Simulation and experimental evaluation of a vane-type magnetorheological damper based on multi-physics field coupling
Source abstract
Abstract
This work aims to accurately evaluate the nonlinear behaviors of the vane-type magnetorheological (MR) damper through multi-physics field coupling analysis. The working principle of the vane-type MR damper is introduced, and the output torsion model is derived. Considering that the performance of the MR damper is affected by the coupling of electromagnetic field, flow field, thermal field, and solid mechanics, the finite element software COMSOL is used to simulate the multi-physics field inside the MR damper. Correspondingly, the mechanical performance testing of the MR damper is carried out on the torsional electro-hydraulic servo fatigue testing machine. The test results show that the MR damper can reach a maximum output torsion of 7130 N·m and achieves a high torsion-volume ratio of 4.19 × 10 7 N·m −2 , which proves that it has good mechanical properties as well as the ability to satisfy high torsional requirements in relatively limited space. Finally, a comparative analysis between the simulation and experimental curves is carried out, and it is concluded that the multi-physics field coupling analysis can accurately simulate the mechanical performance and working state of the vane-type MR damper.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Key Laboratory of Complex Multibody System Dynamics, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1045389X1875435010.1177/1045389X18754350 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.17039610.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170396 ↗
3. 10.1002/msd2.1201810.1002/msd2.12018 ↗
4. 10.1051/epjap/201818018210.1051/epjap/2018180182 ↗
5. Dong ZZ · Shock and Vibration · 2020 · 2020 · 1
6. 10.1007/s12206-014-0828-510.1007/s12206-014-0828-5 ↗
7. 10.1155/2019/938304710.1155/2019/9383047 ↗
8. 10.3390/act1008017610.3390/act10080176 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.16952710.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169527 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.04210.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.042 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11071-023-08279-z10.1007/s11071-023-08279-z ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jsv.2023.11785110.1016/j.jsv.2023.117851 ↗
13. 10.3390/w1210268410.3390/w12102684 ↗
14. 10.1177/003685041987900010.1177/0036850419879000 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10927910.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109279 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.06.03110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.06.031 ↗
17. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.628.50510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.628.505 ↗
18. 10.1177/1045389X1987688010.1177/1045389X19876880 ↗
19. 10.1177/1045389X2094257710.1177/1045389X20942577 ↗
20. 10.3390/act903005610.3390/act9030056 ↗
21. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/10/10503210.1088/0964-1726/25/10/105032 ↗
22. Takaddus AT · Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering · 2018 · 34 · 1
23. 10.1177/095440701876589910.1177/0954407018765899 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cja.2022.06.00110.1016/j.cja.2022.06.001 ↗
25. 10.1177/1045389X1988872910.1177/1045389X19888729 ↗
26. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab643610.1088/1361-665X/ab6436 ↗
27. Yang L · Advanced Materials Research · 2011 · 328 · 1135
28. Zhang JQ · 2011 · 793
29. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/10/10502410.1088/0964-1726/24/10/105024 ↗
30. 10.3390/machines1103036810.3390/machines11030368 ↗