journal article·2026-02Open access

Revealing the dynamic recrystallization and deformation instability of TiC reinforced AZ61 composites with uniform structure and bimodal grain structure

Lingling Fan, Ying Zeng, Lingbao Ren, Yanyan huang, Kunyang Fan, Zhenyu Zhu, Ran Ni, Gaofeng Quan, Wei Feng, Hajo Dieringa

Abstract

• The bimodal composite has a higher Q value and larger instability region. • The CDRX mechanism dominates the uniform composite, while both CDRX and DDRX mechanisms dominate the bimodal composite. • At high T and low ε ˙ , the uniform composite prone to GBS, leading to micro-voids. • The occurrence of AGG in bimodal composite leads to instability at high T and low ε ˙ . Although microstructural configuration significantly enhances composites' comprehensive mechanical properties, its influence on hot deformation remains unclear. To investigate the effects of microstructural configurations on hot workability, dynamic recrystallization (DRX) mechanisms and instability mechanisms, hot compression tests were conducted on two TiC/AZ61 composites (bimodal/uniform structures) with constitutive modeling, processing maps, and microstructure observations. The results show that uniform composite exhibits better hot workability, lower deformation activation energy ( Q ) and smaller instability regions than bimodal composite. The uniform composite primarily undergoes continuous DRX (CDRX), while the bimodal composite involves both CDRX and discontinuous DRX (DDRX) mechanisms. At low temperatures ( T ) and high strain rates ( ε ˙ ), the uniform composite achieves sufficient DRX, whereas the bimodal composite experiences only partial DRX accompanied by twinning. At high T and low ε ˙ , the uniform composite is prone to grain boundary sliding (GBS) due to fine grains, causing to micro-voids formation; the bimodal composite undergoes abnormal grain growth (AGG), leading to instability. The favorable hot-processing regions for the bimodal composite are (260–320 °C, 0.0009–0.03 s⁻¹) and (325–370 °C, 0.0001–0.0003 s⁻¹), while those for the uniform composite are (260–310 °C, 0.01–0.1 s⁻¹) and (250–300 °C, 0.0001–0.0005 s⁻¹). This work offers in-depth insights into DRX and deformation instability in magnesium matrix composites with different initial structures. It provides a guidance for their selection of hot working processes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (93)

