Wetting behavior of Mo, Ta, and stainless steel substrates in contact with molten Mg
Source abstract
Abstract
• Investigation of high-temperature behavior of liquid Mg with refractory metals. • Wettability of liquid magnesium on the Mo, Ta, and stainless steel substrates. • Non-wetting behavior of investigated couples under the used experimental conditions. • SEM/EDS analysis of Mg/Mo, Mg/Ta, and Mg/AISI 316L couples after sessile drop tests. • Discussion of Mg's high-temperature properties with dissimilar metallic substrates. The sessile drop method combined with a capillary purification procedure was used, for the first time, to analyze the high-temperature behavior of molten Mg on three dissimilar substrates: 1) molybdenum, 2) tantalum and 3) AISI 316L stainless steel. All tests were performed under isothermal conditions at 720°C in a protective atmosphere (Ar + 5 wt% H 2 ). Images of Mg/substrate couples recorded during the experiments were used to calculate the contact angles (θ) formed between the liquid Mg drop and the selected substrates. After the sessile drop tests, the Mg/Mo, Mg/Ta, and Mg/AISI 316L couples were subjected to in-depth microstructural characterization using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Under the employed experimental conditions, oxide-free Mg drops on all tested couples presented non-wetting behavior (θ > 90°). The average values of the calculated contact angles after 40 s of liquid Mg deposition were θ Mg/Mo = 124°, θ Mg/Ta = 125°, and θ Mg/AISI 316L = 126°, respectively. The SEM/EDS analysis showed no mass transfer and no bonding between solidified drops and the substrates. This non-reactive and non-wetting behavior of investigated couples can be associated with the immiscible nature of the Mg-Mo, Mg-Ta, and Mg-Fe systems, where the solubility of liquid Mg with all tested materials is negligible, and Mg does not form any compounds with them.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhu · J. Mater. Sci. · 2024 · 59 · 115310.1007/s10853-023-09314-5 ↗
2. Monika · World J. Clin. Cases. · 2015 · 3 · 5210.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.52 ↗
3. Tian · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2010 · 527 · 182110.1016/j.msea.2009.11.014 ↗
4. Gepreel · J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. · 2013 · 20 · 40710.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.11.014 ↗
5. Niinomi · Metall. Mater. Trans. A. · 2002 · 33 · 47710.1007/s11661-002-0109-2 ↗
6. Chen · Mater. Sci. Eng. R: Rep. · 2015 · 87 · 110.1016/j.mser.2014.10.001 ↗
7. Khrunyk · Int. J. Mol. Sci. · 2021 · 22 · e1061110.3390/ijms221910611 ↗
8. Ma · Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. · 2020 · 8
9. Fu · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2023 · 11 · 148510.1016/j.jma.2023.05.002 ↗
10. Koster · Lancet · 2000 · 356 · 189510.1016/S0140-6736(00)03262-1 ↗
11. Calin · Mater. Sci. Eng. C. · 2013 · 33 · 87510.1016/j.msec.2012.11.015 ↗
12. Nag · 2012 · 23 · 6
13. Poinern · Am. J. Biomed. Eng. · 2012 · 2 · 21810.5923/j.ajbe.20120206.02 ↗
14. Sezer · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2018 · 6 · 2310.1016/j.jma.2018.02.003 ↗
15. Xing · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 142810.1016/j.jma.2022.02.013 ↗
16. Tie · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 163110.1016/j.jma.2020.11.005 ↗
17. Chen · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2024 · 12 · 51610.1016/j.jma.2023.10.007 ↗
18. Xie · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2024 · 12 · 36110.1016/j.jma.2022.04.004 ↗
19. Delavar · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2023 · 11 · 112510.1016/j.jma.2023.04.010 ↗
20. Sezer · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2021 · 9 · 39210.1016/j.jma.2020.09.014 ↗
21. Li · J. Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 46 · 6510.1007/s10853-010-4843-3 ↗
22. Nayab · Biomater · 2007 · 28 · 3810.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.032 ↗
23. Pesode · Bioprinting · 2023 · 36 · e0031810.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00318 ↗
24. Kumar · Mater. Technol. · 2018 · 33 · 15310.1080/10667857.2017.1377973 ↗
25. Zhao · J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. · 2018 · 78 · 14310.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.019 ↗
26. Salunke · Mater. Sci. Eng. B. · 2011 · 176 · 171110.1016/j.mseb.2011.07.002 ↗
27. Pandey · J. Bionic Eng. · 2023 · 20 · 47010.1007/s42235-022-00284-z ↗
28. Wang · Biomater. Transl. · 2021 · 2 · 248
29. Terlicka · Materials · 2022 · 15 · e902410.3390/ma15249024 ↗
30. Terlicka · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2024 · 12 · 65910.1016/j.jma.2024.01.008 ↗
31. Terlicka · J. Mol. Liq. · 2023 · 38710.1016/j.molliq.2023.122730 ↗
32. Terlicka · J. Mater. Eng. Perform. · 2023 · 32 · 568910.1007/s11665-023-07950-1 ↗
33. Godzierz · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2021 · 9 · 15610.1016/j.jma.2020.06.006 ↗
34. Kudyba · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2021 · 9 · 18310.1016/j.jma.2020.06.003 ↗
35. Ziółkowski · Metalurgia · 2020 · 1 · 519
36. Picknett · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1977 · 61 · 33610.1016/0021-9797(77)90396-4 ↗
37. Wetting dynamics of evaporating drops on various surfaces, NASA
38. Bourgks-Monnier · Langmuir. · 1995 · 11 · 282010.1021/la00007a076 ↗
39. Yildirim Erbil · Langmuir. · 2002 · 18 · 263610.1021/la011470p ↗
40. Park · Soft. Matter · 2012 · 8 · 1188910.1039/c2sm26559a ↗
41. Saiz · Acta. Mater. · 1998 · 46 · 234910.1016/S1359-6454(98)80016-5 ↗
42. Fujii · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2006 · 417 · 9910.1016/j.msea.2005.10.055 ↗
43. Kondoh · Acta. Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 60610.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.039 ↗
44. FactSage Version 8.3, with FTlite Database. Available online: https://w:ww.crct.polymtl.ca/fact (Accessed June 10, 2024).
45. Shi · Inter. J. Mater. Research. · 2001 · 92 · 382
46. Xu · J. Manuf. Process. · 2022 · 80 · 60010.1016/j.jmapro.2022.06.042 ↗
47. P. Darłak, J. Sobczak, M. Górny, E. Ziółkowski, S. Terlicka, A. Korniewa-Surmacz, N. Sobczak, High-temperature interaction of liquid magnesium with cast iron substrates. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24294.70729.
48. Eustathopoulos · J. Mater. Sci. · 2005 · 40 · 227110.1007/s10853-005-1945-4 ↗
49. Sobczak · Curr. Opin. Solid. State. Mater. Sci. · 2005 · 9 · 24110.1016/j.cossms.2006.07.007 ↗
50. Sobczak · China Foundry · 2010 · 7 · 425