Effect of warm rotary swaging on the mechanical and operational properties of the biodegradable Mg-1 %Zn-0.6 %Ca alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
• Warm rotary swaging (RS) leads to grain refinement of Mg-1 %Zn-0.6 %Ca alloy. • RS increases strength of the alloy without loss of ductility. • RS does not impair corrosion resistance of Mg-1 %Zn-0.6 %Ca alloy. • Increasing the incubation time leads to a decrease in the degradation rate by 4 times. • RS-treated alloy has attractive biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. A study of the effect of rotary swaging (RS) at 350 °C on mechanical properties, corrosion resistance and biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo of biodegradable Mg-1 %Zn-0.6 %Ca alloy was conducted. It is shown that the formation of a recrystallized microstructure after RS with a grain size of 3.2 ± 0.2 μm leads to an increase in the strength of the alloy without reduction of level of ductility and corrosion resistance. At the same time, aging of the quenched alloy at 100 °C for 8 h leads to a slight increase in strength, but significantly reduces its ductility and corrosion resistance. The study of the degradation process of the alloy in the quenched state and after RS, both under in vitro and in vivo conditions, did not reveal a significant difference between these two microstructural states. However, an increase in the duration of incubation of the alloy in a complete growth medium from 4 h to 24 days leads to a decrease in the degradation rate (DR) by 4 times (from ∼2 to ∼0.5 mm/year) due to the formation of a dense layer of degradation products. The study of biocompatibility in vitro did not reveal a significant effect of RS on the hemolytic and cytotoxic activity of the alloy. No signs of systemic toxicity were observed after subcutaneous implantation of alloy samples into mice before and after RS. However, it was found that RS promotes uniform degradation of the alloy over the entire contact surface. In summary, RS at 350 °С allows to increase the strength of Mg-1 %Zn-0.6 %Ca alloy up to 348 ± 5 MPa at a ductility level of 17.3 ± 2.8 % and a DR in vivo equal to 0.56 ± 0.12 mm/year without impairing its biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. He · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2023 · 23 · 439610.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.037 ↗
2. Chen · J. Orthop. Sci. · 2020 · 25 · 110710.1016/j.jos.2020.01.018 ↗
3. Wang · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 332710.1016/j.jma.2022.11.014 ↗
4. Witte · Biomater · 2005 · 26 · 355710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.049 ↗
5. Mario · J. Interv. Cardiol. · 2004 · 17 · 39110.1111/j.1540-8183.2004.04081.x ↗
6. Heublein · Heart · 2003 · 89 · 65110.1136/heart.89.6.651 ↗
7. Tomljenovic · J. Alzheimers Dis. · 2011 · 23 · 56710.3233/JAD-2010-101494 ↗
8. Alfrey · N. Engl. J. Med. · 1976 · 294 · 18410.1056/NEJM197601222940402 ↗
9. Cao · Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. · 2020 · 17 · 139910.3390/ijerph17041399 ↗
10. Jin · J. Mater. Sci. Technol · 2020 · 47 · 19010.1016/j.jmst.2020.02.017 ↗
11. Wang · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2021 · 9 · 214510.1016/j.jma.2020.09.020 ↗
12. Krüger · Bioact. Mater. · 2022 · 13 · 37
13. Hirano · Environ. Health Perspect. · 1996 · 104 · 85
14. Chen · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 338010.1016/j.jma.2021.05.013 ↗
15. Seong · Acta Biomater · 2015 · 11 · 53110.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.029 ↗
16. MacDonald · J. Nutr. · 2000 · 130 · 1500S10.1093/jn/130.5.1500S ↗
17. Yamaguchi · Mol. Cell. Biochem. · 2011 · 355 · 17910.1007/s11010-011-0852-z ↗
18. Hypermagnesemia
19. Kirkland · 2014 · 73
20. Nanda · IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2019 · 602
