journal article·2026-05-14Open access

An Ambient Photocatalytic Approach to In‐Situ Prepare Cobalt/Cobalt Phosphide and Cobalt/Cobalt Phosphide@Graphene Heterojunction Nanomaterials With Optimized Charge Separation Effects for Highly Efficient Relayed Electrocatalytic NO X − Reduction to NH 3

Xin Zhao, Chuanjun Wang, Shenjie Liu, Guoqiang Wang, Jing Dong, Chen Lei, Geoffrey I. N. Waterhouse, Jing Xu

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper reports a novel visible‐light‐driven photocatalytic method for in‐situ preparation of cobalt/cobalt phosphide (Co/CoP‐ x , where x = Co/CoP molar ratio) heterojunction nanocatalysts for electrocatalytic NO x − (NO 2 − /NO 3 − ) reduction to ammonia (eNO x RR). A series of Co/CoP‐ x catalysts with different Co:CoP ratios was successfully synthesized at room temperature via the photocatalytic method that utilized tetrabromine fluorescein as a photosensitizer and triethylamine as a sacrificial electron donor in pure aqueous solution. The intimate contact of lattice fringes of Co (0) and CoP confirms the presence of Co/CoP heterostructures. Amongst the catalysts, Co/CoP‐4 was found to deliver the most outstanding performance, including a Faraday efficiency (FE) of 99.38% and an ammonia yield of 797.56 μmol h −1 cm −2 at −0.16 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) for eNO 2 RR, along with a FE of 95.34% and ammonia yield of 552.84 μmol h −1 cm −2 at −0.21 V versus RHE for eNO 3 RR. Furthermore, when graphene (rGO) was introduced as support material during photosynthesis, the formed Co/CoP@rGO (Co:CoP = 4) catalyst demonstrated enhanced electron transport activity and synergistic electronic effects that enabled promoted ammonia yields up to 3.55 mmol h −1 cm −2 (eNO 2 RR) and 2.30 mmol h −1 cm −2 (eNO 3 RR). X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy revealed an effectively enlarged charge separation effect between Co ( δ + ) and P ( δ − ) sites in the Co/CoP‐4 and Co/CoP@rGO, underpinning the excellent catalytic performance. In situ characterization techniques revealed that the excellent charge separation effect significantly enhanced the supply capacity of active hydrogen (*H) and optimized proton transfer kinetics. Meanwhile, the low‐valent state transition characteristics of cobalt active sites accelerated *NO consumption, clarifying the ammonia synthesis relay mechanism where CoP phase was responsible for rapid activation of *NO 3 to *NO 2 , which was then transferred to Co phase for subsequent reactions, while the P active sites acted as efficient *H acceptors to promote nitrate hydrogenation. Density functional theory calculations demonstrated that Co/CoP‐4 achieved optimized charge separation for Co ( δ + )‐P ( δ − ) through d ‐band center modulation, enhancing NO x − adsorption on Co sites and *H generation on P sites, suppressing the hydrogen evolution reaction, and significantly reducing the energy barrier of the rate‐determining step of *NO 3 → *NO 2 reaction. This study reveals the significant role of charge separation effect in eNO x RR for ammonia synthesis, providing insight for the development of low‐cost and highly‐effective electrocatalysts for eNO x RR to ammonia.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Chemistry and Material Science Shandong Agricultural University Tai'an China

Key Laboratory of Agricultural Film Application of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Tai'an Shandong China

