Effect of unusual texture on tension-compression asymmetry for Mg-RE alloy by viscoplastic self-consistent modeling
Source abstract
Abstract
• The alloy exhibited negligible yield tension-compression asymmetry, with a CYS/TYS ratio of 0.98. • VPSC simulations revealed low yield tension-compression asymmetry due to similar {10-12} twinning activation levels in tensile and compressive processes. • The twinning behavior was attributed to unusual (11-20) <0001> texture in Mg-RE alloy. • The twinning distribution maps from EBSD confirmed the simulation results. The tension-compression asymmetry presents notable challenges for the application of magnesium alloys in many fields. In this study, the solid-solution treated Mg-8.5Gd-4.5Y-0.8Zn-0.4Zr alloy's tension-compression asymmetry was examined using optical microscope (OM), x-ray diffraction (XRD), viscoplastic self-consistent (VPSC) modeling, and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). The VPSC hardening parameters were significantly adjusted based on the Schmid factor of deformation modes in rare earth magnesium (Mg-RE) alloy, which came from the EBSD data. Excellent agreement was found between the modified VPSC model's calculation results, especially the stress-strain curves and pole figures. The alloy exhibited good strength with a negligible tension-compression asymmetry and an impressive 0.98 ratio of compressive yield strength to tensile yield strength (CYS/TYS). The main cause could be attributed to the unusual texture of (11-20) <0001> in alloy, which eliminated the imbalance in tension and compression deformation by having a negative effect on the activation of {10-12} twinning in tensile and a positive effect in compressive deformation. The activation level of {10-12} twinning was 0.37 and 0.40 calculated by VPSC model, in the plastic deformation of tension and compression, respectively; in the tensile and compression samples, the EBSD data indicated that approximately 31.9% and 31.1% (area proportion) of the grains were deformed with twins, respectively. Both tension and compression deformation showed the {10-12} twinning in the early stage of deformation, which transformed to {11-22} twinning in the later stage. The considerable activation of pyramidal during the later stages of deformation endowed the alloy with good ductility.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Poggiali · P.R. Cetlin. J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2014 · 3 · 33110.1016/j.jmrt.2014.09.002 ↗
2. Gu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 85510.1016/j.msea.2022.143901 ↗
3. Kim · Mater. Charact. · 2015 · 109 · 8810.1016/j.matchar.2015.09.007 ↗
4. Zeng · Acta Mater · 2018 · 160 · 9710.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.045 ↗
5. Sin · Mater. Charact. · 2008 · 59 · 17810.1016/j.matchar.2007.04.026 ↗
6. Emamy · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 84010.1016/j.msea.2022.142996 ↗
7. Zhang · J.Mater. Res. Technol. · 2024 · 29 · 160110.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.214 ↗
8. Zhang · J. Rare Earths. · 2024
9. Chen · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2023 · 960
10. Yang · J. Sun. J. Alloy. Compd. · 2021 · 868
11. Huang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 80710.1016/j.msea.2021.140853 ↗
12. Mosayebi · Mater. Lett. · 2020 · 26310.1016/j.matlet.2019.127209 ↗
13. Y.Wang · Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. · 2023 · 30 · 9210.1007/s12613-021-2388-x ↗
14. Robson · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 194510.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.060 ↗
15. Peng · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2023 · 86210.1016/j.msea.2022.144353 ↗
16. Vasilev · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2020 · 51 · 385810.1007/s11661-020-05841-x ↗
17. Zhou · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2024 · 894
18. Robson · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2011 · 528 · 724710.1016/j.msea.2011.05.075 ↗
19. Yin · Int. J. Plast. · 2021 · 13610.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102878 ↗
20. Chi · Mater. Des. · 2019 · 17010.1016/j.matdes.2019.107705 ↗
21. Lv · Mater. Des. · 2012 · 33 · 52910.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.060 ↗
22. Xu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2006 · 420 · 32210.1016/j.msea.2006.01.092 ↗
23. Plasticity Problems in Metals[J]
24. Plastic Strain in Metals[J]
25. Wu · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 42310.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.034 ↗
26. Bishop · Phil. Maga. · 1951 · 42 · 129810.1080/14786444108561385 ↗
27. Hutchinson · Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A · 1970 · 319 · 24710.1098/rspa.1970.0177 ↗
28. Lebensohn · Acta Metal. Mater. · 1993 · 41 · 261110.1016/0956-7151(93)90130-K ↗
29. Lebensohn · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 368710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00067-0 ↗
30. Tomé · Acta Metal. Mater. · 1991 · 39 · 266710.1016/0956-7151(91)90083-D ↗
31. Kalidindi · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1998 · 46 · 27310.1016/S0022-5096(97)00051-3 ↗
32. Proust · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 213710.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.017 ↗
33. Proust · Int. J. Plast. · 2009 · 25 · 86110.1016/j.ijplas.2008.05.005 ↗
34. Jain · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2007 · 462 · 2910.1016/j.msea.2006.03.160 ↗
35. Jain · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2008 · 486 · 54510.1016/j.msea.2007.09.069 ↗
36. Agnew · Int. J. Plast. · 2005 · 21 · 116110.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.018 ↗
37. Zhao · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2017 · 710 · 15910.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.243 ↗
38. Wang · Acta Mech · 2019 · 230 · 207110.1007/s00707-019-2374-9 ↗
39. Xu · J. Magn. Alloy. · 2023 · 11 · 60710.1016/j.jma.2021.06.011 ↗
40. Riyad · Int. J. Plast. · 2023 · 16310.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103571 ↗
41. Zhou · Rare Metal Mat. Eng. · 2022 · 51 · 2429
42. Hu · J. Magn. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 199410.1016/j.jma.2020.12.008 ↗
43. Biswas · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2011 · 528 · 372210.1016/j.msea.2011.01.021 ↗
44. Hui · Rare Metal Mat. Eng. · 2021 · 50 · 3446
45. Matsuoka · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2022 · 90610.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164285 ↗
46. Cheng · J. Magn. Alloy. · 2023 · 11 · 52210.1016/j.jma.2021.07.025 ↗
47. Kuang · J. Sun. J. Magn. Alloy. · 2023 · 11 · 129210.1016/j.jma.2021.07.016 ↗
48. Shin · J. Magn. Alloy. · 2023 · 11 · 202710.1016/j.jma.2023.04.007 ↗
49. Zhou · J. Mater. Sci. Tech. · 2022 · 98 · 8710.1016/j.jmst.2021.03.087 ↗
50. He · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2022 · 20 · 34310.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.034 ↗
51. Mishra · J. Magn. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 254610.1016/j.jma.2021.08.021 ↗
52. Lebensohn · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2004 · 52 · 24910.1016/S0022-5096(03)00114-5 ↗
53. Lebensohn · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1994 · 175 · 7110.1016/0921-5093(94)91047-2 ↗
54. Lebensohn · 2000
55. Li · Mater. Res. Express · 2021 · 8
56. Zachariah · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2013 · 572 · 810.1016/j.msea.2013.02.023 ↗
57. Zhou · J. Mater. Eng. Perform · 2016 · 25 · 85310.1007/s11665-016-1961-3 ↗
58. Kale · J. Jordon, K. Solanki. Materialia · 2020 · 9
59. Wu · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 42 · 17510.1016/j.jmst.2019.10.010 ↗
60. J.Wang · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2015 · 653 · 10010.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.136 ↗
61. Davis · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2019 · 744 · 52510.1016/j.msea.2018.12.060 ↗
62. Zhong · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 82610.1016/j.msea.2021.141987 ↗
63. Peng · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2021 · 854