Prediction of single track clad quality in laser metal deposition using dissimilar materials: Comparison of machine learning-based approaches
Source abstract
Abstract
Powder-based laser metal deposition (LMD) offers a promising additive manufacturing process, given the large number of available materials for cladding or generative applications. In laser cladding of dissimilar materials, it is necessary to control the mixing of substrate and additive in the interaction zone to ensure safe metallurgical bonding while avoiding critical chemical compositions that lead to undesired phase precipitation. However, the generation of empirical data for LMD process development is very challenging and time-consuming. In this context, different machine learning models are examined to identify whether they can converge with a small amount of empirical data. In this work, the prediction accuracy of back propagation neural network (BPNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was compared using mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). A hyperparameter optimization was performed for each model. The materials used are 316L as the substrate and VDM Alloy 780 as the additive. The dataset used consists of 40 empirically determined values. The input parameters are laser power, feed rate, and powder mass flow rate. The quality characteristics of height, width, dilution, Fe-amount, and seam contour are defined as outputs. As a result, the predictions were compared with retained validation data and described as MSE and MAPE to determine the prediction accuracy for the models. BPNN achieved a prediction accuracy of 0.0072 MSE and 4.37% MAPE and XGBoost of 0.0084 MSE and 6.34% MAPE. The most accurate prediction was achieved by LSTM with 0.0053 MSE and 3.75% MAPE.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Engineering Design, Saarland University 1 , Campus E2 9, Saarbruecken 66123, Germany
School of Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Saarland 2 , Goebenstrasse 40, Saarbruecken 66117, Germany
Funding
European Regional Development Fund
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Laser cladding of Ni-WC layers with graded WC content10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.171 ↗
2. Laser cladding of Inconel 625-based composite coatings10.26628/wtr.v90i9.946 ↗
3. Finishing surface after regeneration with laser cladding10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.174 ↗
4. Underwater additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V alloy by laser metal deposition: Formability, grain growth and microstructure evolution10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109196 ↗
5. Mechanical properties of high strength aluminum alloy EN AW-7075 additively manufactured by directed energy deposition10.3390/met10050579 ↗
6. Robust metal additive manufacturing process selection and development for aerospace components10.1007/s11665-022-06850-0 ↗
7. Laser metal deposition as repair technology for a gas turbine burner made of Inconel 71810.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.078 ↗
8. Adaptive toolpath deposition method for laser net shape manufacturing and repair of turbine compressor airfoils10.1007/s00170-009-2265-7 ↗
9. Design of experiments for laser metal deposition in maintenance, repair and overhaul applications10.1016/j.procir.2013.07.031 ↗
10. 2013
11. Microstructures, tensile properties, and fracture mechanisms of Inconel 718 formed by HDR-LMD with PREP and GA powders10.1007/s00170-018-1662-1 ↗
12. Powder-based laser metal deposition of VDM Alloy 780 strategy development for efficient buildup of thin-walled components10.1117/12.2647372 ↗
13. 2019
14. 2021
15. Numerical modeling for large-scale parts fabricated by directed energy deposition10.1117/12.2624947 ↗
16. Modeling process–structure–property relationships in metal additive manufacturing: A review on physics-driven versus data-driven approaches10.1088/2515-7639/abca7b ↗
17. Simulation of thermal behaviours and powder flow for direct laser metal deposition process10.1051/matecconf/201819002001 ↗
18. Prediction on geometrical characteristics of laser energy deposition based on regression equation and neural network10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.04.085 ↗
19. Quality prediction in directed energy deposition using artificial neural networks based on process signals10.3390/app12083955 ↗
20. Mechanistic data-driven prediction of as-built mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing10.1038/s41524-021-00555-z ↗
21. Prediction of TC11 single-track geometry in laser metal deposition based on back propagation neural network and random forest10.1007/s12206-022-0229-0 ↗
22. Utilisation of artificial neural networks to rationalise processing windows in directed energy deposition applications10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109342 ↗
23. Prediction of melt pool shape in additive manufacturing based on machine learning methods10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108964 ↗
24. Optimized XGBoost model with small dataset for predicting relative density of Ti-6Al-4V parts manufactured by selective laser melting10.3390/ma15155298 ↗
25. Prediction of mechanical behaviors of additively manufactured SS 316L via machine learning10.1007/s00170-022-09509-1 ↗
26. Prediction of melt pool temperature in directed energy deposition using machine learning10.1016/j.addma.2020.101692 ↗
27. Neural network methods in natural language10.1007/978-3-031-02165-7 ↗
28. 2020
29. Advanced predictive control for GRU and LSTM networks10.1016/j.ins.2022.10.078 ↗
30. Towards activation function search for long short-term model network: A differential evolution based approach10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.04.015 ↗
31. Directed energy deposition via artificial intelligence-enabled approaches10.1155/2022/2767371 ↗