Recent developments in the application of carbon-based nanomaterials in implantable and wearable enzyme-biofuel cells
Source abstract
Abstract
The implanted electronic devices require a stable, continuous, and long-lasting energy source to function correctly. These devices are powered by alkaline batteries and lithium ions. When used in implantable or wearable devices, these batteries can pose a threat to human health and the environment. Because of these factors, implantable and wearable devices using enzyme biofuel cells (EBFCs) are receiving a lot of attention. These EBFCs use human physiological fluid to provide long-term control for these devices. Carbon nanomaterials have successfully been demonstrated in enzymatic biofuel cells to improve applications by increasing current and power density; they have the potential to enhance EBFC efficiency. This review summarizes the fundamental process of EBFC compounds based on carbon nanomaterials before delving into the most recent advancements that have been tested and used as implantable and wearable self-power sources.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Holzinger M, Le Goff A, Cosnier S (2012) Carbon nanotube/enzyme biofuel cells. Electrochim Acta 82:179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.13510.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.135 ↗
2. Kumar A, Sharma S, Pandey LM, Chandra P (2018) Nanoengineered material based biosensing electrodes for enzymatic biofuel cells applications. Mater Sci Ener Technol 1:38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2018.04.00110.1016/j.mset.2018.04.001 ↗
3. Kashyap D, Venkateswaran PS (2015) Recent developments in enzymatic biofuel cell: towards implantable integrated micro-devices. Int J Nanoparticles 8:61–80. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNP.2015.07034510.1504/IJNP.2015.070345 ↗
4. Gamella M, Koushanpour A, Katz E (2017) Biofuel cells—activation of micro- and macro-electronic devices. Bioelectrochem 119:33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.09.00210.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.09.002 ↗
5. Minteer SD, Liaw BY, Cooney MJ (2007) Enzyme-based biofuel cells. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2007.03.00710.1016/j.copbio.2007.03.007 ↗
6. Franks AE, Nevin KP (2010) Microbial fuel cells, a current review. Energies 3:899–919. https://doi.org/10.3390/en305089910.3390/en3050899 ↗
7. Lobato J, Del Campo AG, Fernández FJ, Cañizares P, Rodrigo MA (2013) Lagooning microbial fuel cells: a first approach by coupling electricity-producing microorganisms and algae. Appl Energy 110:220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.01010.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.010 ↗
8. Afroz AS, Romano D, Inglese F, Stefanini C (2021) Towards bio-hybrid energy harvesting in the real-world: pushing the boundaries of technologies and strategies using bio-electrochemical and bio-mechanical processes. Appl Sci 11(5):2220. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP1105222010.3390/APP11052220 ↗
9. Babanova S, Hubenova Y, Mitov M (2011) Influence of artificial mediators on yeast-based fuel cell performance. J Biosci Bioeng 112:379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.06.00810.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.06.008 ↗
10. Abrevaya XC, Sacco NJ, Bonetto MC, Hilding-Ohlsson A, Cortón E (2015) Analytical applications of microbial fuel cells. Part I: biochemical oxygen demand. Biosens Bioelectron 63:580–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.04.03410.1016/j.bios.2014.04.034 ↗
11. Dessie Y, Tadesse S, Eswaramoorthy R (2020) Review on manganese oxide based biocatalyst in microbial fuel cell: nanocomposite approach. Mater Sci Technol 3:136–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2019.11.00110.1016/j.mset.2019.11.001 ↗
12. Koók L, Kaufer B, Bakonyi P, Rózsenberszki T, Rivera I, Buitrón G, Bélafi-Bakó K, Nemestóthy N (2019) Supported ionic liquid membrane based on [bmim][PF6] can be a promising separator to replace Nafion in microbial fuel cells and improve energy recovery: a comparative process evaluation. J Membr Sci 570–571:215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.06310.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.063 ↗
13. Kim KY, Chae KJ, Choi MJ, Yang ET, Hwang MH, Kim IS (2013) High-quality effluent and electricity production from non-CEM based flow-through type microbial fuel cell. Chem Eng J 218:19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.01810.1016/j.cej.2012.12.018 ↗
