journal article·2025-09Open access

Improvement in electromagnetic shielding effectiveness and mechanical properties of ultrafine Mg98.5Zn0.5Y alloy via friction stir processing

Guangyu Zhang, Jialiang Dong, Ziyi Li, Zhongxue Feng, Jun Tan, Xianhua Chen, Jianhong Yi, Fusheng Pan

Journal of Magnesium and Alloys· Volume 13· Issue 9

Abstract

• Achieved simultaneous enhancement in mechanical properties and EMI SE of Mg 98.5 Zn 0.5 Y alloy through FSP. • Refinement of LPSO phases and grain size is a key factor for strength and EMI performance improvement. • Mg 98.5 Zn 0.5 Y alloy sheets show a promising combination of lightweight, high strength, and full-spectrum EMI shielding effectiveness. • Provides a new strategy for designing Mg-based alloys with optimized mechanical and shielding properties for advanced electronic and automotive applications. • The study reveals the key role of multi-pass FSP in microstructure control and enhancement of EMI shielding materials. A novel Mg 98.5 Zn 0.5 Y alloy sheet with ultrafine grains and exceptional electromagnetic shielding performance has been fabricated using friction stir processing (FSP). This study investigates the impact of FSP on the microstructure, mechanical properties, and electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding effectiveness (SE) of the alloy, specifically across three distinct layers within the stir zone (SZ): Top, Middle, and Bottom. The results reveal that the Mg 12 YZn long-period stacking ordered (LPSO) phase is the predominant structure, undergoing significant grain refinement. The grain size is drastically reduced from 1.5 mm in the as-cast state to 12.6 µm, 10.0 µm, and 7.1 µm in the Top, Middle, and Bottom, respectively. This grain refinement and fragmentation of the LPSO phase into nanoscale particles result in a substantial enhancement of mechanical properties. The ultimate tensile strength (UTS) reached 358.2 MPa with an elongation (EL) of 15.1%, reflecting a 344% increase in strength and a 733% improvement in ductility compared to the as-cast material. Simultaneously, the EMI SE was maintained between 70 and 110.4 dB over a broad frequency range (30–4500 MHz). Despite the nanoscale LPSO particles contributing minimally to EMI shielding, the lamellar LPSO structure demonstrated excellent performance through multiple electromagnetic wave reflections within the matrix. These findings underscore the dual benefits of FSP in improving both mechanical strength and electromagnetic shielding effectiveness, positioning this Mg 98.5 Zn 0.5 Y alloy for advanced applications in the electronics and telecommunications sectors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Xie · J Build Engineer · 2020 · 27
2. Yang · New Carbon Materials · 2024 · 39 · 22310.1016/S1872-5805(24)60840-1 ↗
3. Zhang · J Mat Sci Technol · 2022 · 96 · 1110.1016/j.jmst.2021.05.001 ↗
4. Chung · Mater Chem Phys · 2020 · 25510.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123587 ↗
5. Chen · J Alloys Compd · 2024 · 990
6. Sista · J Alloys Compd · 2021 · 85310.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157251 ↗
7. Yang · Construct Build Mat · 2024 · 426
8. Li · J Magnes Alloys · 2024
9. Liu · J Magnes Alloys · 2021 · 9 · 190610.1016/j.jma.2021.10.001 ↗
10. Guan · J Magnes Alloys · 2022
11. Yang · J Magnes Alloys · 2023
12. Liu · J Magnes Alloys · 2024 · 12 · 17110.1016/j.jma.2023.06.014 ↗
13. Mineta · Mat Today Commun · 2024 · 39
