Effect of different extrusion parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-4Sm-3Gd-2Yb-0.5Zr alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
• By adjusting the extrusion parameters, Mg-4Sm-3Gd-2Yb-0.5Zr alloy with dynamic recrystallization grains less than 1 µm was prepared by extrusion at 420 °C-ER9.4. • The Mg-4Sm-3Gd-2Yb-0.5Zr alloy was extruded under 420 °C -ER9.4 conditions, and it was found that the non-dynamic recrystallized grains contained high-density dislocations, and the Schmid factor of the basal slip system was small, so it was difficult to activate the basal slip, which was beneficial to the improvement of the alloy strength. • The effects of extrusion parameters on the dynamic recrystallization and dynamic precipitation behavior of Mg-4Sm-3Gd-2Yb-0.5Zr alloy were analyzed. • The effects of extrusion parameters on the texture evolution and deformation behavior of dynamic recrystallized grains and non-dynamic recrystallized grains of Mg-4Sm-3Gd-2Yb-0.5Zr alloy were analyzed. The effect of different extrusion parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-4Sm-3Gd-2Yb-0.5Zr (SGY2) alloy was investigated. It was observed that under different extrusion parameters, unDRXed grains of SGY2 alloy exhibited a pronounced basal plane texture, specifically <01 1 ¯ 0>//ED, while the texture of DRXed grains was relatively dispersed. Under the condition of 420 °C and an extrusion ratio of 9.4 (420 °C-ER9.4), the basal plane texture intensity of unDRXed grains in SGY2 alloy was the highest. Furthermore, SGY2 alloy at different extrusion parameters exhibited recrystallization mechanisms mainly characterized by continuous dynamic recrystallization (CDRX), with some DRXed grains and deformed grains experiencing discontinuous dynamic recrystallization (DDRX). Additionally, at the 420 °C-ER9.4, the second phase particles in the as-extruded SGY2 alloy were smaller in size and exhibited a dispersed distribution. Under this condition, a significant amount of dislocation accumulation, dislocation bypassing, and dislocation tangling phenomena were observed in the SGY2 alloy. The primary deformation mechanism of unDRXed grains in the SGY2 alloy at the 420 °C-ER9.4 may involve prismatic plane 〈a〉, pyramidal plane 〈a〉, and pyramidal plane 〈 c + a 〉 slip, thereby activating a significant amount of dislocations. Compared to other extrusion conditions, this condition is more prone to activate non-basal plane slip. The as-extruded SGY2 alloy exhibited superior mechanical properties, with ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and yield strength (YS) of 332 MPa and 278 MPa, respectively. This is mainly attributed to the extremely fine grains, with many DRXed grains having grain sizes smaller than 1 µm, and higher density grain boundaries produced under this condition. Additionally, the unDRXed grains contain a high density of dislocations with small Schmid factor (SF), thus effectively inhibiting basal plane slip and strengthening the alloy to some extent. Similarly, the increased presence of second phase particles will also contribute to strengthening the alloy matrix through precipitation hardening.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. You · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2017 · 5 · 23910.1016/j.jma.2017.09.001 ↗
2. Xu · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2019 · 7 · 53610.1016/j.jma.2019.08.001 ↗
3. Yang · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2021 · 9 · 70510.1016/j.jma.2021.04.001 ↗
4. Shi · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 147610.1016/j.jma.2022.03.006 ↗
5. Weiler · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2019 · 7 · 29710.1016/j.jma.2019.02.005 ↗
6. Yazman · J. Manuf. Process. · 2020 · 57 · 13610.1016/j.jmapro.2020.05.050 ↗
7. Zhang · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2019 · 810
8. Pan · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 149 · 35010.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.002 ↗
9. Gu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 85510.1016/j.msea.2022.143901 ↗
10. Calado · Front. Mater. · 2022 · 910.3389/fmats.2022.858921 ↗
11. Chen · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 850
12. Yang · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2024 · 12 · 126010.1016/j.jma.2024.03.014 ↗
13. Xie · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2020 · 814
14. Wang · Acta Mater. · 2023 · 254
15. Zhang · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2019 · 784 · 113010.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.110 ↗
16. Li · Mater. Des. · 2017 · 116 · 41910.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.040 ↗
17. Yuan · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2014 · 30 · 261
18. Yuan · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2021 · 15 · 251810.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.080 ↗
19. Che · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2017 · 706 · 52610.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.269 ↗
20. K · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2017 · 703 · 9710.1016/j.msea.2017.07.058 ↗
21. Zhang · Met. Mater. Int. · 2024 · 1
22. Köklü · P. I. Mech. Eng. E-J. Pro. · 2022 · 236 · 208210.1177/09544089221080820 ↗
23. Baysal · Metals-Basel · 2022 · 12 · 180010.3390/met12111800 ↗
24. Karunakaran · Bioact. Mater. · 2020 · 5 · 44
25. Zhang · Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. · 2022 · 122 · 4029
26. Jiang · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2024 · 970
27. Xu · Mater Today Commun. · 2024 · 39
28. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 856
29. Zhao · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 38710.1016/j.jma.2020.06.019 ↗
30. Zengin · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 214 · 42110.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.04.110 ↗
31. Jin · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 45 · 13310.1016/j.jmst.2019.11.021 ↗
32. Wang · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 258810.1016/j.jma.2021.11.028 ↗
33. Guo · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 86010.1016/j.msea.2022.144329 ↗
34. Kubin · Scripta Mater. · 2003 · 48 · 11910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00335-4 ↗
35. Lv · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 83310.1016/j.msea.2021.142521 ↗
36. WANG · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2023 · 26 · 763410.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.111 ↗
37. Mao · Materials · 2023 · 16 · 630710.3390/ma16186307 ↗
38. Yu · J. Mater. Sci. · 2017 · 52 · 667010.1007/s10853-017-0902-3 ↗
39. Guan · J. Meng. T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc. · 2023 · 33 · 4610.1016/S1003-6326(22)66089-8 ↗
40. Gottstein · Scripta Mater. · 2010 · 62 · 91410.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.017 ↗
41. Xu · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 515710.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.045 ↗
42. She · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2019 · 35 · 257010.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.014 ↗
43. Sasaki · Scripta Mater. · 2008 · 59 · 111110.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.07.042 ↗
44. Deng · Mater. Des. · 2022 · 223
45. Deng · Mater. Des. · 2022 · 21810.1016/j.matdes.2022.110678 ↗
46. Zhang · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2024 · 12 · 177410.1016/j.jma.2024.03.016 ↗
47. Yuan · Scripta Mater. · 2011 · 65 · 99410.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.08.028 ↗
48. Gao · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2023 · 2510.1002/adem.202201046 ↗
49. Nie · Scripta Mater. · 2003 · 48 · 100910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00497-9 ↗
50. Zheng · T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc. · 2022 · 32 · 186610.1016/S1003-6326(22)65914-4 ↗
51. Piao · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2024 · 29 · 21310.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.065 ↗
52. Li · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2019 · 776 · 66610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.322 ↗
53. Li · Vacuum · 2020 · 173