journal article·2021-04Open access

A recent trend: application of graphene in catalysis

Yuxin Yan, Woo In Shin, Hao Chen, Shar-Mun Lee, Sivakumar Manickam, Svenja Hanson, Haitao Zhao, Edward Lester, Tao Wu, Cheng Heng Pang

Carbon Letters· Volume 31· Issue 2

Abstract

Graphene, an allotrope of carbon in 2D structure, has revolutionised research, development and application in various disciplines since its successful isolation 16 years ago. The single layer of sp2-hybridised carbon atoms brings with it a string of unrivalled characteristics at a fraction of the price of its competitors, including platinum, gold and silver. More recently, there has been a growing trend in the application of graphene in catalysis, either as metal-free catalysts, composite catalysts or as catalyst supports. The unique and extraordinary properties of graphene have rendered it useful in increasing the reactivity and selectivity of some reactions. Owing to its large surface area, outstanding adsorptivity and high compatibility with various functional groups, graphene is able to provide a whole new level of possibilities and flexibilities to design and synthesise fit-for-purpose graphene-based catalysts for specific applications. This review is focussed on the progress, mechanisms and challenges of graphene application in four main reactions, i.e., oxygen reduction reaction, water splitting, water treatment and Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. This review also summarises the advantages and drawbacks of graphene over other commonly used catalysts. Given the inherent nature of graphene, coupled with its recent accelerated advancement in the synthesis and modification processes, it is anticipated that the application of graphene in catalysis will grow exponentially from its current stage of infancy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Huang C, Li C, Shi G (2012) Graphene based catalysts. Energy Environ Sci 5(10):8848–886810.1039/c2ee22238h ↗
2. Zhao H et al (2015) Screening of metal oxides for Hg0capture. Energy Procedia 75:2421–242610.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.202 ↗
3. Julkapli NM, Bagheri S (2015) Graphene supported heterogeneous catalysts: an overview. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40(2):948–97910.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.129 ↗
4. Su C, Loh KP (2013) Carbocatalysts: graphene oxide and its derivatives. Acc Chem Res 46(10):2275–228510.1021/ar300118v ↗
5. Marras F (2010) Recovery and recycling of homogeneous catalysts: silica as temporary or permanent support, in Faculty of Science (FNWI). University of Amsterdam, p 138
6. Gomes JF et al (2008) Development of heterogeneous catalysts for transesterification of triglycerides. React Kinet Catal Lett 95(2):273–27910.1007/s11144-008-5372-9 ↗
7. Lv G et al (2015) Graphene oxide: a convenient metal-free carbocatalyst for facilitating aerobic oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural into 2, 5-diformylfuran. ACS Catal 5(9):5636–564610.1021/acscatal.5b01446 ↗
8. ASTM Standards C618-89a (1989) ASTM Designation C618-89a. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, p 289
9. Zhu Y et al (2010) Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater 22(35):3906–392410.1002/adma.201001068 ↗
10. Geim AK, Novoselov KS (2007) The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 6(3):183–19110.1038/nmat1849 ↗
11. Morales Ibarra R et al (2020) Graphene exfoliation with supercritical fluids. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-020-00153-x10.1007/s42823-020-00153-x ↗
12. Marinkas A et al (2013) Graphene as catalyst support: the influences of carbon additives and catalyst preparation methods on the performance of PEM fuel cells. Carbon 58:139–15010.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.043 ↗
13. Chehroudi B (2016) Applications of graphene in fuel propellant combustion. In: Graphene science handbook, pp 391–39810.1201/b19488-31 ↗
