Growth of rGO nanostructures via facile wick and oil flame synthesis for environmental remediation
Source abstract
Abstract
Oil spills into ocean or coastal waters can result in significant damage to the environment via pollution of aquatic ecosystems. Absorbents based on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) foams have the capacity to remove minor or major oil spills. However, conventional chemical synthesis of rGO often uses petrochemical precursors, potentially harmful chemicals, and requires special processing conditions that are expensive to maintain. In this work, an alternative cost-effective and environmentally friendly approach suitable for large-scale production of high-quality rGO directly from used cooking sunflower oil is discussed. Thus, produced flaky graphene structures are effective in absorbing used commercial sunflower oil and engine oil, via monolayer physisorption in the case of used sunflower and engine oils facilitated by van der Waals forces, π–π stacking and hydrophobic interactions, π-cation (H+) stacking and radical scavenging activities. From adsorption kinetic models, first-order kinetics provides a better fit for used sunflower oil adsorption (R2 = 0.9919) and second-order kinetics provides a better fit for engine oil adsorption (R2 = 0.9823). From intra-particle diffusion model, R2 for USO is 0.9788 and EO is 0.9851, which indicates that both used sunflower and engine oils adsorption processes follow an intra-particle diffusion mechanism. This study confirms that waste-derived rGO could be used for environmental remediation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Membrane Separation Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (85)
Show source-provided references
1. Mathew EE, Balachandran M (2021) Crumpled and porous graphene for supercapacitor applications: a short review. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-021-00229-2 (in press)10.1007/s42823-021-00229-2 ↗
2. Kumar A, Sharma K, Dixit AR (2020) A review on the mechanical properties of polymer composites reinforced by carbon nanotubes and graphene. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-020-00161-x10.1007/s42823-020-00161-x ↗
3. Levchenko I, Bazaka K, Belmonte T, Keidar M, Xu S (2018) Advanced materials for next generation spacecraft. Adv Mater 30:1802201. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180220110.1002/adma.201802201 ↗
4. Gupta MK (2020) Analysis of tribological behavior of Al/Gr/MoS2 surface composite fabricated by friction stir process. Carbon Lett 30:399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-019-00109-w10.1007/s42823-019-00109-w ↗
5. Gupta N, Gupta SM, Gupta SK, Sharma (2019) Carbon nanotubes: synthesis, properties and engineering applications. Carbon Lett 29:419–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-019-00068-210.1007/s42823-019-00068-2 ↗
6. Levchenko I, Xu S, Mazouffre S, Lev D, Pedrini D, Goebel D, Garrigues L, Taccogna F, Bazaka K (2020) Perspectives, frontiers, and new horizons for plasma-based space electric propulsion. Phys Plasmas 27:020601. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.510914110.1063/1.5109141 ↗
7. Levchenko I, Xu S, Wu YL, Bazaka K (2020) Hopes and concerns for astronomy of satellite constellations. Nat Astron 4:1012–1014. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1141-010.1038/s41550-020-1141-0 ↗
8. Levchenko I, Baranov O, Fang J, Cherkun O, Xu S, Bazaka K (2021) Focusing plasma jets to achieve high current density: feasibility and opportunities for applications in debris removal and space exploration. Aerospace Sci Technol 108:106343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.10634310.1016/j.ast.2020.106343 ↗
9. Kumari P, Alam M, Siddiqi WA (2019) Usage of nanoparticles as adsorbents for waste water treatment: an emerging trend. Sustain Mater Technol 22:e00128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e0012810.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00128 ↗
10. Liang S-X, Zhang W, Zhang L, Wang W, Zhanga L-C (2019) Remediation of industrial contaminated water with arsenic and nitrate by mass-produced Fe-based metallic glass: toward potential industrial applications. Sustain Mater Technol 22:e00126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e0012610.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00126 ↗
11. Litvina M, Todoruk TR, Langford CH (2003) Composition and structure of agentsresponsible for development of water repellency in soils following oil contamination. Environ Sci Technol 37:2883–2888. https://doi.org/10.1021/es026296l10.1021/es026296l ↗
12. Wan Y, Wang B, Khim JS, Hong S, Shim WJ, Hu J (2014) Naphthenic acids in coastal sediments after the hebei spirit oil spill: a Potential indicator for oil contamination. Environ Sci Technol 48:4153–4162. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405034y10.1021/es405034y ↗
13. Barrera G, Pizzimenti S, Ciamporcero ES, Daga M, Ullio C, Arcaro A, Cetrangolo GP, Ferretti C, Dianzani C, Lepore A, Gentile F (2015) Role of 4-hydroxynonenal-protein adducts in human diseases. ARS Antioxid Redox Sign 22:1681–1702. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2014.616610.1089/ars.2014.6166 ↗
