Carbon nano-materials (CNMs) derived from biomass for energy storage applications: a review
Source abstract
Abstract
In today’s world, carbon-based materials research is much wider wherein, it requires a lot of processing techniques to manufacture or synthesize. Moreover, the processing methods through which the carbon-based materials are derived from synthetic sources are of high cost. Processing of such hierarchical porous carbon materials (PCMs) was slightly complex and only very few methods render carbon nano-materials (CNMs) with high specific surface area. Once it is processed, which paves a path to versatile applications. CNMs derived from biological sources are widespread and their application spectrum is also very wide. This review focuses on biomass-derived CNMs from various plant sources for its versatile applications. The major thrust areas of energy storage include batteries, super-capacitors, and fuel cells which are described in this article. Meanwhile, the challenges faced during the processing of biomass-derived CNMs and their future prospects are also discussed comprehensively. Graphical abstract
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Tarascon JM (2010) Key challenges in future Li-battery research. Philos Trans Royal Soc A 368:3227–324110.1098/rsta.2010.0112 ↗
2. Gao Z, Zhang Y, Song N, Li X (2017) Biomass-derived renewable carbon materials for electrochemical energy storage. Mater Res Lett 5:69–8810.1080/21663831.2016.1250834 ↗
3. Tang W, Zhang Y, Zhong Y, Shen T, Wang X, Xia X et al (2017) Natural biomass-derived carbons for electrochemical energy storage. Mater Res Bull 88:234–24110.1016/j.materresbull.2016.12.025 ↗
4. Zu L, Zhang W, Qu L, Liu L, Li W, Yu A, Zhao D (2020) Mesoporous materials for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Adv Energy Mater 10(38):200215210.1002/aenm.202002152 ↗
5. Shan C, Yen HJ, Wu K, Lin Q, Zhou M, Guo X et al (2017) Functionalized fullerenes for highly efficient lithium-ion storage: structure-property-performance correlation with energy implications. Nanomater Energy 40:327–33510.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.033 ↗
6. Abhilash SV, Meshram P (2022) An overview on chemical processes for synthesis of graphene from waste carbon resources. Carbon Lett 32:653–66910.1007/s42823-021-00313-7 ↗
7. Miao J, Lang Z, Xue T, Li Y, Li Y, Cheng J, Zhang H, Tang Z (2020) Revival of zeolite-templated nanocarbon materials: recent advances in energy storage and conversion. Adv Sci 7(20):200133510.1002/advs.202001335 ↗
8. Sun L, Wang X, Wang Y, Zhang Q (2017) Roles of carbon nanotubes in novel energy storage devices. Carbon 122:462–47410.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.006 ↗
9. Aqel A, El-Nour KMMA, Ammar RAA, Al-Warthan A (2012) Carbon nanotubes, science and technology part (I) structure, synthesis and characterisation. Arab J Chem 5:1–2310.1016/j.arabjc.2010.08.022 ↗
10. Holappa L (2020) A general vision for reduction of energy consumption and CO2 emissions from the steel industry. Metals 10(9):111710.3390/met10091117 ↗
11. Chen Z, Ren W, Gao L, Liu B, Pei S, Cheng HM (2011) Three-dimensional flexible and conductive interconnected graphene networks grown by chemical vapour deposition. Nat Mater 10:42410.1038/nmat3001 ↗
12. Osman AI (2022) Production of solid and liquid fuels for energy applications via pyrolysis of biomass. In: Sonil Nanda, Dai-Viet Vo (eds) Innovations in Thermochemical Technologies for Biofuel Process Elsevier BV, pp 63-8910.1016/B978-0-323-85586-0.00001-9 ↗
13. Liu WJ, Jiang H, Yu HQ (2015) Development of biochar-based functional materials: toward a sustainable platform carbon material. Chem Rev 115:12251–1228510.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00195 ↗
14. Zhang C, Zhang L, Gao J, Zhang S, Liu Q, Duan P, Hu X (2020) Evolution of the functional groups/structures of biochar and heteroatoms during the pyrolysis of seaweed. Algal Res 48:10190010.1016/j.algal.2020.101900 ↗
