Insight into the evolution of lamellar and block LPSO phase of Mg-Gd-Y-Zn-Zr alloy with laser welding after post-weld solution and aging treatment
Source abstract
Abstract
• The microstructure transformation throughout entire laser welding, post-weld solution and aging treatment of Mg-RE-Zn alloy consisting of LPSO phases were systematically illustrated. • Complete dissolution of brittle eutectic (Mg,Zn) 3 (Gd,Y) phases and block LPSO phases were observed after solution treatment, however, the lamellar 14H-LPSO phase precipitated across α-Mg grains. • The nano-sized β′ phase precipitated perpendicular to lamellar 14H-LPSO phases within the lamellae, however, precipitated in three directions with an angle of 120° to each other within α-Mg grains free of lamellar 14H-LPSO. • The precipitation of 14H-LPSO lamellae results in the bulge of finer α-Mg grain boundaries during post-weld solution, however, 14H-LPSO lamellae inhibit the migration of grain boundaries and thus restrain the growth of α-Mg grains during aging treatment. The paper systematically investigated the effect of laser welding parameters and post-weld heat treatment on morphology microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of weld joint of Mg-13Gd-4Y-2Zn-0.6Zr alloy consisting of lamellar and block long-period stacking ordered (LPSO) phases. Experimental results demonstrate that laser power and welding speed significantly influence weld geometry, with optimal parameters (600 W, 25 mm/s) achieving full penetration, stable keyhole dynamics, and minimal defects, while resulting in a narrow heat-affected zone (HAZ)(<100 µm) dominated by fine grains. The eutectic (Mg,Zn) 3 (Gd,Y) phase formed at fusion zone (FZ) and HAZ after laser welding, which was attributed to remelting process during laser welding. Furthermore, the post-weld solution and aging treatments were conducted on Mg-Gd-Y-Zn-Zr alloy with laser welding. The rare earth (RE) atoms from eutectic (Mg,Zn) 3 (Gd,Y) phases and block LPSO phases dissolved into α-Mg grains in the course of solution treatment, thus lamellar 14H-LPSO phase precipitated from grain boundaries into α-Mg grains along basal planes and equilibrium β phases precipitated at grain boundaries with reduced block LPSO. The lamellar 14H-LPSO phase precipitated across α-Mg grains as solution time further increased, and only the equilibrium β phase remained at grain boundaries. The finely dispersed β′ phase precipitated inside α-Mg grains after aging treatment, thus nano-sized and densely β′ phase contributed to dislocation pinning, which significantly improves microhardness. The ellipsoidal β′ phases precipitated perpendicular to 14H-LPSO lamellae within the α-Mg grains consisting of lamellar 14H-LPSO phase. However, the β′ phases precipitated in three directions with an angle of 120° to each other within α-Mg grain that is devoid of 14H-LPSO lamellae. The equilibrium β phases gradually declined with prolonged aging treatment. The precipitation of lamellar 14H-LPSO and nano-sized β′ phase contributed to grain boundary migration of α-Mg grains. The results provide fundamental principle for optimizing weld integrity and mechanical response in Mg-RE-Zn alloys with LPSO phase.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Cizek · J. Mater. Process. Technol · 2004 · 157 · 46610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.149 ↗
2. Chen · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2025 · 36 · 579710.1016/j.jmrt.2025.04.076 ↗
3. Luk’yanova · Met Sci Heat Treat · 2024 · 66 · 49810.1007/s11041-024-01077-3 ↗
4. Arora · Crystals · 2022 · 12 · 710.3390/cryst12070945 ↗
5. Liu · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2024 · 221 · 19410.1016/j.jmst.2024.09.038 ↗
6. Wang · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2023 · 27 · 592410.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.243 ↗
7. Xiang · Mater. Charact. · 2023 · 20210.1016/j.matchar.2023.113028 ↗
8. Satya Prasad · J Magnes Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 110.1016/j.jma.2021.05.012 ↗
9. Huang · J Magnes Alloy · 2023 · 11 · 392610.1016/j.jma.2023.09.013 ↗
10. Li · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2023 · 26 · 291910.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.055 ↗
11. Li · Mater. Res. Express · 2022 · 9
12. Han · J. Mater. Eng. Perform. · 2023 · 32 · 255210.1007/s11665-022-07045-3 ↗
13. Li · Mater. Charact. · 2018 · 141 · 28610.1016/j.matchar.2018.04.044 ↗
14. Chen · Mater. Res. Express · 2019 · 6 · 0965a510.1088/2053-1591/ab332d ↗
15. Matsuda · Mater. Trans. · 2005 · 46 · 36110.2320/matertrans.46.361 ↗
16. Wu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 831
17. Li · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2023 · 154 · 6510.1016/j.jmst.2022.12.053 ↗
18. Wang · J Magnes Alloy · 2023 · 11 · 7810.1016/j.jma.2022.10.001 ↗
19. Hong · Process. Technol. · 2017 · 245 · 4610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.02.008 ↗
20. Gao · J Magnes Alloy · 2024 · 12 · 198610.1016/j.jma.2022.09.034 ↗
21. Padmanaban · Opt. Laser Technol. · 2010 · 42 · 125310.1016/j.optlastec.2010.03.019 ↗
22. Kim · Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. · 2010 · 11 · 36910.1007/s12541-010-0042-z ↗
23. Wang · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2017 · 33 · 85410.1080/02670836.2016.1243356 ↗
24. Wang · Metals · 2022 · 12 · 69610.3390/met12040696 ↗
25. Dai · Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2013 · 201310.1155/2013/219347 ↗
26. Dai · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2011 · 529 · 40110.1016/j.msea.2011.09.052 ↗
27. Wang · J. Mater. Eng. Perform. · 2016 · 25 · 450610.1007/s11665-016-2260-8 ↗
28. Zhang · J. Manuf. Process. · 2024 · 126 · 3510.1016/j.jmapro.2024.07.075 ↗
29. Ge · J Magnes Alloy · 2025
30. Zhu · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 293610.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.022 ↗
31. Zhang · J.Z. Cui, J. Alloy Compd. · 2015 · 624 · 11610.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.177 ↗
32. Zhou · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2023 · 25 · 465810.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.278 ↗
33. Li · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2025 · 34 · 84510.1016/j.jmrt.2024.12.107 ↗
34. Wang · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2024 · 31 · 189610.1016/j.jmrt.2024.06.202 ↗
35. Zhou · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2025 · 93710.1016/j.msea.2025.148466 ↗
36. Zhu · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 656210.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.022 ↗
37. Matsunaga · Mater. Trans. · 2015 · 56 · 92310.2320/matertrans.MH201404 ↗
38. Furuhara · Mater. Trans. · 2013 · 54 · 67510.2320/matertrans.MI201224 ↗
39. Wu · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2023 · 11 · 249510.1016/j.jma.2022.01.008 ↗
40. Gao · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2006 · 431 · 32210.1016/j.msea.2006.06.018 ↗
41. Zhou · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2017 · 48 · 306010.1007/s11661-017-4081-2 ↗
42. Guan · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2024 · 12 · 204110.1016/j.jma.2022.09.017 ↗
43. Meng · J. Magnes Alloys · 2025
44. Jin · Mater. Des. · 2021 · 19910.1016/j.matdes.2020.109384 ↗