journal article·2025-02Open access

Improvement of strength and ductility of TC4p/AZ91D magnesium matrix composites by modifying the extrusion ratio

Zuying Yu, Kaihong Zheng, Xintao Li, Jun Xu, Jianxin Sun, Nan Zhou, Fusheng Pan

Journal of Magnesium and Alloys· Volume 13· Issue 2

Abstract

In this study, AZ91D (Mg-9Al-Zn) alloys reinforced with 2 vol% TC4 (Ti–6Al–4 V) particles fabricated by semi-solid stir casting were extruded at different ratios, resulting in observed grain refinement effects. The research findings demonstrate that both TC4 and β-Mg17Al12 phases contribute to promoting dynamic recrystallization (DRX) nucleation. With increasing extrusion ratio, the β-phase (Mg17Al12) gradually fractures into smaller particles, leading to progressive grain refinement. Furthermore, the transition from 〈01–10〉 fiber texture to non-basal texture in the α-Mg matrix after hot extrusion is attributed to improved DRX behavior and activation of non-basal slip. As the extrusion ratio increases, the tensile strength and elongation (EL) of TC4p/AZ91D composite improve significantly, reaching optimum comprehensive mechanical properties at an extrusion of 40:1 with a yield strength (YS) of 257 MPa, an ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 357 MPa, and an EL of 9.7%. This remarkable strengthening effect is primarily attributed to β-phase reinforcement, grain refinement strengthening, and strain hardening.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Ye · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 226610.1016/j.jma.2022.06.012 ↗
2. Cui · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2023 · 863 · 14451810.1016/j.msea.2022.144518 ↗
3. Yang · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 231110.1016/j.jma.2022.07.008 ↗
4. Wang · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2020 · 8 · 42110.1016/j.jma.2019.05.015 ↗
5. Wang · Acta Metall. Sin. · 2016 · 29 · 94010.1007/s40195-016-0473-3 ↗
6. Feng · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2023 · 88810.1016/j.msea.2023.145783 ↗
7. Luo · Mater. Charact. · 2022 · 19110.1016/j.matchar.2022.112154 ↗
8. Luo · Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China · 2022 · 32 · 323810.1016/S1003-6326(22)66016-3 ↗
9. Wang · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2012 · 532 · 7810.1016/j.jallcom.2012.04.023 ↗
10. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2011 · 528 · 638710.1016/j.msea.2011.04.064 ↗
11. Harjo · Acta Mater. · 2023 · 255 · 11902910.1016/j.actamat.2023.119029 ↗
12. Fan · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2023 · 00 · 01
13. Sun · Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China · 2023 · 00 · 1
14. Zhao · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2022 · 310 · 11775510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117755 ↗
15. Tong · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2013 · 569 · 4810.1016/j.msea.2013.01.052 ↗
16. Yu · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2023 · 26 · 739510.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.069 ↗
17. Hafner · Phys. Chem. Miner. · 1983 · 9 · 1910.1007/BF00309465 ↗
18. Chung · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 1974 · 7 · 51910.1107/S0021889874010375 ↗
19. Zhang · Scr. Mater. · 2003 · 48 · 64710.1016/S1359-6462(02)00555-9 ↗
20. Duly · Acta Metall. Mater. · 1995 · 43 · 101
21. Wu · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2018 · 749 · 84410.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.372 ↗
22. Jiang · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 157 · 5310.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.014 ↗
23. Basu · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 96 · 11110.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.044 ↗
24. Guan · Sci. Rep. · 2019 · 9 · 715210.1038/s41598-019-43415-z ↗
25. Yang · Mater. Charact. · 2019 · 155 · 10983410.1016/j.matchar.2019.109834 ↗
26. Lou · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2021 · 860 · 15853010.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158530 ↗
27. Zhao · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 808 · 14094210.1016/j.msea.2021.140942 ↗
28. Wang · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2020 · 9 · 1260410.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.002 ↗
29. Chen · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 145710.1016/j.jma.2022.05.013 ↗
30. Chen · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2023 · 00 · 01
31. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2016 · 666 · 11410.1016/j.msea.2016.04.056 ↗
32. Hansen · Scr. Mater. · 2004 · 51 · 80110.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.002 ↗
33. Luo · Scr. Mater. · 2012 · 66 · 78510.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.02.008 ↗
34. Hughes · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 298510.1016/S1359-6454(00)00082-3 ↗
35. Yasnikov · Scr. Mater. · 2014 · 76 · 3710.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.12.009 ↗
36. Kai · Scr. Mater. · 2013 · 68 · 55510.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.11.024 ↗
37. Zhu · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2020 · 9 · 110.1080/21663831.2020.1796836 ↗
38. Wu · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2015 · 112 · 1450110.1073/pnas.1517193112 ↗
39. Liu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2021 · 822 · 14170410.1016/j.msea.2021.141704 ↗
40. Nan · Scr. Mater. · 2012 · 67 · 44310.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.05.042 ↗
41. Yu · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2017 · 702 · 19910.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.231 ↗