Electromechanical impact analysis of 2–2 cement-based piezoelectric sensor considering resistor
Source abstract
Abstract
The model of the 2–2 type cement-based piezoelectric sensor, which is connected with a resistor while under the impact mechanical load, is established in this article. The dynamic theoretical expressions are acquired by utilizing the separation variable method and the matrix coefficient method and then used to analyze and discuss the electrical properties and the influence of the resistance value, which is verified correctly by numerical analysis. Also, the effect of resistor value and different material parameters on dynamic properties of such sensor is further investigated. And a reverse voltage is proposed to balance the displacement of the free-end and the stress of the fixed-end to enhance the safety. At last, the acoustic impedance ratio associated with the compatibility of the composite is discussed. The conclusions discussed in this work could provide some theoretical references for optimizing the design of the 2–2 cement-based piezoelectric sensor connected to electrical components in practical application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Smart Materials for Construction · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
National Institute of Metrology, Beijing, China
Funding
national natural science foundation of china · fundamental research funds for the central universities
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1049/ep.1964.020710.1049/ep.1964.0207 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.03810.1016/j.rser.2018.09.038 ↗
3. 10.1073/pnas.131723311110.1073/pnas.1317233111 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.37195410.1063/1.371954 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.09.01510.1016/j.ymssp.2007.09.015 ↗
6. 10.1137/071003610.1137/0710036 ↗
7. Grewe MG · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control · 1992 · 25 · 506
8. 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00159-210.1016/S0041-624X(02)00159-2 ↗
9. Harris CM · 2002
10. 10.1007/978-0-387-21562-4_710.1007/978-0-387-21562-4_7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.04.05310.1016/j.matlet.2007.04.053 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.04010.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.040 ↗
13. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/3/00910.1088/0964-1726/15/3/009 ↗
14. 10.1080/10584587.2018.152167110.1080/10584587.2018.1521671 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.acme.2018.12.00710.1016/j.acme.2018.12.007 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0248650010.1007/BF02486500 ↗
17. 10.1617/s11527-010-9699-010.1617/s11527-010-9699-0 ↗
18. Lu YY · ACI Materials Journal · 2011 · 108 · 178
19. 10.1680/macr.13.0007110.1680/macr.13.00071 ↗
20. 10.3390/app703023310.3390/app7030233 ↗
21. Mathews J · 1964
22. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.12.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.12.007 ↗
23. Polyanin AD · 2002
24. 10.1145/229459.22946410.1145/229459.229464 ↗
25. 10.1080/10584587.2016.124926710.1080/10584587.2016.1249267 ↗
26. 10.1617/s11527-005-9021-810.1617/s11527-005-9021-8 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0247632610.1007/BF02476326 ↗
28. Thomson WT · 1981
29. 10.1023/A:100992662355110.1023/A:1009926623551 ↗
30. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/4/04503210.1088/0964-1726/23/4/045032 ↗
31. 10.12989/sss.2014.14.3.26710.12989/sss.2014.14.3.267 ↗
32. 10.1177/1045389X1880345410.1177/1045389X18803454 ↗
33. 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.284488110.1109/TUFFC.2018.2844881 ↗
34. 10.1177/1045389X1770406810.1177/1045389X17704068 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cap.2008.07.01510.1016/j.cap.2008.07.015 ↗
36. 10.3390/s811684610.3390/s8116846 ↗
37. 10.1109/NANO.2016.775134410.1109/NANO.2016.7751344 ↗
38. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/2/02502310.1088/0964-1726/24/2/025023 ↗
39. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/8/08501710.1088/0964-1726/20/8/085017 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.05910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.059 ↗
41. 10.1177/1045389X1881271310.1177/1045389X18812713 ↗
42. Zhu J · Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018 · 11