14. Fan X (2015) Graphene: a promising two-dimensional support for heterogeneous catalysts. Front Mater 1(39):1–2
15. Hu L et al (2010) Density functional calculation of transition metal adatom adsorption on graphene. Phys B 405(16):3337–334110.1016/j.physb.2010.05.001 ↗
16. Nakada K, Ishii A (2011) Migration of adatom adsorption on graphene using DFT calculation. Solid State Commun 151(1):13–1610.1016/j.ssc.2010.10.036 ↗
17. Machado BF, Serp P (2012) Graphene-based materials for catalysis. Catal Sci Technol 2(1):54–7510.1039/C1CY00361E ↗
18. Tang Y, Yang Z, Dai X (2011) Noble metals induced magnetic properties of graphene. J Magn Magn Mater 323(20):2441–244710.1016/j.jmmm.2011.05.004 ↗
19. Yanwu Z et al (2010) Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater 22(35):3906–392410.1002/adma.201001068 ↗
20. Woo J-H et al (2019) Effect of polydopamine-modified reduced graphene oxides on the catalytic activity of Pt nanoparticles catalysts for fuel cell electrodes. Carbon Lett 29(1):47–5510.1007/s42823-019-00017-z ↗
21. Liu J et al (2018) Graphene-based nanomaterials and their potentials in advanced drug delivery and cancer therapy. J Control Release 286:64–7310.1016/j.jconrel.2018.07.034 ↗
22. Boukhvalov DW, Katsnelson MI (2009) Chemical functionalization of graphene. J Phys Condens Matter 21(34):34420510.1088/0953-8984/21/34/344205 ↗
23. Hashimoto A et al (2004) Direct evidence for atomic defects in graphene layers. Nature 430:87010.1038/nature02817 ↗
24. Fan X, Zhang G, Zhang F (2015) Multiple roles of graphene in heterogeneous catalysis. Chem Soc Rev 44(10):3023–303510.1039/C5CS00094G ↗
25. Shende P, Augustine S, Prabhakar B (2020) A review on graphene nanoribbons for advanced biomedical applications. Carbon Lett 30:465–47510.1007/s42823-020-00125-1 ↗
26. Jeong H-S et al (2020) Oriented wrinkle textures of free-standing graphene nanosheets: application as a high-performance lithium-ion battery anode. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-020-00163-910.1007/s42823-020-00163-9 ↗
27. Hu H et al (2015) Metal-free graphene-based catalyst—insight into the catalytic activity: a short review. Appl Catal A 492:1–910.1016/j.apcata.2014.11.041 ↗
28. Zhou X et al (2014) A review of graphene-based nanostructural materials for both catalyst supports and metal-free catalysts in PEM fuel cell oxygen reduction reactions. Adv Energy Mater 4(8):130152310.1002/aenm.201301523 ↗
29. Song C, Zhang J (2008) Electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reaction. In: Zhang J (ed) PEM fuel cell electrocatalysts and catalyst layers: fundamentals and applications. Springer, London, pp 89–13410.1007/978-1-84800-936-3_2 ↗
30. Zhang L et al (2006) Progress in preparation of non-noble electrocatalysts for PEM fuel cell reactions. J Power Sour 156(2):171–18210.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.069 ↗
31. Gouérec P, Savy M, Riga J (1998) Oxygen reduction in acidic media catalyzed by pyrolyzed cobalt macrocycles dispersed on an active carbon: the importance of the content of oxygen surface groups on the evolution of the chelate structure during the heat treatment. Electrochim Acta 43(7):743–75310.1016/S0013-4686(97)00209-0 ↗
32. Goellner V et al (2015) Degradation by hydrogen peroxide of metal-nitrogen–carbon catalysts for oxygen reduction. J Electrochem Soc 162(6):H403–H41410.1149/2.1091506jes ↗
33. Higgins D et al (2016) The application of graphene and its composites in oxygen reduction electrocatalysis: a perspective and review of recent progress. Energy Environ Sci 9(2):357–39010.1039/C5EE02474A ↗
34. Rabis A, Rodriguez P, Schmidt TJ (2012) Electrocatalysis for polymer electrolyte fuel cells: recent achievements and future challenges. ACS Catalysis 2(5):864–89010.1021/cs3000864 ↗
35. Shao M-H, Sasaki K, Adzic RR (2006) Pd−Fe nanoparticles as electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction. J Am Chem Soc 128(11):3526–352710.1021/ja060167d ↗
36. Carpenter MK et al (2012) Solvothermal synthesis of platinum alloy nanoparticles for oxygen reduction electrocatalysis. J Am Chem Soc 134(20):8535–854210.1021/ja300756y ↗