14. Domenico D, Tramutola F, Butterfield A (2017) Role of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal HNE in the pathogenesis of alzheimer disease and other selected age-related neurodegenerative disorders. Free Radical Biol Med 111:253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.10.49010.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.10.490 ↗
15. LoPachin RM, Gavin T (2014) Molecular mechanisms of aldehyde toxicity: a chemical perspective. Chem Res Toxicol 27:1081–1091. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx500104610.1021/tx5001046 ↗
16. Barrera G, Pizzimenti S, Dianzani MU (2008) Lipid peroxidation: control of cell proliferation, cell differentiation and cell death. Mol Aspects Med 29:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2007.09.01210.1016/j.mam.2007.09.012 ↗
17. Esterbauer H, Schaur RJ, Zollner H (1991) Chemistry and biochemistry of 4- hydroxynonenal, malonaldehyde and related aldehydes. Free Radical Biol Med 11:81–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(91)90192-610.1016/0891-5849(91)90192-6 ↗
18. Ma L, Liu G, Cheng W, Liu X, Liu H, Wang Q, Mao G, Cai X, Brennan C, Brennan MA (2020) Formation of malondialdehyde, 4-hydroxy-hexenal and 4-hydroxynonenal during deep-frying of potato sticks and chicken breast meat in vegetable oil. Int J Food Sci Technol 55:1833–1842. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.1446210.1111/ijfs.14462 ↗
19. Abdel-Shafy HI, Mansour MSM (2016) A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egypt J Petrol 25:107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.03.01110.1016/j.ejpe.2015.03.011 ↗
20. Chandio I, Janjhi FA, Memon AA, Memon S, Ali Z, Thebo KH, Pirzado AAA, Hakro AA, Khan WS (2021) Ultrafast ionic and molecular sieving through graphene oxide based composite membranes. Desalination 500:114848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.11484810.1016/j.desal.2020.114848 ↗
21. Janjhi FA, Chandio I, Memon AA, Ahmed Z, Thebo KH, Pirzado AAA, Hakro AA, Iqbal M (2020) Functionalized graphene oxide based membranes for ultrafast molecular separation. Sep Purif Technol 1:117969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11796910.1016/j.seppur.2020.117969 ↗
22. Kumar S, Levchenko I, Ostrikov KK, McLaughlin JA (2012) Plasma-enabled, catalyst-free growth of carbon nanotubes on mechanically-written Si features with arbitrary shape. Carbon 50:325–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.06010.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.060 ↗
23. Han ZJ, Yick S, Levchenko I, Tam E, Yajadda MMA, Kumar S, Martin PJ, Furman S, Ostrikov K (2011) Controlled synthesis of a large fraction of metallic single-walled carbon nanotube and semiconducting carbon nanowire networks. Nanoscale 3:3214–3220. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1NR10327J10.1039/C1NR10327J ↗
24. Alancherry S, Jacob MV, Prasad K, Joseph J, Bazaka O, Neupane R, Varghese OK, Baranov O, Xu S, Levchenko I, Bazaka K (2020) Tuning and fine morphology control of natural resource-derived vertical graphene. Carbon 159:668–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.06010.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.060 ↗
25. Thebo KH, Qian X, Wei Q, Zhang Q, Cheng H-M, Ren W (2018) Reduced graphene oxide/metal oxide nanoparticles composite membranes for highly efficient molecular separation. J Mater Sci Technol 34:1481–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.05.00810.1016/j.jmst.2018.05.008 ↗
26. Suresh SP, Lekshmi GS, Kirupha SD, Ariraman M, Bazaka O, Levchenko I, Bazaka K, Mandhakini M (2019) Superhydrophobic fluorine-modified cerium-doped mesoporous carbon as an efficient catalytic platform for photo-degradation of organic pollutants. Carbon 147:323–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.07410.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.074 ↗
27. Celebi K, Buchheim J, Wyss RM, Droudian A, Gasser P, Shorubalko I, Kye J-I, Lee C, Park HG (2014) Ultimate permeation across atomically thin porous graphene. Science 344:289–292. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA04692H10.1039/C7TA04692H ↗
28. Baig N, Alghunaimi FI, Saleh T (2019) Hydrophobic and oleophilic carbon nanofiber impregnated styrofoam for oil and water separation: a green technology. Chem Eng J 360:1613–1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.04210.1016/j.cej.2018.10.042 ↗
29. Nair RR, Wu HA, Jayaram PN, Grigorieva IV, Geim AK (2012) Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak-tight graphene-based membranes. Science 335:442–444. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0091410.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00914 ↗
30. Bazaka K, Jacob MV, Ostrikov K (2016) Sustainable life cycles of natural-precursor-derived nanocarbons. Chem Rev 116:163–214. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1219309910.3390/ma12193099 ↗
31. The USA environmental protection agency science matters research impacts report 2018, page 17 (https://www.epa.gov/research/epa-science-matters-research-impacts-2018), (Accessed Oct 2020).
