journal article·2022-07Open access

Calibration of piezoresistive shape-memory alloy strain sensors

Thomas Mäder, Jonas v Heusinger, Björn Senf, Martin Zoch, Anja Winkler, Welf-Guntram Drossel

Abstract

Continuous strain measurement on fibre-reinforced structures demands mechanical sensors with superior fatigue resistance. Shape-memory alloy wires are predestined for strain sensors utilising their strong piezo-resistance. Calibration of these sensors is necessary in order to extract mechanical data. Therefore, four-point bending of glass-fibre reinforced plastic specimens with applied strain sensors and an optical reference measuring system is used to calibrate and compare shape-memory alloy sensors and standard strain gauges. The gauge factor and its standard deviation is successfully measured by this calibration method. Shape-memory alloy sensors show strain-dependent gauge factor whilst standard strain gauges show a constant strain sensitivity, both with a narrow stochastic distribution. Shape-memory alloy mechanical sensors are reliable to determine strain of fibre-reinforced structures. This offers the possibility to use them in structural health monitoring applications of such structures. Consequently, the four-point bending calibration using glass-fibre reinforced specimens represents a suitable possibility for calibration of strain sensors exposed to higher strain amplitudes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU, Dresden, Germany

Institute of Lightweight Engineering and Polymer Technology, Dresden, Germany

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/147592171665327810.1177/1475921716653278 ↗
2. 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i41/8583210.17485/ijst/2016/v9i41/85832 ↗
3. Buck TC · 2012
4. 10.31399/asm.tb.scm.978162708314010.31399/asm.tb.scm.9781627083140 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.126116410.1126/science.1261164 ↗
6. DIN EN ISO 14125:2011-05 · 2011
7. HBK (2019) LI66: Strain gauge for embedded applications. Available at: https://www.hbm.com/en/3452/li66-strain-gauge/ (accessed 16 September 2020).
8. HBK (2020) Prewired strain gauges. Available at: https://www.hbm.com/en/4550/pre-wired-strain-gauges-fast-safe-and-convenient/ (accessed 16 September 2020).
9. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.742.77810.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.742.778 ↗
10. VDI/VDE-Gesellschaft Mess- und Automatisierungstechnik (2015) Experimentelle Strukturanalyse - Dehnungsmessstreifen mit metallischem Messgitter - Kenngrößen und Prüfbedingungen. Beuth 17.040.30(VDI/VDE 2635 Blatt 1). Available at: http://www.vdi.de/2635 (accessed 18 August 2016).
11. Vishay (2010) Fatigue characteristics of micro-measurements strain gages. Available at: http://www.vishaypg.com/docs/11058/tn5081.pdf (accessed 9 May 2017).
12. Witten E, Mathes V, Sauer M, et al. (2018) Der Composites-Markt Europa: Marktentwicklungen, Herausforderungen und Chancen: The European GRP Market - Dr. Elmar Witten, Volker Mathes (AVK) The Global CF and CC Market - Michael Sauer, Michael Kühnel (CCeV). https://www.avk-tv.de/files/20181115_avk_ccev_market_report_2018_final.pdf