Show source-provided references
1. Ren · Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf · 2018 · 1 · 81
2. Wang · J Rare Earths · 2024
3. Gupta · Mater Charact · 2015 · 105 · 3010.1016/j.matchar.2015.04.015 ↗
4. Abazari · J Magnes Alloys · 2023 · 11 · 265510.1016/j.jma.2023.08.005 ↗
5. Nie · J Magnes Alloys · 2021 · 9 · 5710.1016/j.jma.2020.08.018 ↗
6. Yang · Mater Sci Eng A · 2020 · 777 · 13907210.1016/j.msea.2020.139072 ↗
7. Chaudry · J Alloys Compd · 2019 · 792 · 65210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.031 ↗
8. Liu · J Magnes Alloys · 2024
9. Ning · Acta Mater · 2024 · 267 · 11972710.1016/j.actamat.2024.119727 ↗
10. Karewar · Comput Mater Sci · 2017 · 126 · 25210.1016/j.commatsci.2016.09.002 ↗
11. Zhou · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2019 · 768 · 13844710.1016/j.msea.2019.138447 ↗
12. Deng · Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett · 2019 · 32 · 41310.1007/s40195-019-00872-9 ↗
13. Chapuis · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 198610.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.064 ↗
14. Jiang · Acta Mater · 2016 · 103 · 12810.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.057 ↗
15. Ye · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2019 · 753 · 14610.1016/j.msea.2019.03.037 ↗
16. Zhou · J Alloys Compd · 2021 · 868 · 15909810.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159098 ↗
17. Xiao · J Alloys Compd · 2019 · 798 · 110.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.244 ↗
18. Xu · J Mater Res Technol · 2023 · 24 · 20010.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.199 ↗
19. Zhang · J Alloys Compd · 2024 · 999 · 17504710.1016/j.jallcom.2024.175047 ↗
20. Zhang · Mater Sci Eng A · 2017 · 707 · 31510.1016/j.msea.2017.09.056 ↗
21. Wang · Nature · 2002 · 419 · 91210.1038/nature01133 ↗
22. Xia · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 490 · 47110.1016/j.msea.2008.03.002 ↗
23. Wu · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2015 · 112 · 1450110.1073/pnas.1517193112 ↗
24. Vajpai · Metall Mater Trans A · 2015 · 46 · 90310.1007/s11661-014-2649-7 ↗
25. Tan · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2021 · 800 · 14031210.1016/j.msea.2020.140312 ↗
26. Azizi-Alizamini · Scr Mater · 2007 · 57 · 106510.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.08.035 ↗
27. Zhang · Mater Des · 2020 · 191 · 10869510.1016/j.matdes.2020.108695 ↗
28. Zhang · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2022 · 859 · 14419510.1016/j.msea.2022.144195 ↗
29. Wang · Sci Rep · 2015 · 5 · 1710010.1038/srep17100 ↗
30. Zhang · J Alloys Compd · 2019 · 780 · 31210.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.229 ↗
31. Fan · J Mater Sci Technol · 2025 · 215 · 29610.1016/j.jmst.2024.07.027 ↗
32. Fan · J Magnes Alloys · 2024 · 12 · 326410.1016/j.jma.2023.02.011 ↗
33. Fan · J Magnes Alloys · 2025 · 13 · 90210.1016/j.jma.2024.10.012 ↗
34. Xiao · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2023 · 887 · 14577510.1016/j.msea.2023.145775 ↗
35. Fan · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2023 · 867 · 14434410.1016/j.msea.2022.144344 ↗
36. Fan · J Alloys Compd · 2025 · 1014 · 17869610.1016/j.jallcom.2025.178696 ↗
37. Xu · J Magnes Alloys · 2025
38. Sahoo · J Alloys Compd · 2019 · 776 · 86510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.276 ↗
39. Deng · Mater Des · 2015 · 67 · 7210.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.006 ↗
40. Shi · Mater Sci Eng · 2013 · 571 · 8310.1016/j.msea.2013.01.080 ↗
41. Liu · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2024 · 914 · 14712310.1016/j.msea.2024.147123 ↗
42. Chandiran · J Alloy Compd · 2023 · 93010.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167443 ↗
43. Kanti · Mater Chem Phys · 2025 · 338 · 13067910.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.130679 ↗
44. Chen · J Alloys Compd · 2019 · 803 · 58510.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.242 ↗
45. Aliakbari Sani · J Magnes Alloys · 2016 · 4 · 10410.1016/j.jma.2016.05.001 ↗
46. Wu · Vacuum · 2019 · 159 · 44710.1016/j.vacuum.2018.10.079 ↗
47. Hamada · Mater Sci Eng · 2007 · 467 · 11410.1016/j.msea.2007.02.074 ↗
