021/la00073a01310.1021/la00073a013 ↗
52. Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV, Olivier JP, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Rouquerol J, Sing KSW (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 87(9–10):1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-111710.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗
53. Gibaud A, Xue JS, Dahn JR (1996) A small angle X-ray scattering study of carbons made from pyrolyzed sugar. Carbon 34(4):499–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00207-310.1016/0008-6223(95)00207-3 ↗
54. Jagiello J, Chojnacka A, Pourhosseini SEM, Wang Z, Beguin F (2021) A dual shape pore model to analyze the gas adsorption data of hierarchical micro-mesoporous carbons. Carbon 178:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.02.09810.1016/j.carbon.2021.02.098 ↗
55. Wu R, Ye Q, Wu K, Wang L, Dai H (2021) Highly efficient CO2 adsorption of corn kernel-derived porous carbon with abundant oxygen functional groups. J CO2 Util 51:101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2021.10162010.1016/j.jcou.2021.101620 ↗
56. Thomas A, Fischer A, Goettmann F, Antonietti M, Müller J-O, Schlögl R, Carlsson JM (2008) Graphitic carbon nitride materials: variation of structure and morphology and their use as metal-free catalysts. J Mater Chem 18(41):4893–4908. https://doi.org/10.1039/B800274F10.1039/B800274F ↗
57. Armandi M, Garrone E, Areán CO, Bonelli B (2009) Thermodynamics of carbon dioxide adsorption on the protonic zeolite H-ZSM-5. Chem Phys Chem 10(18):3316–3319. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.20090056110.1002/cphc.200900561 ↗
58. Qian J, Shen J, Li Q, Hu Y, Huang S (2017) Selective adsorption behaviour of carbon dioxide in OH-functionalized metal–organic framework materials. Cryst Eng Comm 19(36):5346–5350. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CE01195D10.1039/C7CE01195D ↗
59. Xing W, Liu C, Zhou Z, Zhang L, Zhou J, Zhuo S, Yan Z, Gao H, Wang G, Qiao SZ (2012) Superior CO2 uptake of N-doped activated carbon through hydrogen-bonding interaction. Energy Environ Sci 5(6):7323–7327. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE21653A10.1039/C2EE21653A ↗
60. Algara-Siller G, Severin N, Chong SY, Bjorkman T, Palgrave RG, Laybourn A, Antonietti M, Khimyak YZ, Krasheninnikov AV, Rabe JP, Kaiser U, Cooper AI, Thomas A, Bojdys MJ (2014) Triazine-based graphitic carbon nitride: a two-dimensional semiconductor. Angew Chem Int Ed 53(29):7450–7455. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20140219110.1002/anie.201402191 ↗
61. Klepel O, Hunger B (2005) Temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) of carbon dioxide on alkali-metal cation-exchanged faujasite type zeolites. J Therm Anal Calorim 80(1):201–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-005-0636-310.1007/s10973-005-0636-3 ↗
62. Querejeta N, Rubiera F, Pevida C (2022) Experimental study on the kinetics of CO2 and H2O Adsorption on honeycomb carbon monoliths under cement flue gas conditions. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 10(6):2107–2124. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0721310.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07213 ↗
63. Yao J, Wen J, Li H, Yang Y (2022) Surface functional groups determine adsorption of pharmaceuticals and personal care products on polypropylene microplastics. J Hazard Mater 423:127131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12713110.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127131 ↗
64. Álvarez-Gutiérrez N, Gil MV, Rubiera F, Pevida C (2017) Kinetics of CO2 adsorption on cherry stone-based carbons in CO2/CH4 separations. Chem Eng J 307:249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.07710.1016/j.cej.2016.08.077 ↗
65. Donnaperna L, Duclaux L, Gadiou R, Hirn MP, Merli C, Pietrelli L (2009) Comparison of adsorption of Remazol Black B and Acidol Red on microporous activated carbon felt. J Colloid Interface Sci 339(2):275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2009.07.05710.1016/j.jcis.2009.07.057 ↗