32. Antwi-Akomeah S, Fei-Baffoe B, Belford EJD, Borigu M (2018) Hydrocarbon contaminated water remediation using a locally constructed multi-stage bioreactor incorporated with media filtration. Global J Environ Sci Manag 4:413–426. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2018.04.00310.22034/gjesm.2018.04.003 ↗
33. Zhang Q, Qian X, Thebo KH, Cheng H-M, Ren W (2018) Controlling reduction degree of graphene oxide membranes for improved water permeance. Sci Bull 63:788–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2018.05.01510.1016/j.scib.2018.05.015 ↗
34. Tamilselvi R, Ramesh M, Lekshmi GS, Bazaka O, Levchenko I, Bazaka K, Mandhakini M (2020) Graphene oxide-based supercapacitors from agricultural wastes: A step to mass production of highly efficient electrodes for electrical transportation systems. Renew Energy 151:731–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.07210.1016/j.renene.2019.11.072 ↗
35. Sirignano M, Bartos D, Conturso M, Dunn M, D’Anna A, Masri A (2017) Detection of nanostructures and soot in laminar premixed flames. Combus Flame 176:299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.10.00910.1016/j.combustflame.2016.10.009 ↗
36. Verdugo I, Cruz JJ, Álvarez E, Reszka P, da Silva LFF, Fuentes A (2020) Candle flame soot sizing by planar time-resolved laser-induced incandescence. Sci Rep 10:11364. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68256-z10.1038/s41598-020-68256-z ↗
37. Singh G, Sharma M, Vaish R (2019) Tunable surface adsorption and wettability of candle soot coated on ferroelectric ceramics. J Adv Res 16:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2018.12.00510.1016/j.jare.2018.12.005 ↗
38. Swapna MS, Menon PV, Anand AS, Soumya S, Sankararaman S (2017) Synthesis and characterization of carbon nano kajal. JOJ Mater Sci 1:555566. https://doi.org/10.19080/JOJMS.2017.01.55556610.19080/JOJMS.2017.01.555566 ↗
39. Yang L, Fu H, Yang C, Tian W, Wu P, Jiang W (2019) Carbon soot with arbitrary wettability deposited on solid surface by ethanol flame method. Colloid Surface A 578:12357610.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.123576 ↗
40. Tiwari RN, Ishihara M, Tiwari JN, Yoshimura M (2012) Flame-annealing assisted synthesis of graphene films from adamantine. J Mater Chem 22:15031. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b0569010.1021/acsnano.5b05690 ↗
41. Ramya AV, Mohan AN, Manoj B (2016) Wrinkled graphene: synthesis and characterization of few layer graphene-like nanocarbons from kerosene. Mater Sci Poland 34:330–336. https://doi.org/10.1515/msp-2016-006110.1515/msp-2016-0061 ↗
42. Fopp-Spori D, Martin-Tanchereau P (2014) Contact angle measurementsn: "Biofouling methods”. John Wiley and Sons
43. Rudnick LR (2003) Lubricant additives. Chemistry and Application10.1201/9780824747404 ↗
44. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335424 (Accesse Mar 2021).
45. Osman DI, Attia SK, Taman AR (2018) Recycling of used engine oil by different solvent. Egyptian J Petrol 27:221–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2017.05.01010.1016/j.ejpe.2017.05.010 ↗
46. Mannu A, Vlahopoulou G, Urgeghe P, Ferro M, Del Caro A, Taras A, Garroni S, Rourke JP, Cabizza R, Petretto GL (2019) Variation of the chemical composition of waste cooking oils upon bentonite filtration. Resources 8:108. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources802010810.3390/resources8020108 ↗
47. Naz S, Sherazi ST, Talpur FN, Kara H, Uddin S, Khaskheli AR (2014) Chemical characterization of canola and sun fl ower oil deodorizer distillates. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 64:115–120. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjfns-2013-000810.2478/pjfns-2013-0008 ↗
48. Abro R, Chen X, Harijan K, Dhakan ZA, Ammar M (2013) A comparative study of recycling of used engine oil using extraction by composite solvent, single solvent, and acid treatment methods. Internat Scholarly Res Notic 13:952589. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/95258910.1155/2013/952589 ↗
49. ASTM D3860 - 98 (2020). Standard practice for determination of adsorptive capacity of activated carbon by aqueous phase isotherm technique (https://www.astm.org/Standards/D3860.htm). (Accesed Oct 2020).
