Texture traits and mechanical anisotropy of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheet by hard plate cross rolling
Source abstract
Abstract
• This study first proposed the HP-CR process and prepared AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets, with an average grain size refined to 5.33 µm. Reduced the degree of work hardening, ρ GND decreased by 70.8 %. • The dynamic recrystallization process leads to randomness in the orientation of most grains, promoting orientations deviation towards TD direction and significantly weakening strong basal texture. • Compared with CR, the HP-CR average yield strength and tensile strength of AZ31 magnesium sheet after hard plate cross rolling are 191 Mpa and 283 Mpa, respectively, and the average elongation is increased from 8.5 % to 11.5 %. • HP-CR sheet with higher SF values on the prismatic and pyramidal plane, providing more slip systems for dislocation slip and improving the mechanical anisotropy and plastic deformation ability of the sheet. Conventional cross rolling is influenced by the force couple effect of symmetrical rollers, resulting in the c-axis of the plate grains being oriented perpendicular to the rolling surface. This orientation contributes to a high degree of work hardening and mechanical anisotropy, thereby complicating subsequent processing. In this study, the hard plate cross rolling (HP-CR) process is put forward for the first time, and the microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of rolled AZ31 Magnesium plate were analyzed. The results indicate that, in comparison to traditional cross rolling (CR), the average grain size of the HP-CR is refined to 5.33 µm. Additionally, the average yield strength and elongation of the sheet are enhanced by 15.2 % and 35.2 %, respectively, while the average tensile strength is 283 MPa, and the r value decreases by 39.8 %. These changes are attributed to the combined effects of grain refinement, microstructural homogenization, and basal texture weakening. On the one hand, the substantial energy stored in the original lattice distortion serves as a driving force for the dynamic recrystallization process, facilitating the elimination of the deformed grain structure. This process increases the proportion of recrystallized grains from 5 % to 82 %, reduces the degree of work hardening, and correspondingly decreases the density of geometrically necessary dislocations (ρ GND ) by 70.8 %, accompanied by the formation of high-angle grain boundaries (HAGB). On the other hand, dynamic recrystallization promotes grain rearrangement, resulting in an increased number of grains oriented in the transverse direction (TD), which diminishes the texture strength of the basal plane. Concurrently, the activation of non-basal slip systems reduces the resistance to dislocation sliding in various directions, significantly reduces the degree of mechanical anisotropy and enhancing the plastic deformation capacity of the plate. This research provides valuable scientific insights and technical foundations for the large-scale manufacturing of high-performance AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang · J Rare Earths · 2024 · 42 · 228510.1016/j.jre.2024.03.026 ↗
2. Niu · J Magnes Alloy · 2024 · 08 · 005
3. Sun · J Magnes Alloy · 2024 · 10 · 003
4. Xu · Mater Sci Eng A · 2022 · 84410.1016/j.msea.2022.143202 ↗
5. Luo · J Alloy Compd · 2021 · 88310.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160813 ↗
6. Chen · J Alloy Compd · 2023 · 960
7. Wang · J Mater Res Technol · 2020 · 9 · 960710.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.093 ↗
8. Li · Mater · 2021 · 19
9. Jin · J Mater Res Technol · 2023 · 27 · 116010.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.041 ↗
10. Shen · J Alloy Compd · 2023 · 963
11. Hamad · Sci Rep · 2016 · 6 · 2995410.1038/srep29954 ↗
12. Li · Mater Today Commun · 2023 · 37
13. Ko · J Alloy Compd · 2018 · 744 · 9610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.095 ↗
14. Wang · T Nonferr Metal Soc · 2023 · 33 · 106610.1016/S1003-6326(23)66166-7 ↗
15. de Abreu · J Magnes Alloy · 2018 · 6 · 12110.1016/j.jma.2018.04.004 ↗
16. Wang · J Mater Sci Technol · 2024 · 176 · 13210.1016/j.jmst.2023.07.052 ↗
17. Pan · Mater Sci Eng A · 2016 · 653 · 9310.1016/j.msea.2015.12.002 ↗
18. Chamanfar · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 397 · 15310.1016/j.msea.2005.02.039 ↗
19. Lee · Comp Mater Sci · 2015 · 100 · 4510.1016/j.commatsci.2014.09.049 ↗
20. Zhao · J Alloy Compd · 2021 · 854
21. Merson · Mater Lett · 2023 · 33410.1016/j.matlet.2022.133702 ↗
22. Sun · Mater Sci Eng A · 2024 · 892
23. Wang · Mater Charact · 2022 · 194
24. Deng · Mater Design · 2022 · 218
25. Li · Mater Charact · 2021 · 179
26. Zhao · Scripta Mater · 2020 · 188 · 20010.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.07.037 ↗
27. Malik · J Mater Res Technol · 2020 · 9 · 1447810.1016/j.jmrt.2020.10.023 ↗
28. Deng · Mater Design · 2022 · 223
29. Calcagnotto · Mater Sci Eng A · 2010 · 527 · 273810.1016/j.msea.2010.01.004 ↗
30. Sun · Mater Sci Eng A · 2023 · 887
31. Wang · J Mater Res Technol · 2023 · 27 · 443010.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.205 ↗
32. Malik · J Mater Sci Technol · 2021 · 79 · 4610.1016/j.jmst.2020.10.074 ↗
33. Kong · J Mater Res Technol · 2023 · 25 · 324310.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.134 ↗
34. Wang · J Mater Res Technol · 2023 · 26 · 612110.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.307 ↗
35. Wu · Mater Charact · 2022 · 19410.1016/j.matchar.2022.112323 ↗
36. Tian · J Magnes Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 219310.1016/j.jma.2021.01.007 ↗
37. Ahmad · Acta Mater · 2020 · 183 · 22810.1016/j.actamat.2019.10.053 ↗
38. Mazar · J Mater Res Technol · 2023 · 27 · 202010.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.070 ↗