journal article·2023-06Open access

Surplus energy utilization of spent lithium‐ion batteries for high‐profit organolithiums

Jian Lu, Yun Zhao, Yuqiong Kang, Chenglei Li, Yawen Liu, Liguang Wang, Hao Du, Meicen Fan, Yunan Zhou, John Wozny, Tao Li, Naser Tavajohi, Feiyu Kang, Baohua Li

Carbon Energy· Volume 5· Issue 6

Abstract

Abstract It is challenging to efficiently and economically recycle many lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) because of the low valuation of commodity metals and materials, such as LiFePO4. There are millions of tons of spent LIBs where the barrier to recycling is economical, and to make recycling more feasible, it is required that the value of the processed recycled material exceeds the value of raw commodity materials. The presented research illustrates improved profitability and economics for recycling spent LIBs by utilizing the surplus energy in lithiated graphite to drive the preparation of organolithiums to add value to the recycled lithium materials. This study methodology demonstrates that the surplus energy of lithiated graphite obtained from spent LIBs can be utilized to prepare high‐value organolithiums, thereby significantly improving the economic profitability of LIB recycling. Organolithiums (R–O–Li and R–Li) were prepared using alkyl alcohol (R–OH) and alkyl bromide (R–Br) as substrates, where R includes varying hindered alkyl hydrocarbons. The organolithiums extracted from per kilogram of recycled LIBs can increase the economic value between $29.5 and $226.5 kg−1 cell. The value of the organolithiums is at least 5.4 times the total theoretical value of spent materials, improving the profitability of recycling LIBs over traditional pyrometallurgical ($0.86 kg−1 cell), hydrometallurgical ($1.00 kg−1 cell), and physical direct recycling methods ($5.40 kg−1 cell).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Extraction and Separation Processes · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shenzhen Key Laboratory on Power Battery Safety, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School (SIGS) Shenzhen Geim Graphene Center Shenzhen China

College of Chemical and Biological Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou China

Institute of Zhejiang University Quzhou China

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Northern Illinois University DeKalb Illinois USA

Department of Chemistry Umeå University Umeå Sweden

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.121274110.1126/science.1212741 ↗
2. 10.1039/C9EE03549D10.1039/C9EE03549D ↗
3. 10.1038/s41586-019-1682-510.1038/s41586-019-1682-5 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0053510.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00535 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.00110.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.001 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20210334610.1002/adma.202103346 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.06810.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.068 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.04510.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.045 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22875310.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228753 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41560-019-0368-410.1038/s41560-019-0368-4 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.10074110.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100741 ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20220255810.1002/anie.202202558 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.03.00710.1016/j.chempr.2022.03.007 ↗
14. 10.1002/cey2.2910.1002/cey2.29 ↗
15. ZhangN DengW XuZ WangX.Upcycling of spent LiCoO2cathodes via nickel‐ and manganese‐doping.Carbon Energy.2023;5(1):e231.10.1002/cey2.231 ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.0c0549810.1021/jacs.0c05498 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.oprd.0c0009010.1021/acs.oprd.0c00090 ↗
18. 10.1039/D0TA07611B10.1039/D0TA07611B ↗
19. 10.1007/s12598-021-01919-610.1007/s12598-021-01919-6 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.07810.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.078 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.235795210.1063/1.2357952 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.02510.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.025 ↗
23. 10.1002/mrc.282310.1002/mrc.2823 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.10.02410.1016/j.foodcont.2014.10.024 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.00810.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.008 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20210269310.1002/aenm.202102693 ↗
27. 10.1039/C4FD00079J10.1039/C4FD00079J ↗
28. 10.1007/s12598-021-01918-710.1007/s12598-021-01918-7 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20220074410.1002/adma.202200744 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.11.00510.1016/j.ensm.2021.11.005 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.12.01910.1016/j.ensm.2020.12.019 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-021-25686-110.1038/s41467-021-25686-1 ↗
33. DaiQ GainesL SpangenbergerJ KellyJC AhmedS WangM.Everbatt: a closed‐loop battery recycling cost and environmental impacts model.2019.www.anl.gov/egs/everbatt10.2172/1530874 ↗
34. ENERGY.GOV. Energy Department Announces Battery Recycling Prize and Battery Recycling R&D Center. January 17 2019.https://www.energy.gov/articles/energy-department-announces-battery-recycling-prize-and-battery-recycling-rd-center
35. European Commission. SET Plan documents. https://setis.ec.europa.eu/implementing-actions/set-plan-documents_en
36. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.10.00810.1016/j.joule.2020.10.008 ↗