journal article·2013-01

Analysis of bimorph piezoelectric beam energy harvesters using Timoshenko and Euler–Bernoulli beam theory

Gang Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

Single-degree-of-freedom lumped parameter model, conventional finite element method, and distributed parameter model have been developed to design, analyze, and predict the performance of piezoelectric energy harvesters with reasonable accuracy. In this article, a spectral finite element method for bimorph piezoelectric beam energy harvesters is developed based on the Timoshenko beam theory and the Euler–Bernoulli beam theory. Linear piezoelectric constitutive and linear elastic stress/strain models are assumed. Both beam theories are considered in order to examine the validation and applicability of each beam theory for a range of harvester sizes. Using spectral finite element method, a minimum number of elements is required because accurate shape functions are derived using the coupled electromechanical governing equations. Numerical simulations are conducted and validated using existing experimental data from the literature. In addition, parametric studies are carried out to predict the performance of a range of harvester sizes using each beam theory. It is concluded that the Euler–Bernoulli beam theory is sufficient enough to predict the performance of slender piezoelectric beams (slenderness ratio > 20, that is, length over thickness ratio > 20). In contrast, the Timoshenko beam theory, including the effects of shear deformation and rotary inertia, must be used for short piezoelectric beams (slenderness ratio < 5).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1045389X0505315010.1177/1045389X05053150 ↗
2. 10.1177/1045389X970080120210.1177/1045389X9700801202 ↗
3. Blevins R · 1979
4. 10.1115/1.400293110.1115/1.4002931 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2006.03.00310.1016/j.mechatronics.2006.03.003 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10832-006-6287-310.1007/s10832-006-6287-3 ↗
7. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/4/04300110.1088/0964-1726/17/4/043001 ↗
8. 10.1109/84.62311610.1109/84.623116 ↗
9. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1832-610.1007/978-1-4612-1832-6 ↗
10. 10.1080/1058458059096457410.1080/10584580590964574 ↗
11. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/6/06501610.1088/0964-1726/17/6/065016 ↗
12. 10.1115/1.289040210.1115/1.2890402 ↗
13. 10.1177/1045389X0708563910.1177/1045389X07085639 ↗
14. 10.1002/978111999115110.1002/9781119991151 ↗
15. Gopalakrishnan S · 2007
16. IEEE · 1987
17. Ikeda T · 1990
18. 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.07.01410.1016/j.jsv.2003.07.014 ↗
19. 10.1002/978047082376710.1002/9780470823767 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00154-710.1016/S0020-7683(99)00154-7 ↗
21. 10.1007/978-1-4471-2026-110.1007/978-1-4471-2026-1 ↗
22. 10.1080/1058458070175664910.1080/10584580701756649 ↗
23. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/1/00710.1088/0964-1726/13/1/007 ↗
24. 10.1109/TPEL.2002.80219410.1109/TPEL.2002.802194 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.01.01010.1016/j.compstruc.2010.01.010 ↗
26. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/5/01810.1088/0964-1726/13/5/018 ↗
27. 10.1177/1045389X1142836610.1177/1045389X11428366 ↗
28. 10.1177/058310240404327510.1177/0583102404043275 ↗
29. Sodano HA · Strain: An International Journal for Experimental Mechanics · 2004 · 40 · 4910.1111/j.1475-1305.2004.00120.x ↗
30. Timoshenko S · 1974
31. 10.1115/1.146900710.1115/1.1469007 ↗
32. 10.2514/1.430210.2514/1.4302 ↗