journal article·2024-09Open access

Twinning mediated anisotropic fracture behavior in bioimplant grade hot-rolled pure magnesium

Prakash C. Gautam, Somjeet Biswas

Journal of Magnesium and Alloys· Volume 12· Issue 9

Abstract

• Anisotropic elastic plastic fracture toughness ( J IC ) was related to initial texture. • Extension, contraction, and double twins (ET, CT, and DT) formed at the crack tip ( a n ) vicinity due to stress triaxiality. • Distinct ET and DT lamellae morphologies and orientations activated for a n ∥, ⊥, and 45° to rolling direction. • Strain incompatibility of matrices with ET domains were higher than the DT domain. • Cracking via matrix-ET Σ15b and matrix-DT Σ23b/Σ15a interfaces led to lower and higher plasticity and J IC , respectively. Bioimplant grade hot-rolled magnesium with equiaxed microstructure and basal texture was examined for fracture toughness (FT) anisotropy using fatigue pre-cracked single-edge notch bending specimens with the notch, a n ∥, ⊥ and 45° to rolling direction (RD). Due to adequate crack-tip plasticity, the size-independent elastic-plastic fracture toughness ( J IC ) were determined. Anisotropic J IC was observed due to different twin lamellae formation w.r.t. notch owing to the initial basal texture with { 10 1 ¯ 0 } and { 11 2 ¯ 0 } poles mostly ∥ and ⊥ to RD. The out-of-plane tensile stresses activated the { 10 1 ¯ 2 } 〈 10 1 ¯ 1 〉 extension twins (ET) as usual with matrix-ET Σ15b coincident site lattice boundary (CSLB) interfaces. While the in-plane tensile stress ⊥ to the crack-tip activated { 10 1 ¯ 1 } 〈 10 1 ¯ 2 〉 contraction twins (CT) that transform into { 10 1 ¯ 1 } - { 10 1 ¯ 2 } double twins (DT) with matrix-DT Σ23b and Σ15a CSLBs. For a n ∥ RD, large DT lamellae fraction formed at ∼30° and few ETs at ∼30° and ∼90° to the notch with crack growth mainly via the Σ23b/Σ15a CSLB interfaces during FT. While, significant DT and ET lamellae developed at ∼0° and ∼60° with cracking via the matrix-DT Σ23b/Σ15a and matrix-ET Σ15b CSLBs for a n ⊥ RD. The DT and ET lamellae activated at ∼15°, and the crack propagated through Σ15b for a n ∼ 45 ∘ to RD. The J IC and the crack-tip plastic zone decreases, while the elastic component of the J-integral ( J el ) and the ET formation increases from a n ∥, ⊥, to ∼ 45 ∘ to RD. The strain incompatibility of matrices was higher with the geometrically hard ETs than DTs. Thus, brittle interlamellar cracking occurred through the Σ15b interfaces. In contrast, almost similar and higher crack-tip plasticity occurred in matrix and DT domains during crack propagation via Σ23b/Σ15a CSLBs. Crack growth through Σ23b/Σ15a led to high J IC , both Σ15b and Σ23b/Σ15a led to moderate J IC , and Σ15b least J IC for a n ∥, ⊥ and 45° to RD, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Ren · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 29 · 100510.1016/j.jmst.2013.09.008 ↗
2. Zhang · Scr. Mater. · 2005 · 53 · 52310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.05.009 ↗
3. Cifuentes · Acta Biomater · 2016 · 32 · 34810.1016/j.actbio.2015.12.037 ↗
4. Cai · Mater. Des. · 2019 · 18210.1016/j.matdes.2019.108038 ↗
5. Li · Biomaterials · 2008 · 29 · 132910.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.021 ↗
6. Estrin · Mater. Lett · 2016 · 173 · 25210.1016/j.matlet.2016.03.052 ↗
7. Tsakiris · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2021 · 9 · 188410.1016/j.jma.2021.06.024 ↗
8. Antoniac · Materials (Basel) · 2022 · 15 · 114810.3390/ma15031148 ↗
9. Gautam · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 81210.1016/j.msea.2021.141103 ↗
10. Sahoo · Int. J. Plast. · 2020
11. Somekawa · Scr. Mater. · 2005 · 53 · 105910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.07.001 ↗
12. Somekawa · J. Alloys Compd. · 2006 · 417 · 20910.1016/j.jallcom.2005.07.073 ↗
13. Somekawa · Philos. Mag. Lett. · 2010 · 90 · 83110.1080/09500839.2010.508444 ↗
14. Srinivasan · Sci Technol Casting Processes. InTech · 2012 · 26 · 287
15. Biswas · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2013 · 44 · 439110.1007/s11661-013-1783-y ↗
16. Agnew · Int. J. Plast. · 2005 · 21 · 116110.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.018 ↗
17. Miller · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2016 · 675 · 34510.1016/j.msea.2016.08.063 ↗
