Sodium-induced phase shift in α-NaMnO2 and electrochemical properties of the full cells using hard carbon anodes derived from regional olive leaves
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, we investigated the effect of excess sodium (Na) in a NaMnO 2 structure using one-step heat treatment at 900 °C followed by quenching in liquid nitrogen (N₂). According to the X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, there was a competition between the monoclinic and orthorhombic phases, and we found that there were two monoclinic phases with similar structural properties. Therefore, we focused on revealing the formation of two isostructures of the monoclinic phase triggered by Na ions. We found that the lattice parameters and β angle changed from 113° to 105° in the samples with increasing Na content. Structural analysis of the powders using the XRD data was conducted using Rietveld refinement, and the phase ratios for all samples were calculated. The sample with x = 1.3 showed a 95% α-phase. To understand the formation of the two isostructures, we performed Density functional theory (DFT) calculations to examine their band structure, stability, and formation energy. A structural analysis of the excess Na-doped samples was performed using common techniques, and it was found that excess Na caused the formation of a coating on the grains in the form of sodium oxide. To validate this prediction, we conducted inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray (SEM–EDX) analyses using the basic properties of these techniques and their interactions with materials. In the second part of the study, we produced HC from locally sourced olive leaves and investigated their structural properties. The electrochemical properties of the electrode materials were examined using a half-cell configuration as electrodes with Na metal and a full-cell configuration using x = 1.3 cathode and HC anode. A direct-contact pre-sodiation strategy was used as the anode in the full-cell measurements. It was found that the full cells had initial capacity values of 150 mAh/g for the voltage range 1.5–4.3 V and 120 mAh/g for the voltage range 1.5–3.5 V.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. Delmas C, Fouassier C, Hagenmuller P (1980) Structural classification and properties of the layered oxides. Physica B+C 99:81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4363(80)90214-410.1016/0378-4363(80)90214-4 ↗
2. Hwang J, Kim J, Yu T, Sun Y (2019) A new P2-type layered oxide cathode with extremely high energy density for sodium-ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20180334610.1002/aenm.201803346 ↗
3. Guo S, Sun Y, Yi J, Zhu K, Liu P, Zhu Y, Zhu G, Chen M, Ishida M, Zhou H (2016) Understanding sodium-ion diffusion in layered P2 and P3 oxides via experiments and first-principles calculations: a bridge between crystal structure and electrochemical performance. NPG Asia Mater 8:e266–e266. https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2016.5310.1038/am.2016.53 ↗
4. Shi Y, Zhang Z, Jiang P, Gao A, Li K, Zhang Q, Sun Y, Lu X, Cao D, Lu X (2021) Unlocking the potential of P3 structure for practical sodium-ion batteries by fabricating zero strain framework for Na+ intercalation. Energy Storage Mater 37:354–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2021.02.02010.1016/j.ensm.2021.02.020 ↗
5. Tournadre F, Croguennec L, Saadoune I, Carlier D, Shao-Horn Y, Willmann P, Delmas C (2004) On the mechanism of the P2–Na0.70CoO2→O2–LiCoO2 exchange reaction—Part I: proposition of a model to describe the P2–O2 transition. J Solid State Chem 177:2790–2802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2004.04.02710.1016/j.jssc.2004.04.027 ↗
6. Manzi J, Paolone A, Palumbo O, Corona D, Massaro A, Cavaliere R, Muñoz-García AB, Trequattrini F, Pavone M, Brutti S (2021) Monoclinic and orthorhombic NaMnO2 for secondary batteries: a comparative study. Energies (Basel) 14:1230. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1405123010.3390/en14051230 ↗
