journal article·2023-06Open access

Inhibiting effect of I-phase formation on the plastic instability of the duplex structured Mg-8Li-6Zn-1.2Y (in wt.%) alloy

B.J. Wang, D.K. Xu, X.Q. Zhuang, L.Y. Sheng

Journal of Magnesium and Alloys· Volume 11· Issue 6

Abstract

In this work, the tensile behaviors of Mg-8%Li and Mg-8%Li-6%Zn-1.2%Y alloys at ambient temperature were investigated and compared. It revealed that the plastic instability of Mg-8%Li alloy was quite remarkable and the variation range of serrated flowing stress can reach 5 MPa. For the Mg-8%Li-6%Zn-1.2%Y alloy, the formation of I-phase (Mg3Zn6Y) can simultaneously enhance the tensile strength and eliminate the plastic instability phenomenon, whilst its ductility was degraded. The in-situ tensile tests revealed that for the Mg-8%Li alloy, the severity and number of slip traces present in both α-Mg and β-Li matrix phases increased remarkably with the applied tensile strain. However, slip traces were quite fine in β-Li matrix phase and could be clearly observed when the applied tensile strain exceeded 18%. Due to the incompatibility of plastic deformation occurred in two matrix phases, the induced strain concentration at α-Mg/β-Li interfaces caused their subsequent cracking. For the Mg-8%-6%Zn-1.2%Y alloy, the I-phase distributed at α-Mg/β-Li interfaces suppressed the plastic deformation of α-Mg matrix phase and the tensile strain was dominated by the β-Li matrix phase, resulting in the disappearance of plastic instability. Moreover, the plastic strain would preferentially concentrate at I-phase/β-Li interfaces and subsequently induced the cracking of I-phase.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 53 · 10210.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.029 ↗
2. Wang · Acta. Metall. Sin. (Eng Lett). · 2019 · 32 · 110.1007/s40195-018-0847-9 ↗
3. Russell · Scr. Mater · 1998 · 39 · 166310.1016/S1359-6462(98)00379-0 ↗
4. Sha · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 27 · 75310.1016/S1005-0302(11)60138-2 ↗
5. Yang · F.S. Pan. J. Magnes. Alloys. · 2021 · 9 · 70510.1016/j.jma.2021.04.001 ↗
6. Wang · J. Magnes. Alloys. · 2021 · 9 · 56010.1016/j.jma.2020.02.020 ↗
7. Dobkowska · J. Mizera. J. Magnes. Alloys. · 2021 · 9 · 46710.1016/j.jma.2020.07.007 ↗
8. Xu · Scr. Mater. · 2007 · 57 · 28510.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.03.017 ↗
9. Xu · Mater. Des. · 2015 · 88 · 8810.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.123 ↗
10. Xu · Scr. Mater. · 2014 · 2110.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.09.025 ↗
11. Xu · Mater. Des. · 2015 · 69 · 12410.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.057 ↗
12. Li · Y.X. Qiao, E.H. Han. Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 40078
13. Xu · J. Alloys. Compds. · 2013 · 161
14. The Li-Mg (Lithium-Magnesium) system10.1007/BF02872951 ↗
15. Kral · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2007 · 460 · 22710.1016/j.msea.2007.01.102 ↗
16. Li · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 32 · 123210.1016/j.jmst.2016.09.018 ↗
17. Wang · Mater. Lett. · 2006 · 60 · 294110.1016/j.matlet.2006.02.093 ↗
18. Li · J. Magnes. Alloys. · 2015 · 3 · 10610.1016/j.jma.2015.02.003 ↗
19. Wu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2014 · 605 · 3310.1016/j.msea.2014.03.026 ↗
20. Li · J. Magnes. Alloys. · 2021 · 9 · 56910.1016/j.jma.2020.02.022 ↗
21. Li · J. Magnes. Alloys. · 2021 · 9 · 93710.1016/j.jma.2020.06.015 ↗
22. C. Corby, C.H. Cáceres, P. Luká, Sci. Eng. A 387-389 (2004) 22–24.10.1016/j.msea.2004.01.077 ↗
23. Wu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2012 · 532 · 26710.1016/j.msea.2011.10.090 ↗
24. Zhu · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 50 · 5110.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.09.039 ↗
25. Couling · Acta Metall · 1959 · 7 · 13310.1016/0001-6160(59)90121-X ↗
26. Wang · Z. Liu, J. Mater. Sci. · 2007 · 42 · 263010.1007/s10853-006-1346-3 ↗
27. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2016 · 649 · 21410.1016/j.msea.2015.09.100 ↗
28. Stanford · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2010 · 41 · 73410.1007/s11661-009-0107-8 ↗
29. Fang · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2009 · 40 · 276110.1007/s11661-009-9967-1 ↗
30. Jiang · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 221910.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.029 ↗
31. Wang · Scr. Mater. · 2014 · 88 · 510.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.06.015 ↗
32. Wu · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 369910.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.006 ↗
33. Catoor · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 295310.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.055 ↗
34. Wang · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 1601410.1038/s41598-017-16351-z ↗
35. Becerra · J. Mater. Res. · 2008 · 337910.1557/JMR.2008.0414 ↗
36. Lentz · Acta Mater · 2015 · 86 · 25410.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.003 ↗
37. Agnew · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 427710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00297-X ↗
38. Agnew · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2002 · 33 · 85110.1007/s11661-002-0154-x ↗
39. Guo · J. Alloys Compd. · 2020 · 813
40. Risse · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2016 · 48 · 44610.1007/s11661-016-3780-4 ↗
41. Samman · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 222910.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.031 ↗
42. Xie · Z.W. Zhang, Y.F. Gao. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2021 · 815
43. Wu · Mater. Trans. · 2016 · 57 · 188010.2320/matertrans.M2016179 ↗
44. Zhang · 2010
45. Characteristics and perspectives of new magnesium-lithium-alloys an approach towards LAE
46. Bae · Acta. Mater. · 2002 · 50 · 234310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00067-8 ↗
47. Xu · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2007 · 432 · 12910.1016/j.jallcom.2006.05.123 ↗
48. Xu · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2018 · 20
49. Garces · Acta. Mater. · 2018 · 151 · 27110.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.060 ↗