Improving Accessibility of the Impedance-Based Structural Health Monitoring Method
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents current research on impedance-based structural health monitoring technique. The basic principle behind this technique is to apply high-frequency structural excitations (typically higher than 30 kHz) through the surface-bonded piezoelectric transducers, and measure the impedance of structures by monitoring the current and voltage applied to the piezoelectric transducers. Changes in impedance indicate changes in the structure, which in turn can indicate that damage has occurred. Three examples, including a bolted joint, gas pipeline, and composite structure, are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of this health monitoring technique to a wide variety of practical field applications. Although many proof-of-concept experiments have been performed using the impedance methods, the impedance-measuring device (HP4194A) is still bulky and expensive. Therefore, an operational amplifier-based turnkey device that can measure and record the electric impedance of a PZT has been developed. The performance of this miniaturized and portable device has been compared to our previous results and its effectiveness has been demonstrated. This paper summarizes the experimental setup, procedures, and considerations needed to implement the device in field applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Intelligent Materials Systems and Structures, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Eidinger, J.M. 1999. ‘‘Girth Joints in Steel Pipelines Subjected to Wrinkling and Ovalling,’’ In: Proceedings, 5th U.S. Conference on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, pp. 100–109 .
2. Giurgiutiu, V. and Rogers, C.A. 1997. ‘‘Electro-mechanical (E/M) Impedance Method for Structural Health Monitoring and Nondestructive Evaluation’’, International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, September 18–20, pp. 433–444, Stanford University, CA .
3. Koseki, J., Matsuo, O. and Tanaka, S. 1998. ‘‘Uplift of Sewer Pipes Caused by Earthquake-induced Liquefaction of Surrounding Soil,’’ Soils and Foundations, 38: 75–87 .10.3208/sandf.38.3_75 ↗
4. 10.1177/1045389X940050010210.1177/1045389X9400500102 ↗
5. 10.1106/H0EV-7PWM-QYHW-E7VF10.1106/H0EV-7PWM-QYHW-E7VF ↗
6. O’Rourke, T. D. and Palmer, M.C. 1996. ‘‘Earthquake Performance of Gas Transmission Pipelines,’’ Earthquake Spectra, 20: 493–527 .10.1193/1.1585895 ↗
7. Park, G., Kabeya, K., Cudney, H. and Inman, D.J. 1999. ‘‘Impedance-Based Structural Health Monitoring for Temperature Varying Applications,’’ JSME International Journal, 42: 249–258 .10.1299/jsmea.42.249 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2000)6:4(153)10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2000)6:4(153) ↗
9. 10.1106/QXMV-R3GC-VXXG-W3AQ10.1106/QXMV-R3GC-VXXG-W3AQ ↗
10. Peairs, D.M., Park, G. and Inman, D.J. 2001. ‘‘Self-monitoring and Self-healing Bolted Joint’’ , In: Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, September 12–14, pp. 430–439 , Stanford, CA.
11. 10.1117/12.17518610.1117/12.175186 ↗
12. 10.1177/1045389X950060011710.1177/1045389X9500600117 ↗