A Novel Framework of Developing a Predictive Model for Powder Bed Fusion Process
Source abstract
Abstract
The powder bed fusion (PBF) process is a metal additive manufacturing process, which can build parts with any complexity from a wide range of metallic materials. PBF process research has predominantly focused on the impact of only a few parameters on product properties due to the lack of a systematic approach for predictive modeling of a large set of process parameters simultaneously. The pivotal challenges regarding this process require a quantitative approach for mapping the material properties and process parameters onto the ultimate quality; this will then enable the optimization of those parameters. In this study, we propose a two-phase framework for studying the process parameters and developing a predictive model for 316L stainless steel material. We also discuss the correlation between process parameters that is, laser specifications and mechanical properties, and how to obtain an optimum range of volumetric energy density for producing parts with high density (>99%), as well as better ultimate mechanical properties. In this article, we introduce and test an innovative approach for developing AM predictive models, with a relatively low error percentage (i.e., around 10%), which are used for process parameter selection in accordance with user or manufacturer part performance requirements. These models are based on techniques such as support vector regression, random forest regression, and neural network. It is shown that the intelligent selection of process parameters using these models can achieve a high density of up to 99.31% with uniform microstructure, which improves hardness, impact strength, and other mechanical properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Collaborative Additive Manufacturing Research Initiative (CAMRI), Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Quad City Manufacturing Laboratory, Western Illinois University, Rock Island, Illinois, USA.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.14810.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.148 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00170-017-1172-610.1007/s00170-017-1172-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
4. Brown CU Brown CU Jacob G et al. The Effects of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Parameters on Material Hardness and Density for Nickel Alloy 625. US Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg MD; 2018.10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-19 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10876210.1016/j.matdes.2020.108762 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00466-018-1539-z10.1007/s00466-018-1539-z ↗
7. Malekipour E, , El-Mounayri H. Defects, process parameters and signatures for online monitoring and control in powder-based additive manufacturing. Mech Addit Adv Manufacturing, 2018; 9:83–90.
8. Mukherjee T, , Zuback J, , De A, et al. Printability of alloys for additive manufacturing. Sci Reports, 2016; 6(1):1–8.
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.00510.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.005 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.04210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.042 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.03510.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.035 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.03710.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.037 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.05610.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.056 ↗
14. 10.1108/1355254071077614210.1108/13552540710776142 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.01710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.017 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10206510.1016/j.addma.2021.102065 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.02210.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.022 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma1322506310.3390/ma13225063 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10845-020-01541-w10.1007/s10845-020-01541-w ↗
20. 10.1007/s00170-014-6297-210.1007/s00170-014-6297-2 ↗
21. 10.3390/ma1112235610.3390/ma11122356 ↗
22. Cheng B Chou K editors. Melt pool evolution study in selective laser melting. 26th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium-An Additive Manufacturing Conference Austin TX USA; 2015.
23. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.08.00610.1016/j.apmt.2017.08.006 ↗
24. 10.1007/BF0054713210.1007/BF00547132 ↗
25. Van Elsen M. Complexity of Selective Laser Melting: A New Optimisation Approach. PhD thesis. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven: Leuven Belgium; 2007.
26. 10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2014.06603610.1504/IJRAPIDM.2014.066036 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.11810.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.118 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.17910.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.179 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10087110.1016/j.addma.2019.100871 ↗
30. 10.12776/ams.v25i4.136610.12776/ams.v25i4.1366 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.04310.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.043 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.12.01510.1016/j.addma.2018.12.015 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.12.02110.1016/j.msea.2015.12.021 ↗
34. E8M-14 AE. Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken PA; 2013.
35. Chen H. A Process Modelling and Parameters Optimization and Recommendation System for Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing Process. McGill University: Montreal Canada; 2016.10.1115/DETC2015-47627 ↗
36. 10.1007/s00170-019-03396-910.1007/s00170-019-03396-9 ↗
37. Samuel R. Rockwell Hardness Measurement of Metallic Materials. NIST: Gaithersburg MD; 2003.
38. Lont M. The Determination of Uncertainties in Charpy Impact Testing. UNCERT COP, 2000; 6.
39. Vial G. Automatic extensometers. Adv Mater Process, 2005; 163(9):49–52.
40. Campanelli SL Contuzzi N Angelastro A et al. Capabilities and performances of the selective laser melting process. In: New Trends in Technologies: Devices Computer Communication and Industrial Systems M. J. Er Ed. Open Access Book 2010 https://www.intechopen.com/books/howtoreference/new-trends-in-technologies--devices--computer--communication-and-industrial-systems/capabilities-and-performances-of-the-selective-laser-melting-process
41. 10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.00410.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.004 ↗
42. Crowther PS Cox RJ (eds). A Method for Optimal Division of Data Sets for Use in Neural Networks. International conference on knowledge-based and intelligent information and engineering systems. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg;. 2005.10.1007/11554028_1 ↗
43. Moshagen T Adde NA Rajgopal AN. Finding hidden-feature depending laws inside a data set and classifying it using Neural Network. arXiv preprint arXiv:210110427 2021.
44. Gu H Gong H Pal D et al. editors. Influences of energy density on porosity and microstructure of selective laser melted 17-4PH stainless steel 2013 Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium; 2013.
45. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.02710.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.027 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.21410.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.214 ↗
47. 10.3390/ma1011126010.3390/ma10111260 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2020.10339810.1016/j.ijengsci.2020.103398 ↗
49. 10.1080/1040834050052676610.1080/10408340500526766 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.00110.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001 ↗
51. Malekipour E, , El-Mounayri H, , Al Hasan M, et al. A Vision toward Layer-wise Intelligent Monitoring and Control of Scan Strategy in Powderbed Fusion Process. TechConnect Briefs, 2019:127–130.
52. Amini M, , Chang S. Process monitoring of 3D metal printing in Industrial Scale. In International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers;, 2018; 51357:V001T01A035.
53. Imani F, , Gaikwad A, , Montazeri M, et al., editors. Layerwise in-process quality monitoring in laser powder bed fusion. International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers;, 2018; 51357:V001T01A038.
54. Taheri H, , Shoaib MR, , Koester LW, et al. Powder-based additive manufacturing-a review of types of defects, generation mechanisms, detection, property evaluation and metrology. Int J Addit Subtractive Mater Manufacturing, 2017; 1(2):172–209.
55. 10.1115/1.404054310.1115/1.4040543 ↗