Optimizing Infill Patterns for Enhanced Durability and Resilience in Direct Ink Writing-Additive Manufacturing of Silicone Elastomers
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of internal infill geometry and density on the mechanical and rheological behavior of 3D-printed silicone structures fabricated using direct ink writing. Test samples with three different infill patterns (linear, triangular, and honeycomb) and four infill densities (55%, 70%, 85%, and 100%) were manufactured and evaluated through rheological creep–recovery analysis, static tensile and compression tests, and cyclic compression loading. The results demonstrate that both geometry and infill degree significantly affect the rheological and mechanical properties, such as static and cyclic compressive tests of the printed structures. Linear infill exhibited the highest compressive strength at 85% density and maintained favorable short-term stability during initial cyclic loading. Triangular patterns displayed significant sensitivity to infill density, with distinct stiffness characteristics, while honeycomb structures offered a balanced trade-off between density and mechanical response. Microscopic observations confirmed that print path quality and structural continuity correlate with the mechanical properties. The findings underscore the importance of tailored infill design in optimizing the functional performance of silicone-based components for applications such as orthotic insoles, soft robotics, and cushioning systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Cellular and Composite Structures · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, Bialystok, Poland.
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszów University of Technology, Rzeszów, Poland.
Centre for Advanced Technologies, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Funding
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland with allocation to the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.ade444110.1126/science.ade4441 ↗
2. 10.1155/2021/665396710.1155/2021/6653967 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ajps.2023.10081210.1016/j.ajps.2023.100812 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.aime.2023.10012510.1016/j.aime.2023.100125 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10624010.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106240 ↗
6. 10.1002/app.5096910.1002/app.50969 ↗
7. 10.3390/technologies1106017910.3390/technologies11060179 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c0144110.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01441 ↗
9. 10.1002/rcs.235310.1002/rcs.2353 ↗
10. 10.1136/bjsports-2016-09667110.1136/bjsports-2016-096671 ↗
11. 10.1080/17452759.2024.233615110.1080/17452759.2024.2336151 ↗
12. 10.3390/prosthesis502003810.3390/prosthesis5020038 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.00410.1016/j.addma.2018.10.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.07.06610.1016/j.jmapro.2023.07.066 ↗
15. 10.1177/1528083724129016910.1177/15280837241290169 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compind.2017.12.00110.1016/j.compind.2017.12.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijlmm.2018.10.00310.1016/j.ijlmm.2018.10.003 ↗
18. 10.1108/rpj-06-2024-024010.1108/rpj-06-2024-0240 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.10630910.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106309 ↗
20. ISO 527-2:. Plastics—Determination of tensile properties—Part 2: Test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics. ISO; Geneva:2012.
21. Bolesta Ł, , Romańczuk-Ruszuk E, , Sztorch B. “Pressure-relieving silicone orthopedic insole made by 3D printing.” In: Recent developments in biomedical engineering. (Pauk J, , Klekotka M, , Borowska M., eds.) Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej; Białystok:2024.
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.02810.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.028 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10939310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109393 ↗
24. 10.3390/mi1401012010.3390/mi14010120 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.31210.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.312 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1510370610.3390/ma15103706 ↗
27. 10.1007/s42452-019-1744-110.1007/s42452-019-1744-1 ↗
28. 10.3390/technologies703005710.3390/technologies7030057 ↗
29. Holzman N. 3D Printing and Mechanical Performance of Silicone Elastomers. Graduate School Thesis; 2019.
30. 10.1063/1.506486410.1063/1.5064864 ↗
31. 10.3390/polym1502025510.3390/polym15020255 ↗
32. 10.1007/s12540-019-00272-910.1007/s12540-019-00272-9 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1407131610.3390/polym14071316 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.03810.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.038 ↗
35. 10.1007/s40964-023-00418-710.1007/s40964-023-00418-7 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00080-910.1016/S0268-0033(03)00080-9 ↗