14. Li WW, Sheng GP, Liu XW, Yu HQ (2011) Recent advances in the separators for microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 102:244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.09010.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.090 ↗
15. Oliot M, Galier S, de Balmann HR, Bergel A (2016) Ion transport in microbial fuel cells: key roles, theory and critical review. Appl Energy 183:1682–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.04310.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.043 ↗
16. Koók L, Nemestóthy N, Bakonyi P, Zhen G, Kumar G, Lu X, Su L, Saratale GD, Kim S-H, Gubicza L (2017) Performance evaluation of microbial electrochemical systems operated with Nafion and supported ionic liquid membranes. Chemosphere 175:350–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.05510.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.055 ↗
17. Arges CG, Ramani VK, Pintauro PN (2010) The chalkboard: anion exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochem Soc Interface 19:31–35. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.F03102if10.1149/2.F03102if ↗
18. Pandit S, Ghosh S, Ghangrekar M, Das D (2012) Performance of an anion exchange membrane in association with cathodic parameters in a dual chamber microbial fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:9383–9392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.01110.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.011 ↗
19. Fang C, Achal V (2019) The potential of microbial fuel cells for remediation of heavy metals from soil and water—review of application. Microorganisms 7(12):697. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms712069710.3390/microorganisms7120697 ↗
20. Zebda A, Alcaraz J-P, Vadgama P, Shleev S, Minteer SD, Boucher F, Cinquin P, Martina DK (2018) Challenges for successful implantation of biofuel cells. Bioelectrochem 124:57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.05.01110.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.05.011 ↗
21. Li X, Zhang L, Su L, Ohsaka T, Mao L (2009) A miniature glucose/O2 biofuel cell with a high tolerance against ascorbic acid. Fuel Cells 9:85–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.20080005410.1002/fuce.200800054 ↗
22. Zebda A, Cosnier S, Alcaraz J-P, Holzinger M, Le Goff A, Gondran C, Boucher F, Giroud F, Gorgy K, Lamraoui H, Cinquin P (2013) Single glucose biofuel cells implanted in rats power electronic devices. Sci Rep 3:1516. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0151610.1038/srep01516 ↗
23. Slaughter G, Kulkarni T (2015) Enzymatic glucose biofuel cell and its application. J Biochips Tissue Chips 5(1):1000110. https://doi.org/10.4172/21530777.100011110.4172/21530777.1000111 ↗
24. Yang J, Ghobadian S, Goodrich PJ, Montazami R, Hashemi N (2013) Miniaturized biological and electrochemical fuel cells: challenges and applications. Phys Chem Chemical Phys 15:14147–14161. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP50804H10.1039/C3CP50804H ↗
25. Huang X, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Guo S, Shang H, Li Y, Liu J (2019) Wearable biofuel cells based on the classification of enzyme for high power outputs and lifetimes. Biosens Bioelectron 124–125:40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.09.08610.1016/j.bios.2018.09.086 ↗
26. Meredith MT, Minteer SD (2012) Biofuel cells: enhanced enzymatic bioelectrocatalysis. Annu Rev Anal Chem 5:157–17910.1146/annurev-anchem-062011-143049 ↗
27. Bandodkar AJ (2017) Wearable biofuel cells: past, present and future. J Electrochem Soc 164(3):H3007–H3014. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0031703jes10.1149/2.0031703jes ↗
28. Bandodkar AJ, Jia Wırez JR, Wang J (2015) Biocompatible enzymatic roller pens for direct writing of biocatalytic materials: “do-it-yourself” electrochemical biosensors. Adv Healthc Mater 4:1215–1224. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20140080810.1002/adhm.201400808 ↗
29. Fersht AR, Serrano L (1993) Principles of protein stability derived from protein engineering experiments. Curr Opin Struct Biol 3:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-440X(93)90205-Y10.1016/0959-440X(93)90205-Y ↗
30. Courjean O, Gao F, Mano N (2009) Deglycosylation of glucose oxidase for direct and efficient glucose electrooxidation on a glassy carbon electrode. Angew Chem Int Ed 48:5897–5899. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20090219110.1002/anie.200902191 ↗
31. Prevoteau A, Courjean O, Mano N (2010) Deglycosylation of glucose oxidase to improve biosensors and biofuel cells. Electrochem Commun 12:213–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2009.11.02710.1016/j.elecom.2009.11.027 ↗