7. Parant J-P, Olazcuaga R, Devalette M, Fouassier C, Hagenmuller P (1971) Sur quelques nouvelles phases de formule NaxMnO2 (x ⩽ 1). J Solid State Chem 3(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(71)90001-610.1016/0022-4596(71)90001-6 ↗
8. Nayak D, Jha PK, Ghosh S, Adyam V (2019) Aluminium substituted β–type Naman1-Al O2: a stable and enhanced electrochemical kinetic sodium-ion battery cathode. J Power Sources 438:227025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22702510.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227025 ↗
9. Billaud J, Clément RJ, Armstrong AR, Canales-Vázquez J, Rozier P, Grey CP, Bruce PG (2014) β-NaMnO 2: a high-performance cathode for sodium-ion batteries. J Am Chem Soc 136:17243–17248. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja509704t10.1021/ja509704t ↗
10. Xu S, Dong H, Yang D, Wu C, Yao Y, Rui X, Chou S, Yu Y (2023) Promising cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries from lab to application. ACS Cent Sci 9:2012–2035. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.3c0102210.1021/acscentsci.3c01022 ↗
11. Palluzzi M, Silvestri L, Celeste A, Tuccillo M, Latini A, Brutti S (2022) Structural degradation of O3-NaMnO2 positive electrodes in sodium-ion batteries. Crystals (Basel) 12:885. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1207088510.3390/cryst12070885 ↗
12. Li W, Li Z, Li L, Merryweather AJ, Chen Y, Yang S, Shi H, Lu Y, Qiu Y, Tan G, Chen Z, Wang W, Wang Y, Huang Y-F, Lun Z, Schnedermann C, Gao X, Wang J, Grey CP, Xu C (2025) Navigating low state of charge phase transitions in layered cathodes for long-life sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EE00422E10.1039/D5EE00422E ↗
13. Kang Y, Weng Y, Han X, Zhang J, Yu X, Wang B (2024) Glucose-derived hard carbon/carbon nanotube neural network architectures for enhanced sodium ion storage. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-024-00815-010.1007/s42823-024-00815-0 ↗
14. Kim J, Yu D, Oh E, Jang J, Kim J, Yang J (2025) Carbonization temperature dependent structural modifications of waste coffee grounds derived hard carbons and their electrochemical behaviors as anode materials for sodium ion batteries. Carbon Lett 35:351–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-024-00806-110.1007/s42823-024-00806-1 ↗
15. Darjazi H, Bottoni L, Moazami HR, Rezvani SJ, Balducci L, Sbrascini L, Staffolani A, Tombesi A, Nobili F (2023) From waste to resources: transforming olive leaves to hard carbon as sustainable and versatile electrode material for Li/Na-ion batteries and supercapacitors. Mater Today Sustain 21:100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.10031310.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100313 ↗
16. Noman YA, Fernández Uclés D (2024) Efficiency factors in the olive oil sector in Turkey. Agriculture 14:493. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture1403049310.3390/agriculture14030493 ↗
17. Li X, Wu D, Zhou Y-N, Liu L, Yang X-Q, Ceder G (2014) O3-type Na(Mn0.25Fe0.25Co0.25Ni0.25)O2: a quaternary layered cathode compound for rechargeable Na ion batteries. Electrochem Commun 49:51–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2014.10.00310.1016/j.elecom.2014.10.003 ↗
18. Clément RJ, Bruce PG, Grey CP (2015) Review—manganese-based P2-type transition metal oxides as sodium-ion battery cathode materials. J Electrochem Soc 162:A2589–A2604. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0201514jes10.1149/2.0201514jes ↗
19. Patra A, Davis J, Pidaparthy S, Karigerasi MH, Zahiri B, Kulkarni AA, Caple MA, Shoemaker DP, Zuo JM, Braun PV (2021) Electrodeposition of atmosphere-sensitive ternary sodium transition metal oxide films for sodium-based electrochemical energy storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.202504411810.1073/pnas.2025044118 ↗
20. Ma T, Xu G-L, Zeng X, Li Y, Ren Y, Sun C, Heald SM, Jorne J, Amine K, Chen Z (2017) Solid state synthesis of layered sodium manganese oxide for sodium-ion battery by in-situ high energy X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy. J Power Sources 341:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.02210.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.022 ↗