15. Saifuddin N, Raziah AZ, Junizah AR (2013) Carbon nanotubes: a review on structure and their interaction with proteins. J Chem. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/67681510.1155/2013/676815 ↗
16. Yang C, Li R, Zhang B, Qiu Q, Wang B, Yang H, Ding Y, Wang C (2019) Pyrolysis of microalgae: a critical review. Fuel Process Technol 186:53–7210.1016/j.fuproc.2018.12.012 ↗
17. Wang F, Ouyang D, Zhou Z, Page SJ, Liu D, Zhao X (2021) Lignocellulosic biomass as sustainable feedstock and materials for power generation and energy storage. J Energy Chem 57:247–28010.1016/j.jechem.2020.08.060 ↗
18. Koytsoumpa EI, Magiri-Skouloudi D, Karellas S, Kakaras E (2021) Bioenergy with carbon capture and utilization: A review on the potential deployment towards a European circular bioeconomy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 152:11164110.1016/j.rser.2021.111641 ↗
19. Zhang Z, Zhu Z, Shen B, Liu L (2019) Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: a review. Energy 171:581–59810.1016/j.energy.2019.01.035 ↗
20. Wan Z, Sun Y, Tsang DC, Khan E, Yip AC, Ng YH, Rinklebe J, Ok YS (2020) Customised fabrication of nitrogen-doped biochar for environmental and energy applications. Chem Eng J 401:12613610.1016/j.cej.2020.126136 ↗
21. Khiari B, Jeguirim M, Limousy L, Bennici S (2019) Biomass derived chars for energy applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 108:253–27310.1016/j.rser.2019.03.057 ↗
22. Antero RVP, Alves ACF, de Oliveira SB, Ojala SA, Brum SS (2020) Challenges and alternatives for the adequacy of hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass in cleaner production systems: a review. J Cleaner Prod 252:11989910.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119899 ↗
23. Zhu Z, Xu Z (2020) The rational design of biomass-derived carbon materials towards next-generation energy storage: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 134:11030810.1016/j.rser.2020.110308 ↗
24. Cheng BH, Zeng RJ, Jiang H (2017) Recent developments of post-modification of biochar for electrochemical energy storage. Bioresour Technol 246:224–23310.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.060 ↗
25. Khandaker T, Hossain MS, Dhar PK, Rahman M, Hossain M, Ahmed MB (2020) Efficacies of carbon-based adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture. Processes 8(6):65410.3390/pr8060654 ↗
26. Brewer CE, Schmidt-Rohr K, Satrio JA, Brown RC (2009) Characterization of biochar from fast pyrolysis and gasification systems. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 28:386–39610.1002/ep.10378 ↗
27. Jin H, Wang X, Gu Z, Polin J (2013) Carbon materials from high ash biochar for supercapacitor and improvement of capacitance with HNO3 surface oxidation. J Power Sources 236:285–29210.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.02.088 ↗
28. Chen F, Yang J, Bai T, Long B, Zhou X (2016) Biomass waste-derived honeycomb-like nitrogen and oxygen dual-doped porous carbon for high performance lithium sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 192:99–10910.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.192 ↗
29. Kambo HS, Dutta AA (2015) comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:359–37810.1016/j.rser.2015.01.050 ↗
30. Zhao H, Luo X, Zhang H, Sun N, Wei W, Sun Y (2018) Carbon-based adsorbents for post-combustion capture: a review. Greenh Gases Sci Technol 8(1):11–3610.1002/ghg.1758 ↗
31. Cheng P, Li T, Yu H, Zhi L, Liu Z, Lei Z (2016) Biomass-derived carbon fiber aerogel as a binder-free electrode for high-rate supercapacitors. J Mater Chem C 120:2079–2086
32. Wang L, Schnepp Z, Titirici MM (2013) Rice husk-derived carbon anodes for lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem 1:526910.1039/c3ta10650k ↗
33. Wang T, Zhang D, Fang K, Zhu W, Peng Q, Xie Z (2021) Enhanced nitrate removal by physical activation and Mg/Al layered double hydroxide modified biochar derived from wood waste: Adsorption characteristics and mechanisms. J Environ Chem Eng 9(4):10518410.1016/j.jece.2021.105184 ↗
34. Liu T, Li X (2019) Biomass-derived nanostructured porous carbons for sodium ion batteries: a review. Mater Technol 34:232–24510.1080/10667857.2018.1545392 ↗
