journal article·2023-03Open access

Is Mg17Al12 ductile or brittle? A theoretical insight

Jiajia Wang, Lei Niu, Yanglin Zhang, Jianqing Chen, Jinghua Jiang, Dan Song, Baosong Li, Guobing Ying, Jiangbo Cheng, Aibin Ma

Journal of Magnesium and Alloys· Volume 11· Issue 3

Abstract

The Mg17Al12-phase, which is common and important in Mg-Al alloy, has long been regarded as a brittle phase in experiments but theoretical calculations report controversial results. To unravel why theoretical calculations report controversial results and determine whether Mg17Al12 is brittle or ductile, density functional theory calculations on atomic level are performed to investigate mechanic properties of Mg17Al12 without containing alloying elements and without taking the size effect. The results showed that the parameter k-point played critical role in the DFT-based elastic calculations. The convergent G/B ratio of Mg17Al12 was about 0.52, suggesting that the Mg17Al12-phase was theoretically ductile although its ductility was poor. The chemical bonding in Mg17Al12 was the mixture of metallic Mg-Mg bond and covalent Al-Al bond. The advantage of metallic bonding over covalent bonding provided a possible explanation for the ductility of Mg17Al12. Possible reasons for the brittleness of Mg17Al12 in experiments are also discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Schumann · Mater Sci Forum · 2003 · 419-422 · 5110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.419-422.51 ↗
2. Kulekci · Int J Adv Manuf Technol · 2008 · 39 · 85110.1007/s00170-007-1279-2 ↗
3. Liu · J Alloys Compd. · 2017 · 704 · 50910.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.107 ↗
4. Yuan · Metals (Basel) · 2019 · 9 · 38610.3390/met9040386 ↗
5. Jiang · Surf Coat Technol · 2013 · 216 · 25910.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.11.055 ↗
6. Yang · J Manuf Processes · 2016 · 22 · 29010.1016/j.jmapro.2016.04.003 ↗
7. Sun · Mater Sci Eng A · 2018 · 734 · 48510.1016/j.msea.2018.07.075 ↗
8. Luo · J Mater Sci · 1994 · 29 · 525910.1007/BF01171534 ↗
9. Luo · Int Mater Rev · 2004 · 49 · 1310.1179/095066004225010497 ↗
10. Zha · J Alloys Compd · 2017 · 728 · 68210.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.289 ↗
11. Huang · Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China · 2006 · 16 · S197
12. Shin · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 513510.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.010 ↗
13. Zhou · Comput Mater Sci · 2014 · 86 · 2410.1016/j.commatsci.2014.01.007 ↗
14. Wang · Comput Mater Sci · 2017 · 140 · 22410.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.044 ↗
15. Wang · Acta Mater · 2018 · 158 · 6510.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.041 ↗
16. Zhou · J Alloys Compd · 2019 · 774 · 86510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.027 ↗
17. Zhou · Mater Res Express · 2019 · 6 · 0865e110.1088/2053-1591/ab2420 ↗
18. Zhuo · Metals (Basel) · 2020 · 10 · 83610.3390/met10060836 ↗
19. Wang · J Phys D: Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 41
20. Duan · Solid State Sci · 2011 · 13 · 45510.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.12.011 ↗
21. Zhuang · Phys Rev Appl. · 2016 · 5 · 1110.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.064021 ↗
22. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 401210.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.020 ↗
23. Huang · Physica B · 2012 · 407 · 107510.1016/j.physb.2011.12.132 ↗
24. Dai · J Alloys Compd · 2014 · 595 · 14210.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.171 ↗
25. Hu · Philos Mag · 2015 · 95 · 162610.1080/14786435.2015.1040098 ↗
26. Zheng · Physica B · 2019 · 560 · 25510.1016/j.physb.2018.11.067 ↗
27. Cai · J Alloys Compd · 2006 · 422 · 9210.1016/j.jallcom.2005.11.054 ↗
28. Gu · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 487 · 8610.1016/j.msea.2007.09.064 ↗
29. Pugh · Philos Mag · 1954 · 45 · 82310.1080/14786440808520496 ↗
30. Vanderbilt · Phys Rev B · 1990 · 41 · 789210.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892 ↗
31. Troullier · Phys Rev B · 1991 · 43 · 199310.1103/PhysRevB.43.1993 ↗
32. Blöchl · Phys Rev B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
33. Ceperley · Phys Rev Lett · 1980 · 45 · 56610.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566 ↗
34. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 46 · 667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
35. Perdew · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
36. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 45 · 1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
37. Lejaeghere · Science · 2016 · 351 · 710.1126/science.aad3000 ↗
38. Kresse · Comput Mater Sci · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
39. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
40. Clark · Z Kristallogr · 2005 · 220 · 56710.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075 ↗
41. Page · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65 · 14
42. Schobinger-Papamantellos · Naturwissenschaften · 1970 · 57 · 12810.1007/BF00600053 ↗
43. Haas · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 7910.1103/PhysRevB.79.085104 ↗
44. Yang · J Mater Sci Technol · 2020 · 48 · 11410.1016/j.jmst.2020.03.005 ↗
45. Jamal · Comput Mater Sci · 2014 · 95 · 59210.1016/j.commatsci.2014.08.027 ↗
46. Wu · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 76
47. Hill · Proc Phys Soc Lond, Sect A · 1952 · 65 · 34910.1088/0370-1298/65/5/307 ↗
48. Pettifor · Mater Sci Technol · 1992 · 8 · 34510.1179/mst.1992.8.4.345 ↗
49. Niu · Sci Rep · 2012 · 2 · 71810.1038/srep00718 ↗
50. Nalewajski · J Phys Chem A · 2005 · 109 · 1003810.1021/jp053184i ↗
51. Yermakov · J Mater Sci Lett · 1990 · 9 · 69610.1007/BF00721807 ↗
52. Cawkwell · Mater Res Soc Symp Proc · 2003 · 779 · 12910.1557/PROC-779-W5.5 ↗
53. Cawkwell · ScienceScience · 2005 · 309 · 105910.1126/science.1114704 ↗
54. Nie · Metall Mater Trans A · 2012 · 43 · 389110.1007/s11661-012-1217-2 ↗
55. Duly · Philos Mag A · 1995 · 71 · 18710.1080/01418619508242964 ↗
56. Liu · Scr Mater · 2019 · 163 · 9110.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.01.001 ↗
57. Lin · Prog Nat Sci Mater Int · 2018 · 28 · 6610.1016/j.pnsc.2018.01.006 ↗