14. Wang · J Mat Res Technol · 2023 · 24 · 290710.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.187 ↗
15. Wei · Mat Sci Engineer · 2021 · 802
16. Xia · J Rare Earths · 2020 · 38 · 111910.1016/j.jre.2020.05.012 ↗
17. Kwak · J Mat Sci Technol · 2019 · 35 · 18110.1016/j.jmst.2018.06.019 ↗
18. Liu · J Mat Sci Technol · 2019 · 35 · 107410.1016/j.jmst.2018.12.010 ↗
19. Lu · J Magnes Alloys · 2023 · 11 · 146110.1016/j.jma.2021.08.001 ↗
20. Wang · Transact Nonferrous Metals So China · 2022 · 32 · 138510.1016/S1003-6326(22)65881-3 ↗
21. Xu · J Mat Res Technol · 2023 · 26 · 774010.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.096 ↗
22. Li · J Magnes Alloys · 2024
23. Zhang · Scr Mater · 2013 · 68 · 67510.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.01.023 ↗
24. Long · J Magnes Alloys · 2023 · 11 · 193110.1016/j.jma.2021.08.029 ↗
25. Chai · J Magnes Alloys · 2015 · 3 · 20310.1016/j.jma.2015.08.001 ↗
26. Wang · Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) · 2020 · 33 · 4310.1007/s40195-019-00971-7 ↗
27. Yang · Mat Sci Engineer · 2015 · 626 · 27510.1016/j.msea.2014.12.091 ↗
28. Jin · Mater Charact · 2019 · 150 · 5210.1016/j.matchar.2019.02.008 ↗
29. Li · Mater Charact · 2019 · 155
30. Zhou · J Magnes Alloys · 2022 · 10 · 1810.1016/j.jma.2021.12.002 ↗
31. Huang · J Mat Process Technol · 2017 · 249
32. Zheng · J Magnes Alloys · 2013 · 1 · 12210.1016/j.jma.2013.06.001 ↗
33. Heidarzadeh · Prog Mater Sci · 2020
34. Zhou · Mats Sci Engineer · 2021 · 805
35. Cheng · J Alloys Compd · 2018 · 764 · 22610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.056 ↗
36. Luo · Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) · 2019 · 32 · 81710.1007/s40195-019-00887-2 ↗
37. Zhang · J Magnes Alloys · 2018 · 6 · 27710.1016/j.jma.2018.08.001 ↗
38. Liu · J Magnes Alloys · 2017 · 5 · 23110.1016/j.jma.2017.05.002 ↗
39. Liu · J Magnes Alloys · 2023 · 11 · 140810.1016/j.jma.2022.03.018 ↗
40. Liu · Jom · 2019 · 71 · 331410.1007/s11837-019-03610-9 ↗
41. Lv · J Magnes Alloys · 2022
42. Huang · Mater Des · 2016 · 111 · 54810.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.012 ↗
43. Xu · Mater Des · 2009 · 30 · 188610.1016/j.matdes.2008.09.021 ↗
44. Liu · J Magnes Alloys · 2022 · 10 · 50110.1016/j.jma.2020.09.023 ↗
45. Yu · J Mat Sci Technol · 2018 · 34 · 24810.1016/j.jmst.2017.07.022 ↗
46. Datta · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 253110.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.046 ↗
47. Xu · Mat Sci Engineer · 2023 · 882
48. Li · J Mater Sci · 2020 · 55 · 1163710.1007/s10853-020-04724-1 ↗
49. Armstrong · The Philosophical Magazine: J Theoret Experi Applied Phys · 1962 · 7 · 4510.1080/14786436208201857 ↗
50. J. Gröbner, A. Kozlov, X.Y. Fang, J. Geng, J.F. Nie, R. Schmid-Fetzer, Phase equilibria and transformations in ternary Mg-Gd-Zn alloys, Acta Mater 60 (17) (2012) 5948–5962.10.1016/j.actamat.2012.05.035 ↗
51. Liu · Mater Des · 2016 · 110 · 110.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.111 ↗
52. Chen · Mater Des · 2018 · 152 · 110.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.070 ↗
53. Li · J Mat Sci Technol · 2022 · 13510.1016/j.jmst.2022.04.036 ↗
54. Liang · Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) · 2021 · 34 · 1210.1007/s40195-020-01122-z ↗
55. Tahreen · J mat Sci Technol · 2018 · 34 · 111010.1016/j.jmst.2017.12.005 ↗
56. Xu · Mat Rep · 2018 · 32 · 865
57. Pandey · J Mat Sci: Mat Elect · 2018 · 29 · 9728
58. Zhang · J Mat Engineer · 2013 · 3 · 5210.1016/j.msea.2012.10.080 ↗
59. Wang · Mater Charact · 2019 · 157