35. Dong D, Zhang Y, Xiao Y, Wang T, Wang J, Pan WP (2020) Synthesis of O-doped coal-based carbon electrode materials by ultrasound-assisted bimetallic activation for application in supercapacitors. Appl Surf Sci 529:14707410.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147074 ↗
36. Li H, Cheng Z, Zhang Q, Natan A, Yang Y, Cao D et al (2018) Bacterial-derived, compressible, and hierarchical porous carbon for high-performance potassium ion batteries. Nano Lett 18:7407–741310.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03845 ↗
37. Hoang AT, Nižetić S, Cheng CK, Luque R, Thomas S, Banh TL, Nguyen XP (2022) Heavy metal removal by biomass-derived carbon nanotubes as a greener environmental remediation: A comprehensive review. Chemosphere 287:13195910.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131959 ↗
38. Bibri SE, Krogstie J (2020) Environmentally data-driven smart sustainable cities: Applied innovative solutions for energy efficiency, pollution reduction, and urban metabolism. Energy Inform 3(1):1–5910.1186/s42162-020-00130-8 ↗
39. Shah SS, Shaikh MN, Khan MY, Alfasane MA, Rahman MM, Aziz MA (2021) Present status and future prospects of jute in nanotechnology: A review. The Chem Record 1(7):1631–166510.1002/tcr.202100135 ↗
40. Dhilip Kumar R, Nagarani S, Sethuraman V, Andra S, Dhinakaran V (2022) Investigations of conducting polymers, carbon materials, oxide and sulfide materials for supercapacitor applications: A review. Chem Pap 76:3371–338510.1007/s11696-022-02124-0 ↗
41. Hosseinzadeh A, Zhou JL, Li X, Afsari M, Altaee A (2022) Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of hydrogen production processes using bio-waste as renewable energy resource. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 156:11199110.1016/j.rser.2021.111991 ↗
42. Chang BP, Rodriguez-Uribe A, Mohanty AK, Misra MA (2021) comprehensive review of renewable and sustainable biosourced carbon through pyrolysis in biocomposites uses: Current development and future opportunity. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 152:11166610.1016/j.rser.2021.111666 ↗
43. Oseghe EO, Akpotu SO, Mombeshora ET et al (2021) Multi-dimensional applications of graphitic carbon nitride nanomaterials–A review. J Molecul Liq 44:11782010.1016/j.molliq.2021.117820 ↗
44. Azzou KAK, Terbouche A, Ramdane-Terbouche CA et al (2022) Electrochemical performance of new hybrid activated carbon materials from binary and ternary Date-Olive pits for supercapacitor electrodes. J Energy Storage 47:10355910.1016/j.est.2021.103559 ↗
45. Wareing TC, Gentile P, Phan AN (2021) Biomass-based carbon dots: current development and future perspectives. ACS Nano 5(10):15471–1550110.1021/acsnano.1c03886 ↗
46. Asghar A, Hussain N, Baqar Z, Sumrin A, Bilal M (2022) Current challenges of biomass refinery and prospects of emerging technologies for sustainable bioproducts and bioeconomy. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefining. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.240310.1002/bbb.2403 ↗
47. Sun L, Gong Y, Li D, Pan C (2022) Biomass-derived porous carbon materials: synthesis, designing, and applications for supercapacitors. Green Chem 24:3864–389410.1039/D2GC00099G ↗
48. Dodón A, Quintero V, Chen Austin M, Mora D (2021) Bio-inspired electricity storage alternatives to support massive demand-side energy generation: a review of applications at building scale. Biomimetics 6(3):5110.3390/biomimetics6030051 ↗
49. Hossain E, Faruque HMR, Sunny MSH, Mohammad N, Nawar N (2020) A comprehensive review on energy storage systems: Types, comparison, current scenario, applications, barriers, and potential solutions, policies, and future prospects. Energies 13(14):365110.3390/en13143651 ↗
50. Li H, He X, Wu T, Jin B, Yang L, Qiu J (2022) Synthesis, modification strategies and applications of coal-based carbon materials. Fuel Process Technol 230:10720310.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107203 ↗