37. 황성주 One-pot synthesis of platinum nanoparticles embedded on reduced graphene oxide for oxygen reduction in methanol fuel cells. 14(7)
38. He W et al (2012) An efficient reduction route for the production of Pd–Pt nanoparticles anchored on graphene nanosheets for use as durable oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Carbon 50(1):265–27410.1016/j.carbon.2011.08.044 ↗
39. Zeng L et al (2015) Graphene-supported platinum catalyst prepared with ionomer as surfactant for anion exchange membrane fuel cells. J Power Sour 275:506–51510.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.021 ↗
40. Hsieh SH et al (2013) Study of Pt catalyst on graphene and its application to fuel cell. Appl Surf Sci 277:223–23010.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.029 ↗
41. Li J et al (2016) Synthesis of PtM (M=Co, Ni)/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites as electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Nanoscale Res Lett 11(1):310.1186/s11671-015-1208-5 ↗
42. Seger B, Kamat PV (2009) Electrocatalytically active graphene-platinum nanocomposites. Role of 2-D carbon support in PEM fuel cells. J Phys Chem C 113(19):7990–799510.1021/jp900360k ↗
43. Deng D et al (2011) Size effect of graphene on electrocatalytic activation of oxygen. Chem Commun 47(36):10016–1001810.1039/c1cc13033a ↗
44. Lester E et al (2018) A proposed biomass char classification system. Fuel 232:845–85410.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.153 ↗
45. Daley PJ et al (2019) The impact of ash pellet characteristics and pellet processing parameters on ash fusion behaviour. Fuel 251:779–78810.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.142 ↗
46. Jiang D-E, Sumpter BG, Dai S (2007) Unique chemical reactivity of a graphene nanoribbon’s zigzag edge. J Chem Phys 126(13):13470110.1063/1.2715558 ↗
47. Guo S, Sun S (2012) FePt nanoparticles assembled on graphene as enhanced catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. J Am Chem Soc 134(5):2492–249510.1021/ja2104334 ↗
48. Lijun Y et al (2011) Boron-doped carbon nanotubes as metal-free electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed 50(31):7132–713510.1002/anie.201101287 ↗
49. Yang Z et al (2012) Sulfur-doped graphene as an efficient metal-free cathode catalyst for oxygen reduction. ACS Nano 6(1):205–21110.1021/nn203393d ↗
50. Benson J et al (2014) Tuning the catalytic activity of graphene nanosheets for oxygen reduction reaction via size and thickness reduction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(22):19726–1973610.1021/am5048202 ↗
51. Imran Jafri R, Rajalakshmi N, Ramaprabhu S (2010) Nitrogen doped graphene nanoplatelets as catalyst support for oxygen reduction reaction in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J Mater Chem 20(34):7114–711710.1039/c0jm00467g ↗
52. Bai J et al (2013) Nitrogen-doped graphene as catalysts and catalyst supports for oxygen reduction in both acidic and alkaline solutions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38(3):1413–141810.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.039 ↗
53. Chenzhen Z et al (2013) Synthesis of phosphorus-doped graphene and its multifunctional applications for oxygen reduction reaction and lithium ion batteries. Adv Mater 25(35):4932–493710.1002/adma.201301870 ↗
54. Quílez-Bermejo J, Morallón E, Cazorla-Amorós D (2020) Metal-free heteroatom-doped carbon-based catalysts for ORR: a critical assessment about the role of heteroatoms. Carbon 165:434–45410.1016/j.carbon.2020.04.068 ↗
55. Jang AR et al (2018) Electrochemical and electrocatalytic reaction characteristics of boron-incorporated graphene via a simple spin-on dopant process. J Mater Chem A 6(17):7351–735610.1039/C7TA09517A ↗
56. Bo X, Guo L (2013) Ordered mesoporous boron-doped carbons as metal-free electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline solution. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15(7):2459–246510.1039/c2cp43541a ↗
