Roughness and Near-Surface Porosity of Unsupported Overhangs Produced by High-Speed Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Source abstract
Abstract
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a promising technology that requires further work to improve productivity to be adopted more widely. One possible approach is to increase the laser power and scan speed. A customized high-speed and high-power LPBF system has been developed for this purpose. The current study investigated the surface roughness and near-surface porosity as a result of unsupported overhangs at varying inclination angles and orientations during the manufacturing of Ti6Al4V parts with this custom high-speed and high-power LPBF system. It is known that surface roughness and porosity are among the main drawbacks for parts manufactured by LPBF, and that supports are required for overhang regions with low inclination angles relative to the powder bed, typically in commercial LPBF systems requiring supports for regions with inclination angles less than 45°. However, the appropriate inclination angles for this custom system with high power and speed requires investigation. In this article, a simple benchmark test artefact with different inclination angles was manufactured in different orientations on the build platform and characterized by X-ray tomography, touch probe roughness meter, optical microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The analysis of surface roughness and near-surface porosity at upskin and downskin regions was performed as a function of inclination angle. The results indicate that the high-speed LPBF process produces relatively high roughness in all cases, with different porosity distributions at upskin and downskin areas. Both roughness and porosity vary as a function of inclination angle. Significant warping was observed, depending on build orientation relative to laser scanning direction. These are the first reported results of the detailed surface roughness and porosity characterization of part quality from such a high-speed, high-power LPBF process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Laser Material Processing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laser Enabled Manufacturing, National Laser Centre, CSIR, Pretoria, South Africa.
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Research Group 3D Innovation, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.01910.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11837-017-2655-510.1007/s11837-017-2655-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mprp.2016.12.06210.1016/j.mprp.2016.12.062 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41467-018-03734-710.1038/s41467-018-03734-7 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.00410.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.004 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.10.01010.1016/j.addma.2016.10.010 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00170-012-4688-910.1007/s00170-012-4688-9 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00170-012-4271-410.1007/s00170-012-4271-4 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.08.00610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.08.006 ↗
10. Sulaiman MR Yusof F Jamaludin MFB . Effect of support structure design on the part built using Selective Laser Melting . In: Awang M Emamian S Yusof F . (eds). Advances in Material Sciences and Engineering . Lect Notes Mech Eng Springer Singapore. 2020; pp. 275–286.10.1007/978-981-13-8297-0_30 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00170-012-4403-x10.1007/s00170-012-4403-x ↗
12. 10.1007/s11837-017-2706-y10.1007/s11837-017-2706-y ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.00910.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.009 ↗
14. 10.1088/2051-672X/3/4/04400610.1088/2051-672X/3/4/044006 ↗
15. 10.1179/1743284715Y.000000005310.1179/1743284715Y.0000000053 ↗
16. Chen Z Cao S Wu X et al. Surface roughness and fatigue properties of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy. In: Additive Manufacturing for the Aerospace Industry. Elsevier: Amsterdam The Netherlands 2019; pp. 283–299.10.1016/B978-0-12-814062-8.00015-7 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.02510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.025 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10247710.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102477 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.04310.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.043 ↗
20. Cloots M Spierings AB Wegener K Assessing new support minimizing strategies for the additive manufacturing technology SLM. In: International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium an Additive Manufacturing Conference Austin August 12–14 2013. The University of Texas. pp. 631–643.
21. 10.1016/j.mprp.2018.09.00310.1016/j.mprp.2018.09.003 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.02.00910.1016/j.addma.2018.02.009 ↗
23. 10.1371/journal.pone.022119810.1371/journal.pone.0221198 ↗
24. Charles A, , Elkaseer A, , Müller T, et al. A study of the factors influencing generated surface roughness of down-facing surfaces in selective laser melting. In: World Congress on Micro and Nano Manufacturing (WCMNM), Portorož, Slovenia, 2018; pp. 327–330.
25. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.12.10010.1016/j.msea.2018.12.100 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.03310.1016/j.addma.2019.03.033 ↗
27. 10.1089/3dp.2018.006010.1089/3dp.2018.0060 ↗
28. Townsend A, , Racasan R, , Leach R, et al. An interlaboratory comparison of X-ray computed tomography measurement for texture and dimensional characterisation of additively manufactured parts. Addit Manuf, 2018; 23:422–432.
29. van Zyl I, , Yadroitsava I, , Yadroitsev I. Residual stress in TI6AL4V objects produced by direct metal laser sintering. South African J Ind Eng, 2016; 27:134–141.
30. Leach RK. The Measurement of Surface Texture Using Stylus Instruments NPL Good practice guide. UK: National Physical Laboratory; 2001 p. 37.
31. 10.1016/j.mex.2018.09.00410.1016/j.mex.2018.09.004 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.01.00210.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.01.002 ↗
33. 10.1515/amm-2016-021310.1515/amm-2016-0213 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.11.01410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.11.014 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.06110.1016/j.procir.2015.08.061 ↗
36. Yadroitsev I. Selective laser melting: Direct manufacturing of 3D-objects by selective laser melting of metal powders Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publications 2009.
37. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.01710.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.017 ↗
38. Makoana N Yadroitsava I Möller H et al. Characterization of 17-4PH single tracks produced at different parametric conditions towards increased productivity of LPBF Systems—the effect of laser power and spot size upscaling Metals (Basel) 2018;8:475.10.3390/met8070475 ↗
39. 10.1115/1.404026410.1115/1.4040264 ↗
40. 10.1007/s11661-019-05322-w10.1007/s11661-019-05322-w ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.05010.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.050 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41598-017-04237-z10.1038/s41598-017-04237-z ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.01410.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014 ↗
44. Aboulkhair NT, , Everitt NM, , Ashcroft I, et al. Reducing porosity in AlSi10Mg parts processed by selective laser melting. Addit Manuf, 2017; 1–4:77–86.
45. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.01410.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.014 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.09.09010.1016/j.powtec.2018.09.090 ↗