51. Ramesh M, Rajeshkumar L, Bhoopathi R (2021) Carbon substrates: a review on fabrication, properties and applications. Carbon Lett 31(4):557–58010.1007/s42823-021-00264-z ↗
52. Qin L, Wu Y, Hou Z, Zhang S, Jiang E (2021) Synthesis of heteroatom and metallic compound self-co-doped porous carbon derived from swine manure for supercapacitor electrodes and lead ion adsorbents. J Indus Eng Chem 102:195–20510.1016/j.jiec.2021.06.038 ↗
53. Zhou X, Zeng Z, Zeng G et al (2020) Persulfate activation by swine bone char-derived hierarchical porous carbon: multiple mechanism system for organic pollutant degradation in aqueous media. Chem Eng J 383:12309110.1016/j.cej.2019.123091 ↗
54. Qin L, Wu Y, Jiang E (2022) In situ template preparation of porous carbon materials that are derived from swine manure and have ordered hierarchical nanopore structures for energy storage. Energy 242:12304010.1016/j.energy.2021.123040 ↗
55. Yang H, Sun X, Zhu H et al (2020) Nano-porous carbon materials derived from different biomasses for high performance supercapacitors. Ceram Int 46(5):5811–582010.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.031 ↗
56. Atchudan R, Edison TNJI, Perumal S et al (2022) Facile synthesis of nitrogen-doped porous carbon materials using waste biomass for energy storage applications. Chemosphere 289:13322510.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133225 ↗
57. Yıldız Z, Ceylan S (2019) Pyrolysis of tobacco factory waste biomass. J Therm Anal Calorim 136(2):783–79410.1007/s10973-018-7630-z ↗
58. Hu BB, Lin ZL, Chen Y, Zhao GK et al (2020) Evaluation of biomass briquettes from agricultural waste on industrial application of flue-curing of tobacco. Energy Sources Recover Util Environ Eff. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.179685210.1080/15567036.2020.1796852 ↗
59. Wang J, Jiang B, Liu L, Cao L et al (2022) Tobacco waste biomass for electrochemical energy storage application. J Phys Conf Ser 2160(1):01205210.1088/1742-6596/2160/1/012052 ↗
60. Zhang J, Zhang J, Wang M, Wu S et al (2019) Effect of tobacco stem-derived biochar on soil metal immobilization and the cultivation of tobacco plant. J Soils Sediment 19(5):2313–232110.1007/s11368-018-02226-x ↗
61. Berbeć AK, Matyka M (2020) Biomass characteristics and energy yields of tobacco (Nicotianatabacum L.) cultivated in eastern Poland. Agriculture 10(11):55110.3390/agriculture10110551 ↗
62. Huang Z, Qin C, Wang J, Cao L, Ma Z, Yuan Q, Lin Z, Zhang P (2021) Research on high-value utilization of carbon derived from tobacco waste in supercapacitors. Materials 14(7):171410.3390/ma14071714 ↗
63. Liu L, Lu Y, Qiu D, Wang D et al (2022) Sodium alginate-derived porous carbon: Self-template carbonization mechanism and application in capacitive energy storage. J Colloid Interface Sci 620:284–29210.1016/j.jcis.2022.04.022 ↗
64. Wei L, Huang X, Zhang X, Yang X, Yang J, Yan F, Ya Y (2021) High-performance electrochemical sensing platform based on sodium alginate-derived 3D hierarchically porous carbon for simultaneous determination of dihydroxybenzene isomers. Anal Methods 13(9):1110–112010.1039/D0AY02240C ↗
65. Qin L, Xiao Z, Zhai S, Wang S et al (2020) Alginate-derived porous carbon obtained by nano-ZnO hard template-induced ZnCl2-activation method for enhanced electrochemical performance. J Electrochem Soc 167(4):04050510.1149/1945-7111/ab717b ↗
66. Svinterikos E, Zuburtikudis I, Al-Marzouqi M (2020) Electrospun lignin-derived carbon micro-and nanofibers: A review on precursors, properties, and applications. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8(37):13868–1389310.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03246 ↗
67. Anuchi SO, Campbell KLS, Hallett JP (2022) Effective pretreatment of lignin-rich coconut wastes using a low-cost ionic liquid. Scient Rep 12(1):1–1110.1038/s41598-021-99269-x ↗
68. Li W, Wanninayake N, Gao X, Li M, Pu Y, Kim DY, Ragauskas AJ, Shi J (2020) Mechanistic insight into lignin slow pyrolysis by linking pyrolysis chemistry and carbon material properties. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8(42):15843–1585410.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03423 ↗