21. Whba R, Dogan E, Altin E, Benzaid A, Arshad M, Altin S (2025) Cobalt-substituted P2-Na0.67MnO2 and purple basil-derived hard carbon for high-performance sodium-ion battery full cells: insight to ex situ structural analysis. Ionics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-024-06047-610.1007/s11581-024-06047-6 ↗
22. Altundag S, Altin E, Altin S, Ates MN, Ji X, Sahinbay S (2023) High-performance P2-Na0.67Mn0.85Cu0.15O2/hard carbon full cell Na-ion battery: pre-sodiation of anode, p/n ratio optimizations, and operando XAS studies. Electrochim Acta 468:143183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2023.14318310.1016/j.electacta.2023.143183 ↗
23. Dogan E, Altundag S, Altin S, Arshad M, Balci E, Altin E (2024) Production of V-Doped P2-type Na 0.67 Mn 0.5 Fe 0.43 Al 0.07 O 2 cathodes and investigation of na-ion full cells performance. Energy Technol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20230083710.1002/ente.202300837 ↗
24. Kresse G, Hafner J (1994) Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys Rev B 49:14251–14269. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
25. Kresse G, Hafner J (1993) Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 47:558–561. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
26. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–11186. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
27. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–1775. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
28. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci 6:15–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
29. Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–17979. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
30. Altin E, Altundag S, Altin S, Bayri A (2019) Fabrication of Cr doped Na0.67Fe0.5Mn0.5O2 compounds and investigation of their structural, electrical, magnetic and electrochemical properties. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-02136-910.1007/s10854-019-02136-9 ↗
31. Altin S, Altundag S, Altin E, Oz E, Harfouche M, Bayri A (2020) Investigation of Ti-substitution effects on structural and electrochemical properties of Na 0. 67 Mn 0 . 5 Fe 0 . 5 O 2 battery cells. Int J Energy Res 44:11794–11806. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.582010.1002/er.5820 ↗
32. Dees DW, Kawauchi S, Abraham DP, Prakash J (2009) Analysis of the galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) as applied to a lithium-ion porous electrode. J Power Sources 189:263–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.04510.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.045 ↗
33. Shen Z, Cao L, Rahn CD, Wang C-Y (2013) Least squares galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (LS-GITT) for accurate solid phase diffusivity measurement. J Electrochem Soc 160:A1842–A1846. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.084310jes10.1149/2.084310jes ↗
34. Yalman E, Altundag S, Aydın MG, Onal Y, Depci T, Tekbas H, Bulut F, Yaşar S, Altin S (2023) Optimization of electrochemical presodiation parameters of Na-ion full cells for stable solid-electrolyte interface formation: hard carbon rods from waste firefighter suits. Energy Technol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20230001410.1002/ente.202300014 ↗
35. Zhao S, Lin Z, Wu F, Xiao F, Xu J (2020) Smoothing the surface and improving the electrochemical properties of NaxMnO2 by a wet chemical method. Nanomaterials 10:246. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1002024610.3390/nano10020246 ↗
36. Mohsin IU, Ziebert C, Rohde M, Seifert HJ (2021) Thermophysical characterization of a layered P2 type structure Na0.53MnO2 cathode material for sodium ion batteries. Batteries 7(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries701001610.3390/batteries7010016 ↗
37. Xiao Z, Xia F, Xu L, Wang X, Meng J, Wang H, Zhang X, Geng L, Wu J, Mai L (2022) Suppressing the Jahn-Teller effect in Mn-based layered oxide cathode toward long-life potassium-ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20210824410.1002/adfm.202108244 ↗