32. Gross AJ, Holzingera M, Cosnier S (2018) Bucky paper bioelectrodes: emerging materials for implantable and wearable biofuel cells. Energy Environ Sci 11:1670–1687. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE00330K10.1039/C8EE00330K ↗
33. Mano N, Mao F, Heller AA (2002) Miniature biofuel cell operating in a physiological buffer. J Am Chem Soc 124:12962–12963. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja028514g10.1021/ja028514g ↗
34. Pan C, Fang Y, Wu H, Ahmad M, Luo Z, Li Q, Xie J, Yan X, Wu L, Wang ZL, Zhu J (2010) Generating electricity from biofluid with a nanowire-based biofuel cell for self-powered nanodevices. Adv Mater 22:5388–5392. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20100251910.1002/adma.201002519 ↗
35. Barriére F, Kavanagh P, Leech D (2006) A laccase-glucose oxidase biofuel cell prototype operating in a physiological buffer. Electrochim Acta 51:5187–5192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.05010.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.050 ↗
36. Southcott M, MacVittie K, Halámek J, Halámkova L, Southcott M, Jemison WD, Lobel R, Katz E (2013) A pacemaker powered by an implantable biofuel cell operating under conditions mimicking the human blood circulatory system—battery not included. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:6278–6283. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp50929j10.1039/c3cp50929j ↗
37. Zhao C, Gai P, Song R, Chen Y, Zhang J, Jie Zhu J (2017) Nanostructured material-based biofuel cells: recent advances and future prospects. Chem Soc Rev 46:1545–1564. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00044D10.1039/C6CS00044D ↗
38. Mousty C, Bioanal A (2010) Biosensing applications of clay-modified electrodes: a review. Chem 396:315–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3274-y10.1007/s00216-009-3274-y ↗
39. Zhou M, Du Y, Chen C, Li B, Wen D, Dong S, Wang E (2010) Aptamer-controlled biofuel cells in logic systems and used as self-powered and intelligent logic aptasensors. J Am Chem Soc 132:2172–2174. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja910634e10.1021/ja910634e ↗
40. Babadi AA, Bagheri S, Hamid SBA (2016) Progress on implantable biofuel cell: nano-carbon functionalization for enzyme immobilization enhancement. Biosens Bioelectron 79:850–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.01.01610.1016/j.bios.2016.01.016 ↗
41. Ramimoghadam D, Bagheri S, Abd Hamid SB (2014) Biotemplated synthesis of anatase titanium dioxide nanoparticles via lignocellulosic waste material. BioMed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/20563610.1155/2014/205636 ↗
42. Szwacki NG (2008) Boron fullerenes: a first-principles study. Nanoscale Res Lett 3(2):49–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-007-9113-110.1007/s11671-007-9113-1 ↗
43. Karim AN, Yang H (2021) Mini-review: recent technologies of electrode and system in the enzymatic biofuel cell (EBFC). Appli Sci 11(11):5197. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1111519710.3390/app11115197 ↗
44. Miki K, Watanabe T, Koh S (2020) Electrochemical characterization of CVD-grown graphene for designing electrode/biomolecule interfaces. Curr Comput-Aided Drug Des 10:241. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1004024110.3390/cryst10040241 ↗
45. Sakamoto H, Koto A, Takamura EI, Asakawa H, Fukuma T, Satomura T, Suye SI (2019) Development of biofuel cell using a complex of highly oriented immobilized his-tagged enzyme and carbon nanotube surface through a pyrene derivative. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 19:3551–3557. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2019.1612110.1166/jnn.2019.16121 ↗
46. Tominaga M, Kuwahara K, Tsushida M, Shida K (2020) Cellulose nanofiber-based electrode as a component of an enzyme-catalyzed biofuel cell. RSC Adv 10(37):22120–22125. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA03476B10.1039/D0RA03476B ↗
47. Wang SC, Yang F, Silva M, Zarow A, Wang Y, Iqbal Z (2009) Membrane-less and mediator-free enzymatic biofuel cell using carbon nanotube/porous silicon electrodes. Electrochem Commun 11(1):34–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2008.10.01910.1016/j.elecom.2008.10.019 ↗
48. Chekin F, Raoof JB, Bagheri S, Abd Hamid S (2012) Fabrication of chitosan-multiwall carbon nanotube nanocomposite containing ferri/ferrocyanide: application for simultaneous detection of D-penicillamine and tryptophan. J Chin Chem Soc 59:1461–1467. https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.20120013810.1002/jccs.201200138 ↗
49. Le Goff A, Holzinger M, Cosnier S (2011) Enzymatic biosensors based on SWCNT-conducting polymer electrodes. Analyst 136:1279–1287. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0AN00904K10.1039/C0AN00904K ↗
