Tensile creep anisotropy and analysis based on composite theory of duplex Mg-9Li-4Al-1Zn alloy with geometric and mechanical heterogeneity
Source abstract
Abstract
The creep anisotropy of a duplex Mg-9Li-4Al-1Zn (LAZ941) alloy, possessing a lamellar microstructure with both geometric and mechanical heterogeneity, was systematically investigated. The minimum creep rate and fracture behavior were dependent on the geometric relationship between the tensile stress axis and the phase boundaries. Specifically, the creep resistance was superior when the stress axis was parallel to the phase boundaries compared to the perpendicular orientation. This anisotropy was found to originate from the distinct mechanical responses of the layered microstructure, which can be consistently explained by a composite theory. When loaded parallel to the phase boundaries, the hard and soft phases deform under an isostrain condition. As a result, the macroscopic creep behavior is strongly influenced by the more creep-resistant α phase, leading to a low creep rate and a stress exponent approaching that of the α phase. Conversely, when loaded perpendicular to the phase boundaries, the constituent phases deform under an isostress condition. This concentrates strain within the softer β phase, resulting in a high creep rate and a stress exponent approaching that of the β phase. These findings provide a foundational framework for the composite-theory-based design of materials possessing a lamellar structure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Agnew · Int. J. Plast. · 2005 · 21 · 116110.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.018 ↗
2. Li · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2024 · 12 · 470910.1016/j.jma.2023.12.013 ↗
3. Mineta · Mater. Today Commun. · 2024 · 39
4. Drozdenko · J. Alloys Compd. · 2023 · 94410.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169175 ↗
5. Mineta · Mater. Trans. · 2018 · 59 · 60210.2320/matertrans.M2017336 ↗
6. Alaneme · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2017 · 5 · 46010.1016/j.jma.2017.11.001 ↗
7. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2025 · 934
8. Mineta · Mater. Trans. · 2024 · 65 · 45510.2320/matertrans.MT-L2023021 ↗
9. Yang · J. Alloys Compd. · 2025 · 1035
10. Gao · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2024 · 12 · 490910.1016/j.jma.2023.03.003 ↗
11. Ouyang · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2024 · 12 · 396710.1016/j.jma.2024.08.001 ↗
12. Mineta · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2018 · 735 · 41810.1016/j.msea.2018.08.077 ↗
13. Mineta · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2023 · 88610.1016/j.msea.2023.145714 ↗
14. Xie · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2024 · 29 · 348710.1016/j.jmrt.2024.02.094 ↗
15. Mineta · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2020 · 77310.1016/j.msea.2019.138867 ↗
16. Mineta · Mater. Sci. Eng. Technol. · 2021 · 52 · 339
17. Xin · Sci. Adv. · 2021 · 7 · 303910.1126/sciadv.abf3039 ↗
18. Terbush · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2010 · 41A · 243510.1007/s11661-010-0271-x ↗
19. Mineta · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2025 · 36 · 849210.1016/j.jmrt.2025.05.116 ↗
20. Mineta · Mater. Today Commun. · 2023 · 34
21. Zhang · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2024 · 12 · 276610.1016/j.jma.2022.12.016 ↗
22. Xiao · J. Alloys Compd. · 2020 · 82310.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153754 ↗
23. Wang · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2025 · 13 · 322310.1016/j.jma.2024.12.002 ↗
24. Zhang · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2022 · 53 · 74710.1007/s11661-021-06578-x ↗
25. Mahmudi · Mater. Des. · 2015 · 75 · 18410.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.003 ↗
26. Wei · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 22 · 73010.1179/174328406X86083 ↗
27. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 827
28. Mineta · J. Alloys Compd. · 2022 · 91010.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164938 ↗
29. Mineta · Mater. Today Commun. · 2025 · 46
30. Kato · Acta Metall · 1981 · 29 · 7910.1016/0001-6160(81)90088-2 ↗
31. Kheradmandfard · J. Alloys Compd. · 2018 · 738 · 54010.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.049 ↗
32. Xiao · J. Alloys Compd. · 2023 · 96310.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171270 ↗
33. Yamasaki · Mater. Trans. · 2017 · 58 · 44210.2320/matertrans.M2016407 ↗
34. Shruti · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2025 · 94010.1016/j.msea.2025.148567 ↗
35. Hu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2023 · 86810.1016/j.msea.2023.144771 ↗
36. Langdon · Mater. Trans. JIM · 1996 · 37 · 35910.2320/matertrans1989.37.359 ↗
37. Liu · J. Alloys Compd. · 2011 · 509 · 955810.1016/j.jallcom.2011.07.081 ↗
38. Furui · J. Japan Inst. Metals · 2006 · 70 · 72910.2320/jinstmet.70.729 ↗
39. Metenier · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1990 · 125 · 19510.1016/0921-5093(90)90169-4 ↗
40. Lin · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2013 · 16 · 38110.1002/adem.201300302 ↗
41. Mehrabi · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2019 · 76510.1016/j.msea.2019.138274 ↗
42. Jeong · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2024 · 12 · 31610.1016/j.jma.2024.01.001 ↗
43. Guo · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2023 · 23 · 548610.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.110 ↗
44. Sivakesavam · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2002 · 323 · 27010.1016/S0921-5093(01)01392-2 ↗
45. Kim · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2004 · 385 · 30010.1016/S0921-5093(04)00882-2 ↗
46. Brennan · J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. · 2012 · 33 · 12110.1007/s11669-012-0007-2 ↗
47. Hyun · Mater. High Temp. · 2014 · 31 · 3410.1179/0960340913Z.0000000005 ↗
48. French · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1994 · 77 · 285710.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb04515.x ↗
49. Goel · Bull. Alloy Phase Diagr. · 1990 · 11 · 52810.1007/BF02841712 ↗
50. Weinberg · Trans. Am. Soc. Met. · 1956 · 48 · 855