38. Alonso JA, Martínez-Lope MJ, Casais MT, Fernández-Díaz MT (2000) Evolution of the Jahn−Teller distortion of MnO 6 octahedra in RMnO 3 perovskites (R = Pr, Nd, Dy, Tb, Ho, Er, Y): a neutron diffraction study. Inorg Chem 39:917–923. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic990921e10.1021/ic990921e ↗
39. Toumar AJ, Ong SP, Richards WD, Dacek S, Ceder G (2015) Vacancy ordering in O 3 -type layered metal oxide sodium-ion battery cathodes. Phys Rev Appl 4:064002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.4.06400210.1103/PhysRevApplied.4.064002 ↗
40. Ni J, Huang Y, Gao L (2013) A high-performance hard carbon for Li-ion batteries and supercapacitors application. J Power Sources 223:306–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.04710.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.047 ↗
41. Liu Y, Xue JS, Zheng T, Dahn JR (1996) Mechanism of lithium insertion in hard carbons prepared by pyrolysis of epoxy resins. Carbon 34:193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(96)00177-710.1016/0008-6223(96)00177-7 ↗
42. Khan MA, Han D, Lee G, Kim Y-I, Kang Y-M (2019) P2/O3 phase-integrated Na0.7MnO2 cathode materials for sodium-ion rechargeable batteries. J Alloys Compd 771:987–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.03310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.033 ↗
43. Naeem R, Ali Ehsan M, Yahya R, Sohail M, Khaledi H, Mazhar M (2016) Fabrication of pristine Mn 2 O 3 and Ag–Mn 2 O 3 composite thin films by AACVD for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Dalton Trans 45:14928–14939. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6DT02656G10.1039/C6DT02656G ↗
44. Wu J, Wang S, Zheng H (2016) The influence of ionic strength on carbonate-based spectroscopic barometry for aqueous fluids: an in-situ Raman study on Na2CO3-NaCl solutions. Sci Rep 6:39088. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3908810.1038/srep39088 ↗
45. Li X, Qiu J, Hu Y, Ren X, He L, Zhao N, Ye T, Zhao X (2020) Characterization and comparison of walnut shells-based activated carbons and their adsorptive properties. Adsorpt Sci Technol 38:450–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/026361742094652410.1177/0263617420946524 ↗
46. Griffiths PR, de Haseth JA (2007) Fourier transform infrared spectrometry. Wiley, US10.1002/047010631X ↗
47. Ponce MF, Mamani A, Jerez F, Castilla J, Ramos PB, Acosta GG, Sardella MF, Bavio MA (2022) Activated carbon from olive tree pruning residue for symmetric solid-state supercapacitor. Energy 260:125092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.12509210.1016/j.energy.2022.125092 ↗
48. Tesch R, Kowalski PM (2022) Hubbard U parameters for transition metals from first principles. Phys Rev B 105:195153. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.19515310.1103/PhysRevB.105.195153 ↗
49. Gimble NJ, Kraynak LA, Schneider JD, Schulze MC, Prieto AL (2021) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy as a probe for understanding the potential-dependent impact of fluoroethylene carbonate on the solid electrolyte interface formation in Na/Cu2Sb batteries. J Power Sources 489:229171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22917110.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229171 ↗
50. Sun Q, Cui P-X, Zhu M, Fan T-T, Ata-Ul-Karim ST, Gu J-H, Wu S, Zhou D-M, Wang Y-J (2019) Cd(II) retention and remobilization on δ-MnO2 and Mn(III)-rich δ-MnO2 affected by Mn(II). Environ Int 130:104932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.10493210.1016/j.envint.2019.104932 ↗
51. Sánchez-Zambrano KS, Hernández-Reséndiz M, Gómez-Rodríguez C, García-Quiñonez LV, Aguilar-Martínez JA, Rodríguez-Castellanos EA, Verdeja LF, Fernández-González D, Castillo-Rodríguez GA (2022) XPS study on calcining mixtures of brucite with titania. Materials 15:3117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1509311710.3390/ma15093117 ↗
52. Gupta BD, Semwal V, Pathak A (2020) Nanotechnology-based fiber-optic chemical and biosensors. In: Nano-Optics. Elsevier, pp 163–19510.1016/B978-0-12-818392-2.00007-X ↗
