Local strengthening and repair of concrete bridge girders using shape memory alloy precast prestressing plate
Source abstract
Abstract
Whether due to accidents, natural hazards, or harsh environmental conditions, concrete structures and bridges, in particular, experience local damages throughout their service life. Based on their severity, these damages can compromise the integrity of the structure. External prestressing is often used as an effective strengthening or repair technique for vulnerable or damaged structures, respectively. However, applying external prestressing in local regions of the structure with limited space can be problematic and not feasible for conventional prestressing techniques. This study investigates an innovative method for applying external prestressing in local regions of bridge girders using externally mounted precast prestressing plate reinforced with shape memory alloy wires. A thin mortar plate with embedded curved shape memory alloy wire was experimentally tested to validate the proposed prestressing concept. Afterward, finite element analysis was performed on a concrete bridge girder to numerically investigate the performance of shape memory alloy precast prestressing plate in enhancing the shear and flexural behavior of the girder. Experimental and numerical results evidently demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of the innovative method in strengthening and repairing concrete structures through external local prestressing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.05810.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.058 ↗
2. 10.36501/0197-9191/18-00110.36501/0197-9191/18-001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.11.00310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.11.003 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.04610.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.046 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:2(102)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:2(102) ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:2(170)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:2(170) ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.03310.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.033 ↗
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/5/05501510.1088/0964-1726/23/5/055015 ↗
9. 10.1680/ceb-fipmc1990.3543010.1680/ceb-fipmc1990.35430 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.06910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.069 ↗
11. Dassault Systèmes · 2013
12. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.00210.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.002 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000049510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000495 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.018 ↗
15. 10.1002/adem.20080031210.1002/adem.200800312 ↗
16. 10.1016/B978-0-7506-1009-4.50015-910.1016/B978-0-7506-1009-4.50015-9 ↗
17. El-Hacha R · ACI Structural Journal · 2004 · 101 · 717
18. El-Tawil S · ACI Structural Journal · 2004 · 101 · 846
19. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.04910.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.049 ↗
20. Gangi M, Jone M, Liesen J, et al. (2018) Evaluation of repair techniques for impact-damaged prestressed beams. Report, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, May.
21. Harries KA, Kasan J, Aktas J (2009) Repair methods for prestressed concrete girders. Report, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, April.
22. 10.1186/s40069-018-0279-y10.1186/s40069-018-0279-y ↗
23. Iowa Department of Transportation (Iowa DOT) · 2014
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.06810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.068 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:1(15)10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:1(15) ↗
26. Kuenzi EW, Stevens GH (1963) Determination of mechanical properties of adhesive for use in the design of bonded joints. Report, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, September.
27. 10.1177/1045389X0607197410.1177/1045389X06071974 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.04110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.041 ↗
29. 10.1260/136943304165357010.1260/1369433041653570 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10940910.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109409 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.018 ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:1(60)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:1(60) ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.07210.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.072 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.09.01710.1016/j.engstruct.2010.09.017 ↗
35. Rius J · 2017
36. 10.14359/5168945510.14359/51689455 ↗
37. 10.15554/pcij.07011997.56.8010.15554/pcij.07011997.56.80 ↗
38. 10.2320/matertrans.47.58010.2320/matertrans.47.580 ↗
39. 10.1007/s40069-016-0133-z10.1007/s40069-016-0133-z ↗
40. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.02310.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.023 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.07710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.077 ↗
42. 10.3141/1770-0310.3141/1770-03 ↗
43. Tatar J · 2013
44. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000045210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000452 ↗
45. Zerbe L · 2017