18. Wang · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2018 · 34 · 204210.1016/j.jmst.2018.02.019 ↗
19. ASTM E1820, Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness, E1820, 2017, pp. 1–53.
20. Somekawa · Met. Mater. Trans. A · 2011 · 42 · 247510.1007/s11661-011-0642-y ↗
21. Somekawa · Philos. Mag. Lett. · 2009 · 89 · 210.1080/09500830802537718 ↗
22. Sharma · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2011 · 528 · 587510.1016/j.msea.2011.04.013 ↗
23. Kondori · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2014 · 45 · 329210.1007/s11661-014-2211-7 ↗
24. Selvarajou · J. Mech. Phys. Solids. · 2016 · 94 · 27310.1016/j.jmps.2016.04.023 ↗
25. Selvarajou · Acta Mater · 2017 · 127 · 5410.1016/j.actamat.2017.01.015 ↗
26. Kaushik · Int. J. Fract. · 2014 · 189 · 19510.1007/s10704-014-9971-3 ↗
27. Verma · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2018 · 742 · 31810.1016/j.msea.2018.10.117 ↗
28. Kaushik · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2014 · 590 · 17410.1016/j.msea.2013.10.018 ↗
29. Prasad · Acta Mater · 2015 · 94 · 28110.1016/j.actamat.2015.04.054 ↗
30. Danylenko · Theor. Appl. Fract. Mec. · 1999 · 32 · 910.1016/S0167-8442(99)00021-X ↗
31. Sivaprasad · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2000 · 284 · 19510.1016/S0921-5093(00)00739-5 ↗
32. Li · Mater. Charact. · 2019 · 1-57
33. Sreedhar S · Acta Mater · 2021 · 202 · 35010.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.059 ↗
34. Vaishakh · Acta Mater · 2020 · 193 · 9910.1016/j.actamat.2020.03.023 ↗
35. Somekawa · Scr. Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 63310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.10.029 ↗
36. Somekawa · Scr. Mater. · 2005 · 53 · 54110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.048 ↗
37. Somekava · Mater. Trans. · 2020 · 61 · 110.2320/matertrans.MT-M2019185 ↗
38. Somekawa · Mater. Trans. · 2007 · 48 · 142210.2320/matertrans.MRA2006355 ↗
39. Fu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2018 · 720 · 9810.1016/j.msea.2018.02.039 ↗
40. Gautam · Theor. Appl. Fract. Mec. · 2024 · 13110.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104350 ↗
41. Li · Mater. Charact. · 2019 · 157
42. Ji · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 84910.1016/j.msea.2022.143514 ↗
43. ASTME8/E8M, Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, E8/E8M, 2016, pp.1–30.
44. Zhang · J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 30 · 300810.1088/0022-3727/30/21/015 ↗
45. Farzadfar · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2012 · 534 · 20910.1016/j.msea.2011.11.061 ↗
46. Biswas · Mater. Sci. Forum · 2008 · 584 · 34310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.584-586.343 ↗
47. Biswas · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2015 · 46 · 259810.1007/s11661-015-2846-z ↗
48. Toth · Mater. Char. · 2013 · 84 · 6710.1016/j.matchar.2013.07.013 ↗
49. Gautam · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2021 · 81210.1016/j.msea.2021.141103 ↗
50. Wu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2013 · 582 · 19410.1016/j.msea.2013.05.080 ↗
51. Gautam · Mater. Today Proc. · 2020 · 44 · 291410.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.689 ↗
52. T.L. Anderson, “Fracture mechanics, fundamentals and applications,” 4th Edition, CRC Press, Washington DC, 2017.10.1201/9781315370293 ↗
53. Rice · ASTM STP · 1973 · 536 · 231
54. Ostapovets · Scr. Mater. · 2011 · 64 · 47010.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.11.011 ↗
55. Martin · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 397010.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.027 ↗
56. Niknejad · Acta Mater · 2016 · 102 · 110.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.026 ↗
57. Barnett · Acta Mater · 2007 · 56 · 510.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.034 ↗
58. Gautam · Mater. Today Commun. · 2024 · 39
59. Luo · Acta Mater · 2012 · 198610.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.017 ↗
60. Song · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2015 · 627 · 36910.1016/j.msea.2015.01.027 ↗
61. Chouhan · Int. J. Plast. · 2023 · 16110.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103516 ↗