journal article·2021-05Open access

A comparative study of the role of solute, potent particles and ultrasonic treatment during solidification of pure Mg, Mg–Zn and Mg–Zr alloys

Nagasivamuni Balasubramani, Gui Wang, Mark A. Easton, David H. StJohn, Matthew S. Dargusch

Journal of Magnesium and Alloys· Volume 9· Issue 3

Abstract

Ultrasonic treatment (UST) applied during the solidification of pure Mg, eutectic (Mg – Zn) and peritectic (Mg – Zr) alloys was investigated in order to explore the grain refinement mechanisms. Temperature dependent grain refinement is observed in pure Mg where decreasing the superheat temperature (at which UST is applied from above the melting temperature, TM) from 100 °C to 40 °C produces significant refinement with a uniform grain structure. The presence of solute reduces the temperature dependence of the UST refinement and excellent grain refinement is obtained regardless of the superheat temperature (100 °C or 40 °C) and even with the use of preheated sonotrode in the Mg – 6 wt.% Zn alloy. A further improvement in grain refinement is achieved when the alloy contains potent particles that introduce additional nucleation of grains in Mg – 0.5 and 1.0 wt.% Zr alloys (producing an average grain size of ≤100 µm). At 40 °C superheat, UST of Mg – Zn alloys produces excellent refinement (average grain size <200 µm) with non-dendritic grains, which is normally achieved only with the addition of grain refining master alloy in the as-cast condition. The enhanced refinement observed in the eutectic alloy is explained through the undercooling imposed by a relatively cold sonotrode combined with high frequency vibrations and acoustic streaming. The advantages of using a cold sonotrode, a low superheat and solute are demonstrated for achieving significant refinement during solidification of Mg alloys under UST without or with a lower addition of grain refining master alloys.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. StJohn · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2013 · 44a · 293510.1007/s11661-012-1513-x ↗
2. StJohn · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2005 · 36a · 166910.1007/s11661-005-0030-6 ↗
3. Alaneme · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2017 · 5 · 46010.1016/j.jma.2017.11.001 ↗
4. Ali · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2015 · 619 · 63910.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.061 ↗
5. Easton · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 1999 · 30 · 161310.1007/s11661-999-0098-5 ↗
6. Lee · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2000 · 31 · 289510.1007/BF02830349 ↗
7. Nagasivamuni · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2015 · 622 · 78910.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.185 ↗
8. StJohn · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 490710.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.035 ↗
9. Ma · Magnes. Technol. · 2003 · 209
10. Qian · Scr. Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 88110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.002 ↗
11. ASM Handbook
12. Karakulak · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2019 · 7 · 35510.1016/j.jma.2019.05.001 ↗
13. Greer · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 282310.1016/S1359-6454(00)00094-X ↗
14. StJohn · Magnes. Technol. · 2013
15. Fan · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 489110.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.052 ↗
16. Du · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2017 · 5 · 18110.1016/j.jma.2017.04.001 ↗
17. Ali · Scr. Mater. · 2016 · 114 · 10310.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.12.015 ↗
18. Fu · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2008 · 456 · 390
19. Wang · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2017 · 19
20. Wang · Sci. Rep.-Uk · 2017 · 7 · 972910.1038/s41598-017-10354-6 ↗
21. Sreekumar · Metall. Mater. Trans. B · 2017 · 48 · 20810.1007/s11663-016-0824-5 ↗
22. Ramirez · Scr. Mater. · 2008 · 59 · 1910.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.02.017 ↗
23. Qian · J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 10510.1063/1.3054374 ↗
24. Qian · J. Cryst. Growth · 2009 · 311 · 370810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.04.036 ↗
25. Qian · J. Cryst. Growth · 2010 · 312 · 226710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.04.035 ↗
26. Nagasivamuni · J. Cryst. Growth · 2019 · 512 · 2010.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.02.004 ↗
27. Wang · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2019
28. Nagasivamuni · J. Cryst. Growth · 2018 · 495 · 2010.1016/j.jcrysgro.2018.05.006 ↗
29. Nagasivamuni · 2019 · 1579
30. Jia · Scr. Mater. · 2019 · 167 · 610.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.03.032 ↗
31. Wang · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2017 · 134 · 11610.1016/j.commatsci.2017.03.041 ↗
32. Tan · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2015 · 46a · 285110.1007/s11661-015-2872-x ↗
33. Wang · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 144 · 50510.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.067 ↗
34. Wang · Acta Mater. · 2019 · 165 · 38810.1016/j.actamat.2018.11.053 ↗
35. StJohn · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2007 · 9 · 73910.1002/adem.200700157 ↗
36. Qian · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 326210.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.052 ↗
37. Balasubramani · Materials · 2019 · 1210.3390/ma12193187 ↗
38. Wang · J. Cryst. Growth · 2014 · 408 · 11910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.09.018 ↗
39. Atamanenko · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2010 · 41a · 205610.1007/s11661-010-0232-4 ↗
40. Dargusch · Scr. Mater. · 2020 · 177 · 23410.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.10.028 ↗
41. Wang · IOP Conf. Ser. · 2016 · 117
42. Wang · 2016 · 141
43. Sun · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2013 · 15 · 37310.1002/adem.201200297 ↗
44. Qian · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 94310.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.016 ↗
45. StJohn · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2015 · 46 · 486810.1007/s11661-015-2960-y ↗