Bio-inspired aquatic propulsion using piezoelectric effect
Source abstract
Abstract
Underwater propulsion of fishes have inspired many biomimetic structures. Generally, the bio-inspired structures mimics the flapping behaviour of various control surfaces/fins in fishes. The present study mimics the flapping behaviour using a piezoelectric structure. The system is analyzed as a fluid structure interaction problem. The dynamic behaviour of a cantilever beam surrounded by a bounded fluid domain open at top is analyzed. The structure is modeled as a Euler-Bernoulli beam and the fluid is modeled using potential flow theory. The influence of domain size on the wet natural frequencies of the system was analyzed. The dimensions of the fluid domain wherein the variation in wet natural frequencies becomes insensitive were determined. The influence of added mass on the wet natural frequency was parametrized based on Non-dimensional Added Mass Increment (NAVMI) factor. The NAVMI factors were observed to be relatively higher for lower wet modes of the structure. Therefore, the peizo-beam was analyzed by exciting the lower wet modes. The thrust generated at different excitation frequencies were determined using tip velocity of the cantilever beam following Lighthill’s analogy. The results from the study indicated that higher propulsive thrust was produced for lower modes of excitation of the structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Micro and Nano Robotics · Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Ocean Engineering and Naval Architecture, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.apm.2015.09.04110.1016/j.apm.2015.09.041 ↗
2. 10.1006/jsvi.1996.015810.1006/jsvi.1996.0158 ↗
3. 10.1242/jeb.35.1.10910.1242/jeb.35.1.109 ↗
4. 10.1088/1748-3182/8/1/01600610.1088/1748-3182/8/1/016006 ↗
5. 10.1017/jfm.2020.91510.1017/jfm.2020.915 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0889-9746(03)00050-110.1016/S0889-9746(03)00050-1 ↗
7. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/12/12501310.1088/0964-1726/20/12/125013 ↗
8. 10.1002/978111999115110.1002/9781119991151 ↗
9. 10.1086/31810810.1086/318108 ↗
10. 10.1016/0022-460X(87)90366-X10.1016/0022-460X(87)90366-X ↗
11. Ghose J · 2015
12. Govardhan R · Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · 2012 · 91 · 329
13. Gray J · 1968
14. 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.03.00510.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.03.005 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0029-8018(00)00045-710.1016/S0029-8018(00)00045-7 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.09.03110.1016/j.jsv.2015.09.031 ↗
17. 10.1017/S002211206000111010.1017/S0022112060001110 ↗
18. 10.1017/S002211207000183010.1017/S0022112070001830 ↗
19. 10.1098/rspb.1971.008510.1098/rspb.1971.0085 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1001-6058(09)60162-110.1016/S1001-6058(09)60162-1 ↗
21. McHenry MJ · Botrylloides · 2003 · 206 · 327
22. 10.1115/1.142111210.1115/1.1421112 ↗
23. 10.1242/jeb.205.12.170910.1242/jeb.205.12.1709 ↗
24. 10.1242/jeb.06304010.1242/jeb.063040 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.36800210.1063/1.368002 ↗
26. 10.1109/48.75727510.1109/48.757275 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00707-012-0792-z10.1007/s00707-012-0792-z ↗
28. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/10/10500710.1088/0964-1726/25/10/105007 ↗
29. 10.1117/12.230100010.1117/12.2301000 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.05610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.056 ↗
31. Taylor G · Proceedings of Royal Society of London · 1951 · 209 · 447
32. Taylor G · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences · 1952 · 211 · 225
33. 10.1038/scientificamerican0395-6410.1038/scientificamerican0395-64 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.03.00110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.03.001 ↗
35. 10.1017/S002211206100094910.1017/S0022112061000949 ↗