57. Zhao Y et al (2013) Can boron and nitrogen codoping improve oxygen reduction reaction activity of carbon nanotubes? J Am Chem Soc 135(4):1201–120410.1021/ja310566z ↗
58. Yao Z et al (2013) Two-step boron and nitrogen doping in graphene for enhanced synergistic catalysis. Angew Chem 52(11):3110–311610.1002/anie.201209548 ↗
59. Garcia AC, Gasparotto LH, Gomes JF, Tremiliosi-Filho G (2012) Straightforward synthesis of carbon-supported Ag nanoparticles and their application for the oxygen reduction reaction. Electrocatalysis 3(2):147–15210.1007/s12678-012-0096-z ↗
60. Soo LT et al (2016) Synthesis of silver/nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide through a one-step thermal solid-state reaction for oxygen reduction in an alkaline medium. J Power Sour 324:412–42010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.106 ↗
61. Jiang S, Zhu C, Dong S (2013) Cobalt and nitrogen-cofunctionalized graphene as a durable non-precious metal catalyst with enhanced ORR activity. J Mater Chem A 1(11):3593–359910.1039/c3ta01682j ↗
62. Liang Y et al (2012) Oxygen reduction electrocatalyst based on strongly coupled cobalt oxide nanocrystals and carbon nanotubes. J Am Chem Soc 134(38):15849–1585710.1021/ja305623m ↗
63. Wu J et al (2012) Manganese oxide–graphene composite as an efficient catalyst for 4-electron reduction of oxygen in alkaline media. Electrochim Acta 75:305–31010.1016/j.electacta.2012.05.005 ↗
64. Zhou R, Qiao SZ (2014) Silver/nitrogen-doped graphene interaction and its effect on electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Chem Mater 26(20):5868–587310.1021/cm502260m ↗
65. Lin Z et al (2013) Simple preparation of nanoporous few-layer nitrogen-doped graphene for use as an efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions. Carbon 53:130–13610.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.039 ↗
66. Sheng Z-H et al (2011) Catalyst-free synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene via thermal annealing graphite oxide with melamine and its excellent electrocatalysis. ACS Nano 5(6):4350–435810.1021/nn103584t ↗
67. Deng D et al (2011) Toward N-doped graphene via solvothermal synthesis. Chem Mater 23(5):1188–119310.1021/cm102666r ↗
68. Hu C et al (2018) Functionalization of graphene materials by heteroatom-doping for energy conversion and storage. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 28(2):121–13210.1016/j.pnsc.2018.02.001 ↗
69. Jiang L, Cui L, He X (2014) Cobalt-porphyrin noncovalently functionalized graphene as nonprecious-metal electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction in an alkaline medium. J Solid State Electrochem 19(2):497–50610.1007/s10008-014-2628-3 ↗
70. Shaojun G et al (2012) Co/CoO nanoparticles assembled on graphene for electrochemical reduction of oxygen. Angew Chem Int Ed 51(47):11770–1177310.1002/anie.201206152 ↗
71. Liang Y et al (2012) Covalent hybrid of spinel manganese-cobalt oxide and graphene as advanced oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. J Am Chem Soc 134(7):3517–352310.1021/ja210924t ↗
72. Sibul R et al (2020) Iron- and nitrogen-doped graphene-based catalysts for fuel cell application. ChemElectroChem 7:1739–174710.1002/celc.202000011 ↗
73. Sun M et al (2015) Graphene-based transition metal oxide nanocomposites for the oxygen reduction reaction. Nanoscale 7(4):1250–126910.1039/C4NR05838K ↗
74. Turner JA (1999) A realizable renewable energy future. Science 285(5428):687–68910.1126/science.285.5428.687 ↗
75. World Commission on, E. and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
76. Zhu J, Zäch M (2009) Nanostructured materials for photocatalytic hydrogen production. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 14:260–26910.1016/j.cocis.2009.05.003 ↗
77. Liu G et al (2012) Engineering TiO2 nanomaterials for CO2 conversion/solar fuels. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 105:53–6810.1016/j.solmat.2012.05.037 ↗