48. Malik · J Mater Res Technol · 2023 · 25 · 681210.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.136 ↗
49. Poletti · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2009 · 516 · 13810.1016/j.msea.2009.03.007 ↗
50. Prasad · Metall Trans A · 1984 · 15 · 188310.1007/BF02664902 ↗
51. Prasad · Mater Sci Eng, A · 1998 · 243 · 8210.1016/S0921-5093(97)00782-X ↗
52. Murty · J Phys D: Appl Phys · 1998 · 31 · 330610.1088/0022-3727/31/22/020 ↗
53. Li · J Mater Res Technol · 2023 · 26 · 913910.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.212 ↗
54. Cheng · J Mater Sci Technol · 2019 · 35 · 119810.1016/j.jmst.2018.12.001 ↗
55. Sahoo · J Magnes Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 352010.1016/j.jma.2021.12.009 ↗
56. Mi · J Alloys Compd · 2025 · 1035 · 18143110.1016/j.jallcom.2025.181431 ↗
57. Xia · J Magnes Alloys · 2020 · 8 · 91710.1016/j.jma.2020.02.018 ↗
58. Shalbafi · J Alloys Compd · 2017 · 696 · 126910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.087 ↗
59. Li · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2022 · 858 · 14417310.1016/j.msea.2022.144173 ↗
60. Cheng · J Mater Sci Technol · 2019 · 35 · 119810.1016/j.jmst.2018.12.001 ↗
61. Sahoo · J Magnes Alloys · 2022 · 10 · 352010.1016/j.jma.2021.12.009 ↗
62. Fan · J Mater Res Technol · 2021 · 10 · 42210.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.105 ↗
63. Hao · J Magnes Alloys · 2020 · 8 · 89910.1016/j.jma.2019.10.002 ↗
64. Zhang · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2021 · 826 · 14202610.1016/j.msea.2021.142026 ↗
65. T Mu, K Zhang, YJ Li, XG Li, ML Ma, GL Shi, JW Yuan, ZQ Sun. J Mater Res Technol 22(202)838-852.10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.158 ↗
66. Li · Mater Charact · 2024 · 207
67. Xie · J Alloys Compd · 2019 · 803 · 1610.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.202 ↗
68. Sarkar · Mater Charact · 2020 · 160 · 11011210.1016/j.matchar.2019.110112 ↗
69. Liu · J Manuf Processes · 2025 · 141 · 26310.1016/j.jmapro.2025.03.003 ↗
70. Wang · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2023 · 871 · 14492710.1016/j.msea.2023.144927 ↗
71. Zhu · Prog Mater Sci · 2023 · 131 · 10101910.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101019 ↗
72. Takigawa · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2008 · 497 · 13910.1016/j.msea.2008.06.026 ↗
73. Z Trojanova, K Turba, Z Száraz, T Ryspaev, P Palček, M Chalupová. Superplastic behaviour of an extruded AZ91 alloy. Acta Physica Polonica Series a 122(3):597-60010.12693/APhysPolA.122.597 ↗
74. Olguín-González · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2014 · 597 · 8210.1016/j.msea.2013.12.027 ↗
75. Sherby · Prog Mater Sci · 1989 · 33 · 16910.1016/0079-6425(89)90004-2 ↗
76. Frost · 1982
77. Somekawa · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2018 · 730 · 35510.1016/j.msea.2018.06.015 ↗
78. Wang · Scr Mater · 2003 · 48 · 111710.1016/S1359-6462(02)00615-2 ↗
79. Yoshida · Mater Trans · 2024 · 8 · 2537
80. Shen · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 323110.1016/0001-6160(88)90058-2 ↗
81. Chen · 2005
82. Zheng · J Mater Sci Technol · 2026 · 243 · 16710.1016/j.jmst.2025.04.023 ↗
83. Kaibyshev · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2002 · 324 · 9610.1016/S0921-5093(01)01407-1 ↗
84. Ma · J Alloys Compd · 2021 · 854 · 15727510.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157275 ↗
85. Nieh · Scripta Mater · 1992 · 26 · 70310.1016/0956-716X(92)90423-C ↗
86. Ashby · Surf Sci · 1972 · 31 · 49810.1016/0039-6028(72)90273-7 ↗
87. Wei · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2003 · 360 · 10710.1016/S0921-5093(03)00407-6 ↗
88. Ma · J Mater Sci Technol · 2021 · 70 · 7310.1016/j.jmst.2020.09.003 ↗
89. Lu · Acta Mater · 2020 · 195 · 110.1016/j.actamat.2020.04.049 ↗
90. Dennis · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 453910.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.018 ↗
91. Smith · Met Sci J · 1967 · 1 · 110.1179/msc.1967.1.1.1 ↗
92. Liao · J Mater Sci Technol · 2021 · 61 · 110.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.064 ↗
93. Che · J Alloys Compd · 2025 · 862 · 15870010.1016/j.jallcom.2021.158700 ↗