69. Li W, Qian D, Kim DY, Cheng YT, Shi J (2022) Engineering lignin-derived carbon–silicon nanocomposite electrodes: insight into the copyrolysis mechanism and process–structure–property–performance relationships. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 10(2):868–87910.1021/acssuschemeng.1c06531 ↗
70. Ehsani A, Moftakhar MK (2021) Lignin-derived carbon as a high efficient active material for enhancing pseudocapacitance performance of p-type conductive polymer. J Energy Storage 35:10229110.1016/j.est.2021.102291 ↗
71. Zhu Y, Li Z, Tao Y, Zhou J, Zhang H (2022) Hierarchical porous carbon materials produced from heavy bio-oil for high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. J Energy Storage 47:10362410.1016/j.est.2021.103624 ↗
72. Xu D, Yang S, Su Y, Shi L, Zhang S, Xiong Y (2021) Simultaneous production of aromatics-rich bio-oil and carbon nanomaterials from catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass/plastic wastes and in-line catalytic upgrading of pyrolysis gas. Waste Manag 121:95–10410.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.008 ↗
73. Feng P, Li J, Wang H, Xu Z (2020) Biomass-based activated carbon and activators: preparation of activated carbon from corncob by chemical activation with biomass pyrolysis liquids. ACS Omega 5(37):24064–2407210.1021/acsomega.0c03494 ↗
74. Ogungbenro AE, Quang DV, Al-Ali KA, Vega LF, Abu-Zahra MR (2020) Synthesis and characterization of activated carbon from biomass date seeds for carbon dioxide adsorption. J Environ Chem Eng 8(5):10425710.1016/j.jece.2020.104257 ↗
75. Azzou KAK, Terbouche A, Ramdane-Terbouche CA, Belkhalfa H, Bachari K, Hauchard D, Mezaoui D (2022) Electrochemical performance of new hybrid activated carbon materials from binary and ternary Date-Olive pits for supercapacitor electrodes. J Energy Storage 47:10355910.1016/j.est.2021.103559 ↗
76. Chen Z, Wei W, Ni BJ, Chen H (2022) Plastic wastes derived carbon materials for green energy and sustainable environmental applications. Environ Funct Mater 1(21):34–48
77. Wu M, Liao J, Yu L, Lv R et al (2020) 2020 Roadmap on carbon materials for energy storage and conversion. Chem Asian J 15(7):995–101310.1002/asia.201901802 ↗
78. Li Y, Mou B, Liang Y, Dong H, Zheng M, Xiao Y, Liu Y (2019) Component degradation-enabled preparation of biomass-based highly porous carbon materials for energy storage. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7(18):15259–1526610.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02364 ↗
79. Li H, He X, Wu T, Jin B, Yang L, Qiu J (2022) Synthesis, modification strategies and applications of coal-based carbon materials. Fuel Process Technol 230:10720310.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107203 ↗
80. Gao N, Quan C, Liu B, Li Z, Wu C, Li A (2017) Continuous pyrolysis of sewage sludge in a screw-feeding reactor: products characterization and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals. Energy Fuels 31(5):5063–507210.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b03112 ↗
81. Wilson F, Tremain P, Moghtaderi B (2018) Characterization of biochars derived from pyrolysis of biomass and calcium oxide mixtures. Energy Fuels 32(4):4167–417710.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03221 ↗
82. Hossain FM, Kosinkova J, Brown RJ, Ristovski Z, Hankamer B, Stephens E, Rainey TJ (2017) Experimental investigations of physical and chemical properties for microalgae HTL bio-crude using a large batch reactor. Energies 10(4):46710.3390/en10040467 ↗
83. Fan F, Zheng Y, Huang Y, Lu Y, Wang Z, Chen B, Zheng Z (2017) Preparation and characterization of biochars from waste Camellia oleifera shells by different thermochemical processes. Energy Fuels 31(8):8146–815110.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00269 ↗
84. Kieseler S, Neubauer Y, Zobel N (2013) Ultimate and proximate correlations for estimating the higher heating value of hydrothermal solids. Energy Fuels 27(2):908–91810.1021/ef301752d ↗
