journal article·2026-06Open access

LightAlloy-Bench: Benchmarking reasoning abilities of large language models in light alloys

Haoyang Xie, Yiran Zhang, Zini Yan, Turab Lookman, Xiangdong Guo, Shuzhou Li, Haoyang Fu, Shiyu Liang, Ziyuan Rao, Xiaoqin Zeng

Abstract

Light alloys play a critical role in lightweight engineering and sustainable development owing to their high specific strength and resource efficiency. However, their intelligent design remains challenging because of complex structure–process–property relationships and the scarcity of structured, high-quality data. Large language models (LLMs) have recently emerged as a promising paradigm for AI-driven materials research, yet their reasoning capabilities in the context of light alloys have not been systematically assessed. Here, we introduce LightAlloy-Bench, a hierarchical benchmark tailored for light alloy research, comprising a foundational layer with 2300 questions covering domain knowledge and a reasoning layer with 10,096 questions designed to evaluate multi-step reasoning. Using this benchmark, we evaluate 13 general-purpose and 3 materials-domain LLMs. Among all models, GPT-4o achieves the highest reasoning accuracy without any task-specific optimization. Building on this baseline, we further investigate the effects of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and reinforcement learning (RL)-based optimization. Notably, Qwen3-14B attains the strongest reasoning performance under CoT prompting, outperforming larger-scale LLMs. This result demonstrates that model scale alone does not determine reasoning capability and highlights the critical role of reasoning-oriented optimization strategies. Overall, LightAlloy-Bench establishes a quantitative foundation for advancing LLM-driven reasoning in intelligent light alloy design and offers a generalizable framework for developing reasoning-focused benchmarks across other alloy systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Big Data and Digital Economy · Advanced Graph Neural Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Robson · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 273910.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.032 ↗
2. Li · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2024 · 12 · 470910.1016/j.jma.2023.12.013 ↗
3. Zeng · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 160 · 9710.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.045 ↗
4. Grewal · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2026 · 16
5. Jiao · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2026 · 16
6. Peng · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2021 · 15 · 125210.1016/j.jmrt.2021.08.133 ↗
7. Wu · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2022 · 21 · 139510.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.108 ↗
8. Yu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2014 · 610 · 44510.1016/j.msea.2014.05.058 ↗
9. Li · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2026 · 16
10. Liu · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2026 · 16
11. Li · Acta Mater. · 2026 · 30510.1016/j.actamat.2025.121884 ↗
12. Pan · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 186 · 27810.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.017 ↗
13. Wang · Acta Mater. · 2025 · 296
14. Meng · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2024 · 30 · 900710.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.244 ↗
15. Yang · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2023 · 11 · 261110.1016/j.jma.2023.07.011 ↗
16. She · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2024 · 12 · 344110.1016/j.jma.2024.10.001 ↗
17. Wang · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2026 · 16
18. Farrokhnejad · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2026 · 16
19. Zhou · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2026 · 16
20. Liu · Acta Mater. · 2025 · 297
21. Zhang · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 200 · 80310.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.068 ↗
22. Yu · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2026 · 16
23. Huang · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2026 · 16
24. Mi · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2024 · 12 · 75010.1016/j.jma.2024.01.005 ↗
25. Peng · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2025 · 238 · 13210.1016/j.jmst.2025.02.059 ↗
26. Wang · Front. Mater. · 2025 · 12
27. Li · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2026 · 16
28. Babenko · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2024 · 12 · 131110.1016/j.jma.2024.03.003 ↗
29. Lv · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2024 · 12 · 168710.1016/j.jma.2024.02.007 ↗
30. Yuan · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2025 · 13 · 406410.1016/j.jma.2025.07.015 ↗
31. Lookman · Adv. Mater. (Deerf. Beach Fla,) · 2026
32. Ross · Nat. Mach. Intell. · 2022 · 4 · 125610.1038/s42256-022-00580-7 ↗
33. Satpute · Mater. Today Commun. · 2024 · 40
34. Wu · IEEE/CAA J. Automat. Sin. · 2023 · 10 · 112210.1109/JAS.2023.123618 ↗
35. J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, K. Toutanova, BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding, arXiv.Org 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805v2. (Accessed 23 December 2024).
36. Huang · J. Chem. Inf. Model. · 2022 · 62 · 636510.1021/acs.jcim.2c00035 ↗
37. Choi · Commun Mater. · 2024 · 5 · 1
38. Polak · Nat. Commun. · 2024 · 15 · 156910.1038/s41467-024-45914-8 ↗
39. Walker · Digital Discovery · 2023 · 2 · 176810.1039/D3DD00019B ↗
40. Tian · Acta Mater. · 2025 · 28510.1016/j.actamat.2024.120663 ↗
41. Song · Nat. Commun. · 2025 · 16 · 653010.1038/s41467-025-61778-y ↗
42. PDGPT: a large language model for acquiring phase diagram information in magnesium alloys
43. A. Wang, A. Singh, J. Michael, F. Hill, O. Levy, S.R. Bowman, GLUE: a multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding, arXiv.Org 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.07461v3. (Accessed 23 December 2024).
44. C. Zhang, F. Pan, J. Kim, I.S. Kweon, C. Mao, ImageNet-D: benchmarking neural network robustness on diffusion synthetic object, 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.18775. Accessed March 27, 2024.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.02055 ↗
45. W. Xuan, R. Yang, H. Qi, Q. Zeng, et al. MMLU-ProX: a multilingual benchmark for advanced large language model evaluation, (n.d.). https://arxiv.org/html/2503.10497v1. (Accessed 20 October 2025).
46. A.N. Rubungo, K. Li, J. Hattrick-Simpers, A.B. Dieng, LLM4Mat-Bench: benchmarking large language models for materials property prediction, 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.00177. Accessed November 30, 2024.
47. S. Liu, J. Xu, B. Ye, B. Hu, D.J. Srolovitz, T. Wen, MatTools: benchmarking large language models for materials science tools, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.10852. Accessed March 27, 2024.
48. J. Wang, D.R. Bukenberger, S. Niedermayr, C. Neuhauser, J. Wu, R. Westermann, SGLDBench: a benchmark suite for stress-guided lightweight 3D designs, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.03068. Accessed May 22, 2025.10.1109/TVCG.2025.3573774 ↗