50. Shim M, Shi Kam NW, Chen RJ, Li Y, Dai H (2002) Functionalization of carbon nanotubes for biocompatibility and biomolecular recognition. Nano Lett 2(4):285–288. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl015692j10.1021/nl015692j ↗
51. Aquino Neto S, Almeida TS, Belnap DM, Minteer SD, De Andrade AR (2015) Enhanced reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide electrocatalysis onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes-decorated gold nanoparticles and their use in hybrid biofuel cell. J Power Sources 273:1065–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.07410.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.074 ↗
52. Yang J, Hu D, Zhang X, Wang K, Wang B, Sun B, Qiu Z (2014) Enzyme-catalyzed biocathode in a photoelectrochemical biofuel cell. J Power Sources 267:617–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.13810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.138 ↗
53. Aquino Neto S, Almeida TS, Palma LM, Minteer SD, de Andrade AR (2014) Hybrid nanocatalysts containing enzymes and metallic nanoparticles for ethanol/O2 biofuel cell. J Power Sources 259:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.06910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.069 ↗
54. Jensen UB, Lörcher S, Vagin M, Chevallier J, Shipovskov S, Koroleva O, Ferapontova EE (2012) Hybrid Zn-O2 biofuel cell with a fungal laccase-carbon cloth biocathode. Electrochim Acta 62:218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.02610.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.026 ↗
55. Neto SA, De Andrade AR (2013) New energy sources: the enzymatic biofuel cell. J Braz Chem Soc 24:1891–1912. https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-5053.2013026110.5935/0103-5053.20130261 ↗
56. Nguyen HH, Kim M (2017) An overview of techniques in enzyme immobilization. Appl Sci Convergence Technol 26(6):157–163. https://doi.org/10.5757/ASCT.2017.26.6.15710.5757/ASCT.2017.26.6.157 ↗
57. Imam HT, Marr PC, Marr AC (2021) Enzyme entrapment, biocatalyst immobilization without covalent attachment. Green Chem 23(14):4980–5005. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC01852C10.1039/D1GC01852C ↗
58. Nazaruk E, Sadowska K, Biernat J, Rogalski J, Ginalska G, Bilewicz R, Bioanal A (2010) Enzymatic electrodes nanostructured with functionalized carbon nanotubes for biofuel cell applications. Chem 398:1651–1660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4012-110.1007/s00216-010-4012-1 ↗
59. Haddad R, Holzinger M, Maaref A, Cosnier S (2010) Pyrene functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes as precursors for high performance biosensors. Electrochim Acta 55:7800–7803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.02110.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.021 ↗
60. Haddad R, Holzinger M, Villalonga R, Neumann A, Roots J, Maaref A, Cosnier S (2011) Pyrene-adamantane-β-cyclodextrin: an efficient host–guest system for the biofunctionalization of SWCNT electrodes. Carbon 49:2571–2578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.04910.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.049 ↗
61. Korani A, Salimi A (2015) High performance glucose/O2 compartment-less biofuel cell using DNA/CNTs as platform for immobilizing bilirubin oxidase as novel biocathode and integrated NH2-CNTs/dendrimer/glucose dehydrogenase/nile blue as bioanode. Electrochim Acta 185:90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.09010.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.090 ↗
62. Zebda A, Gondran C, Le Goff A, Holzinger M, Cinquin P, Cosnier S (2011) Mediatorless high-power glucose biofuel cells based on compressed carbon nanotube-enzyme electrodes. Nature Commun 2(370):2555–2559. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms136510.1038/ncomms1365 ↗
63. Falk M, Andoralov V, Blum Z, Sotres J, Suyatin DB, Ruzgas T, Arnebrant T, Shleev S (2012) Biofuel cell as a power source for electronic contact lenses. Biosens Bioelectron 37:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2012.04.03010.1016/j.bios.2012.04.030 ↗
64. Wang Y, Liu L, Li M, Xu S, Gao F (2011) Multifunctional carbon nanotubes for direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase and glucose bioassay. Biosens Bioelectron 30(1):107–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2011.08.03810.1016/j.bios.2011.08.038 ↗
65. Li Y, Chen SM, Sarawathi R (2011) Membraneless enzymatic biofuel cells based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Int J Electrochem Sci 6:3776–378810.1016/S1452-3981(23)18288-5 ↗