53. Qu J, Meyer HM (2013) X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Encyclopedia of tribology. Springer, US, pp 4133–413810.1007/978-0-387-92897-5_1222 ↗
54. Kumar R, Miyaoka H, Shinzato K, Ichikawa T (2021) Analysis of sodium generation by sodium oxide decomposition on corrosion resistance materials: a new approach towards sodium redox water-splitting cycle. RSC Adv 11:21017–21022. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA02671B10.1039/D1RA02671B ↗
55. Davies CN, Jayasekera PN, Cheung KK (1983) Evaporation of sodium and the formation of aerosols. J Aerosol Sci 14:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(83)90040-X10.1016/0021-8502(83)90040-X ↗
56. Ma X, Chen H, Ceder G (2011) Electrochemical properties of monoclinic NaMnO2. J Electrochem Soc 158:A1307. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.035112jes10.1149/2.035112jes ↗
57. Zhang N, Wang B, Jin F, Chen Y, Jiang Y, Bao C, Tian J, Wang J, Xu R, Li Y, Lv Q, Ren H, Wang D, Liu H, Dou S, Hong X (2022) Modified cathode-electrolyte interphase toward high-performance batteries. Cell Rep Phys Sci 3:101197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.10119710.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101197 ↗
58. Tan S, Yang H, Zhang Z, Xu X, Xu Y, Zhou J, Zhou X, Pan Z, Rao X, Gu Y, Wang Z, Wu Y, Liu X, Zhang Y (2023) The progress of hard carbon as an anode material in sodium-ion batteries. Molecules 28:3134. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2807313410.3390/molecules28073134 ↗
59. Wang S, Fan Y, Stroe D-I, Fernandez C, Yu C, Cao W, Chen Z (2021) Lithium-ion battery characteristics and applications. In: Battery System Modeling. Elsevier, pp 1–4610.1016/B978-0-323-90472-8.00003-2 ↗
60. Kasnatscheew J, Evertz M, Streipert B, Wagner R, Klöpsch R, Vortmann B, Hahn H, Nowak S, Amereller M, Gentschev A-C, Lamp P, Winter M (2016) The truth about the 1st cycle Coulombic efficiency of LiNi 1/3 Co 1/3 Mn 1/3 O 2 (NCM) cathodes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:3956–3965. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP07718D10.1039/C5CP07718D ↗
61. Yang H, Yang B, Zhou L, Jin Y, Wang J, Hu X, Li G (2022) One-step synthesis of WO3 coating-modified LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathode material with long cycling stability for lithium-ion batteries. Ionics 28:1537–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-021-04404-310.1007/s11581-021-04404-3 ↗
62. An SJ, Li J, Daniel C, Meyer HM, Trask SE, Polzin BJ, Wood DL (2017) Electrolyte volume effects on electrochemical performance and solid electrolyte interphase in Si-graphite/NMC lithium-ion pouch cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:18799–18808. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0361710.1021/acsami.7b03617 ↗
63. Verma B, Raj H, Rajput H, Sil A (2023) Insights into the electrochemical properties of bagasse-derived hard carbon anode materials for sodium-ion battery. Ionics 29:5205–5216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-023-05240-310.1007/s11581-023-05240-3 ↗
64. Choi W, Shin H-C, Kim JM, Choi J-Y, Yoon W-S (2020) Modeling and applications of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) for lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Sci Technol 11:1–13. https://doi.org/10.33961/jecst.2019.0052810.33961/jecst.2019.00528 ↗
65. Linsenmann F, Pritzl D, Gasteiger HA (2019) A reference electrode for in situ impedance measurements in Sodium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 166:A3668–A3674. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0741915jes10.1149/2.0741915jes ↗
66. Liu B, Hector AL, Razmus WO, Wills RGA (2022) Temperature dependence of hard carbon performance in sodium half-cells with 1 M NaClO4 in EC/DEC electrolyte. Batteries (Basel) 8:108. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries809010810.3390/batteries8090108 ↗
67. Wang J, Koenig GM (2023) Comparison of lithium diffusion coefficient measurements in tellurium electrodes via different electrochemical techniques. J Electrochem Soc. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/acd43e10.1149/1945-7111/acd43e ↗
