Theoretical analyses of the electronic breaker switching method for nonlinear energy harvesting interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
It has been proved that the harvested energy can be greatly improved by applying nonlinear treatments on the piezoelectric element. These treatments consist of switching the piezoelectric element on a resonant electrical network intermittently. To implement these treatments with little power consumption, a self-powered switching circuit called electronic breaker has been researched. Although the operation of the switching control circuit has been introduced, the theoretical model of the circuit has not been set up. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to further investigate the mechanism of this circuit and to establish its theoretical model. Furthermore, this switching circuit is employed in the parallel synchronized switch harvesting on inductor interface and the synchronous charge extraction interface. It is proved that the electronic breaker can fulfill different switching times in these interfaces. It is shown both theoretically and experimentally that the parallel synchronized switch harvesting on inductor interface allows a gain of 18.4 of power compared to a standard circuit, while the synchronous charge extraction interface results in a gain of 4. Meanwhile, the switching circuits consume less than 2% power of that harvested. Thus, the electronic breaker circuit has been proved an efficient way of charging control for self-powered vibration generators.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, No. 29 Yudao Street, Nanjing, China
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TUFFC.2006.161102710.1109/TUFFC.2006.1611027 ↗
2. 10.1177/1045389X0606944710.1177/1045389X06069447 ↗
3. 10.1109/TUFFC.2005.142804110.1109/TUFFC.2005.1428041 ↗
4. Guyomar D · IEEE Transactions on Power Electron · 2008 · 13 · 604
5. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/03503010.1088/0964-1726/17/3/035030 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.sna.2007.11.01710.1016/j.sna.2007.11.017 ↗
7. Lallart M · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2011 · 99 · 1
8. 10.1016/j.sna.2005.10.04310.1016/j.sna.2005.10.043 ↗
9. Liang J · IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation · 2009 · 1 · 945
10. Makihara K · Smart Materials and Structures · 2006 · 14 · 717
11. 10.1109/TPEL.2002.80219410.1109/TPEL.2002.802194 ↗
12. Richard C, Guyomar D, Lefeuvre D (2007) Self-powered electronic breaker with automatic switching by detecting maxima or minima of potential difference between its power electrodes. Patent PCT/FR2005/003000 (publication number: WO/2007/063194).
13. 10.1088/0960-1317/14/5/00910.1088/0960-1317/14/5/009 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0140-3664(02)00248-710.1016/S0140-3664(02)00248-7 ↗
15. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/6/02810.1088/0964-1726/16/6/028 ↗
16. Tan YK · IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies · 2008 · 11 · 23