66. Feng W, Ji P (2011) Enzymes immobilized on carbon nanotubes. Biotech Adv 29(6):889–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.00710.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.007 ↗
67. Cosnier S, Gross A, Le Goff A, Holzinger M (2016) Recent advances on enzymatic glucose/oxygen and hydrogen/oxygen biofuel cells: achievements and limitations. J Power Sources 325:252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.13310.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.133 ↗
68. Cosnier S, Holzinger M, Le Goff A (2014) Recent advances in carbon nanotube-based enzymatic fuel cells. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2:45. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2014.0004510.3389/fbioe.2014.00045 ↗
69. Cosnier S, Le Goff A, Holzinger M (2014) Towards glucose biofuel cells implanted in human body for powering artificial organs: review. Electrochem Commun 38:19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2013.09.02110.1016/j.elecom.2013.09.021 ↗
70. Rewatkar P, Bandapati M, Goel S (2018) Optimized bucky paper-based bioelectrodes for oxygen-glucose fed enzymatic biofuel cells. IEEE Sens J 18(13):5395–5401. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2018.283709210.1109/JSEN.2018.2837092 ↗
71. Rewatkar P, Goel S (2018) Paper based membraneless co-laminar microfluidic glucose biofuel cell with MWCNT fed bucky paper bioelectrodes. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 17(4):374–379. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnb.2018.285740610.1109/tnb.2018.2857406 ↗
72. Gross A, Robin MP, Nédellec Y, O’reilly RK, Shan D (2016) Robust bi-functional buckypapers from carbon nanotubes and polynorbornene copolymers for flexible engineering of enzymatic bioelectrodes. Carbon 107:542–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.02710.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.027 ↗
73. Fapyane D, Lee SJ, Kang SH, Ahn JH (2015) Graphitized-carbon-nanofiber paper-enzyme electrode fabrication through non-covalent modification for enzyme biofuel cell application. J Biomed Nanotechnol 11:137–142. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2015.202910.1166/jbn.2015.2029 ↗
74. Ji Y, Gai P, Feng J, Wang L, Zhang J, Zhu J-J (2017) A Fe3O4–carbon nanofiber/gold nanoparticle hybrid for enzymatic biofuel cells with larger power output. J Mater Chem 5:11026–11031. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA01931A10.1039/C7TA01931A ↗
75. Olabi AG, Abdelkareem MA, Wilberforce T, Sayed ET (2021) Application of graphene in energy storage device—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 135:110026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.11002610.1016/j.rser.2020.110026 ↗
76. Kim J, Eum J-H, Kang J, Kwon O, Kim H, Kim DW (2021) Tuning the hierarchical pore structure of graphene oxide through dual thermal activation for high-performance supercapacitor. Sci Rep 11:2063. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81759-710.1038/s41598-021-81759-7 ↗
77. Li G, Li Z, Xiao X, An Y, Wang WA, Hu Z (2019) An ultrahigh electron-donating quaternary-N-doped reduced graphene oxide@ carbon nanotube framework: a covalently coupled catalyst support for enzymatic bioelectrodes. J Mater Chem 7(18):11077–11085. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA00771G10.1039/C9TA00771G ↗
78. Yoon T, Baek I, Lee S, Choi H, Yoon S, Lee H, Kim SU, Na S (2020) Immobilization of laccase on a graphene interface: direct electron transfer and molecular dynamics study. Appl Surf Sci 521:146378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14637810.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146378 ↗
79. Tang J, Yan X, Huang W, Engelbrekt C, Duus Jens Ø, Ulstrup J, Xiao X, Zhang J (2020) Bilirubin oxidase oriented on novel type three-dimensional biocathodes with reduced graphene aggregation for biocathode. Biosens Bioelectron 167:112500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.11250010.1016/j.bios.2020.112500 ↗
80. Serag E, El Nemr A, El-Maghraby A (2017) Synthesis of highly effective novel graphene oxide-polyethylene glycol-polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposite hydrogel for copper removal. JWENT 2(4):223–234. https://doi.org/10.22090/jwent.2017.04.00110.22090/jwent.2017.04.001 ↗
81. Zhang H, Zhang L, Han Y, Yu Y, Xu M, Zhang X, Huang L, Dong S (2017) RGO/Au NPs/N-doped CNTs supported on nickel foam as an anode for enzymatic biofuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron 97:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.05.03010.1016/j.bios.2017.05.030 ↗
