In vivo degradability and biocompatibility of a rheo-formed Mg–Zn–Sr alloy for ureteral implantation
Source abstract
Abstract
The introduction of biodegradable implant materials has significantly improved the postoperative subjective feelings of patients within the past few decades, among which magnesium alloy is widely considered a favorable choice as its appropriate biodegradability and evident antibacterial activity. Here, we reveal a semisolid rheo-formed Mg–Zn–Sr alloy ureteral implant that displayed suitable degradability and biocompatibility in a pig model. Refined non-dendritic microstructure was observed in the rheo-formed alloy, which led to ca. 47% increase in ultimate tensile strength (from 195.0 MPa to 288.1 MPa) and more homogeneous degradation process compared with the untreated alloy. No post-interventional inflammation or pathological changes of the test animals were observed during the implantation period, and the corrosion rate (0.22 ± 0.04 mm·y−1) perfectly fitted the clinical ureteral stent indwelling time. The urine bacteria numbers decreased from 88 ± 13 CFU·mL−1 at 7 weeks post operation to 59 ± 8 CFU·mL−1 at 14 weeks post operation, which confirmed the evident antibacterial activity of the alloy. Our study demonstrates that the Mg–Zn–Sr alloy is clinically safe for urinary system, enabling its efficacious use as ureteral implant materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Shan · Front. Pharmacol. · 2020 · 11 · 710.3389/fphar.2020.00007 ↗
2. Allen · World J. Surg · 2018 · 42 · 309710.1007/s00268-018-4606-x ↗
3. Bettenworth · Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. · 2019 · 17 · 251410.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.048 ↗
4. Sundaramurthy · J. Pediatr. Urol. · 2019 · 15 · 661.e110.1016/j.jpurol.2019.08.009 ↗
5. Vutskits · Curr. Opin. Anesthesio. · 2017 · 30 · 33710.1097/ACO.0000000000000461 ↗
6. Lu · BMC Urol. · 2020 · 20 · 810.1186/s12894-020-0582-1 ↗
7. Finney · 1992 · 33
8. Future developments in ureteral stents10.1097/MOU.0000000000000577 ↗
9. Barros · World J. Urol. · 2018 · 36 · 27710.1007/s00345-017-2124-3 ↗
10. Champagne · Materials · 2019 · 12 · 29510.3390/ma12020295 ↗
11. Lange · Nat. Rev. Urol. · 2015 · 12 · 1710.1038/nrurol.2014.340 ↗
12. Wang · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2015 · 10 · 305510.2147/IJN.S80810 ↗
13. Soria · Urology · 2018 · 115 · 5910.1016/j.urology.2018.02.004 ↗
14. Barros · Int. J. Pharmaceut. · 2016 · 513 · 22710.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.08.061 ↗
15. Guo · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2020 · 8 · 87310.1016/j.jma.2019.09.012 ↗
16. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. C · 2016 · 68 · 41410.1016/j.msec.2016.06.017 ↗
17. Zhao · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2020 · 8 · 37410.1016/j.jma.2020.02.008 ↗
18. Drelich · Acta Biomater. · 2017 · 58 · 53910.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.045 ↗
19. Wegener · Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 10 · 1010.1038/s41598-020-66289-y ↗
20. Bowen · Adv. Healthc. Mater. · 2016 · 5 · 112110.1002/adhm.201501019 ↗
21. Hernandez-Escobar · Acta Biomater. · 2019 · 97 · 110.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.034 ↗
22. Betschart · Urology · 2019 · 134 · 7210.1016/j.urology.2019.08.028 ↗
23. Witte · Biomaterials · 2007 · 28 · 216310.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.12.027 ↗
24. Lellouche · Biomaterials · 2009 · 30 · 596910.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.037 ↗
25. Jin · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2011 · 13 · 687710.1007/s11051-011-0595-5 ↗
26. Song · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2020 · 8 · 110.1016/j.jma.2020.02.003 ↗
27. Lock · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A · 2014 · 102 · 78110.1002/jbm.a.34741 ↗
28. Robinson · Acta Biomater. · 2010 · 6 · 186910.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.007 ↗
29. Sezer · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2018 · 6 · 2310.1016/j.jma.2018.02.003 ↗
30. Tie · Eur. Cells Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 28410.22203/eCM.v025a20 ↗
31. Tie · Acta Biomater. · 2016 · 29 · 45510.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.014 ↗
32. Tian · Mater. Sci. Eng. C · 2019 · 96 · 24810.1016/j.msec.2018.11.018 ↗
33. Tie · Acta Biomater. · 2020 · 116 · 41510.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.023 ↗
34. Tie · Crystals · 2019 · 9 · 64110.3390/cryst9120641 ↗
35. Campo · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 52 · 20710.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.009 ↗
36. Yamasaki · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2020 · 53110.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147351 ↗
37. McGill · EXCLI J · 2016 · 15 · 817
38. Nafisi · Acta Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 350310.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.016 ↗
39. Nayeb-Hashemi · Bull. APD · 1986 · 7 · 149
40. Esmaily · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 162 · C31110.1149/2.0341507jes ↗
41. Knapek · Corros. Sci. · 2018 · 145 · 1010.1016/j.corsci.2018.09.006 ↗
42. Gomes · Electrochim. Acta · 2019 · 306 · 6110.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.080 ↗
43. Orazem · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2013 · 160 · C21510.1149/2.033306jes ↗
44. Wang · Acta Biomater. · 2014 · 10 · 521310.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.034 ↗
45. Ardizzone · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1997 · 119 · 25310.1016/S0169-4332(97)00180-3 ↗
46. Lim · Int. Neurourol. J. · 2010 · 14 · 9310.5213/inj.2010.14.2.93 ↗
47. Betschart · World J. Urol. · 2019 · 37 · 170310.1007/s00345-018-2569-z ↗
48. Aharony · Neurourol. Urodyn. · 2020 · 39 · 20310.1002/nau.24169 ↗
49. Kanai · J. Urol. · 2006 · 175 · 162410.1016/S0022-5347(05)00977-8 ↗