85. Nanda S, Mohanty P, Pant KK, Naik S, Kozinski JA, Dalai AK (2013) Characterization of North American lignocellulosic biomass and biochars in terms of their candidacy for alternate renewable fuels. Bioenergy Res 6(2):663–67710.1007/s12155-012-9281-4 ↗
86. Pfanz H, Vodnik D, Wittmann C, Aschan G, Batic F, Turk B, Macek I (2007) Photosynthetic performance (CO2-compensation point, carboxylation efficiency, and net photosynthesis) of timothy grass (Phleumpratense L.) is affected by elevated carbon dioxide in post-volcanic mofette areas. Environ Exp Botany 61(1):41–4810.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.02.008 ↗
87. Voca N, Bilandzija N, Jurisic V, Matin A, Kricka T, Sedak I (2016) Proximate, ultimate, and energy values analysis of plum biomass by-products case study: Croatia’s potential. J Agric Sci Technol 18(6):1655–1666
88. Yao D, Hu Q, Wang D, Yang H, Wu C, Wang X, Chen H (2016) Hydrogen production from biomass gasification using biochar as a catalyst/support. Bioresour Technol 216:159–16410.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.011 ↗
89. Liu Y, Guo Y, Gao W, Wang Z, Ma Y, Wang Z (2012) Simultaneous preparation of silica and activated carbon from rice husk ash. J Clean Prod 32:204–20910.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.021 ↗
90. Ronsse F, Van Hecke S, Dickinson D, Prins W (2013) Production and characterization of slow pyrolysis biochar: influence of feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions. Gcb Bioenergy 5(2):104–11510.1111/gcbb.12018 ↗
91. Yue Y, Lin Q, Xu Y, Li G, Zhao X (2017) Slow pyrolysis as a measure for rapidly treating cow manure and the biochar characteristics. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 124:355–36110.1016/j.jaap.2017.01.008 ↗
92. Liu W, Mei J, Liu G, Kou Q, Yi T, Xiao S (2018) Nitrogen-doped hierarchical porous carbon from wheat straw for supercapacitors. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6(9):11595–1160510.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01798 ↗
93. Cai J, Li B, Chen C, Wang J, Zhao M, Zhang K (2016) Hydrothermal carbonization of tobacco stalk for fuel application. Bioresour Technol 220:305–31110.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.098 ↗
94. Shi Y, Ge Y, Chang J, Shao H, Tang Y (2013) Garden waste biomass for renewable and sustainable energy production in China: potential, challenges and development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 22:432–43710.1016/j.rser.2013.02.003 ↗
95. Chen T, Zhang Y, Wang H, Lu W, Zhou Z, Zhang Y, Ren L (2014) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on characteristics and heavy metal adsorptive performance of biochar derived from municipal sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol 164:47–5410.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.048 ↗
96. Huang F, Li D, Wang L, Zhang K et al (2021) Rational introduction of nitridizing agent to hydrothermal carbonization for enhancing CO2 capture performance of tobacco stalk-based porous carbons. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 157:10504710.1016/j.jaap.2021.105047 ↗
97. Demirbas A (2004) Effects of temperature and particle size on bio-char yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 72(2):243–24810.1016/j.jaap.2004.07.003 ↗
98. Lee Y, Park J, Ryu C, Gang KS, Yang W, Park YK, Jung J, Hyun S (2013) Comparison of biochar properties from biomass residues produced by slow pyrolysis at 500 °C. Bioresour Technol 148:196–20110.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.135 ↗
99. Areeprasert C, Leelachaikul P, Jangkobpattana G, Phumprasop K, Kiattiwat T (2018) Biochar preparation from simulated municipal solid waste employing low temperature carbonization process. IOP Conf Series Mater Sci Eng 311(1):01202110.1088/1757-899X/311/1/012021 ↗
100. Sánchez ME, Menéndez JA, Domíngue A, Pis JJ, Martínez O, Calvo LF, Bernad PL (2009) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on the composition of the oils obtained from sewage sludge. Biomass Bioenerg 33(6–7):933–94010.1016/j.biombioe.2009.02.002 ↗