21. Ramesh · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2019 · 7 · 44410.1016/j.jma.2019.05.008 ↗
22. Bommala · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2019 · 7 · 7210.1016/j.jma.2018.11.001 ↗
23. Zhang · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2023 · 11 · 367310.1016/j.jma.2022.02.010 ↗
24. R.J. Werkhoven, W.H. Sillekens, J.B.J.M. van Lieshout, In: Sillekens, W.H., Agnew, S.R., Neelameggham, N.R., Mathaudhu, S.N. (eds) Magnesium Technology 2011. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48223-1_7910.1007/978-3-319-48223-1_79 ↗
25. Yuan · Bioact. Mater. · 2022 · 7 · 192
26. Pulido-González · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 54010.1016/j.jma.2021.06.022 ↗
27. Incesu · J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. · 2020 · 31 · 12310.1007/s10856-020-06468-5 ↗
28. Istrate · Crystals · 2022 · 12 · 146810.3390/cryst12101468 ↗
29. Qin · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2024 · 12 · 374410.1016/j.jma.2023.03.008 ↗
30. Chen · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2024 · 12 · 51610.1016/j.jma.2023.10.007 ↗
31. Tang · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2024 · 12 · 510810.1016/j.jma.2024.01.004 ↗
32. Mao · J. Alloys Compd. · 2022 · 896
33. Trojanová · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2020 · 2210.1002/adem.201900596 ↗
34. Wang · Met. Sci. Heat Treat. · 2019 · 60 · 77710.1007/s11041-019-00355-9 ↗
35. Yang · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2021 · 9 · 25510.1080/21663831.2021.1891150 ↗
36. Bahmani · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 260710.1016/j.jma.2022.09.007 ↗
37. Martynenko · Materialia · 2020 · 1310.1016/j.mtla.2020.100841 ↗
38. Martynenko · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2020 · 8 · 103810.1016/j.jma.2020.08.008 ↗
39. Liu · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2020 · 8 · 6610.1016/j.jma.2020.02.002 ↗
40. Gerashi · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 31310.1016/j.jma.2021.09.009 ↗
41. Ben Hamu · J. Alloys Compd. · 2009 · 468 · 22210.1016/j.jallcom.2008.01.084 ↗
42. Aung · Corros. Sci. · 2010 · 52 · 58910.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.018 ↗
43. Sabbaghian · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2019 · 7 · 70710.1016/j.jma.2019.11.001 ↗
44. Zou · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2015 · 618 · 4410.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.115 ↗
45. Estrin · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2020 · 2210.1002/adem.201900506 ↗
46. Martynenko · Crystals · 2021 · 11 · 138110.3390/cryst11111381 ↗
47. Schäublin · Acta Mater · 2022 · 23910.1016/j.actamat.2022.118223 ↗
48. Degner · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2013 · 282 · 26410.1016/j.apsusc.2013.05.115 ↗
49. Merson · Materials (Basel) · 2022 · 15 · 32810.3390/ma15010328 ↗
50. Zhang · Scr. Mater. · 2010 · 63 · 102410.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.07.038 ↗
51. Wang · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2023 · 163 · 3210.1016/j.jmst.2023.03.057 ↗
52. Pulido-González · J. Alloys Compd. · 2020 · 83110.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154735 ↗
53. Cao · J. Mater. Res. · 2016 · 31 · 214710.1557/jmr.2016.196 ↗
54. Zhang · Sci. Technol. Adv. Mat. · 2011 · 12
55. Li · Acta Mater · 2023 · 257
56. Kulyasova · Materials (Basel) · 2022 · 15 · 674910.3390/ma15196749 ↗
57. Mozaffari · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2024 · 31 · 101710.1016/j.jmrt.2024.06.121 ↗
58. Velmurugan · J. Ind. Eng. Chem. · 2024 · 133 · 22810.1016/j.jiec.2023.11.061 ↗
59. Nabiyouni · Acta Biomater · 2018 · 66 · 2310.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.033 ↗
60. Goldberg · Bioact. Mater. · 2020 · 5 · 644