Comparative study of two types of self-recovery shape-memory alloy pseudo-rubber isolator devices under compression–shear interactions
Source abstract
Abstract
Two types of novel shape-memory alloy-based devices with three-dimensional isolation potential and deformation recovery abilities were developed. These two types of isolators, which are called shape-memory alloy pseudo-rubber isolators, were both created with martensitic shape-memory alloy wires through weaving, rolling, and punching processes, but they underwent heat treatment at different fabrication stages and for different durations. A series of mechanical tests were performed on these two types of shape-memory alloy pseudo-rubber isolators to investigate their properties under compression, shear, and combined compression–shear loading at room temperature. The restorable shear limit was then investigated, and the corresponding shear failure mechanism was discussed according to a tension test of one thin layer of the shape-memory alloy wire mesh. Subsequently, the deformation recovery ability of the shape-memory alloy pseudo-rubber isolator with residual deformation was tested through heating on a thermo-control stove. Finally, the mechanical-property stabilities, energy-dissipation abilities, and recovery abilities were compared between the two types of shape-memory alloy pseudo-rubber isolator devices. The experimental results indicated that both types of shape-memory alloy pseudo-rubber isolators had excellent residual deformation recovery abilities, and the type-I shape-memory alloy pseudo-rubber isolator device had more stable mechanical properties than the type-II shape-memory alloy pseudo-rubber isolator. The type-I shape-memory alloy pseudo-rubber isolator device is thus an ideal candidate for traditional three-dimensional isolators.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology at Weihai, Weihai, China
Ministry-of-Education Key Laboratory of Structural Dynamic Behavior and Control, School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China
Funding
the National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:8(1119)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:8(1119) ↗
2. 10.1177/1045389X1244074810.1177/1045389X12440748 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.09.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2005.09.005 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.02210.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.022 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.10.01410.1016/j.probengmech.2007.10.014 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11803-007-0787-210.1007/s11803-007-0787-2 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.04510.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.045 ↗
8. 10.1002/stc.185510.1002/stc.1855 ↗
9. Chopra AK · 2011
10. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/7/07503910.1088/0964-1726/25/7/075039 ↗
11. Dezfuli FH · Smart Materials and Structures · 2013 · 22
12. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.11.01710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.11.017 ↗
13. 10.1002/eqe.52210.1002/eqe.522 ↗
14. Dolce M · Proceedings of SPIE: Smart Structures and Materials: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways · 2001 · 4330 · 237
15. 10.1002/eqe.64210.1002/eqe.642 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00244-210.1016/S0142-9612(02)00244-2 ↗
17. Fujita T · 1996
18. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.01810.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.018 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.05510.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.055 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.01310.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.013 ↗
21. 10.1016/0029-5493(85)90246-810.1016/0029-5493(85)90246-8 ↗
22. 10.1002/eqe.12010.1002/eqe.120 ↗
23. Inoue K · 2004
24. 10.1177/1045389X1558862910.1177/1045389X15588629 ↗
25. Jiang HY · Machinery Design & Manufacture · 2001 · 2 · 85
26. Kageyama M · 2003
27. Kashiwazaki A · Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers · 1999 · 66 · 146
28. Kelly JM · 1990
29. Krumme R · Proceedings of SPIE: Smart Structures and Materials: Passive Damping · 1995 · 4330 · 225
30. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/4/01710.1088/0964-1726/15/4/017 ↗
31. 10.1002/stc.183510.1002/stc.1835 ↗
32. 10.1117/12.208562310.1117/12.2085623 ↗
33. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/11/11500810.1088/0964-1726/20/11/115008 ↗
34. Liu H · Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration · 2008 · 28 · 152
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.06710.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.067 ↗
36. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/12/12501610.1088/0964-1726/23/12/125016 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.03110.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.031 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.03510.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.035 ↗
39. Morishita M · 2004
40. 10.1177/1045389X0404152910.1177/1045389X04041529 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.09.01010.1016/j.engstruct.2009.09.010 ↗
42. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/1/01500310.1088/0964-1726/20/1/015003 ↗
43. Parvin A · Journal of Structural Engineering · 2001 · 2 · 98
44. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/12/12502610.1088/0964-1726/25/12/125026 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.06510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.065 ↗
46. 10.1002/eqe.89110.1002/eqe.891 ↗
47. 10.1115/PVP2005-7137610.1115/PVP2005-71376 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.04.00410.1016/j.probengmech.2015.04.004 ↗
49. 10.1002/stc.27610.1002/stc.276 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.12.01010.1016/j.engstruct.2005.12.010 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.01110.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.011 ↗
52. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:9(1227)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:9(1227) ↗
53. 10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00097-210.1016/S0141-0296(98)00097-2 ↗
54. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00287-910.1016/S0921-5093(03)00287-9 ↗
55. 10.1177/1045389X0935566510.1177/1045389X09355665 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.05.06410.1016/j.msea.2013.05.064 ↗
57. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:3(240)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:3(240) ↗
58. 10.1007/s10999-006-9007-x10.1007/s10999-006-9007-x ↗