68. Schied T, Nickol A, Heubner C, Schneider M, Michaelis A, Bobeth M, Cuniberti G (2021) Determining the diffusion coefficient of lithium insertion cathodes from GITT measurements: theoretical analysis for low temperatures**. ChemPhysChem 22:885–893. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.20200102510.1002/cphc.202001025 ↗
69. Kim J, Park S, Hwang S, Yoon W-S (2022) Principles and applications of galvanostatic intermittent titration technique for lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Sci Technol 13:19–31. https://doi.org/10.33961/jecst.2021.0083610.33961/jecst.2021.00836 ↗
70. Liu Z, Jiang K, Chu S, Wu J, Xu H, Zhang X, Wang P, Guo S, Zhou H (2020) Integrating P2 into O′3 toward a robust Mn-based layered cathode for sodium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 8:23820–23826. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA08383F10.1039/D0TA08383F ↗
71. Nayak D, Dora JK, Ghosh S, Adyam V (2022) Superior diffusion kinetics and electrochemical properties of α/β–type NaMn0.89Co0.11O2 as cathode for sodium-ion batteries. J Solid State Electrochem 26:1231–1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-022-05157-310.1007/s10008-022-05157-3 ↗
72. Cheng Y, Sun Y, Chu C, Chang L, Wang Z, Zhang D, Liu W, Zhuang Z, Wang L (2022) Stabilizing effects of atomic Ti doping on high-voltage high-nickel layered oxide cathode for lithium-ion rechargeable batteries. Nano Res 15:4091–4099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-021-4035-210.1007/s12274-021-4035-2 ↗
73. Qian H, Ren H, Zhang Y, He X, Li W, Wang J, Hu J, Yang H, Sari HMK, Chen Y, Li X (2022) Surface doping vs. bulk doping of cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries: a review. Electrochem Energ Rev 5:2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-022-00155-510.1007/s41918-022-00155-5 ↗
74. Ohishi K, Igarashi D, Tatara R, Nishimura S, Koda A, Komaba S, Sugiyama J (2022) Na diffusion in hard carbon studied with positive muon spin rotation and relaxation. ACS Phys Chem Au 2:98–107. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphyschemau.1c0003610.1021/acsphyschemau.1c00036 ↗
75. Ledwoch D, Robinson JB, Gastol D, Smith K, Shearing PR, Brett DJL, Kendrick E (2021) Hard carbon composite electrodes for sodium-ion batteries with nano-zeolite and carbon black additives. Batteries Supercaps 4:163–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.20200016110.1002/batt.202000161 ↗
76. Kulkarni P, Jung H, Ghosh D, Jalalah M, Alsaiari M, Harraz FA, Balakrishna RG (2023) A comprehensive review of pre-lithiation/sodiation additives for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries. J Energy Chem 76:479–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2022.10.00110.1016/j.jechem.2022.10.001 ↗
77. Guo Z, Liaw BY, Qiu X, Gao L, Zhang C (2015) Optimal charging method for lithium ion batteries using a universal voltage protocol accommodating aging. J Power Sources 274:957–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.18510.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.185 ↗
78. Wu Y, Shuang W, Wang Y, Chen F, Tang S, Wu X-L, Bai Z, Yang L, Zhang J (2024) Recent progress in sodium-ion batteries: advanced materials, reaction mechanisms and energy applications. Electrochem Energ Rev 7:17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-024-00215-y10.1007/s41918-024-00215-y ↗
79. Sun Y-K (2020) Direction for commercialization of O3-type layered cathodes for sodium-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett 5:1278–1280. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0059710.1021/acsenergylett.0c00597 ↗
80. Sun Y-K, Liang X, Song X, Sun HH, Kim H, Kim M-C (2024) High-energy and long-life O3-type layered cathode material for sodium-ion batteries10.21203/rs.3.rs-5322440/v1 ↗
81. Wang H, Xiao Y, Sun C, Lai C, Ai X (2015) A type of sodium-ion full-cell with a layered NaNi 0.5 Ti 0.5 O 2 cathode and a pre-sodiated hard carbon anode. RSC Adv 5:106519–106522. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA21235A10.1039/C5RA21235A ↗