50. Muhamad MH, Abdullah SRS, Hasan HA, Rahim RA, Bakar SNH, Ismail N, Halmi MIE (2018) Adsorption isotherm and kinetic studies of pentachlorophenol removal from aqueous solution onto coconut shell-based granular activated carbon. J Environ Sci Technol 11:68–78. https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2018.68.7810.3923/jest.2018.68.78 ↗
51. Chen X (2015) Modeling of experimental adsorption isotherm data. Information 6:14–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/info601001410.3390/info6010014 ↗
52. Kandasamy A, Ramasamy T, Samrin A, Narayanasamy P, Mohan R, Bazaka O, Levchenko I, Bazaka K, Mohandas M (2020) Hierarchical doped gelatin-derived carbon aerogels: three levels of porosity for advanced supercapacitors. Nanomaterials 10:1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1006117810.3390/nano10061178 ↗
53. Cui P, Lee J, Hwang E, Lee H (2011) One-pot reduction of graphene oxide at subzero temperatures. Cheem Commun 47:12370–12372. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc15569e10.1039/c1cc15569e ↗
54. Je JH, Lee JY (1985) The influence of deposition mechanism on the microstructure of pyrolytic carbon deposited in a tumbling bed. J Mater Sci 20:839–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0058572410.1007/BF00585724 ↗
55. Amaro-Gahete J, Benítez A, Otero R, Esquivel D, Jiménez-Sanchidrián C, Morales J, Caballero Á, Romero-Salguero FJ (2019) A comparative study of particle size distribution of graphene nanosheets synthesized by an ultrasound-assisted method. Nanomaterials 9:15210.3390/nano9020152 ↗
56. Santini CA, Sebastian A, Marchiori C, Jonnalagadda VP, Dellmann L, Koelmans WW, Rossell MD, Rossel CP, Eleftheriou E (2015) Oxygenated amorphous carbon for resistive memory applications. Nat Commun 6:8600. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms960010.1038/ncomms9600 ↗
57. Yano H, Cai N-S, Xu M, Verma RK, Rea W, Hoffman AF, Shi L, Javitch JA, Bonci A, Ferré S (2018) Gs- versus Golf-dependent functional selectivity mediated by the dopamine D1 receptor. Nat Commun 9:486. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02606-w10.1038/s41467-017-02606-w ↗
58. Sharma N, Sharma V, Jain Y, Kumari M, Gupta R, Sharma SK, Sachdev K (2017) Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) for gas sensing application. Macromol Symp. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.20170000610.1002/masy.201700006 ↗
59. Fierro V, Torné-Fernández V, Montané D, Celzard A (2008) Adsorption of phenol onto activated carbons having different textural and surface properties. Micropor Mesop Mater 111:276–284. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1703078910.3390/ijerph17030789 ↗
60. Johnson CA, Patrick JW, Thomas KM (1986) Characterization of coal chars by Raman spectroscopy X-ray diffraction and reflectance measurements. Fuel 65:1284–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(86)90243-710.1016/0016-2361(86)90243-7 ↗
61. Hung K-H, Chan C-H, Wang H-W (2014) Aqueous only route toward graphene from graphite oxide. Renew Energ 66:150–158. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn102896710.1021/nn1028967 ↗
62. Okewale AO, Babayemi KA, Olalekan AP (2013) Adsorption isotherms and kinetics models of starchy adsorbents on uptake of water from ethanol/water systems. Int J Appl Sci Technol 3:35–42
63. Wachs IE, Roberts CA (2010) Monitoring surface metal oxide catalytic active sites with Raman spectroscopy. Chem Soc Rev 39:5002–5017. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00145G10.1039/C0CS00145G ↗
64. Ho YS, McKay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Proc Biochem 34:451–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5a10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5a ↗
65. Hu J, Zhu J, Ge S, Jiang C, Guo T, Peng T, Huang T, Xie L (2020) Hydrophobic and resilience graphene/chitosan composite aerogel for efficient oil−water separation. Surf Coat Technol 385:125361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12536110.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125361 ↗
66. Songsaeng S, Thamyongkit P, Poompradu S (2019) Natural rubber/reduced-graphene oxide composite materials: morphological and oil adsorption properties for treatment of oil spills. J Adv Res 20:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.05.00710.1016/j.jare.2019.05.007 ↗
67. Cheu S, Kong H, Song S, Johari K, Saman N, Yunus M, Mat H (2020) Separation of dissolved oil from aqueous solution by sorption onto acetylated lingo cellulosic biomass—equilibrium, kinetics and mechanism studies. J Environ Chem Eng 385:125361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.12.02810.1016/j.jece.2015.12.028 ↗
