journal article·2019-05

Core–skin debonding detection in honeycomb sandwich structures through guided wave wavefield analysis

Lingyu Yu, Zhenhua Tian, Xiaopeng Li, Rui Zhu, Guoliang Huang

Publisher page

Abstract

Ultrasonic guided waves have proven to be an effective and efficient method for damage detection and quantification in various plate-like structures. In honeycomb sandwich structures, wave propagation and interaction with typical defects such as hidden debonding damage are complicated; hence, the detection of defects using guided waves remains a challenging problem. The work presented in this article investigates the interaction of low-frequency guided waves with core–skin debonding damage in aluminum core honeycomb sandwich structures using finite element simulations. Due to debonding damage, the waves propagating in the debonded skin panel change to fundamental antisymmetric Lamb waves with different wavenumber values. Exploiting this mechanism, experimental inspection using a non-contact laser Doppler vibrometer was performed to acquire wavefield data from pristine and debonded structures. The data were then processed and analyzed with two wavefield data–based imaging approaches, the filter reconstruction imaging and the spatial wavenumber imaging. Both approaches can clearly indicate the presence, location, and size of the debonding in the structures, thus proving to be effective methods for debonding detection and quantification for honeycomb sandwich structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/2/02502210.1088/0964-1726/22/2/025022 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.09.00710.1016/j.ultras.2014.09.007 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-94-011-5856-510.1007/978-94-011-5856-5 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.03.00810.1016/j.ndteint.2012.03.008 ↗
5. 10.2514/1.3040810.2514/1.30408 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.04.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2013.04.003 ↗
7. Giurgiutiu V · 2008
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/2/02501310.1088/0964-1726/20/2/025013 ↗
9. 10.1177/147592171560254610.1177/1475921715602546 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.07710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.077 ↗
11. 10.1177/147592171351397210.1177/1475921713513972 ↗
12. Johnson DH · 1993
13. 10.1177/1045389X1454414010.1177/1045389X14544140 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.05.04110.1016/j.ymssp.2014.05.041 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ultras.2010.11.01110.1016/j.ultras.2010.11.011 ↗
16. 10.12989/sss.2012.10.3.22910.12989/sss.2012.10.3.229 ↗
17. Oppenheim AV · 1997
18. 10.1111/str.1209810.1111/str.12098 ↗
19. Radzienski M · 2016
20. 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.12.01510.1016/j.ultras.2012.12.015 ↗
21. Rose JL · 1999
22. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/6/01410.1088/0964-1726/16/6/014 ↗
23. 10.1177/1045389X1561090610.1177/1045389X15610906 ↗
24. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/4/04501710.1088/0964-1726/20/4/045017 ↗
25. 10.2514/1.J05089110.2514/1.J050891 ↗
26. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/12/12500710.1088/0964-1726/18/12/125007 ↗
27. Staszewski WJ · 2004
28. 10.1177/1045389X1452187510.1177/1045389X14521875 ↗
29. Tian ZH · 2015 · 943807
30. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/10/10501910.1088/0964-1726/24/10/105019 ↗
31. Vinson JR · 1999
32. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/2/02010.1088/0964-1726/13/2/020 ↗
33. 10.1109/TIM.2014.236241710.1109/TIM.2014.2362417 ↗
34. 10.1177/147592171350110810.1177/1475921713501108 ↗
35. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/6/06501910.1088/0964-1726/22/6/065019 ↗