journal article·2023-11-01Open access

Predictive modeling of lattice structure design for 316L stainless steel using machine learning in the L-PBF process

Karim Asami, Sebastian Roth, Michel Krukenberg, Tim Röver, Dirk Herzog, Claus Emmelmann

Journal of Laser Applications· Volume 35· Issue 4

Abstract

Lattice structures in additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel have gained increasing attention due to their well-suited mechanical properties and lightweight characteristics. Infill structures such as honeycomb, lattice, and gyroid have shown promise in achieving desirable mechanical properties for various applications. However, the design process of these structures is complex and time-consuming. In this study, we propose a machine learning-based approach to optimize the design of honeycomb, lattice, and gyroid infill structures in 316L stainless steel fabricated using laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) technology under different loading conditions. A dataset of simulated lattice structures with varying geometries, wall thickness, distance, and angle using a computational model that simulates the mechanical behavior of infill structures under different loading conditions was generated. The dataset was then used to train a machine learning model to predict the mechanical properties of infill structures based on their design parameters. Using the trained machine learning model, we then performed a design exploration to identify the optimal infill structure geometry for a given set of mechanical requirements and loading conditions. Finally, we fabricated the optimized infill structures using L-PBF technology and conducted a series of mechanical tests to validate their performance under different loading conditions. Overall, our study demonstrates the potential of machine learning-based approaches for efficient and effective designing of honeycomb, lattice, and gyroid infill structures in 316L stainless steel fabricated using L-PBF technology under different loading conditions. Furthermore, this approach can be used for dynamic loading studies of infill structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Laser and System Technologies (iLAS), Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), 1 Harburger Schloßstraße 28, 21079 Hamburg, Germany

Institute for Industrialization of Smart Materials (ISM), Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), 2 Eißendorfer Straße 40, 21073 Hamburg, Germany

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. ASTM
2. Improved mechanical properties and energy absorption of BCC lattice structures with triply periodic minimal surfaces fabricated by SLM10.3390/ma11122411 ↗
3. Evaluation of light-weight AlSi10Mg periodic cellular lattice structures fabricated via direct metal laser sintering10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.12.004 ↗
4. Finite element modelling of the compressive response of lattice structures manufactured using the selective laser melting technique10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.12.004 ↗
5. 2019
6. Influence of processing parameters on the evolution of melt pool, porosity, and microstructures in Ti-6Al-4V alloy parts fabricated by selective laser melting10.1007/s40964-017-0030-2 ↗
7. Optimization of SLM process parameters for Ti6Al4 V medical implants10.1108/RPJ-05-2018-0112 ↗
8. Material modeling of Ti–6Al–4 V alloy processed by laser powder bed fusion for application in macro-scale process simulation10.1016/j.msea.2021.141237 ↗
9. A review on integration of lightweight gradient lattice structures in additive manufacturing parts10.1177/1687814020916951 ↗
10. Local strengthening design and compressive behavior study of the triangular honeycomb structure10.3390/met12111779 ↗
11. Correlations of geometry and infill degree of extrusion additively manufactured 316L stainless steel components10.3390/ma14185173 ↗
12. [INVITED] Lasers in additive manufacturing10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.09.025 ↗
13. In-process sensing in selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing10.1186/s40192-016-0045-4 ↗
14. Investigation of SLM process in terms of temperature distribution and melting pool size: Modeling and experimental approaches10.3390/ma12081272 ↗
15. Additive manufacturing of honeycomb lattice structure-from theoretical models to polymer and metal products10.3390/ma15051838 ↗
16. Kynast · 2021 · 80
17. Design guidelines for laser powder bed fusion in Inconel 71810.2351/7.0000508 ↗
18. Machine learning integrated design for additive manufacturing10.1007/s10845-020-01715-6 ↗
19. Prediction of surface roughness in extrusion-based additive manufacturing with machine learning10.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.004 ↗
20. Predicting melt track geometry and part density in laser powder bed fusion of metals using machine learning10.1007/s40964-022-00387-3 ↗
21. Application of machine learning techniques to predict the mechanical properties of polyamide 2200 (PA12) in additive manufacturing10.3390/app9061060 ↗
22. Gaussian process-based surrogate modeling framework for process planning in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel10.1007/s00170-017-1045-z ↗
23. Process design of laser powder bed fusion of stainless steel using a Gaussian process-based machine learning model10.1007/s11837-019-03792-2 ↗
24. Characterization of laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) process quality: A novel approach based on statistical features extraction and support vector machine10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.048 ↗
25. Predictive manufacturability assessment system for laser powder bed fusion based on a hybrid machine learning model10.1016/j.addma.2021.101946 ↗
26. SLM lattice structures: Properties, performance, applications and challenges10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108137 ↗
27. Towards the optimization of post-laser powder bed fusion stress-relieve treatments of stainless steel 316L10.1007/s11661-021-06472-6 ↗
29. A machine learning approach to estimate product costs in the early product design phase: A use case from the automotive industry10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.137 ↗