68. Hameed BH, Ahmad AA, Azi N (2007) Isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics of acid dye adsorption on activated palm ash. Chem Eng J 133:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.01.03210.1016/j.cej.2007.01.032 ↗
69. Ho YS, McKay G (1998) The kinetics of sorption of basic dyes from aqueous solution by sphagnum moss peat. Can J Chem Eng 76:822–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.545076041910.1002/cjce.5450760419 ↗
70. Tan AW, Ahmad AL, Hameed BH (2009) Adsorption isotherms, kinetics, thermodynamics and desorption studies of 2, 4, 6-trichlorophenol on oil palm empty fruit bunch-based activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 164:473–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.02510.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.025 ↗
71. Wang X, Liu B, Lu Q, Qu Q (2014) Graphene-based materials: fabrication and application for adsorption in analytical chemistry. J Chromatogr A 1362:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.08.02310.1016/j.chroma.2014.08.023 ↗
72. Lv N, Wang X, Peng S, Zhang H, Luo L (2018) Study of the kinetics and equilibrium of the adsorption of oils onto hydrophobic jute fiber modified via the sol-gel method. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1505096910.3390/ijerph15050969 ↗
73. Cheremisinoff NP (2002) Handbook of water and wastewater treatment technologies. Butterworth-Heinemann 1:576. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075067498-0/50000-010.1016/B978-075067498-0/50000-0 ↗
74. Ayotamuno M, Kogbara R, Ogaji S, Probert S (2006) Petroleum contaminated ground-water: remediation using activated carbon. App Energy 83:1258–1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2006.01.00410.1016/j.apenergy.2006.01.004 ↗
75. Salehi K, Mowla D, Karimi G (2011) Removal of oil spills from salty waters by commercial organoclays. App Energy 33:1682–1687. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2011.63550610.1080/01932691.2011.635506 ↗
76. Guo H-L, Su P, Kang X, Ning S-K (2013) Synthesis and characterization of nitrogen-doped graphenehydrogelsby hydrothermal route with urea as reducing-doping agents. J Mater Chem A 1:2248. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TA00887D10.1039/C2TA00887D ↗
77. Moazed H, Viraraghavan T (2005) Use of organo-clay/anthracite mixture in the separation of oil from oily waters. Energ Source 27:101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/0090831049044814510.1080/00908310490448145 ↗
78. Moazed H, Viraraghavan T (2005) Practice periodical of hazardous. Tox Radioact Waste Manag 9:130–134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2005)9:4(205)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2005)9:4(205) ↗
79. Cai Z-X, Song X-H, Chen Y-Y, Wang Y-R, Chen X (2016) 3D nitrogen-doped graphene aerogel: a low-cost, facile prepared direct electrode for H2O2 sensing. Sens Actu B 222:567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.08.09410.1016/j.snb.2015.08.094 ↗
80. Sigma Aldrich: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com
81. Wang W, Huang G, An C, Zhao S, Chen X, Zhang P (2018) Adsorption of anionic azo dyes from aqueous solution on cationic gemini surfactant-modified flax shives: synchrotron infrared, optimization and modeling studies. J Clean Prod 172:1986–1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.22710.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.227 ↗
82. Hailu SL, Nair BU, Mesfin RA, Diaz I, Tessema M (2017) Preparation and characterization of cationic surfactant modified zeolite adsorbent material for adsorption of organic and inorganic industrial pollutants. J Environ Chem Eng 5:3319–3329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.06.03910.1016/j.jece.2017.06.039 ↗
83. Jiménez-Castañeda M, Medina D (2017) Use of surfactant-modified zeolites and clays for the removal of heavy metals from water. Water 9:235. https://doi.org/10.3390/w904023510.3390/w9040235 ↗
84. Leng L, Yuan X, Zeng G, Shao J, Chen X, Wu Z, Wang H, Peng X (2015) Surface characterization of rice husk bio-char produced by liquefaction and application for cationic dye (Malachite green) adsorption. Fuel 155:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.01910.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.019 ↗
85. H. S. Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, 4th Edition (1050 pages, Prentice Hall, 2006); Chapter 10: Catalysis and Catalytic Reactors. ISBN: 0130473944 9780130473943 0131278398 9780131278394