82. Inamuddin K, Suvardhan K, Heba A (2020) Electrochemical biosensor for the detection of amygdalin in apple seeds with a hybrid of f-MWCNTs/CoFe2O4 nanocomposite. Curr Anal Chem 16(5):660–668. https://doi.org/10.2174/157341101666620021109360310.2174/1573411016666200211093603 ↗
83. Shakeel N, Ahamed MI, Kanchi S, Kashmery HA (2020) Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles decorated on polyindole functionalized-MCNTs and used as anode material for enzymatic biofuel cell applications. Sci Rep 10:5052. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61831-410.1038/s41598-020-61831-4 ↗
84. Werchmeister RML (2019) Three-dimensional bioelectrodes utilizing graphene based bioink. J Electrochem Soc 166:G170. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0261916jes10.1149/2.0261916jes ↗
85. Song Y, Wang C (2019) High-power biofuel cells based on three dimensional reduced graphene oxide/carbon nanotube micro-arrays. Microsyst Nanoeng 5:46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-019-0081-210.1038/s41378-019-0081-2 ↗
86. Chung Y, Tannia DC, Kwon Y (2018) Glucose biofuel cells using bi-enzyme catalysts including glucose oxidase, horseradish peroxidase and terephthalaldehyde crosslinker. Chem Eng J 334:1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.12110.1016/j.cej.2017.10.121 ↗
87. Kang Z, Jiao K, Cheng J, Peng R, Jiao S, Kang Z, Jiao K, Cheng J, Peng R, Jiao HuZ (2018) A novel three-dimensional carbonized PANI1600@CNTs network for enhanced enzymatic biofuel cell. Biosens Bioelectron 101:60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.10.00810.1016/j.bios.2017.10.008 ↗
88. Lv P, Feng Q, Wang Q, Li G, Li D, Wei Q (2016) Biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose/carboxylic multi-walled carbon nanotubes for enzymatic biofuel cell application. Materials 9(3):183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma903018310.3390/ma9030183 ↗
89. Barton SC, Gallaway J, Atanassov P (2004) Enzymatic biofuel cells for implantable and microscale devices. Chem Rev 104:4867–488610.1021/cr020719k ↗
90. Gonzalez-Solino C, Di Lorenzo M (2018) Enzymatic fuel cells: towards self-powered implantable and wearable diagnostics. Biosensors 8:11. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios801001110.3390/bios8010011 ↗
91. Kakehi N, Yamazaki T, Tsugawa W, Sode K (2007) A novel wireless glucose sensor employing direct electron transfer principle based enzyme fuel cell. Biosens Bioelec 22:2250–2255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2006.11.00410.1016/j.bios.2006.11.004 ↗
92. Wen D, Deng L, Guo S, Dong S (2011) Self-powered sensor for trace Hg2+ detection. Anal Chem 83:3968–3972. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac200188410.1021/ac2001884 ↗
93. Deng L, Chen C, Zhou M, Guo S, Wang E, Dong S (2010) Integrated self-powered microchip biosensor for endogenous biological cyanide. Anal Chem 82:4283–4287. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac100274s10.1021/ac100274s ↗
94. Germain MN, Arechederra RL, Minteer SD (2008) Nitroaromatic actuation of mitochondrial bioelectrocatalysis for self-powered explosive sensors. J Am Chem Soc 130:15272–15273. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja807250b10.1021/ja807250b ↗
95. Meredith MT, Minteer SD (2011) Inhibition and activation of glucose oxidase bioanodes for use in a self-powered EDTA sensor. Anal Chem 83:5436–5441. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac201108710.1021/ac2011087 ↗
96. Nasar A, Perveen R (2019) Applications of enzymatic biofuel cells in bioelectronic devices—a review. Inter J Hydr Ener 44(29):15287–15312. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2019.04.18210.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2019.04.182 ↗
97. Gross A, Holzinger M, Cosnier S (2018) Buckypaper bioelectrodes: emerging materials for implantable and wearable biofuel cells. Energy Environ Sci, Royal Soc Chem 11(7):1670–1687. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ee00330k10.1039/c8ee00330k ↗
98. Dagdeviren C, Li Z, Wang ZL (2017) Energy harvesting from the animal/human body for self-powered electronics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 19:85–108. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-04451710.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044517 ↗
99. Bock DC, Marschilok AC, Takeuchi KJ, Takeuchi ES (2012) Batteries used to power implantable biomedical devices. Electrochim Acta 84:155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.05710.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.057 ↗
100. Drake RF, Kusserow BK, Messinger S, Matsuda S (1970) A tissue implantable fuel cell power supply. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 16:199–205