School of Chemical Sciences The University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41929-023-01094-010.1038/s41929-023-01094-0 ↗
2. 10.1021/jacs.5c1036210.1021/jacs.5c10362 ↗
3. 10.1039/D5EE01585E10.1039/D5EE01585E ↗
4. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.12417310.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124173 ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20240006510.1002/aenm.202400065 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20241868110.1002/adma.202418681 ↗
7. 10.1002/smsc.20250028910.1002/smsc.202500289 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.12374910.1016/j.apcatb.2024.123749 ↗
9. 10.1039/D2CC00189F10.1039/D2CC00189F ↗
10. 10.26599/NRE.2025.912018810.26599/NRE.2025.9120188 ↗
11. 10.1002/sstr.20230016810.1002/sstr.202300168 ↗
12. 10.26599/NR.2025.9490734410.26599/NR.2025.94907344 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20240122110.1002/adma.202401221 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41929-023-00951-210.1038/s41929-023-00951-2 ↗
15. 10.1039/D4EE03987D10.1039/D4EE03987D ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20241530010.1002/anie.202415300 ↗
17. 10.1021/jacs.9b1334710.1021/jacs.9b13347 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.10.05010.1016/j.jcis.2022.10.050 ↗
19. 10.1002/smll.20220803610.1002/smll.202208036 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1872-2067(23)64464-X10.1016/S1872-2067(23)64464-X ↗
21. 10.1021/jacs.9b0798610.1021/jacs.9b07986 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.4c1462110.1021/acsami.4c14621 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11426-020-9795-x10.1007/s11426-020-9795-x ↗
24. 10.1039/D1CC02410H10.1039/D1CC02410H ↗
25. 10.1002/smll.20231143910.1002/smll.202311439 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20200364910.1002/adma.202003649 ↗
27. 10.1002/aenm.20210387210.1002/aenm.202103872 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41467-023-43459-w10.1038/s41467-023-43459-w ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.01710.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.017 ↗
30. 10.1002/adsu.20240027210.1002/adsu.202400272 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17677010.1016/j.jallcom.2024.176770 ↗
32. 10.1007/s40242-025-5103-z10.1007/s40242-025-5103-z ↗
33. Electroless Ni‐P Based Nanocoating Technology—A Review10.1080/15533170600596030 ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20241035610.1002/anie.202410356 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.12446810.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124468 ↗
36. 10.1021/jacs.5c0145510.1021/jacs.5c01455 ↗
37. 10.1039/D1EE03097C10.1039/D1EE03097C ↗
38. 10.1021/jacs.4c0498510.1021/jacs.4c04985 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsanm.4c0572010.1021/acsanm.4c05720 ↗
40. 10.1021/jacs.7b1242010.1021/jacs.7b12420 ↗
41. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0773410.1021/acssuschemeng.2c07734 ↗
42. 10.1021/acscatal.4c0231710.1021/acscatal.4c02317 ↗
43. Modulating Ru–Co Bond Lengths in Ru1Co Single‐Atom Alloys Through Crystal Phase Engineering for Electrocatalytic Nitrate‐To‐Ammonia Conversion10.1038/s41467-025-61232-z ↗
44. 10.1021/jacs.3c0808410.1021/jacs.3c08084 ↗
45. 10.1002/adma.20240868010.1002/adma.202408680 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41467-025-60043-610.1038/s41467-025-60043-6 ↗
47. 10.1002/anie.20240675010.1002/anie.202406750 ↗
48. 10.1039/D2EE03956G10.1039/D2EE03956G ↗
49. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.12618610.1016/j.apcatb.2025.126186 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.12452810.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124528 ↗
51. 10.1039/D4EE02747G10.1039/D4EE02747G ↗
52. 10.1039/D2EE04095F10.1039/D2EE04095F ↗
53. 10.1038/s41467-022-28728-410.1038/s41467-022-28728-4 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.12555010.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125550 ↗
55. 10.1002/cey2.7015910.1002/cey2.70159 ↗
56. 10.1021/jacs.3c1351710.1021/jacs.3c13517 ↗
57. Gradient‐Concentration Ruco Electrocatalyst for Efficient and Stable Electroreduction of Nitrate into Ammonia10.1038/s41467-024-50670-w ↗
58. 10.1021/acsami.1c0492110.1021/acsami.1c04921 ↗
59. Efficient Tandem Electroreduction of Nitrate Into Ammonia Through Coupling Cu Single Atoms With Adjacent Co3O410.1038/s41467-024-48035-4 ↗
60. 10.26599/NR.2025.9490713510.26599/NR.2025.94907135 ↗
61. Insights into Lattice Oxygen and Strains of Oxide‐Derived Copper for Ammonia Electrosynthesis From Nitrate10.1038/s41467-025-58811-5 ↗
62. 10.1038/s44160-025-00941-110.1038/s44160-025-00941-1 ↗
63. 10.1002/cey2.65710.1002/cey2.657 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2026.12650710.1016/j.apcatb.2026.126507 ↗
65. 10.1002/anie.20242511210.1002/anie.202425112 ↗
66. 10.1002/anie.20250822710.1002/anie.202508227 ↗
67. 10.1002/anie.20251292510.1002/anie.202512925 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.12568010.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125680 ↗
69. Modulation of Active Sites Induced by CoP via mn Doping Enables Multifunctional Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution, Oxygen Evolution, and Biomass Oxidation Reactions10.1002/adfm.202514250 ↗
70. 10.1038/s41467-025-57097-x10.1038/s41467-025-57097-x ↗
71. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12087410.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120874 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12357910.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123579 ↗
73. In‐Situ Electrochemical Reconstruction and Modulation of Adsorbed Hydrogen Coverage in Cobalt/Ruthenium‐Based Catalyst Boost Electroreduction of Nitrate to Ammonia10.1038/s41467-024-52780-x ↗
74. 10.1002/adma.20250736310.1002/adma.202507363 ↗