78. Suk Jang J, Gyu Kim H, Lee JS (2012) Heterojunction semiconductors: a strategy to develop efficient photocatalytic materials for visible light water splitting. Catal Today 185:270–27710.1016/j.cattod.2011.07.008 ↗
79. Quanhua X et al (2012) A novel photocatalyst LaOF: facile fabrication and photocatalytic hydrogen production. Catal Commun 27:21–2510.1016/j.catcom.2012.06.019 ↗
80. Ahmad H et al (2015) Hydrogen from photo-catalytic water splitting process: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:599–61010.1016/j.rser.2014.10.101 ↗
81. Jiang D et al (2001) Photoelectrochemical behaviour of methanol oxidation at nanoporous TiO2 film electrodes. J Photochem Photobiol A 144(2):197–20410.1016/S1010-6030(01)00527-5 ↗
82. Lee JS (2006) Photocatalytic water splitting under visible light with particulate semiconductor catalysts. Catal Surv Asia 9(4):217–227
83. Wang X et al (2008) A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light. Nat Mater 8:7610.1038/nmat2317 ↗
84. Liu G et al (2010) Unique electronic structure induced high photoreactivity of sulfur-doped graphitic C3N4. J Am Chem Soc 132(33):11642–1164810.1021/ja103798k ↗
85. Wu N et al (2010) Shape-enhanced photocatalytic activity of single-crystalline anatase TiO2 (101) nanobelts. J Am Chem Soc 132(19):6679–668510.1021/ja909456f ↗
86. Yu J et al (2009) Enhancement of photocatalytic activity of mesporous TiO2 powders by hydrothermal surface fluorination treatment. J Phys Chem C 113(16):6743–675010.1021/jp900136q ↗
87. Joung D et al (2010) Space charge limited conduction with exponential trap distribution in reduced graphene oxide sheets. Appl Phys Lett 97(9):09310510.1063/1.3484956 ↗
88. Jiang X et al (2013) Graphene oxide as a chemically tunable 2-D material for visible-light photocatalyst applications. J Catal 299:204–20910.1016/j.jcat.2012.12.022 ↗
89. Yeh T-F et al (2011) Graphite oxide with different oxygenated levels for hydrogen and oxygen production from water under illumination: the band positions of graphite oxide. J Phys Chem C 115(45):22587–2259710.1021/jp204856c ↗
90. Loh K et al (2010) Graphene oxide as a chemically tunable platform for optical applications. Nat Chem 2:1015–102410.1038/nchem.907 ↗
91. Krishnamoorthy K, Mohan R, Kim S-J (2011) Graphene oxide as a photocatalytic material. Appl Phys Lett 98(24):24410110.1063/1.3599453 ↗
92. Liu P et al (2012) Hybrid density functional study on SrTiO3 for visible light photocatalysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37(16):11611–1161710.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.038 ↗
93. Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238(5358):37–3810.1038/238037a0 ↗
94. Khalid NR, Ahmed E, Hong Z, Zhang Y, Ullah M, Ahmed M (2013) Graphene modified Nd/TiO2 photocatalyst for methyl orange degradation under visible light irradiation. Ceram Int 39(4):3569–357510.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.183 ↗
95. Xu Y, Gao S-P (2012) Band gap of C3N4 in the GW approximation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:11072–1108010.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.138 ↗
96. Zhang H et al (2010) P25-graphene composite as a high performance photocatalyst. ACS Nano 4(1):380–38610.1021/nn901221k ↗
97. Zhang Y et al (2010) Cytotoxicity effects of graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes in neural phaeochromocytoma-derived PC12 Cells. ACS Nano 4(6):3181–318610.1021/nn1007176 ↗
98. Sher Shah MSA et al (2012) Green synthesis of biphasic TiO2–reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites with highly enhanced photocatalytic activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4(8):3893–390110.1021/am301287m ↗
99. Kudo A, Miseki Y (2009) Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem Soc Rev 38(1):253–27810.1039/B800489G ↗
100. Joy J, Mathew J, George SC (2018) Nanomaterials for photoelectrochemical water splitting—review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43(10):4804–481710.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.099 ↗